標題: Titlebook: Energy Democracy; Germany’s Energiewen Craig Morris,Arne Jungjohann Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Energiew [打印本頁] 作者: 小缺點 時間: 2025-3-21 18:18
書目名稱Energy Democracy影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Energy Democracy影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Energy Democracy網(wǎng)絡公開度
書目名稱Energy Democracy網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名
書目名稱Energy Democracy被引頻次
書目名稱Energy Democracy被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Energy Democracy年度引用
書目名稱Energy Democracy年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Energy Democracy讀者反饋
書目名稱Energy Democracy讀者反饋學科排名
作者: ACME 時間: 2025-3-21 20:58 作者: legislate 時間: 2025-3-22 03:50
Fledgling Wind Power: The Folly of Innovation Without Deployment,money at researchers—along with unrealistic expectations. What’s worse, corporate management at the big firms mainly wanted the R&D funding so they could prove that wind power didn’t work. Innovation did not come from early R&D.作者: 痛恨 時間: 2025-3-22 08:13
German Wind Pioneers Fighting Power Monopolies in the 1980s, startups with no R&D funding gradually, but quickly scaled up from small models that worked well. Entrepreneurial risk kept them focused on market success. Meanwhile, conventional utilities fought to keep these startup turbines off their grids.作者: Banister 時間: 2025-3-22 09:24
,The Power Rebels of Sch?nau,ility and government treated them with disrespect. But the campaigners weren’t just idealists; at crucial times, they repeatedly turned out to have someone in their ranks who knew exactly what to do. Waiting for liberalization was not an option, so they came up with a winning slogan to take back the作者: 過份好問 時間: 2025-3-22 13:12 作者: 過份好問 時間: 2025-3-22 19:13 作者: jocular 時間: 2025-3-22 21:52 作者: Nonporous 時間: 2025-3-23 03:55
,Healthy Democracy: Key to the Energiewende’s Success,s a set of robust, long-term policies for a transition to renewables? Might its political system explain this success? Keeping money out of politics, preventing legislative gridlock through a cooperative federalism, and diverse media play an important role in that respect. But the struggle to keep t作者: creatine-kinase 時間: 2025-3-23 09:16
,Utilities Bet on Gas and Coal and Renewables Boom (2005–2011),tility experts were still in denial about the threat that renewables posed to their business models. So corporative board rooms voted for a boom in coal plant construction—even as solar, wind, and biomass were exploding.作者: conjunctiva 時間: 2025-3-23 11:00
From Meitner to Merkel: A History of German Nuclear Power,ization. But by the 1970s, banks had opted out, and an eroding public faith in the nuclear complex began. Left behind was the hollow shell of an envisioned world with endless energy—and a powerful industrial sector hanging on for dear life. After years of public debate and massive protests, that she作者: 使迷醉 時間: 2025-3-23 15:08 作者: 斜谷 時間: 2025-3-23 19:31 作者: Conscientious 時間: 2025-3-23 23:24 作者: 緯度 時間: 2025-3-24 02:48 作者: disciplined 時間: 2025-3-24 06:33 作者: Individual 時間: 2025-3-24 12:47 作者: debris 時間: 2025-3-24 16:13
Will the Energiewende Succeed?,sensus that it will work and even be more affordable than a non-Energiewende. So the question for Germany is less about . it will switch to renewables, but .: driven by a few large corporations, or by communities and citizens?作者: 激怒某人 時間: 2025-3-24 20:52
Book 2016s to do so. It traces the origins of the Energiewende movement in Germany from the Power Rebels of Sch?nau to German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s shutdown of eight nuclear power plants following the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident. The authors explore how, by taking ownership of energy efficiency at a作者: maintenance 時間: 2025-3-24 23:36 作者: MURKY 時間: 2025-3-25 04:32 作者: regale 時間: 2025-3-25 08:19
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86129-3answer, one thing is clear: it didn’t start with Merkel’s post-Fukushima phaseout of 2011. The decision did, however, draw international attention for three reasons: the timing, the message, and the messenger. So what lessons can we draw from the Energiewende?作者: 出生 時間: 2025-3-25 12:18
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-240-5beralization of power markets across the EU distracted them. At a time when solar startups got going, they doubted renewable energy would make much difference—a mistake no utility anywhere is likely to repeat today.作者: 胰臟 時間: 2025-3-25 16:14
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63610-4ioned world with endless energy—and a powerful industrial sector hanging on for dear life. After years of public debate and massive protests, that shell collapsed in Germany in March 2011 when it lost its last influential proponents. How different the story is in France—where critics had been silenced with brute force and pink slips.作者: 晚間 時間: 2025-3-25 22:51 作者: 壁畫 時間: 2025-3-26 04:11
Craig Morris,Arne JungjohannFocuses on Germany as a role-model for other countries to follow.Feeds into the broader discussion surrounding energy transition and the move from coal and nuclear to renewables.Tackles the debate in 作者: 起草 時間: 2025-3-26 08:23
http://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/310223.jpg作者: Arthritis 時間: 2025-3-26 09:13
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31891-2Energiewende; grassroots; climate change; Growian; wind power; green capitalism; Energy policy; renewables; 作者: 提升 時間: 2025-3-26 16:02
978-3-319-81145-1The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016作者: NOMAD 時間: 2025-3-26 19:27
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86129-3ith the first Energiewende book, or in some other year—maybe in 1974 with the protests against industrialization in a farming community? Whatever the answer, one thing is clear: it didn’t start with Merkel’s post-Fukushima phaseout of 2011. The decision did, however, draw international attention for作者: Synchronism 時間: 2025-3-26 21:41
Software Selection for Surveyorszens began protesting against the industrialization of their quiet rural farming communities—and against an authoritarian government and the arrogant technocrats who were trying to push through a large nuclear plant. The Energiewende thus began with a call for energy democracy.作者: vanquish 時間: 2025-3-27 03:56
Jutta Eckstein,Claudia de O. Melomoney at researchers—along with unrealistic expectations. What’s worse, corporate management at the big firms mainly wanted the R&D funding so they could prove that wind power didn’t work. Innovation did not come from early R&D.作者: GLIDE 時間: 2025-3-27 07:50
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22057-9 startups with no R&D funding gradually, but quickly scaled up from small models that worked well. Entrepreneurial risk kept them focused on market success. Meanwhile, conventional utilities fought to keep these startup turbines off their grids.作者: 支架 時間: 2025-3-27 09:57 作者: Legion 時間: 2025-3-27 16:52 作者: Factual 時間: 2025-3-27 19:56 作者: cogitate 時間: 2025-3-28 00:28 作者: 忘恩負義的人 時間: 2025-3-28 03:42
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26488-8s a set of robust, long-term policies for a transition to renewables? Might its political system explain this success? Keeping money out of politics, preventing legislative gridlock through a cooperative federalism, and diverse media play an important role in that respect. But the struggle to keep t作者: 逢迎白雪 時間: 2025-3-28 06:24 作者: 推延 時間: 2025-3-28 12:18
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63610-4ization. But by the 1970s, banks had opted out, and an eroding public faith in the nuclear complex began. Left behind was the hollow shell of an envisioned world with endless energy—and a powerful industrial sector hanging on for dear life. After years of public debate and massive protests, that she作者: 欺騙世家 時間: 2025-3-28 14:49
menschen denken maschinen denken lassen fear of power shortages when Germany actually has become Europe’s biggest electricity exporter. And the flip side of utilities finally taking renewables seriously turns out, unsurprisingly, to be real pushback. Is the grassroots movement that powered the Energiewende over at the very moment it beco作者: nocturia 時間: 2025-3-28 21:55 作者: spinal-stenosis 時間: 2025-3-29 01:04
Software, Animation and the Moving Imagessions about the energy transition focus too narrowly on affordability and carbon emissions. These are, no doubt, important criteria to consider. But so are civil rights in the energy sector. You have a right to make your own energy. And people are citizens first and consumers second.作者: Vulvodynia 時間: 2025-3-29 06:01
Software Selection for Surveyorszens began protesting against the industrialization of their quiet rural farming communities—and against an authoritarian government and the arrogant technocrats who were trying to push through a large nuclear plant. The Energiewende thus began with a call for energy democracy.作者: Visual-Acuity 時間: 2025-3-29 09:14 作者: 公式 時間: 2025-3-29 11:52
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22057-9 startups with no R&D funding gradually, but quickly scaled up from small models that worked well. Entrepreneurial risk kept them focused on market success. Meanwhile, conventional utilities fought to keep these startup turbines off their grids.作者: 字謎游戲 時間: 2025-3-29 16:30 作者: A精確的 時間: 2025-3-29 23:30
https://doi.org/10.1007/979-8-8688-0572-1ves. How can environmental campaigners elsewhere get such support across party lines? Maybe by understanding what . is and how it drives so many citizen projects in Germany: people want to save their communities first before they save the planet.作者: 進步 時間: 2025-3-30 03:03
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-46505-8hed the top echelons of policymaking. Red-Green passed the eco-tax, the Renewable Energy Act, and the original nuclear phaseout within a couple of years. The result obviously hurt incumbent utilities, so they should have fought back harder—but they still doubted renewables would matter much. And anyway, they had bigger fish to fry.作者: 節(jié)省 時間: 2025-3-30 06:18
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26488-8s a set of robust, long-term policies for a transition to renewables? Might its political system explain this success? Keeping money out of politics, preventing legislative gridlock through a cooperative federalism, and diverse media play an important role in that respect. But the struggle to keep the debate civil is continuous.作者: inventory 時間: 2025-3-30 08:22
Hazeline U. Asuncion,Richard N. Taylortility experts were still in denial about the threat that renewables posed to their business models. So corporative board rooms voted for a boom in coal plant construction—even as solar, wind, and biomass were exploding.作者: 萬花筒 時間: 2025-3-30 13:47
menschen denken maschinen denken lassen fear of power shortages when Germany actually has become Europe’s biggest electricity exporter. And the flip side of utilities finally taking renewables seriously turns out, unsurprisingly, to be real pushback. Is the grassroots movement that powered the Energiewende over at the very moment it becomes uncontested governmental policy?作者: Injunction 時間: 2025-3-30 19:39
Software, Animation and the Moving Imagessions about the energy transition focus too narrowly on affordability and carbon emissions. These are, no doubt, important criteria to consider. But so are civil rights in the energy sector. You have a right to make your own energy. And people are citizens first and consumers second.作者: 冷淡周邊 時間: 2025-3-30 23:21
The Birth of a Movement: 1970s Protests for Democracy in Wyhl,zens began protesting against the industrialization of their quiet rural farming communities—and against an authoritarian government and the arrogant technocrats who were trying to push through a large nuclear plant. The Energiewende thus began with a call for energy democracy.作者: 代理人 時間: 2025-3-31 04:11
Fledgling Wind Power: The Folly of Innovation Without Deployment,money at researchers—along with unrealistic expectations. What’s worse, corporate management at the big firms mainly wanted the R&D funding so they could prove that wind power didn’t work. Innovation did not come from early R&D.
