作者: 獎(jiǎng)牌 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 21:33
Further Discussion of Emergent Evolution reducing all of science to physics, a point which the logical positivists themselves came to admit.t Since the mid-1950s, the concept of emergentism has been rehabilitated, to the point that it has once more taken its place as a legitimate basis for philosophy of science and metaphysical systems based on science.作者: 自制 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:00
Book 1992 is a universal process of change, one which is productive of qualitative novelties; secondly, that qualitative novelty is the emergence in a system of a property not possessed by any of its parts; and thirdly, that reality can be analyzed into levels, each consisting of systems characterized by sig作者: anniversary 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:23 作者: 恭維 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 08:45
Other Systems of Emergent Evolutionons had converged on Lloyd Morgan, so the interpretation of his work diverged into a multiplicity of applications and developments. Emergent evolution became a philosophical trend, in the sense that it had a continuous series of defenders, commentators and critics.作者: 濃縮 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:42
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6646-7ng the nature of mind, and those concerning the evolution of society. While Lloyd Morgan made a considerable contribution to the philosophical analysis of novelty in evolution, his work was not without serious problems which resulted from his combination of emergentist concepts with dual aspect notions related to neutral monism.作者: 濃縮 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:36 作者: oracle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 21:38
Monitoring and Mitigation of Volcano Hazardsed and rejected their theses, transformed the retained theses and then integrated them into a new theory which included an innovative element — the placing of emergence at the heart of a monistic philosophy of evolution. This was the project that Lloyd Morgan accomplished in the period from 1912 to 1915.作者: FAZE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 01:39 作者: 遵循的規(guī)范 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 07:55
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7238-6ted or universal scope of the evolutionary process. This established the intellectual context for the work of Lloyd Morgan, who attempted to account for qualitative novelty within a continuous, natural, and universal evolutionary process. The result was the theory of emergent evolution.作者: Antagonism 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:43
Lloyd Morgan’s Creative Synthesised and rejected their theses, transformed the retained theses and then integrated them into a new theory which included an innovative element — the placing of emergence at the heart of a monistic philosophy of evolution. This was the project that Lloyd Morgan accomplished in the period from 1912 to 1915.作者: cylinder 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 15:16
Systems Related to Emergent Evolutionn” and J. E. Boodin’s “cosmic evolution” — and two systems of the 1940s — the ontologies of Nicolai Hartmann and James Feibleman. Common to all these philosophies were attempts to analyze emergence in terms of more basic concepts, combined with an acceptance of the emergentist concept of irreducible levels of reality..作者: diskitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 18:04 作者: 表主動(dòng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 23:19 作者: 軟膏 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 03:10
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38969-7 Stephen Jay Gould has called the “fact of evolution,” has obscured his subtle differences with Darwin as concerned the mechanism of evolution, and his independent approach to the philosophical framework for evolutionary theory.作者: 注意 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 06:58 作者: 懶洋洋 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 10:49 作者: tackle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 15:19
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8557-5who was instrumental in popularizing the term “Darwinism,” but the exposition he advanced was based on his own single-factor reading of Darwin’s scientific theory, and his dualistic position on the philosophical framework for evolutionary theory.作者: exclusice 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 19:55
Monitoring Tissue Perfusion in Shockexplain species origination, and developed the theory of physiological selection to supplement Darwin’s theory. Particularly in his philosophical speculations concerning monism, Romanes was the link between the 19th century debate over the framework for evolutionary theory and Lloyd Morgan.作者: enumaerate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:20 作者: abject 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 04:57
Philosophy of Evolutionverrated as a philosopher during the latter part of the 19th century, Spencer’s reputation has declined precipitously with the 20th, and is arguably as underestimated today as it was over-estimated in his own time.作者: 修飾 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 08:04
Evolution and the Supernaturalwho was instrumental in popularizing the term “Darwinism,” but the exposition he advanced was based on his own single-factor reading of Darwin’s scientific theory, and his dualistic position on the philosophical framework for evolutionary theory.作者: 圍巾 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:43 作者: 維持 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 17:26 作者: 無(wú)能力之人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:13
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8042-7Inuit; argue; bibliography; comparative; continuity; evolution; mind; monism; organ; philosophy; science; writi作者: 作嘔 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 00:35 作者: Curmudgeon 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:23
Epistemehttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/308158.jpg作者: 可卡 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:28 作者: 小溪 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 15:52 作者: GLOSS 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50292-7 the epic multi-volume treatises on philosophy in the Victorian period — the epic if length is taken into account — he was not trained as a philosopher either.. He was in fact an engineer by formation and a publicist by trade, living from the proceeds of his writings. He became one of the most impor作者: NEEDY 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:00
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38969-7to nine volumes and his scientific writings another four. His role as “Darwin’s bulldog,” a sobriquet earned because of his implacable defense of what Stephen Jay Gould has called the “fact of evolution,” has obscured his subtle differences with Darwin as concerned the mechanism of evolution, and hi作者: 拱形面包 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 04:37 作者: deriver 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:39 作者: Benign 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 12:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6203-7tral figure in its development.. Lloyd Morgan’s philosophical work can be divided into three periods. The first was that of his pre-emergentist writings from 1882 to 1912, during which time Darwin, Huxley, Spencer, Wallace, and Romanes were all important influences. The second period was that of the作者: 是剝皮 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29442-1ll domains of nature, while the second stated that at specific points of development, new levels of organization appeared, featuring novel qualities. Most theoreticians of the Darwinian tradition had opted for a mode of evolution characterized by quantitative or at best semi-qualitative change. Qual作者: 公豬 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 21:35
Monitoring and Mitigation of Volcano Hazardsry theories of Darwin, Spencer, Huxley, Wallace, and Romanes, Bergson’s notion of creative evolution productive of qualitative novelty, the theories of heteropathic laws due to Mill, and emergent properties as formulated by Lewes, Spaulding’s concept of novelty in the whole-part relationship, and th作者: FOVEA 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:26 作者: 連詞 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:31 作者: Crumple 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 10:19
Monitoring in An?sthesie und Intensivmedizinhe “epitomization” of later structures by earlier ones, Oliver Reiser considered emergence to result from stochastic processes, W. P. Montague argued for emergence as the product of the interaction of two factors at each level, and George Herbert Mead saw emergence as the co-presence of a thing in d作者: 樂(lè)意 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 11:03
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12541-0 a philosophical trend it was at its height during the period of the mid-1920s. A session devoted to it at the VIth World Congress of Philosophy, as well as a colloquium held at the Aristotelian Society were indicative of the interest for the new concept.. As the trend of emergent evolution develope作者: 搬運(yùn)工 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 14:51 作者: lethal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 22:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7238-6eory of emergent evolution, and his system served as the seed or core for the development of a philosophical trend. The debate among Darwin, Romanes, Wallace, Huxley, and Spencer concerned the continuous or discontinuous character of evolutionary change, the role of quantity and quality in that proc作者: 馬具 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 02:50 作者: nauseate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 06:23 作者: 信條 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 09:17
Book 1992problems which form what I call the "philosophical framework for evolutionary theory." This considers the status of continuity and discontinuity in evolution, the role of qualitative and quantitative factors in change, the relation between the organic and the inorganic, the relation between the natu作者: NOMAD 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 15:13
e general problems which form what I call the "philosophical framework for evolutionary theory." This considers the status of continuity and discontinuity in evolution, the role of qualitative and quantitative factors in change, the relation between the organic and the inorganic, the relation between the natu978-90-481-4141-8978-94-015-8042-7作者: labile 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 16:45 作者: 絕緣 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 22:57 作者: Confirm 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 00:35 作者: d-limonene 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 05:36 作者: Panther 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 10:16 作者: Aids209 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 15:27
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29442-1he recognition of qualitative novelty in the evolutionary process, essential to the development of emergent evolution, was regarded with suspicion: either it was seen as a concession to saltationism, or as a concession to supernaturalism, both of which were unacceptable from a strict Darwinian point作者: 指派 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 17:24
Introduction is a universal process of change, one which is productive of qualitative novelties; secondly, that qualitative novelty is the emergence in a system of a property not possessed by any of its parts; and thirdly, that reality can be analyzed into levels, each consisting of systems characterized by sig作者: 無(wú)表情 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 21:08
The Framework for Evolutionary Theory the origin and transformation of species, or are other factors required as well? What is the genetic basis for evolution? What is the rate of species formation — does evolution proceed gradually or does it admit of rapid speciation as well? These and related scientific questions do not exhaust the 作者: 周年紀(jì)念日 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 02:59 作者: 返老還童 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 08:12 作者: GEON 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 11:04
Evolution and the Supernaturalead to the Linnean Society jointly with that of Darwin in 1858. Nonetheless, Wallace had two significant differences with Darwin on the subject of evolution. At the scientific level, Wallace restricted Darwin’s multi-factor theory of evolution to a single factor, with natural selection both necessar作者: theta-waves 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 13:37
