標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Emerson as Philosopher; Postmodernism and Be Richard Gilmore Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lic [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: Strategy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 19:48
書(shū)目名稱Emerson as Philosopher影響因子(影響力)
書(shū)目名稱Emerson as Philosopher影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Emerson as Philosopher網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度
書(shū)目名稱Emerson as Philosopher網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Emerson as Philosopher被引頻次
書(shū)目名稱Emerson as Philosopher被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Emerson as Philosopher年度引用
書(shū)目名稱Emerson as Philosopher年度引用學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Emerson as Philosopher讀者反饋
書(shū)目名稱Emerson as Philosopher讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: Middle-Ear 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:12 作者: OGLE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:55 作者: Diuretic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:58
Lateral and Medial Epicondylitis, so that the enunciation recapitulates the enunciated. Thinking is essentially dialectical and Emerson’s thinking is, as it were, endlessly dialectical. I address Joseph Urbas’ critique of Stanley Cavell’s interpretation of Emerson. Urbas accuses Cavell of not getting Emerson right. Not only does Ur作者: Anticlimax 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 09:34
B. Deixonne,F.-M. Lopez,A. Pissas,B. Sigelhat is fine, but reading Emerson as a philosopher reads him as addressing specific philosophical problems and texts that produces a different version of Emerson from the English department version. I also do an extended analysis of Emerson’s experience, recorded in his diary, of his experience in Le作者: 抗體 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:53
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-71596-9is explanation I consider the role of humor in Emerson’s essays. I consider Emerson’s philosophy as in opposition to what Beauvoir calls “seriousness.” I argue that Emerson is really opposing, as Beauvoir is also, oppression, specifically, the oppression of seriousness. I consider some ambiguities a作者: 抗體 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:46
Mihir M. Desai MD,Inderbir S. Gill MD, MChn recorded reflecting on the Civil War, right after the Civil War. Not only are his reflections on the Civil War very interesting, but the fact that he gives a series of lectures at just this time entitled “Philosophy of the People” in which he seems to have made no mention of the Civil War or of th作者: Dislocation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 22:06
Humerusschaft von antero-lateral?ek, Cornell West, Jean-Fran?ois Lyotard, and Gilles Deleuze to characterize the idea of postmodernism that I want to use in talking about Emerson. The primary idea is Lyotard’s definition of the postmodern as “an incredulity toward metanarratives.” What I understand Lyotard to be describing as post作者: 提名的名單 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 05:01
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-86013-2ing,” not in any way referring to Emerson. I argue, in this chapter, that what Emerson is referring to as a crack and what ?i?ek is referring to as a crack is the same thing. I say something about what Emerson and ?i?ek have to say about this crack, and then I adduce Nobel Prize winning scientist Fr作者: 攤位 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 06:59 作者: Condyle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 10:57
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6640-7aray begins her book by saying, “Sexual difference is one of the major philosophical issues, if not the issue, of our age.” Irigaray and Emerson will make problematic the simple gender binary that is normative in modernism and replace it with a complicated ambiguous movement between genders, between作者: 抱狗不敢前 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 14:34 作者: MAOIS 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:33
Meaning: Operativity and Typicality,hinking about thinking.” I am thinking about Heidegger and Emerson thinking about thinking. Interestingly, Heidegger never says what thinking is, although he gives a pretty good example of it in his book of lectures . can also be translated as . What is it that calls to us to think?.Emerson says, “m作者: Debrief 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:55 作者: 公社 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 05:21 作者: 天然熱噴泉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:45
B. Deixonne,F.-M. Lopez,A. Pissas,B. Sigel, the same recurring patterns. What I understand Emerson to have concluded from that experience is that Nature thinks. Nature is an essayist, an experimenter, and that he, to be in alignment with Nature, ought also to do what Nature does, which is to think in essays.作者: Insulin 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:20
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-90664-9ss the evolutionary, by which I mean, the naturalized, origins of this dialectic in connection with Emerson and Darwinian evolution, and then pick up the metaphor of the labyrinth from Paz. I will consider the contemporary labyrinth in which we are entrapped, and use Emerson and Paz to show us the way out.作者: 神刊 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 15:15 作者: colloquial 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 19:50
Emerson and Paz: Evolutionary Existentialismss the evolutionary, by which I mean, the naturalized, origins of this dialectic in connection with Emerson and Darwinian evolution, and then pick up the metaphor of the labyrinth from Paz. I will consider the contemporary labyrinth in which we are entrapped, and use Emerson and Paz to show us the way out.作者: 同時(shí)發(fā)生 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 02:55 作者: 粗俗人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 03:40 作者: Ankylo- 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 09:37 作者: bonnet 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:04
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-86013-2tential ideas from the future can influence the production of ideas in the present, in much the same way as an environmental niche calls forth the physical adaptation..I then explore other manifestations of this idea in relation to Borges, the Kafkaesque, and Resistentialism.作者: 墊子 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 19:44 作者: 爆米花 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:47 作者: 溺愛(ài) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 00:31
Emerson and Heidegger: Thinking as Thankingecause this is different from that. This is a process of converting the unknown into the known, the unfamiliar into the familiar. We make the unfamiliar familiar by analogy. That, I argue, is what thinking is for Emerson, but also for Heidegger, and that for that experience, Emerson and Heidegger are thankful.作者: Granular 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 05:56 作者: TRACE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:16
Mihir M. Desai MD,Inderbir S. Gill MD, MChe thoughts that he records in his journal at this time, but gives them, his audience something else is telling. What he gives them is what, in fact, they really need, to be provoked into thought in order to begin to see a way out of the trauma of the Civil War.作者: 小歌劇 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 12:41
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6640-7 gender poles, a dialectic of gender. What Irigaray and Emerson are offering is a postmodern solution to the problem of sexual difference. The movement between gender poles sets up a continuum that engages the sorites paradox with a penumbral mid-area of maximum vagueness and ambiguity.作者: monochromatic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 17:24
Book 2023 it in conversation with key 20th and 21st century thinkers such as Beauvoir, Coates, Derrida, Paz, Rorty, and Zizek.?.Postmodern Emerson.?shows how Emersonian skepticism to metanarratives such as sexism, racism, Beauvoiran "serious values," and others, can help us face some of society‘s gravest con作者: Allodynia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 21:52 作者: COUCH 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 04:54
Book 2023.?This is itself a postmodern gesture, breaking rules of genre and topic to make unlikely but interesting connections.?Above all, this book proves that?in this time of social division and widespread despair, Emerson canhelp.??作者: Jingoism 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 08:45 作者: MAZE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 10:17
Humerusschaft von antero-lateraleeing that the problem is oppression, that Emerson sees the problem as a problem of metanarratives, although he does not use that term, but that Emerson provides us with what postmodernism does not provide us, a way of constructing an identity without the metanarratives. We can construct an identity作者: 笨拙的我 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 14:01
Operatives Produktionsmanagementtacking the “onto-theology” that, according to Derrida, pervades the history of Western philosophy, Western metaphysics. Within each Emersonian circle there is a trace, a track that functions like a call, like an environmental niche, calling for the redrawing of a new circle. We experience it as a t作者: Hyperplasia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 20:59 作者: 按時(shí)間順序 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 00:10
ubjects, and Emerson with what would seem to be his opposite.?This is itself a postmodern gesture, breaking rules of genre and topic to make unlikely but interesting connections.?Above all, this book proves that?in this time of social division and widespread despair, Emerson canhelp.??978-3-031-32548-9978-3-031-32546-5作者: 負(fù)擔(dān) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:14
Introduction: Philosophy as Thinking,as completely misses what Cavell is doing, and, furthermore, since I believe that Cavell is doing what Emerson said a scholar is supposed to do in “The American Scholar,” Urbas does not really get what Emerson is doing either.作者: 騎師 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 09:33
Postmodern Emersoneeing that the problem is oppression, that Emerson sees the problem as a problem of metanarratives, although he does not use that term, but that Emerson provides us with what postmodernism does not provide us, a way of constructing an identity without the metanarratives. We can construct an identity作者: Torrid 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 12:24
Emerson and Derrida: On the Track of the Circle Tracetacking the “onto-theology” that, according to Derrida, pervades the history of Western philosophy, Western metaphysics. Within each Emersonian circle there is a trace, a track that functions like a call, like an environmental niche, calling for the redrawing of a new circle. We experience it as a t作者: 漸變 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 14:54 作者: Myofibrils 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 21:06 作者: ACTIN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 02:08
Emerson as Philosopherhat is fine, but reading Emerson as a philosopher reads him as addressing specific philosophical problems and texts that produces a different version of Emerson from the English department version. I also do an extended analysis of Emerson’s experience, recorded in his diary, of his experience in Le作者: 透明 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 07:08
Emerson on Thinking via Peirce and Beauvoiris explanation I consider the role of humor in Emerson’s essays. I consider Emerson’s philosophy as in opposition to what Beauvoir calls “seriousness.” I argue that Emerson is really opposing, as Beauvoir is also, oppression, specifically, the oppression of seriousness. I consider some ambiguities a
