標(biāo)題: Titlebook: English for Writing Research Papers; Adrian Wallwork Book 20111st edition The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: Braggart 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 16:47
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)English for Writing Research Papers影響因子(影響力)
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)English for Writing Research Papers影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)English for Writing Research Papers網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)English for Writing Research Papers網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)English for Writing Research Papers被引頻次
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)English for Writing Research Papers被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)English for Writing Research Papers年度引用
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)English for Writing Research Papers年度引用學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)English for Writing Research Papers讀者反饋
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)English for Writing Research Papers讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: jocular 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 23:52 作者: ASTER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 04:20
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59733-5ne ‘rule’ is that when you present subjective or unproven propositions, you should avoid sounding arrogant or 100% certain of what you state. This approach, known as ‘hedging’, also spread to other scientists in other Anglo societies.作者: 中子 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 06:22 作者: 價(jià)值在貶值 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:12 作者: recession 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 16:24 作者: recession 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:01 作者: maladorit 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 01:15
Highlighting Your Findingsdings because you have neither highlighted nor described them clearly enough, then your paper may not be published. Your contribution to the community may thus vanish into oblivion. In the words of English botanist, Sir Francis Darwin: .作者: 熱烈的歡迎 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:15 作者: atrophy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 09:31
Titlesct to read. According to one of Britain’s top editors, writing good headlines represents about 50% of the skills vital to article writing. For this reason the gurus of research writing tend to dedicate more pages to discussing the importance of the title than they do to any section in the paper itself.作者: affluent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:06 作者: pericardium 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:38
Review of the Literatureding the sequence of events leading up to the current situation - not too much to make it tedious, nor too little so that the context of your research is not meaningful to them. The background information is useful because it allows you to:作者: 強(qiáng)制令 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 18:06 作者: 有角 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:45
Aigul Kulnazarova,Vesselin Popovskiished in the literature. You must make it 100% clear to the reader whose methodology or results you are talking about. If you don’t, you will make it difficult for the referee to: ? identify your contribution ? decide how useful the contribution is ? make a decision about whether this contribution i作者: 易改變 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 05:16 作者: harpsichord 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:30 作者: CAND 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 12:16
ct to read. According to one of Britain’s top editors, writing good headlines represents about 50% of the skills vital to article writing. For this reason the gurus of research writing tend to dedicate more pages to discussing the importance of the title than they do to any section in the paper itse作者: 山頂可休息 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 16:27 作者: Constituent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 21:07
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38886-6ate how the findings of the paper are an advance on current knowledge in the field. A key skill is to be able to say the same things that have been said many times before but in a different, interesting, intriguing way.作者: SOW 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:13
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52616-0ding the sequence of events leading up to the current situation - not too much to make it tedious, nor too little so that the context of your research is not meaningful to them. The background information is useful because it allows you to:作者: boisterous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 05:19
The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Busines作者: Arthritis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:53
Adrian WallworkAt least two-thirds of published scientific papers are written by researchers whose first language is not English.20% of the comments referees make when reviewing papers for possible publication in in作者: largesse 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 12:20 作者: Interlocking 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 19:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7922-3English language; Writing in English作者: 夸張 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:51
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137295408Why is this chapter important? To write a well-structured paper in good clear English you need to have a method. If you don’t have a good method you may waste a lot of time having to re-plan and re-write entire sections of your paper.作者: 涂掉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 01:54 作者: 否決 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:52
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11980-4Why is this chapter important? In his book, ., John Adair reports that approximately 90% of people understand an 8-word sentence on first reading, but only about 4% understand a 27-word sentence first time around, especially if it is poorly punctuated.作者: 要求比…更好 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49240-3Why is this chapter important? One of the most common reasons why referees reject a paper is poor readability.作者: Progesterone 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 15:10 作者: DRILL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:14
Why is this chapter important? Conventions regarding exactly what constitutes plagiarism vary from country to country. Plagiarism in its simplest terms means cutting and pasting from other studies and papers. It also means taking credit for work that others have done.作者: pacifist 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 00:05
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24823-9What key skills are needed when writing the Methods? This section has several different names including: ‘Methods’, ‘Methods and Materials’, ‘Experimental’, ‘Method Description and Validation’. In this chapter, I will always refer to it as Methods.作者: Charade 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 01:35
The Palgrave Handbook of Global PhilanthropyWhat key skills are needed when writing the Results? Not all journals require a separate Results section, often it is integrated with the Discussion, under the section title Results and Discussion.作者: 同位素 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 08:50 作者: bonnet 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 10:06 作者: 同步左右 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:56 作者: cataract 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 17:56 作者: 設(shè)施 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:44
Structuring Paragraphs and SentencesWhy is this chapter important? One of the most common reasons why referees reject a paper is poor readability.作者: Guaff豪情痛飲 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 02:11
Being Concise and Removing RedundancyWhy is this chapter important? Being concise is not an option. Many journals, particularly widely-read ones such as . and ., have severe restrictions on the number of words per article. The space they have available is precious.作者: 鐵塔等 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 08:40 作者: 挖掘 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 10:24 作者: Prostatism 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 15:44 作者: 背書(shū) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 19:27
DiscussionWhat key skills are needed when writing the Discussion? People read papers in different ways. Readers in a hurry, may read the title and then just look at the figures! Many begin from the part that they find the most interesting, which is often the Discussion.作者: expdient 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 01:55
Book 20111st editionical build-up towards various conclusions.write a title and an abstract that will attract attention and be read.decide what to include in the various parts of the paper (Introduction, Methodology, Discussion etc) .select from over 700 useful phrases .highlight your claims and contribution.avoid plag作者: DUST 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 07:00 作者: Soliloquy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 10:42
Avoiding Ambiguity and Vaguenessus. If referees are not clear about what you are -saying in a particular sentence, this may affect their overall understanding of the contribution of the paper. They may thus feel that they are not in a position to judge the merits of your paper. Just two or three ambiguous sentences are enough for 作者: antiandrogen 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 12:40
Clarifying Who Did Whatished in the literature. You must make it 100% clear to the reader whose methodology or results you are talking about. If you don’t, you will make it difficult for the referee to: ? identify your contribution ? decide how useful the contribution is ? make a decision about whether this contribution i作者: urethritis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 17:18
Highlighting Your Findingsdings because you have neither highlighted nor described them clearly enough, then your paper may not be published. Your contribution to the community may thus vanish into oblivion. In the words of English botanist, Sir Francis Darwin: .作者: Pcos971 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 22:26
Hedging and Criticisingne ‘rule’ is that when you present subjective or unproven propositions, you should avoid sounding arrogant or 100% certain of what you state. This approach, known as ‘hedging’, also spread to other scientists in other Anglo societies.作者: 嚙齒動(dòng)物 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 02:23
Titlesct to read. According to one of Britain’s top editors, writing good headlines represents about 50% of the skills vital to article writing. For this reason the gurus of research writing tend to dedicate more pages to discussing the importance of the title than they do to any section in the paper itse作者: Irascible 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 07:12
Abstractssion on whether the paper is relevant to their journal (without having to read the whole paper) and is thus worth submitting to referees who will then judge the paper in its entirety ? a reader to identify quickly what the paper is about, to judge how relevant it is to their interests, and so to dec作者: 小官 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 12:01
Introductionate how the findings of the paper are an advance on current knowledge in the field. A key skill is to be able to say the same things that have been said many times before but in a different, interesting, intriguing way.作者: crease 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 15:22
Review of the Literatureding the sequence of events leading up to the current situation - not too much to make it tedious, nor too little so that the context of your research is not meaningful to them. The background information is useful because it allows you to:作者: 啜泣 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 16:36
Book 20111st editioners from journal editors on reasons why papers written by non-native researchers are rejected due to problems with English usage. It draws on English-related errors from around 5000 papers written by non-native authors, 500 abstracts by PhD students, and over 1000 hours of teaching researchers how t作者: 人類(lèi) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 23:41
es make when reviewing papers for possible publication in in.Publishing your research in an international journal is key to your success in academia. This guide is based on a study of referees‘ reports and letters from journal editors on reasons why papers written by non-native researchers are rejec作者: 興奮過(guò)度 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 03:42
Anastasia Powell,Asher Flynn,Lisa Sugiurathe paper. They may thus feel that they are not in a position to judge the merits of your paper. Just two or three ambiguous sentences are enough for referees to recommend delaying publication until ‘the English has been revised by a native speaking expert’.作者: sparse 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 07:24
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54984-6 judge the paper in its entirety ? a reader to identify quickly what the paper is about, to judge how relevant it is to their interests, and so to decide whether they should buy / read the whole paper or not. This process is sometimes known as ‘screening’ ? information managers (e.g. librarians) to put it in their indexes作者: adhesive 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 11:02
Avoiding Ambiguity and Vaguenessthe paper. They may thus feel that they are not in a position to judge the merits of your paper. Just two or three ambiguous sentences are enough for referees to recommend delaying publication until ‘the English has been revised by a native speaking expert’.作者: cruise 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 16:55 作者: APO 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 17:31
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137514714diagnostic, and therapeutic markers. With the development of drugs that target the specific epigenetic mechanisms involved in the regulation of gene expression, development and utilization of epigenetic tools are an appropriate and effective approach that can be clinically applied to the treatment of various diseases.
