標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Education and Thinking in Continental Philosophy; Thinking against the Itay Snir Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Education fo [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: incoherent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 16:44
書目名稱Education and Thinking in Continental Philosophy影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Education and Thinking in Continental Philosophy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Education and Thinking in Continental Philosophy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Education and Thinking in Continental Philosophy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Education and Thinking in Continental Philosophy被引頻次
書目名稱Education and Thinking in Continental Philosophy被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Education and Thinking in Continental Philosophy年度引用
書目名稱Education and Thinking in Continental Philosophy年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Education and Thinking in Continental Philosophy讀者反饋
書目名稱Education and Thinking in Continental Philosophy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: deactivate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 22:19 作者: 行為 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:59
Hannah Arendt: Thinking as Withdrawal and Regeneration of the World,hinking in Arendt’s approach is indeed possible and of great importance, but may also be hazardous to the thinker as well as her political community. Confronting this danger does not require less thinking (or education encouraging it), but rather engaging in two different but complementary kinds of 作者: Ibd810 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 08:03
Gilles Deleuze: Thinking as Making Sense Against Common Sense,independently of the thinker’s knowledge and place in the sociopolitical order. I start with an analysis of the Deleuzian concepts of common sense and good sense, which form the basis of what he calls “the dogmatic image of thought”. I then discuss his concept of sense, and demonstrate that Deleuzia作者: 好開玩笑 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 11:23
Jacques Derrida: Thinking Madness in Education,ory of Madness”, where Derrida argues against Foucault’s reading of Descartes’ reference to madness in the first chapter of his .. While Foucault claims that Descartes constitutes a dichotomous opposition between thought and madness, Derrida shows that madness finds its way into the Cartesian . and 作者: Torrid 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 14:45
,Jacques Rancière: Thinking, Equality of Intelligence, and Political Subjectivity, between education and politics in his thought. I show that thinking opens the dimensions of plurality and singularity in Rancière’s politics, thereby playing a crucial role in the formation of political subjects. By thinking about thinking in Rancière, I demonstrate that universal teaching?– unders作者: Torrid 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 20:40
Conclusion,them to appear more clearly. To that end, I examine the views of Adorno, Arendt, Deleuze, Derrida, and Rancière along the three main axes around which the book revolves: the conception of thinking, the relations between thinking and politics, and the possibility of education for thinking. The first 作者: arthroscopy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 23:57 作者: 小樣他閑聊 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:57 作者: 是限制 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 06:51
ome philosophers, but also indicates the lack of common ground on which to build a comprehensive theory of education for thinking based on all. Finally, I use the meta-analysis to draw some general conclusions and attempt to think about the relations between the continental conceptions of thinking and concrete educational practice.作者: anthesis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:01
Introduction,ontinental philosophy, to examine how three of its founding fathers?– Marx (who is examined also through the psychological work of Lev Vygotsky), Nietzsche and Heidegger?– have challenged the Cartesian conception of thinking. Finally, I present the aims of the book and outline its chapters.作者: 匍匐 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 16:01 作者: 軍械庫(kù) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 20:07
Conclusion,ome philosophers, but also indicates the lack of common ground on which to build a comprehensive theory of education for thinking based on all. Finally, I use the meta-analysis to draw some general conclusions and attempt to think about the relations between the continental conceptions of thinking and concrete educational practice.作者: 聾子 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:33 作者: instill 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 04:59
Book 2020cière – in order to “think about thinking” and offer new and surprising answers to the question: How can we educate students to think creatively and critically? Despite their differences, all of these philosophers challenge the modern understanding of thinking, and offer original, radical perspectiv作者: 點(diǎn)燃 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:47
2214-9759 againstthe current, this book makes a significant contribution to educational theory and political philosophy, one that is particularly relevant in today’s anti-intellectual climate..978-3-030-56528-2978-3-030-56526-8Series ISSN 2214-9759 Series E-ISSN 2214-9767 作者: 顛簸地移動(dòng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:56 作者: 吞噬 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 16:30 作者: infantile 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 19:24
Jacques Derrida: Thinking Madness in Education,ct is in fact a writing subject who does not fully master the meanings of her thoughts. Finally, I turn to Derrida’s writings on education: I discuss his call to make room in schools for thinking against the predominant “philosophy of the state”, and analyze his claim that the university should “bli作者: CREEK 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 02:39 作者: licence 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 05:30
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-8415-0laws applying to it, for the former thinking requires experiencing the object as “non-identical”, transcending all general categories. Finally, I show that the proper form of genuine thinking is not public discussion but rather the writing of essays. I conclude by terming this type of education that作者: 山頂可休息 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:54
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-29544-2king. Finally, I turn to his discussion of Marcel Proust’s . to elaborate on how thinking is generated by involuntary encounters with signs and analyze the Proustian search as another example of education for thinking, in which the narrator both learns and makes others think.作者: 免除責(zé)任 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:44
Bryan D. Springer,Brian M. Curtinct is in fact a writing subject who does not fully master the meanings of her thoughts. Finally, I turn to Derrida’s writings on education: I discuss his call to make room in schools for thinking against the predominant “philosophy of the state”, and analyze his claim that the university should “bli作者: 代替 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 18:15 作者: 堅(jiān)毅 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:20 作者: plasma 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:54 作者: GOAD 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:32 作者: 新字 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:45 作者: Seminar 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 13:13
Fundamental Issues in This Bookptions of thinking offered by the continental philosophers discussed in the book?– Adorno, Arendt, Deleuze, Derrida and Rancière?– and the educational field. I begin with discussing the constitutive role of thinking in modern philosophy, and analyze the Cartesian conception of thinking that has beco作者: Lobotomy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 18:27 作者: 引導(dǎo) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 00:40 作者: 敵意 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 02:01 作者: flammable 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 06:18
Bryan D. Springer,Brian M. Curtinory of Madness”, where Derrida argues against Foucault’s reading of Descartes’ reference to madness in the first chapter of his .. While Foucault claims that Descartes constitutes a dichotomous opposition between thought and madness, Derrida shows that madness finds its way into the Cartesian . and 作者: 領(lǐng)先 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 12:13 作者: fixed-joint 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 16:39
them to appear more clearly. To that end, I examine the views of Adorno, Arendt, Deleuze, Derrida, and Rancière along the three main axes around which the book revolves: the conception of thinking, the relations between thinking and politics, and the possibility of education for thinking. The first 作者: glamor 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 21:19 作者: 推崇 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 22:13 作者: 受傷 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 04:09
10樓作者: 碎石 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 09:33
10樓作者: 共棲 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 11:39
10樓作者: 容易做 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 17:00
10樓
