標(biāo)題: Titlebook: English Society in the Later Middle Ages; Class, Status and Ge S. H. Rigby Textbook 1995Latest edition S. H. Rigby 1995 England.ideology.Mi [打印本頁] 作者: ACORN 時間: 2025-3-21 19:02
書目名稱English Society in the Later Middle Ages影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱English Society in the Later Middle Ages影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱English Society in the Later Middle Ages網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱English Society in the Later Middle Ages網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱English Society in the Later Middle Ages被引頻次
書目名稱English Society in the Later Middle Ages被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱English Society in the Later Middle Ages年度引用
書目名稱English Society in the Later Middle Ages年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱English Society in the Later Middle Ages讀者反饋
書目名稱English Society in the Later Middle Ages讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 截斷 時間: 2025-3-21 21:06 作者: 多余 時間: 2025-3-22 03:36
Agrarian class structure and the forces for change I: trade, population and the money supplyy 1500, their demesnes had largely been leased out, villeinage and labour-services were a thing of the past, and the population of the English countryside had won its freedom and was enjoying the benefits of low money-rents and high real wages. How had this transformation in agrarian social relations come about?作者: 放氣 時間: 2025-3-22 04:34
The Multiverse of Office Fictionarked internal inequalities of wealth, power and status, the clergy constituted a status-group whose members were clearly set apart from the laity in terms of their access to wealth, their lifestyle and their status.作者: mutineer 時間: 2025-3-22 09:31 作者: 圣歌 時間: 2025-3-22 13:07 作者: 圣歌 時間: 2025-3-22 19:31
Urban class structure and usurpationary closureanisation in medieval England (section i), establishes the major urban economic classes (section ii), sets out the economic and political privileges enjoyed by the towns (section iii), and discusses the forms of conflict which arose from urban social and political inequalities (section iv).作者: 玷污 時間: 2025-3-23 00:21 作者: 純樸 時間: 2025-3-23 04:21 作者: 動機(jī) 時間: 2025-3-23 08:24
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230510807duction’, which allows a more historically nuanced typology of the specific ways in which people obtain access to the means of life and labour, i.e. of their class structure. It is with the property rights and relations of production of medieval England as a form of social exclusion that Part I of t作者: Palpate 時間: 2025-3-23 12:32 作者: GREG 時間: 2025-3-23 14:43 作者: Anecdote 時間: 2025-3-23 20:28 作者: braggadocio 時間: 2025-3-24 00:43 作者: 拖網(wǎng) 時間: 2025-3-24 02:57 作者: Perennial長期的 時間: 2025-3-24 07:50
https://doi.org/10.1007/b107556an, presented society in just this way, dividing individuals into overlapping categories of men and women, young and old, noble and ignoble, wealthy and poor, clergy and laity, secular clergy and regulars, single, married and widowed, sinners and penitents, and so on.作者: 暫停,間歇 時間: 2025-3-24 12:07
Textbook 1995Latest editionvisions interacted with other forms of social inequality, such as those between orders (nobility and clergy), between men and women, and those arising from membership of a status-group (the Jews). Dr Rigby‘s discussion of medieval English society is located within the context of recent historical an作者: ANA 時間: 2025-3-24 15:43 作者: Congeal 時間: 2025-3-24 21:40 作者: altruism 時間: 2025-3-25 00:45 作者: 逃避系列單詞 時間: 2025-3-25 05:50 作者: NATAL 時間: 2025-3-25 07:55
Order as social closure I: the nobilitye production of goods or with any other economic activity’, although the ownership of wealth was of ‘much importance’ for the internal hierarchy of each order. Unlike modern society, where everyone enjoys a legal equality and where classes are relatively open and fluid, a society of orders presuppos作者: Magisterial 時間: 2025-3-25 14:31 作者: Aspirin 時間: 2025-3-25 19:26 作者: Humble 時間: 2025-3-25 20:53 作者: 女歌星 時間: 2025-3-26 04:04
Conclusionan, presented society in just this way, dividing individuals into overlapping categories of men and women, young and old, noble and ignoble, wealthy and poor, clergy and laity, secular clergy and regulars, single, married and widowed, sinners and penitents, and so on.作者: 上下倒置 時間: 2025-3-26 06:17 作者: Graphite 時間: 2025-3-26 09:43
Agrarian class structure: exclusion and dual closuresocial exclusion in the sense that, unlike the ownership of . (such as a toothbrush), the ownership of . (such as a factory) involves ‘the right to . to the means of life and labour’. Murphy has insisted on the need to distinguish . property from the forms of property to be found in state-socialist 作者: Champion 時間: 2025-3-26 12:59 作者: 安撫 時間: 2025-3-26 19:39
Agrarian class structure and the forces for change II: usurpationary closuretential to provoke a response in the form of the usurpationary struggles of those who are excluded. Unlike the social consensus emphasised by functionalist stratification theory (see above, p. 7), closure theorists thus tend to see the relationship between classes ‘a(chǎn)s one of permanent tension and mu作者: 浪蕩子 時間: 2025-3-26 21:08 作者: 滲透 時間: 2025-3-27 03:58 作者: ATP861 時間: 2025-3-27 07:45
Order as social closure II: the clergyand (chapter 5), this does . mean that we need abandon the concept of stratification by social order and simply analyse medieval society in terms of its class relations and property rights. On the contrary, the view of medieval England as a society of orders does serve an extremely useful purpose in作者: 疼死我了 時間: 2025-3-27 10:02
Gender as social closure: women, female or hermaphrodite’, although even hermaphrodites were said to be closer to either the male or to the female pole, ‘a(chǎn)ccording to the predominance of their sexual organs’. The inequality of men and women was thus seen as a fundamental aspect of contemporary social structure: ‘women differ from作者: albuminuria 時間: 2025-3-27 15:20
Status-group as social closure: the Jewsy which specific social groups gain a privileged position for themselves at the expense of other groups can be grounded in ‘virtually any attribute — race, language, social origin, religion’. Closure in such cases is dependent upon inclusion within, or exclusion from, a status-group whose members sh作者: 狗舍 時間: 2025-3-27 17:54
Social ideology: closure legitimated?d status-group. But how were such forms of exclusion maintained and reproduced? One answer, in the case of gender in particular, is that contemporary forms of exclusion themselves divided those who were excluded, preventing the emergence of any sense of shared identity or common interest on the part作者: poliosis 時間: 2025-3-28 00:16
Conclusionmembership of classes, orders, status-groups and genders. Each type of exclusion could be enforced by means of one or more of the three major dimensions of social power: economic, coercive and ideological. Since individuals were members of multiple systacts and because the different forms of power i作者: EPT 時間: 2025-3-28 04:15 作者: 放大 時間: 2025-3-28 07:15 作者: 平 時間: 2025-3-28 11:26
The Multiple Ligament Injured Kneethe forms and extent of such social closure were by no means fixed. On the contrary, they underwent a number of shifts during the later middle ages. When our period begins, in the early thirteenth century, England’s landlords were on the offensive, working their demesnes with labour-services, tighte作者: 半身雕像 時間: 2025-3-28 17:13
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-49289-6tential to provoke a response in the form of the usurpationary struggles of those who are excluded. Unlike the social consensus emphasised by functionalist stratification theory (see above, p. 7), closure theorists thus tend to see the relationship between classes ‘a(chǎn)s one of permanent tension and mu作者: Euthyroid 時間: 2025-3-28 21:37 作者: fodlder 時間: 2025-3-28 22:56
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56724-6ogists and historians, to apply this kind of class-based analysis to societies such as medieval England involves an anachronistic imposition of our own preconceptions about society onto people who saw social relations in ways which differed markedly from those which seem obvious to us. For such writ作者: 軍械庫 時間: 2025-3-29 03:19
The Multiverse of Office Fictionand (chapter 5), this does . mean that we need abandon the concept of stratification by social order and simply analyse medieval society in terms of its class relations and property rights. On the contrary, the view of medieval England as a society of orders does serve an extremely useful purpose in作者: Obscure 時間: 2025-3-29 09:42 作者: Intervention 時間: 2025-3-29 12:10
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87836-8y which specific social groups gain a privileged position for themselves at the expense of other groups can be grounded in ‘virtually any attribute — race, language, social origin, religion’. Closure in such cases is dependent upon inclusion within, or exclusion from, a status-group whose members sh作者: FELON 時間: 2025-3-29 17:17
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07695-6d status-group. But how were such forms of exclusion maintained and reproduced? One answer, in the case of gender in particular, is that contemporary forms of exclusion themselves divided those who were excluded, preventing the emergence of any sense of shared identity or common interest on the part作者: 易怒 時間: 2025-3-29 22:13
