標題: Titlebook: Equilibrium and Evolution; Alfred Marshall and Neil Hart Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2012 Alf [打印本頁] 作者: audiogram 時間: 2025-3-21 19:58
書目名稱Equilibrium and Evolution影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Equilibrium and Evolution影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Equilibrium and Evolution網絡公開度
書目名稱Equilibrium and Evolution網絡公開度學科排名
書目名稱Equilibrium and Evolution被引頻次
書目名稱Equilibrium and Evolution被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Equilibrium and Evolution年度引用
書目名稱Equilibrium and Evolution年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Equilibrium and Evolution讀者反饋
書目名稱Equilibrium and Evolution讀者反饋學科排名
作者: Urologist 時間: 2025-3-21 23:51
,Marshall’s ‘Economic Biology’,ard institutions of ‘man’. In his inaugural lecture, Marshall (1885b) clearly subscribed to the view that biological speculations, founded on the perception of ‘organic growth’, provided the vehicle through which life could be breathed into his theoretical apparatus.. In such a setting, history repl作者: Chipmunk 時間: 2025-3-22 04:12 作者: 激勵 時間: 2025-3-22 07:08 作者: 誘惑 時間: 2025-3-22 11:51
Abraham Kandel,Horst Bunke,Mark Lastard institutions of ‘man’. In his inaugural lecture, Marshall (1885b) clearly subscribed to the view that biological speculations, founded on the perception of ‘organic growth’, provided the vehicle through which life could be breathed into his theoretical apparatus.. In such a setting, history repl作者: diabetes 時間: 2025-3-22 13:08
Gabi Ben-dor,Anatoly Dubinsky,Tov Elperinam economics had completely abandoned the economic biology ‘Mecca’, and instead embraced the mechanical world of static equilibrium analysis. The question as to why the Marshallian disciples had departed so markedly from their prophet in terms of theoretical content and methodology is considered in 作者: diabetes 時間: 2025-3-22 17:26
,Sraffa’s Critique and ‘Marshall’s Theory’,the Marshallian cost controversies of the 1920s, with Piero Sraffa’s (1925, 1926, 1930) contributions widely seen as epitomising the challenge to the prevailing orthodoxy. The setting in which these debates proceeded is suitably described in the following terms by Sraffa:作者: Cirrhosis 時間: 2025-3-22 23:20 作者: 儀式 時間: 2025-3-23 01:22
Validation of a Geomorphological Survey Map,ounded on demand and supply functions. It was generally concluded that Marshall’s attempts to resolve the ‘reconciliation problem’ had not only been unsuccessful but had also, as Mark Blaug (1962: 399) summarised, ‘raised false problems that took the best efforts of a generation of economists to solve’.作者: 類型 時間: 2025-3-23 08:45
Marine Geotechnique, an Overview,shallians had departed from the engine of inquiry that Marshall had attempted to construct. The most obvious ‘casualty’ of the Marshallian reconstruction was Marshall’s economic biology ‘Mecca’. In this chapter, attention is directed towards the Marshallian responses to Sraffa’s critique.作者: 競選運動 時間: 2025-3-23 10:51 作者: 向下 時間: 2025-3-23 15:23 作者: conscience 時間: 2025-3-23 18:50 作者: oblique 時間: 2025-3-23 22:50
Guang-lei Chen ?
(,)ters 5 and 6 is examined. Though largely antagonistic to Marshall’s approach, these writers from across the Atlantic raised issues that were in general much more closely related to ‘Marshall’s theory’ than did their British contemporaries in the course of the . debates.作者: 上流社會 時間: 2025-3-24 04:49
Javad Taghia,Jayantha Katupitiyaely statical analysis, maintaining that the . was ‘concerned throughout with the forces that cause movement’ .: xiv). This chapter outlines the nature and content of Marshall’s equilibrium analysis, and the attempt to ‘reconcile’ the mechanical analogies with the evolutionary modes of thought discussed in the previous chapter.作者: 大暴雨 時間: 2025-3-24 09:05
,Marshall’s Equilibrium Analysis and the ‘Reconciliation Problem’,ely statical analysis, maintaining that the . was ‘concerned throughout with the forces that cause movement’ .: xiv). This chapter outlines the nature and content of Marshall’s equilibrium analysis, and the attempt to ‘reconcile’ the mechanical analogies with the evolutionary modes of thought discussed in the previous chapter.作者: optional 時間: 2025-3-24 11:13
Validation of a Geomorphological Survey Map,o the development of economic analysis in the decades that followed. In these debates, attention was focused on what is now often referred to as Alfred Marshall’s ‘reconciliation problem’, characterised as the attempt to construct supply schedules under conditions of pure competition in the presence作者: Solace 時間: 2025-3-24 16:15
Methods of Thermal Field Measurements,os at St John’s College, Cambridge, and five years after he was elected to the Chair of Political Economy at Cambridge. Insights into this period of Marshall’s professional life are readily acquired from Maynard Keynes’ (1924) detailed memoir of Marshall,. together with the selected writings and cor作者: 同步信息 時間: 2025-3-24 18:59 作者: 閹割 時間: 2025-3-25 02:32 作者: Allege 時間: 2025-3-25 04:42
Anatomy of the Nose and Paranasal Sinuseslian’ theoretical apparatus reigned virtually undisputed in the English-speaking world. The end to these tranquil times is most often associated with the Marshallian cost controversies of the 1920s, with Piero Sraffa’s (1925, 1926, 1930) contributions widely seen as epitomising the challenge to the 作者: 盟軍 時間: 2025-3-25 09:39
Marine Geotechnique, an Overview,sing returns and long-period equilibrium. It was concluded that Sraffa’s critique, while fundamentally challenging the orthodoxy of his time, in fact had very little direct relevance to ‘Marshall’s theory’. Sraffa’s position was reflective of a much wider misinterpretation of the method and content 作者: 參考書目 時間: 2025-3-25 12:54
Gabi Ben-dor,Anatoly Dubinsky,Tov Elperining the negative task of getting Marshall out of the way’. The cost controversies had demonstrated how extensively the Marshallians had diverged from Marshall’s economics, a process that had clearly begun before the ‘turmoil’ of the 1920s. The theoretical difficulties being debated had arisen largel作者: Hangar 時間: 2025-3-25 18:53 作者: organic-matrix 時間: 2025-3-25 20:50 作者: Triglyceride 時間: 2025-3-26 01:59
Overview: Alfred Marshall has traditionally been listed alongside pioneering ‘neoclassical‘ economists. In this volume Neil Hart challenges this view,?illuminating the ambiguities within Marshall‘s work, and exploring his reconciliation of two modes of thinking, equilibrium economics and evolutionary economics.978-1-349-33776-7978-0-230-36117-1作者: 領帶 時間: 2025-3-26 05:47
Book 2012Alfred Marshall has traditionally been listed alongside pioneering ‘neoclassical‘ economists. In this volume Neil Hart challenges this view,?illuminating the ambiguities within Marshall‘s work, and exploring his reconciliation of two modes of thinking, equilibrium economics and evolutionary economics.作者: Pert敏捷 時間: 2025-3-26 09:09 作者: 故意釣到白楊 時間: 2025-3-26 14:18 作者: 運動性 時間: 2025-3-26 17:38
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35184-7The first two sections in this chapter restate some of the central conclusions reached in this book. This is followed by a brief discussion that places Marshall’s economics and the associated controversies in the context of mainstream economics as it evolved after Marshall and the Marshallian era.作者: rectum 時間: 2025-3-26 21:47 作者: 我們的面粉 時間: 2025-3-27 03:43 作者: NOTCH 時間: 2025-3-27 08:36 作者: CURL 時間: 2025-3-27 12:23
,Marshall’s ‘Economic Biology’,bution well over a decade prior to the appearance of his . While the absence of a major publication can be attributed in part to a number of circumstances that diminished the time Marshall had available to writing, the most critical factor that impeded the publication of Marshall’s work was his perc作者: 灌輸 時間: 2025-3-27 14:39 作者: 沒有希望 時間: 2025-3-27 17:46
,Sraffa’s Critique and ‘Marshall’s Theory’,lian’ theoretical apparatus reigned virtually undisputed in the English-speaking world. The end to these tranquil times is most often associated with the Marshallian cost controversies of the 1920s, with Piero Sraffa’s (1925, 1926, 1930) contributions widely seen as epitomising the challenge to the 作者: Arresting 時間: 2025-3-28 01:23 作者: kindred 時間: 2025-3-28 02:54 作者: Living-Will 時間: 2025-3-28 08:57
Increasing Returns and Economic Progress,cerned Marshall in the . Specifically, the perspective taken by Frank Knight, Joseph Schumpeter and Allyn Young on the controversies discussed in Chapters 5 and 6 is examined. Though largely antagonistic to Marshall’s approach, these writers from across the Atlantic raised issues that were in genera作者: Exposure 時間: 2025-3-28 14:26
