標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose; Umberto Albarella Book 2001 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2001 Earth Science.archae [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: 文化修養(yǎng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 18:17
書(shū)目名稱Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose影響因子(影響力)
書(shū)目名稱Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度
書(shū)目名稱Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose被引頻次
書(shū)目名稱Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose年度引用
書(shū)目名稱Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose年度引用學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose讀者反饋
書(shū)目名稱Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 變白 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:18
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230597914 few years of working to build on the common ground between archaeology and environmentalism, I have come to the view that our interests are largely one and the same. This, I would emphasise, is not simply a political point, but goes to the heart of what archaeology is. In what follows I will try to make clear why this is the case.作者: 圍巾 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:37
Environmental Archaeology is Dead: Long Live Bioarchaeology, Geoarchaeology and Human Palaeoecologysked so very politely — but insistently — by the editor to write a brief commentary on Jonathan Driver’s provocative article on the nature of environmental archaeology, I am resolved to try to do my best — and my briefest.作者: 金哥占卜者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 06:03 作者: Melanocytes 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:48 作者: Watemelon 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-24666-5I am grateful that Umberto Albarella sought a reaction to my contribution from Yannis Hamilakis, and to Yannis for responding with vigour and in detail. The discussion between us could run and run, and I must limit myself here to a few comments.作者: Watemelon 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:19
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-9651-6This paper looks at the sources of funding for archaeology. It finds that a large proportion of funding derives from developments that have detrimental effects on nature. This can present a moral dilemma for practising archaeologists. Suggestions on possible ways forward are presented.作者: TOXIN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:27
Whose Dichotomy is it Anyway?I am grateful that Umberto Albarella sought a reaction to my contribution from Yannis Hamilakis, and to Yannis for responding with vigour and in detail. The discussion between us could run and run, and I must limit myself here to a few comments.作者: 泄露 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:49
The Responsibilities of Archaeologists to Nature ConservationThis paper looks at the sources of funding for archaeology. It finds that a large proportion of funding derives from developments that have detrimental effects on nature. This can present a moral dilemma for practising archaeologists. Suggestions on possible ways forward are presented.作者: 修正案 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 06:12 作者: 標(biāo)準(zhǔn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:44
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-99191-2 is an important issue of the project design and not just my personal whim? Everyone involved with the nitty-gritty of archaeology knows that the much talked about integration of the different archaeological sub-disciplines is still an unfulfilled dream. The way we approach archaeology has still as 作者: constitutional 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:09 作者: Airtight 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 21:33 作者: 安心地散步 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:49
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-03533-2An alternative view is that environmental archaeology should be considered as the analysis of “natural” materials from archaeological sites, and that the subdiscipline is characterised by the importance of taphonomy and middle range theory, and not by any particular high level theoretical stance. Th作者: 愚笨 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 03:38 作者: 魔鬼在游行 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:39 作者: 發(fā)出眩目光芒 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 12:14
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-99844-6een criticised for their undue focus on the development of methodology, and an all-too-rare interest in cultural and social issues. Nowhere has this attack been more virulent than amongst post-processualists in the 1990s. However, this paper will seek to suggest that the failure of recent perspectiv作者: 帶來(lái)的感覺(jué) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 16:46 作者: explicit 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 22:30 作者: LAY 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:30 作者: Cholagogue 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 05:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-7832-6he level of integration with orthodox archaeology. A distinction is drawn between . and . archaeology — the two types occupying positions either side of a dividing line at which earth-science analysis moves from a problem-oriented to an integral role, often paralleled by a scale increase to landscap作者: 母豬 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 07:46 作者: aggrieve 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:07
Harald Sajonski,Alfred Smollichpossible to separate between “archaeology” and “environmental archaeology”. Therefore an archaeological approach to a prehistoric culture should reconstruct its metonymic and metaphoric rules from the synchronic and diachronic interactions of material culture, rituals and environmental data. The exa作者: Anticonvulsants 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 18:42 作者: 阻塞 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 22:54 作者: fluffy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:24
Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose978-94-015-9652-7Series ISSN 1382-3124 作者: conflate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:00
Book 2001are often marginalised in archaeology. This is the first book that, by discussing the meaning and purpose we give to the expression `environmental archaeology‘, investigates the reasons for such a problem. This is achieved through the use of theoretical considerations and the aid of a number of case作者: Charade 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:07 作者: 復(fù)習(xí) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:11
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-6603-3to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and loss of biodiversity. I can only emphasise what Paul has said. When the next round of road developments is announced, as it surely will be, archaeologists must play their part in awaking the public and decisionmakers to exactly what is being lost and in stressing the value of the loss.作者: 個(gè)阿姨勾引你 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 18:46
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-7832-6With intensive geoarchaeology, however, problems can be caused by the assumption that the techniques used will inform about the environment at a level similar to other specialisms, when in fact they are more commonly involved in context definition and interpretation.作者: oxidant 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:31 作者: groggy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 04:29 作者: 猛擊 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 07:18
A Reply to Graves-Brownto reduce carbon dioxide emissions and loss of biodiversity. I can only emphasise what Paul has said. When the next round of road developments is announced, as it surely will be, archaeologists must play their part in awaking the public and decisionmakers to exactly what is being lost and in stressing the value of the loss.作者: Neolithic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 09:36 作者: 口味 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:38
Is Human Osteoarchaeology Environmental Archaeology?ot be those that, at face value, are commonly perceived. Indeed, the opposite may be the case: characteristics resembling distinctions may, at a deeper level, operate as unifying forces. Factors deemed to unite the fields might, in fact, generate difference.作者: Cacophonous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 18:49
A Reply to Thomasation, and I see “high level” theory operating somewhat independently from the low and middle level research strategies which guide data analysis. I agree with Thomas that debates about terminology are of minor importance, but definition of terms was not the intention of my paper, so I will clarify a couple of points.作者: STIT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 00:29 作者: 思想靈活 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:01 作者: 官僚統(tǒng)治 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 10:17 作者: arboretum 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 10:33 作者: 暫時(shí)過(guò)來(lái) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 15:04
Harald Sajonski,Alfred Smollichstruct its metonymic and metaphoric rules from the synchronic and diachronic interactions of material culture, rituals and environmental data. The examples in support of a rhetorical archaeology are taken from the Cucuteni-Tripolye Chalcolithic culture.作者: 舊病復(fù)發(fā) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 20:23 作者: 一致性 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 02:20
The Poverty of Empiricism and the Tyranny of Theoryw Marxism allows the study of the processes of production and distribution of food to be linked effectively to an analysis of the patterns of consumption and disposal, thus avoiding the polarisation between traditional empiricism and the idealism of post-processual theory.作者: braggadocio 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 05:50 作者: angiography 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 08:35 作者: 不朽中國(guó) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 12:29 作者: 高興一回 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 17:06 作者: 來(lái)這真柔軟 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 22:44 作者: BRINK 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 02:46
Exploring the Real Nature of Environmental Archaeology is an important issue of the project design and not just my personal whim? Everyone involved with the nitty-gritty of archaeology knows that the much talked about integration of the different archaeological sub-disciplines is still an unfulfilled dream. The way we approach archaeology has still as 作者: accrete 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 04:53
Economic Prehistory or Environmental Archaeology? On Gaining a Sense of Identitythin the discipline has led to uncertainty about the place of the discipline and its relationship with other studies within and without archaeology. A preoccupation with human habitat has inhibited the development of a theoretical framework that fully integrates environmental archaeology with relate作者: 一起平行 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 09:59 作者: CHOP 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 12:27
Environmental Archaeology is not Human PalaeoecologyAn alternative view is that environmental archaeology should be considered as the analysis of “natural” materials from archaeological sites, and that the subdiscipline is characterised by the importance of taphonomy and middle range theory, and not by any particular high level theoretical stance. Th作者: GOAD 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 18:57
Environmental Archaeology is Dead: Long Live Bioarchaeology, Geoarchaeology and Human Palaeoecologysked so very politely — but insistently — by the editor to write a brief commentary on Jonathan Driver’s provocative article on the nature of environmental archaeology, I am resolved to try to do my best — and my briefest.作者: Notorious 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 00:03
A Reply to Thomasth him before I wrote my paper, because I think we are speaking at cross purposes to some extent, perhaps reflecting some differences between British and Canadian conceptualisations of archaeology. I have been influenced by Bruce Trigger’s analysis of the different levels of archaeological generalis作者: 桉樹(shù) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 01:32 作者: infantile 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 08:27
Commercialising the Palaeoenvironmentd cycle is outlined and the ways in which environmental archaeology has been integrated into the various stages is discussed. An attempt is made to highlight some of the problems and misunderstandings that often occur and some possible solutions are offered. In particular the need to establish prope作者: Laconic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 09:15 作者: photophobia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 16:49
A Reply to Graves-Brownto see any development or change as intrinsically better/preferable to another. This includes loss of species or introduction of species or, for example, the change of an essentially rural, intimate landscape to a transport corridor with warehouses, car parks and filling stations. However, as Paul s作者: Obstacle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 20:53 作者: Jargon 時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 00:12 作者: Hyperlipidemia 時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 02:33
The Rhetoric of People and Grainspossible to separate between “archaeology” and “environmental archaeology”. Therefore an archaeological approach to a prehistoric culture should reconstruct its metonymic and metaphoric rules from the synchronic and diachronic interactions of material culture, rituals and environmental data. The exa作者: radiograph 時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 06:58
A Match Made in Heaven or a Marriage of Convenience?l interpretation has been (albeit unintentionally) uneasy at best, and irreconcilable at worst. Poor communication, and a simplistic approach to the interpretation of evidence, are common problems encountered by both parties. Although the principles and potential of integrating information from disp
