標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy; Ivan Cerovac Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lice [打印本頁] 作者: Fixate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 16:35
書目名稱Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy被引頻次
書目名稱Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy年度引用
書目名稱Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy讀者反饋
書目名稱Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 極大痛苦 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 23:03
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91174-3. This position endorses the truth tenet but, building upon epistemology of peer disagreement, claims that democratic procedures have some intrinsic epistemic qualities. I present arguments against the introduction of the concept of epistemic peerhood in the debate on political legitimacy and end th作者: canonical 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:34 作者: 微枝末節(jié) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 06:29 作者: 慷慨援助 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 10:59
The Knowledge Tenet,. This position endorses the truth tenet but, building upon epistemology of peer disagreement, claims that democratic procedures have some intrinsic epistemic qualities. I present arguments against the introduction of the concept of epistemic peerhood in the debate on political legitimacy and end th作者: Neonatal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:40 作者: Neonatal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:39
Epistemic Democracy,legitimacy, such as Estlund’s standard account of epistemic democracy, which I endorse and defend in this book. The chapter proceeds by analyzing how various forms of democratic decision-making meet the criteria set by Estlund and concludes that aggregative democracy should be rejected in favor of deliberative democracy.作者: Arable 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 22:24 作者: 左右連貫 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 02:12
Book 2020 decisions. Mapping and critically engaging with the main theories of epistemic democracy, it additionally evaluates arguments for different democratic decision-making procedures related to aggregative and deliberative democracy...Addressing both positions that are too epistemic, such as Epistrocrac作者: 固執(zhí)點(diǎn)好 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 07:36
System der Fett- und Wachsanalyse,stocracy, I demonstrate that scholocracy can be rejected as well, since it is not unreasonable to think that some epistemically damaging features (biases) might be present in the group that is given greater political authority. I end the chapter by claiming that the authority tenet should be rejected.作者: Apoptosis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:36 作者: Canvas 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 14:21
2946-2738 theories of epistemic democracy.Discusses the implementation.This compelling new book explores whether the ability of democratic procedures to produce correct outcomes increases the legitimacy of such political decisions. Mapping and critically engaging with the main theories of epistemic democracy,作者: 大門在匯總 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02264-1legitimacy, such as Estlund’s standard account of epistemic democracy, which I endorse and defend in this book. The chapter proceeds by analyzing how various forms of democratic decision-making meet the criteria set by Estlund and concludes that aggregative democracy should be rejected in favor of deliberative democracy.作者: Conclave 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:19
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85583-2akers devising means (laws and decisions) for the achievement of these aims. In the second part of the chapter I discuss whether political equality should go deeper than just the formal politics, rejecting Estlund’s view and claiming that the informal political sphere (e.g. contributions to political campaigns) should be more egalitarian as well.作者: cravat 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:34
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24046-2truth value? If they can be true or false, are there people who are better at getting it right or wrong? And if there are, does this imply that those who are better in making correct decisions should have political authority over others? These are some of the key questions I try to answer in this bo作者: IRS 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:16 作者: 無彈性 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 14:10 作者: 奇怪 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 16:37 作者: abject 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 19:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02264-1ld not give greater political authority to any specific group of citizens. This can be claimed only if one adopts a non-monistic account of political legitimacy, such as Estlund’s standard account of epistemic democracy, which I endorse and defend in this book. The chapter proceeds by analyzing how 作者: 青石板 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 02:03
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85583-2cal labor should be implemented, with citizens and their representatives setting the aims and values the society is to pursue, and experts and policymakers devising means (laws and decisions) for the achievement of these aims. In the second part of the chapter I discuss whether political equality sh作者: Basal-Ganglia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 03:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44602-4Epistemic justification; Democratic legitimacy; Experts; Truth; Decision-making; John Rawls; Political nih作者: 鋼筆記下懲罰 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 09:01 作者: 無效 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:51 作者: 鞭打 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 16:19
Ivan CerovacBuilds an innovative structure than can be used to bring order to numerous accounts of epistemic democracy.Critically engages with the main theories of epistemic democracy.Discusses the implementation作者: Supplement 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 23:43
Palgrave Studies in Ethics and Public Policyhttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/313302.jpg作者: AVERT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:04
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24046-2truth value? If they can be true or false, are there people who are better at getting it right or wrong? And if there are, does this imply that those who are better in making correct decisions should have political authority over others? These are some of the key questions I try to answer in this book.作者: 簡(jiǎn)略 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:12 作者: 圓錐 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:33
Introduction,truth value? If they can be true or false, are there people who are better at getting it right or wrong? And if there are, does this imply that those who are better in making correct decisions should have political authority over others? These are some of the key questions I try to answer in this bo作者: 掙扎 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 13:10 作者: medium 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 17:20
The Knowledge Tenet,e knowledge tenet (i.e. claim that there are no experts in politics). Proponents of Pragmatist Deliberative Democracy thus claim that political decisions can be right or wrong, and that we should evaluate the decision-making system by its ability to produce correct decisions. However, since the rele作者: 厚顏 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:18
The Authority Tenet,e of those who know, and claim that, though this decision-making procedure might have considerable epistemic value, it cannot meet the liberal criterion of legitimacy. Namely, we cannot expect all reasonable citizens to see the same group of people as experts in politics, and therefore the rule of a作者: 意外的成功 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 04:35 作者: Bph773 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 09:06
Institutionalizing Epistemic Democracy,cal labor should be implemented, with citizens and their representatives setting the aims and values the society is to pursue, and experts and policymakers devising means (laws and decisions) for the achievement of these aims. In the second part of the chapter I discuss whether political equality sh作者: 增減字母法 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:01 作者: Dislocation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:48 作者: monochromatic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:40 作者: dermatomyositis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:17 作者: 執(zhí) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:12
Philomena Goodmanthe worst sins of all.’. Conversely, those characters who have offended against the church and are aware of some grave misdemeanour weighing upon their conscience arouse the author’s sympathy, even his admiration, with the implication that it is only after one has transgressed and repented that true作者: 引導(dǎo) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 07:24
ials to reflect current radiation oncology practice; includes the most recent staging systems; and features new color illustrations and anatomic atlases to aid in treatment planning. This book is a valuable resource for students, resident physicians, fellows, and other practitioners of radiation oncology.?.978-3-319-62641-3978-3-319-62642-0作者: 夸張 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 12:41
Collaborative Realitiesates the impact of transdisciplinary and participatory methods that elicit the potential of art and artistic activities in health care environments and in academia and thus redefines the scope and impact of knowledge productions.作者: 歌劇等 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 17:56 作者: 鴕鳥 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 18:51
Structural and dynamical forms of elliptical and dwarf galaxies,lliptical galaxies and its thickness impose strong constraints on their global dynamical structures, stellar populations, and the relation of dark to visible matter in them. Second, the prevalence of extreme core-halo structures among the nucleated dwarf galaxies. Finally, some general remarks are m
