標題: Titlebook: Equality and Liberty; Analyzing Rawls and J. Angelo Corlett (Fellow in Philosophy) Book 1991 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan P [打印本頁] 作者: Remodeling 時間: 2025-3-21 18:12
書目名稱Equality and Liberty影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Equality and Liberty影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Equality and Liberty網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Equality and Liberty網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Equality and Liberty被引頻次
書目名稱Equality and Liberty被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Equality and Liberty年度引用
書目名稱Equality and Liberty年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Equality and Liberty讀者反饋
書目名稱Equality and Liberty讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 公共汽車 時間: 2025-3-21 21:51 作者: 誰在削木頭 時間: 2025-3-22 00:32
Rawls on Natural Inequalityment… as counters in quest for political and economic advantage … ‘ (p. 15). This contention that the unequal distribution of natural assets (such as intelligence, talent, and so on) calls for some form of ‘nullification’ on grounds of justice I shall term the ‘Natural Inequality Theses’ (NIT for sh作者: 自愛 時間: 2025-3-22 05:46
Discussions Defining the Least Advantagedst advantaged class, and have been mildly surprised to see no discussion in the literature about the import of that change. I offer this brief note primarily to publicise the change in Rawls’ views and to invite others to consider the significance of the new definition.作者: AWRY 時間: 2025-3-22 11:15 作者: Arb853 時間: 2025-3-22 15:57
Rawls and Ownership: the Forgotten Category of Reproductive Laborto reveal that an analysis of women’s traditional position — her distinctive activities, labour and surrounding sense of ‘mine’ — can not only make valuable contributions towards clarifying traditional property disputes, but may even provide elements for a new conception of ownership. By way of illu作者: Arb853 時間: 2025-3-22 19:39
Reflective Equilibrium and Archimedean Pointse rational choice problem it poses by deriving two lexically-ordered principles of justice and suggests the derivation justifies the principles.. Its soundness aside, just what justificatory force does such a derivation have?作者: Dysplasia 時間: 2025-3-23 00:20 作者: deriver 時間: 2025-3-23 04:07 作者: 邊緣帶來墨水 時間: 2025-3-23 08:30
Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysicalesented in my book .).. I do this because it may seem that this conception depends on philosophical claims I should like to avoid, for example, claims to universal truth, or claims about the essential nature and identity of persons. My aim is to explain why it does not. I shall first discuss what I 作者: Lice692 時間: 2025-3-23 11:15
Does Ambiguity Lurk Behind the Veil of Ignorance in Rawls’ Original Position?uces a hypothetical contract between parties it is no contract at all.. Margarita Levin argues that Rawls’ derivation of his principles of justice from the original position is unsound because it neglects a vital category distinction between one’s not having a characteristic and one’s not knowing ab作者: Root494 時間: 2025-3-23 17:52 作者: 指數(shù) 時間: 2025-3-23 20:23
Capitalism, Socialism, and Justice: Reflections on Rawls’ Theory of Justice liberty and an equality of self-respect, it is argued that only in a socialist society could such ideals be reasonably approximated. Rawls’ own assumptions of what constitute realistic social expectations are in conflict with his own principles of justice. If society must be as Rawls pictures it, t作者: conception 時間: 2025-3-23 23:07 作者: 表示向前 時間: 2025-3-24 04:35 作者: abracadabra 時間: 2025-3-24 07:01 作者: Condyle 時間: 2025-3-24 12:22
978-0-333-53845-6Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1991作者: 收藏品 時間: 2025-3-24 18:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18594-1st advantaged class, and have been mildly surprised to see no discussion in the literature about the import of that change. I offer this brief note primarily to publicise the change in Rawls’ views and to invite others to consider the significance of the new definition.作者: 繁重 時間: 2025-3-24 21:31 作者: cacophony 時間: 2025-3-25 01:25 作者: 諂媚于性 時間: 2025-3-25 07:06 作者: 帶來 時間: 2025-3-25 10:43 作者: 富饒 時間: 2025-3-25 12:19
Discussions Defining the Least Advantagedst advantaged class, and have been mildly surprised to see no discussion in the literature about the import of that change. I offer this brief note primarily to publicise the change in Rawls’ views and to invite others to consider the significance of the new definition.作者: VICT 時間: 2025-3-25 16:49 作者: subordinate 時間: 2025-3-25 23:30
The Claims of Reflective Equilibriumdoubts concerning the significance and value of this method. I will first briefly describe the process of reasoning dubbed by Rawls Reflective Equilibrium. I will then examine some of the claims made for it by Rawls, Nielsen, and others.作者: Obsequious 時間: 2025-3-26 03:37
Stability and Utopia; A Critique of Nozick’s Framework Argumentdid a terrible injustice to Darwin’s theory of evolution. Now, however, there seems to be a theory to which it can be accurately applied. I refer to Nozick’s theory of the minimal state as a framework for Utopia.作者: 沒收 時間: 2025-3-26 07:52 作者: 愚笨 時間: 2025-3-26 08:53 作者: Lipohypertrophy 時間: 2025-3-26 14:43
Miscellaneous antibacterial agents,of this collection of papers helps to show how influential their respective theories of justice are. But their theories are also conflicting, in several important respects. Rawls is widely known as a proponent of what some refer to as the ‘welfare state’, while Nozick provides a theoretical foundati作者: 減少 時間: 2025-3-26 17:02 作者: Talkative 時間: 2025-3-27 01:03 作者: Pericarditis 時間: 2025-3-27 01:11
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18594-1st advantaged class, and have been mildly surprised to see no discussion in the literature about the import of that change. I offer this brief note primarily to publicise the change in Rawls’ views and to invite others to consider the significance of the new definition.作者: 字謎游戲 時間: 2025-3-27 05:30
Roberta J. Melander,Christian Melanderin morality and that there is no rationally defensible way of establishing priorities among these principles, the suspicion persists that Rawls’ own theory of justice is closer to intuitionism than Rawls recognizes. Even if Rawls has succeeded in lexically ordering the two principles of justice so t作者: Classify 時間: 2025-3-27 12:16 作者: Jacket 時間: 2025-3-27 14:51
Materialgewinnung, -entnahme und -transport,e rational choice problem it poses by deriving two lexically-ordered principles of justice and suggests the derivation justifies the principles.. Its soundness aside, just what justificatory force does such a derivation have?作者: CRUC 時間: 2025-3-27 19:10
Imaging Biofilms in Tissue Specimensdoubts concerning the significance and value of this method. I will first briefly describe the process of reasoning dubbed by Rawls Reflective Equilibrium. I will then examine some of the claims made for it by Rawls, Nielsen, and others.作者: stroke 時間: 2025-3-27 22:08 作者: 服從 時間: 2025-3-28 04:25 作者: Pamphlet 時間: 2025-3-28 08:46
Fiona E. Barclay,S. P. Borriellouces a hypothetical contract between parties it is no contract at all.. Margarita Levin argues that Rawls’ derivation of his principles of justice from the original position is unsound because it neglects a vital category distinction between one’s not having a characteristic and one’s not knowing ab作者: 文字 時間: 2025-3-28 12:59 作者: 熟練 時間: 2025-3-28 16:48 作者: 努力趕上 時間: 2025-3-28 21:40
Pneumonia Guidelines in Practice,did a terrible injustice to Darwin’s theory of evolution. Now, however, there seems to be a theory to which it can be accurately applied. I refer to Nozick’s theory of the minimal state as a framework for Utopia.作者: Indolent 時間: 2025-3-28 23:31
Marc J.M. Bonten,Jan Jelrik Oosterheertnforcement of contracts, and so, on, is justified’.. He went on to say that only such a state is justified. Since then, the view has been frequently presented that a more extensive state than the one proposed by Nozick is warranted. — as has the view that only a . extensive state,. or no state at al作者: FIR 時間: 2025-3-29 04:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28951-4here, though not one Nozick has made or is likely to endorse, is implicit in certain principles that are relatively central to the arguments he does make. It is his much as an illegitimate child is its father’s, however unintended and disowned.作者: 繁忙 時間: 2025-3-29 09:50 作者: Commonwealth 時間: 2025-3-29 14:08 作者: 滲透 時間: 2025-3-29 16:46 作者: Ptosis 時間: 2025-3-29 20:51 作者: Jocose 時間: 2025-3-30 00:59 作者: deface 時間: 2025-3-30 04:59
Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysicalbe, so far as possible, independent of controversial philosophical and religious doctrines. Thus, to formulate such a conception, we apply the principle of toleration to philosophy itself: the public conception of justice is to be political, not metaphysical. Hence the title.作者: Eeg332 時間: 2025-3-30 09:45 作者: 琺瑯 時間: 2025-3-30 12:48
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10992-8ating. And, although this methodology, its proponents will admit, is, to some degree, circular, this circularity, they claim, is the sort that is unobjectionable. So, in spite of the criticisms to which it has been subjected, reflective equilibrium methodology continues to be widely regarded as the 作者: BUOY 時間: 2025-3-30 20:14
Immunomodulation by Antiviral Agentsbe, so far as possible, independent of controversial philosophical and religious doctrines. Thus, to formulate such a conception, we apply the principle of toleration to philosophy itself: the public conception of justice is to be political, not metaphysical. Hence the title.作者: Asymptomatic 時間: 2025-3-31 00:41
Roberta J. Melander,Christian Melander Here Rawls’ indictment of intuitionism as ‘but half a conception’ of justice (., 41) appears to haunt his own conception of justice, especially since Rawls himself acknowledges that principles for individual actions are ‘a(chǎn)n essential part of any theory of justice’ (ibid., 108).作者: Concerto 時間: 2025-3-31 04:21
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70839-3my aim is to shift the terms of the property debate as posed by Rawls from . his own position. I hope to show that the real ownership question which now emerges is no longer . ‘justice as fairness’ countenances a private property or socialist form of democracy, but what precise . such a socialism should take.作者: 根除 時間: 2025-3-31 07:51 作者: 窗簾等 時間: 2025-3-31 11:45 作者: electrolyte 時間: 2025-3-31 17:13 作者: 努力趕上 時間: 2025-3-31 19:03 作者: judicial 時間: 2025-4-1 00:54 作者: 天文臺 時間: 2025-4-1 03:20
Book 1991s of particular Rawlsian or Nozickian themes. This collection of recent essays brings the student up-to-date concerning some of the more recent developments and assessments of Rawlsian and Nozickian ideas.作者: 牽索 時間: 2025-4-1 06:57
ir analyses of particular Rawlsian or Nozickian themes. This collection of recent essays brings the student up-to-date concerning some of the more recent developments and assessments of Rawlsian and Nozickian ideas.978-0-333-53845-6978-1-349-21763-2
