標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Epistemic Justification and the Skeptical Challenge; Hamid Vahid Book 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited [打印本頁] 作者: hierarchy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 18:41
書目名稱Epistemic Justification and the Skeptical Challenge影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Epistemic Justification and the Skeptical Challenge影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Epistemic Justification and the Skeptical Challenge網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Epistemic Justification and the Skeptical Challenge網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Epistemic Justification and the Skeptical Challenge被引頻次
書目名稱Epistemic Justification and the Skeptical Challenge被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Epistemic Justification and the Skeptical Challenge年度引用
書目名稱Epistemic Justification and the Skeptical Challenge年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Epistemic Justification and the Skeptical Challenge讀者反饋
書目名稱Epistemic Justification and the Skeptical Challenge讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 多余 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 21:32
The Internalism/Externalism Dividef one thought of the justifying factors (evidence) in a way that required of the cognizer to be actually aware of them, then that would be an example of a strong form of internalism, a version that recognizes as justifiers only those putative grounds that are within the cognizer’s perspective on the作者: tattle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:16
The Politics of Sex and Reproduction,y consider to be the nature of that concept. The increasing sophistication of current theories of epistemic justification and the ensuing disarray have prompted some theorists to deny its privileged place in epistemology, and redefine the debate in different terms.作者: 中古 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71242-6f one thought of the justifying factors (evidence) in a way that required of the cognizer to be actually aware of them, then that would be an example of a strong form of internalism, a version that recognizes as justifiers only those putative grounds that are within the cognizer’s perspective on the作者: 不舒服 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 10:27
Epistemic Justification and the Skeptical Challenge作者: laceration 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:57 作者: laceration 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 20:00 作者: 指派 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 22:31 作者: Accede 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 02:51
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230513907exact structure of the problem. It has been thought to be concerned with phenomena as diverse as truth, knowledge, epistemic principles, and so on, with each version requiring its own special treatment.作者: Esalate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 06:28 作者: nugatory 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 11:12
The Problem of the Criterionexact structure of the problem. It has been thought to be concerned with phenomena as diverse as truth, knowledge, epistemic principles, and so on, with each version requiring its own special treatment.作者: Biofeedback 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 16:19 作者: POWER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:30 作者: 不發(fā)音 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 01:30 作者: 明智的人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 03:37 作者: 四指套 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:09 作者: 果仁 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:51 作者: 意外的成功 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:01 作者: 昏睡中 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 19:52
Analysing Structure in Academic Writingciple of underdetermination. While acknowledging the plausibility of a restricted version of the knowledge version, it shall be argued that this has nothing to do with facts involving underdetermination.作者: 西瓜 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:40
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511422 theories of justification to problems such as the underdetermination of theories by data, one can primarily regard it as an anti-skeptical strategy whose most widely held form upholds that the mere holding of a belief confers justification on that belief.作者: palliate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 04:27 作者: 我沒有強(qiáng)迫 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 09:37
Skepticism and Underdeterminationciple of underdetermination. While acknowledging the plausibility of a restricted version of the knowledge version, it shall be argued that this has nothing to do with facts involving underdetermination.作者: CLOWN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 15:39
Argument from Epistemic Conservatism theories of justification to problems such as the underdetermination of theories by data, one can primarily regard it as an anti-skeptical strategy whose most widely held form upholds that the mere holding of a belief confers justification on that belief.作者: HAVOC 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 18:34 作者: 油氈 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:50
http://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/313308.jpg作者: LATE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 03:13
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596214concept; knowledge; semantic; skepticism; underdetermination; understanding作者: BLUSH 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 05:07
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17670-8tions involving its own nature and characteristics are still very much matters of dispute. The situation has further been aggravated by the recent controversy over the internalist/externalist character of justification with both sides of the debate taking their cues from what they consider to be the nature of that concept.作者: 數(shù)量 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 10:10 作者: 蛛絲 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 13:27 作者: 的染料 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:29
of key responses to the skeptical challenge, Hamid Vahid presents a theory which is shown to work alongside the internalism/externalism issue and the thesis of semantic externalism, with a deontological conception of justification at its core.978-0-230-59621-4作者: Boycott 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 22:37
Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005作者: 騎師 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 01:39 作者: 豎琴 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:19 作者: separate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 10:38 作者: 改革運(yùn)動(dòng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 14:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71242-6the debate there are those epistemologists (internalists) who require the justifying factors of a belief to be cognitively accessible to the agent. Accordingly, something can be regarded as a justifier, that is, confer justification on a belief only if it is reflectively accessible to the subject. E作者: 雄偉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:23
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230513907he idea behind the problem is that any attempt at attaining epistemically justified beliefs incurs the charge of circularity or vicious regress. To be more precise, what the problem of the criterion highlights is the difficulty arising from trying to determine the extent of knowledge (justified beli作者: Genome 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:34 作者: 蘆筍 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:44 作者: 暗指 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 08:10 作者: Locale 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 12:54
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511422ing dogmatically to one’s beliefs is epistemically preposterous, it would be equally unreasonable, it is said, to change them in the absence of any good reasons. This position known as epistemic conservatism seems to have had a distinguished line of advocates among the likes of Quine and Chisholm. A作者: 表示向下 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 15:51
Analysing the Structure of Economic Modelsth. We tend to believe those hypotheses that are, in cer-tain respects, superior to the other members of the set. While this seems to be a rather fair description of the mechanism of belief formation in areas such as commonsense, science, and philosophy, it is also the source of a great many puzzles作者: arthroscopy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 21:56 作者: Gratuitous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 01:12
Introductionl yield different results. Epistemic evaluation, however, involves epistemic standards and appropriate epistemic goals. A theory of epistemic justification must therefore address the question of the aim and objective of epistemic justification, that is, what is the point of epistemic justification a作者: COLON 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 06:18
Elements of a Theory of Justificationtions involving its own nature and characteristics are still very much matters of dispute. The situation has further been aggravated by the recent controversy over the internalist/externalist character of justification with both sides of the debate taking their cues from what they consider to be the作者: dry-eye 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 08:06 作者: 改變立場 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 13:25
The Internalism/Externalism Dividethe debate there are those epistemologists (internalists) who require the justifying factors of a belief to be cognitively accessible to the agent. Accordingly, something can be regarded as a justifier, that is, confer justification on a belief only if it is reflectively accessible to the subject. E作者: 外來 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 18:56 作者: seruting 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 19:42 作者: 切碎 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 03:52
Skepticism and Underdeterminationoubt. In Chapter 5 we discussed one way of utilizing this insight drawing on the principle of closure to set up a (Cartesian) skeptical argument. In this chapter, I shall deal with another way of constructing such arguments that helps itself with, not the principle of closure but, the so-called unde
