標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Epistemology, Knowledge and the Impact of Interaction; Juan Redmond,Olga Pombo Martins,ángel Nepomuceno F Book 2016 Springer International [打印本頁] 作者: 果園 時間: 2025-3-21 17:38
書目名稱Epistemology, Knowledge and the Impact of Interaction影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Epistemology, Knowledge and the Impact of Interaction影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Epistemology, Knowledge and the Impact of Interaction網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Epistemology, Knowledge and the Impact of Interaction網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Epistemology, Knowledge and the Impact of Interaction被引頻次
書目名稱Epistemology, Knowledge and the Impact of Interaction被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Epistemology, Knowledge and the Impact of Interaction年度引用
書目名稱Epistemology, Knowledge and the Impact of Interaction年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Epistemology, Knowledge and the Impact of Interaction讀者反饋
書目名稱Epistemology, Knowledge and the Impact of Interaction讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 牌帶來 時間: 2025-3-21 23:13 作者: Semblance 時間: 2025-3-22 03:23
Ancient and Modern Religion and Politicsnominal reference and presupposition. Our approach also gives a simple account of donkey anaphora without resorting to exotic scope extension of the sort used in Discourse Representation Theory and Dynamic Semantics, thanks to the proof-relevant nature of type theory.作者: hyperuricemia 時間: 2025-3-22 04:59 作者: Increment 時間: 2025-3-22 11:20
Dependent Types for Pragmaticsnominal reference and presupposition. Our approach also gives a simple account of donkey anaphora without resorting to exotic scope extension of the sort used in Discourse Representation Theory and Dynamic Semantics, thanks to the proof-relevant nature of type theory.作者: obsession 時間: 2025-3-22 15:40 作者: obsession 時間: 2025-3-22 20:28 作者: Jocose 時間: 2025-3-22 22:24 作者: WAIL 時間: 2025-3-23 05:06 作者: 溫順 時間: 2025-3-23 06:46 作者: Rodent 時間: 2025-3-23 10:41
Ancillary Benefits of Climate Policyett–Prawitz verificationism, the standard framework of classical logic is not called into question. This account also admits semantic features beyond the inferential ones: computational aspects play an essential role in the determination of meaning. To deal with these computational aspects, a relaxa作者: PACK 時間: 2025-3-23 14:42
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07831-8e how such contexts may arise. The idea is to view informational contexts as the fixed points of iterated, rational responses to incoming information about the agents’ possible choices. We discuss conditions under which such fixed points may exist. In the process, we generalize existing rules for in作者: 耐寒 時間: 2025-3-23 20:20
And I Saw Sequences of Petals and Leavestractness of the relevant alternatives approach and its amenability to formalization through logical techniques. We present some of the important motivations for adopting the relevant alternatives approach; briefly explore the connections and contrasts between the relevant alternatives approach and 作者: 壯觀的游行 時間: 2025-3-23 23:33
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0675-6out knowledge based on the notion of “reliable belief”. Our new understanding of knowledge highlights “reliability” of information that the agent gets from evidence. This is very different from the perspective of safe belief and its focus on “robustness”. By a systematic comparison between these two作者: CARK 時間: 2025-3-24 03:46
Silent Violence: On Point of View,l be shown that two-dimensional semantics does not do the job in an adequate way. A solution is provided which is based on Hintikka’s worldlines. Assuming a slight extension of the syntax, modal epistemic logic can thus deal with classical puzzles like knowledge of identities.作者: 易于出錯 時間: 2025-3-24 07:46 作者: remission 時間: 2025-3-24 10:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0597-6ing the greatest success. The strength of a good argumentation must remain meaningfully in an argument developed in a logically valid way and rhetorically embellished, obtaining as a result a persuaded audience who consequently accept it..Irony, as a rhetorical trope of language, not only embellishe作者: 索賠 時間: 2025-3-24 16:36
William H. Isbell,Helaine Silvermanel is sought. Narrowly focusing on the subject’s epistemic position with respect to . in ～. possibilities yields the wrong verdict in such cases. To account for our judgments, I propose that contextualists should look to virtue responsibilism, which founds epistemic evaluation both on the mastery of作者: ingestion 時間: 2025-3-24 21:32 作者: Interlocking 時間: 2025-3-25 01:31
N. K. Grant,W. I. Rose Jr,L. A. Fultzpect of the semantics will be pointed to: connectives are sensitive to the syntactic structure of the formulas they connect. Even though this is a well motivated principle which can be supported by many examples from natural languages, one of its unwanted consequences is that the resulting formal se作者: buoyant 時間: 2025-3-25 05:32 作者: 鼓掌 時間: 2025-3-25 11:28
Juan Redmond,Olga Pombo Martins,ángel Nepomuceno FExplains the epistemic role of abduction and argumentation in the study of alternative logic.Offers new ideas on how to combine Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science.Presents new insights on C作者: 直覺好 時間: 2025-3-25 13:52 作者: 關(guān)節(jié)炎 時間: 2025-3-25 19:51 作者: AVOW 時間: 2025-3-25 20:42 作者: 公豬 時間: 2025-3-26 03:59
Public Announcements and Inconsistencies: For a Paraconsistent Topological ModelIn this paper, we discuss public announcement logic in topological context. Then, as an interesting application, we consider public announcement logic in a paraconsistent topological model.作者: 有限 時間: 2025-3-26 05:59
Perennial Intuitionismg a reversal in priority between the objective and the subjective. Intuitionism revived the age-old problem of universals, and the controversy between nominalism, conceptualism, and realism, now represented by formalism (nominalism), intuitionism (conceptualism), and set-theoretical Platonism (reali作者: uveitis 時間: 2025-3-26 11:50
Atomic Systems in Proof-Theoretic Semantics: Two Approachess the base case in an inductive definition of validity. We compare two different approaches to atomic systems. The first approach is compatible with an interpretation of atomic systems as representations of states of knowledge. The second takes atomic systems to be definitions of atomic formulas. Th作者: BILL 時間: 2025-3-26 16:06
Knowledge and Its Game-Theoretical Foundations: The Challenges of the Dialogical Approach to Construve Type Theory (CTT). Furthermore, we also claim that the dialogical framework provides the appropriate means to develop such a link. We will restrict our study to the discussion of two paradigmatic cases of dependences triggered by quantifiers, namely the case of the Axiom of Choice and the study o作者: endarterectomy 時間: 2025-3-26 16:49
Dependent Types for Pragmaticsnominal reference and presupposition. Our approach also gives a simple account of donkey anaphora without resorting to exotic scope extension of the sort used in Discourse Representation Theory and Dynamic Semantics, thanks to the proof-relevant nature of type theory.作者: 低位的人或事 時間: 2025-3-26 23:27
On the Computational Meaning of Axiomsett–Prawitz verificationism, the standard framework of classical logic is not called into question. This account also admits semantic features beyond the inferential ones: computational aspects play an essential role in the determination of meaning. To deal with these computational aspects, a relaxa作者: voluble 時間: 2025-3-27 05:02 作者: 郊外 時間: 2025-3-27 06:35
Relevant Alternatives in Epistemology and Logictractness of the relevant alternatives approach and its amenability to formalization through logical techniques. We present some of the important motivations for adopting the relevant alternatives approach; briefly explore the connections and contrasts between the relevant alternatives approach and 作者: 鞠躬 時間: 2025-3-27 13:25 作者: Pulmonary-Veins 時間: 2025-3-27 13:37
Knowing Necessary Truthsl be shown that two-dimensional semantics does not do the job in an adequate way. A solution is provided which is based on Hintikka’s worldlines. Assuming a slight extension of the syntax, modal epistemic logic can thus deal with classical puzzles like knowledge of identities.作者: 蠟燭 時間: 2025-3-27 19:31 作者: Gorilla 時間: 2025-3-28 00:49 作者: 搜集 時間: 2025-3-28 05:39
Ascribing Knowledge to Experts: A Virtue-Contextualist Approachel is sought. Narrowly focusing on the subject’s epistemic position with respect to . in ～. possibilities yields the wrong verdict in such cases. To account for our judgments, I propose that contextualists should look to virtue responsibilism, which founds epistemic evaluation both on the mastery of作者: 口訣 時間: 2025-3-28 07:18
Defeasible Argumentation in African Oral Traditions. A Special Case of Dealing with the Non-monotonionic reasoning in a way that is not that different from nowadays argumentation-based approaches of legal reasoning within the context of western juridical systems. So, the aim of this survey consists in two points: on the one hand, we will show that polemical debates in African oral traditions imple作者: PUT 時間: 2025-3-28 13:00
Semantics of Assertibility and Deniabilitypect of the semantics will be pointed to: connectives are sensitive to the syntactic structure of the formulas they connect. Even though this is a well motivated principle which can be supported by many examples from natural languages, one of its unwanted consequences is that the resulting formal se作者: 模范 時間: 2025-3-28 16:22
The Quest for the Concept in the Twentieth Century: Predicates, Functions, Categories and Argument S words. One way to achieve this was the study of lexical meaning and its combinatorial properties. Our purpose is to explore the seminal ideas that have resulted in categorial grammars and their relationship with other grammatical models and actual theories of meaning, in a historical process that t作者: Emasculate 時間: 2025-3-28 19:28 作者: jet-lag 時間: 2025-3-29 00:45 作者: colostrum 時間: 2025-3-29 03:33
Ancillary Benefits of Climate Policytion of syntax is necessary. This leads to a general kind of proof theory, where the objects of study are not typed objects like deductions, but rather untyped ones, in which formulas are replaced by geometrical configurations.作者: Hangar 時間: 2025-3-29 08:18 作者: nullify 時間: 2025-3-29 11:29
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0675-6 kinds of beliefs, we argue that it is the reliability, not the robustness, that qualifies belief as knowledge. Finally, we explore the agent’s knowledge update, particularly triggered by evidence dynamics, and present a complete dynamic logic.作者: bronchodilator 時間: 2025-3-29 17:21 作者: avarice 時間: 2025-3-29 22:04
Matthew P. Sayre,Silvana A. Rosenfeldment systematically a non-monotonic inference, that is closed to what Aristotle termed by “dialectical arguments”; on the other hand, we are suggesting a way to . with non-monotonic inference in a dialogical framework.作者: 阻塞 時間: 2025-3-29 23:58 作者: Matrimony 時間: 2025-3-30 05:58
Locke and the Challenge of the Biblical God,the second approach this is not the case. This indicates that atomic systems as definitions, which determine the meaning of atomic sentences, might not be the proper basis for proof-theoretic validity, or conversely, that standard notions of proof-theoretic validity are not appropriate for definitional rule systems.作者: 有害 時間: 2025-3-30 10:56 作者: cravat 時間: 2025-3-30 12:59 作者: 悲痛 時間: 2025-3-30 17:29
Perennial Intuitionismmilar stance in the modern foundational debate: set-theoretical Platonism, is rejected on epistemological grounds, and pure conceptualism is rejected on the grounds that if fails to account for the objective nature of mathematics.作者: Interdict 時間: 2025-3-30 21:20 作者: FLAGR 時間: 2025-3-31 02:17
Modified Tableaux for Some Kinds of Multimodal Logics More complicated cases require additional rules to deal with the relationship between different modal operators. Finally, some infinitary operators, such as . or ., may be dealt with using DB-tableaux or recursive rules.作者: 暫時別動 時間: 2025-3-31 06:24
Irony as a Visual Argument speaker. We will show how irony works within the written speech using Joan Fuster’s aphorism as an example; and then, we will explore the possibilities of ironic argumentation in the visual field through one of Banksy’s paintings.作者: PET-scan 時間: 2025-3-31 11:59
And I Saw Sequences of Petals and Leaves different levels of abstraction; and present a sample of relevant alternatives theories (contrasting what we call question-first and topic-first theories) that tie our discussion to ongoing debates in the philosophical literature, as well as showcasing techniques for formalizing some of the important positions in these debates.作者: Chronic 時間: 2025-3-31 16:36
N. K. Grant,W. I. Rose Jr,L. A. Fultzry sentential connective will be replaced with a pair of connectives one of which will be called extensional and the other intensional. This distinction enables us to have an adequate and compositional semantics of assertibility and deniability. We will provide also a syntactic characterization of the logic determined by this semantics.作者: 有斑點 時間: 2025-3-31 18:31 作者: Nutrient 時間: 2025-3-31 23:37 作者: 謊言 時間: 2025-4-1 03:25
On the Computational Meaning of Axiomstion of syntax is necessary. This leads to a general kind of proof theory, where the objects of study are not typed objects like deductions, but rather untyped ones, in which formulas are replaced by geometrical configurations.
