標題: Titlebook: Early Analytic Philosophy - New Perspectives on the Tradition; Sorin Costreie Book 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 [打印本頁] 作者: 要旨 時間: 2025-3-21 18:30
書目名稱Early Analytic Philosophy - New Perspectives on the Tradition影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Early Analytic Philosophy - New Perspectives on the Tradition影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Early Analytic Philosophy - New Perspectives on the Tradition網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Early Analytic Philosophy - New Perspectives on the Tradition網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Early Analytic Philosophy - New Perspectives on the Tradition被引頻次
書目名稱Early Analytic Philosophy - New Perspectives on the Tradition被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Early Analytic Philosophy - New Perspectives on the Tradition年度引用
書目名稱Early Analytic Philosophy - New Perspectives on the Tradition年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Early Analytic Philosophy - New Perspectives on the Tradition讀者反饋
書目名稱Early Analytic Philosophy - New Perspectives on the Tradition讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: glamor 時間: 2025-3-21 22:38 作者: mutineer 時間: 2025-3-22 02:00
Frege and the Aristotelian Model of Science Aristotle’s . has recently been abandoned on grounds that developments in mathematics and logic over the last century or so have rendered it obsolete. Nor has anything emerged to take its place. As things stand we have not even the outlines of an adequate understanding of the rationality of mathema作者: 沒有準備 時間: 2025-3-22 06:36
On the Nature, Status, and Proof of Hume’s Principle in Frege’s Logicist Project, bearing in mind that with its analytic or non-analytic status the intended logical foundation of cardinal arithmetic stands or falls. Section?“.” is concerned with the two criteria of thought identity that Frege states in 1906 and their application to Hume’s Principle. In Section?“.”, I scrutinize作者: Headstrong 時間: 2025-3-22 12:12
A Study in Deflated Acquaintance Knowledge: Sense-Datum Theory and Perceptual Constancyd tastes, are mind-dependent. Although mind-dependent, our knowledge of many facts about the perceptual veil is immediate and secure. These are well-known facets of sense-datum theory. My aim is to carve out a conception of sense-datum theory that does not require the immediate and secure knowledge 作者: 殘酷的地方 時間: 2025-3-22 16:32 作者: 殘酷的地方 時間: 2025-3-22 20:50
The Place of Vagueness in Russell’s Philosophical Developmentnding the Paris conference in August 1900 at which he saw Peano; the period following the Paris conference through his prison stay in 1918; and his post-prison period, in which he becomes concerned with the nature of language as such. I argue that while the topic of vagueness becomes an explicit the作者: 遍及 時間: 2025-3-22 22:46
Propositional Logic from , to ,, Routledge, New York, London, pp. 14–61, 1906) and culminating with ., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1910. They are each based on different primitive connectives and axioms. This paper follows “Peirce’s Law” through those systems with the aim of understanding some of the notorious peculiar作者: JAMB 時間: 2025-3-23 03:53
Later Wittgenstein on the Logicist Definition of Numberectures are discussed, the emphasis falling on understanding Wittgenstein’s views on the most important element of the logicist legacy of Frege and Russell, the definition of number in terms of classes—and, more specifically, by employing the notion of one-to-one correspondence. Since it is clear th作者: 相同 時間: 2025-3-23 07:28 作者: ZEST 時間: 2025-3-23 12:20 作者: 周年紀念日 時間: 2025-3-23 15:26
, Tractatus: , s a foundation for (or is at least consistent with) the conventional logic represented in standard formulations of classical propositional, first-order predicate, and perhaps higher-order formal systems. The present article is a detailed attempt at a mathematical demonstration, or as much demonstrat作者: formula 時間: 2025-3-23 19:45
Justifying Knowledge Claims After the Private Language Argumentraditional empiricist model of knowledge justification. While McDowell’s attempt to solve the difficulties in question is still debated, I claim that a different solution to the same difficulties might have been suggested by Wittgenstein himself in On Certainty.作者: 歌唱隊 時間: 2025-3-23 22:50 作者: phytochemicals 時間: 2025-3-24 04:39 作者: 新娘 時間: 2025-3-24 07:03
On the Nature, Status, and Proof of Hume’s Principle in Frege’s Logicist Projects Principle and in Basic Law V, equinumerosity and coextensiveness. In Section?“.”, I comment on the Julius Caesar problem arising from Hume’s Principle in . and analyze the reasons for its absence in this form in . I conclude with reflections on the introduction of the cardinals and the reals by ab作者: 健談的人 時間: 2025-3-24 12:45 作者: Occipital-Lobe 時間: 2025-3-24 18:20
The Place of Vagueness in Russell’s Philosophical Developmentguage is precise, so that analysis involves a transition only from the more to the less vague. I argue that the failure to recognize the character of Russell’s post-Peano conception of analysis reflects a broader misunderstanding of the character of Russell’s philosophy and of his place in the histo作者: 蒙太奇 時間: 2025-3-24 22:35 作者: 苦惱 時間: 2025-3-25 01:49 作者: laceration 時間: 2025-3-25 06:29 作者: slipped-disk 時間: 2025-3-25 11:00
Basic Surgical Orthopaedic Treatment,s Principle and in Basic Law V, equinumerosity and coextensiveness. In Section?“.”, I comment on the Julius Caesar problem arising from Hume’s Principle in . and analyze the reasons for its absence in this form in . I conclude with reflections on the introduction of the cardinals and the reals by ab作者: 季雨 時間: 2025-3-25 13:45 作者: Chronological 時間: 2025-3-25 17:32 作者: 尾巴 時間: 2025-3-25 21:53
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85312-9though Wittgenstein employs the sign ?—or (x), in his notation—occasionally in explanations and illustrations, e.g., 4.0411 and 5.1311, when it comes to logic, the sign ? should receive in . a semantical treatment that is nonstandard. En route to that result, we show that the hierarchy of variables–作者: 苦惱 時間: 2025-3-26 00:21
1566-659X the volume, each being dedicated to the most important figures in the early analytic tradition: Frege, Russell, and Wittgenstein. The last section gathers several essays that discuss either the relation betwee978-3-319-24214-9Series ISSN 1566-659X Series E-ISSN 2215-1974 作者: plasma 時間: 2025-3-26 04:36 作者: 沉積物 時間: 2025-3-26 10:53 作者: ATRIA 時間: 2025-3-26 16:24
Identity in Frege’s Shadowectival or public. Kripke makes the same mistake about quantifiers as Frege and in addition assumes that only perspectival indentification is needed in the last analysis. He also overlooks dependence relations between modal operators and quantifiers.作者: BLAND 時間: 2025-3-26 17:27
Later Wittgenstein on the Logicist Definition of Numberg of the lectures able to clarify why that was the case. This reading shows (unsurprisingly) that?his better known views on language and mind expressed in Philosophical?Investigations illuminate his conception of mathematics.作者: 隼鷹 時間: 2025-3-26 22:03
1566-659X ntinuities rather than discrepancies?.Includes supplementaryThis volume discusses some crucial ideas of the founders of the analytic philosophy: Gottlob Frege, Bertrand Russell and Ludwig Wittgenstein, or the ‘golden trio’. The book shows how these ‘old’ ideas are still present and influential in th作者: 匯總 時間: 2025-3-27 01:55 作者: 膠狀 時間: 2025-3-27 07:46
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47697-0e do is that although Frege remains true to the spirit of the model, he also modifies it in very fundamental ways. So modified, I will suggest, the model continues to provide a viable and compelling image of scientific rationality by showing, in broad outline, how we achieve, and maintain, cognitive control in our mathematical investigations.作者: NEX 時間: 2025-3-27 11:42
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00149-4s a theorem in 1906. Although it is not proved in 1910, the two lemmas from the proof in 1906 occur as theorems, and Peirce’s Law could have been derived from them in a two step proof. The history of Peirce’s Law in Russell’s systems helps to reconstruct some of the history of axiomatic systems of classical propositional logic.作者: 飛鏢 時間: 2025-3-27 14:43
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14794-4he case: our ordinary notions play, in a sense, an even more important role in Carnap’s philosophy of mathematics than they do in Frege’s. Finally, I address Tyler Burge’s interpretation of Frege which is in opposition to any Carnapian reading of Frege.作者: AIL 時間: 2025-3-27 18:51 作者: 成份 時間: 2025-3-27 22:26
Frege and the Aristotelian Model of Sciencee do is that although Frege remains true to the spirit of the model, he also modifies it in very fundamental ways. So modified, I will suggest, the model continues to provide a viable and compelling image of scientific rationality by showing, in broad outline, how we achieve, and maintain, cognitive control in our mathematical investigations.作者: 大笑 時間: 2025-3-28 03:35 作者: 過份好問 時間: 2025-3-28 08:01 作者: DOSE 時間: 2025-3-28 11:18
Wittgenstein’s Color Exclusion and Johnson’s Determinableclusive moment (Sect. .), drawing on a early work of Prior, I argue that the distinction made by Wittgenstein and Johnson between predication and determination should be looked at from a long term historical perspective.作者: Etymology 時間: 2025-3-28 17:24
Carnap, Logicism, and Ontological Commitmentogicism in the .; and (iii) the distinction between internal and external question characteristic of Carnap’s involvement with modality. As a result, the clear interplay between Carnap’s philosophy of science and his work in the philosophy of mathematics will emerge, as well as some challenges that need to be overcome along the way.作者: 大洪水 時間: 2025-3-28 19:20
Book 2016golden trio’. The book shows how these ‘old’ ideas are still present and influential in the current philosophical debates and to what extent these debates echo the original ideas. The collection aim is twofold: to better understand these fruitful ideas by placing them in the original setting, and to作者: BOLUS 時間: 2025-3-29 00:59 作者: 男學(xué)院 時間: 2025-3-29 05:57 作者: considerable 時間: 2025-3-29 09:46
Everything About UI Development,ulties posed for this conception of mathematics by the conceptual development canonically involved in mathematical progress. The central difficulties are (i) that mathematical development often involves sufficient conceptual progress that mature versions of theories do not involve easily-recognizabl作者: Intercept 時間: 2025-3-29 13:25
Options on One Asset Revisited,em. The resulting flaw in Frege’s and other logicians’ logic began to be corrected only in IF logic. The dependence relations are codified in the Skolem functions that correspond to existential-force quantifiers. Their existence is the natural truth condition. Such functions are not adequately handl作者: ABHOR 時間: 2025-3-29 18:53
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47697-0 Aristotle’s . has recently been abandoned on grounds that developments in mathematics and logic over the last century or so have rendered it obsolete. Nor has anything emerged to take its place. As things stand we have not even the outlines of an adequate understanding of the rationality of mathema作者: epinephrine 時間: 2025-3-29 19:51 作者: 者變 時間: 2025-3-30 03:48 作者: 樂章 時間: 2025-3-30 06:21
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0277-0 surprising that there are such striking differences given their philosophical collaboration and very close personal relationship. The Whitehead’s regarded Russell as one of the family. But family members have rows.作者: 拱墻 時間: 2025-3-30 12:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5589-3nding the Paris conference in August 1900 at which he saw Peano; the period following the Paris conference through his prison stay in 1918; and his post-prison period, in which he becomes concerned with the nature of language as such. I argue that while the topic of vagueness becomes an explicit the作者: Felicitous 時間: 2025-3-30 13:05 作者: 無法治愈 時間: 2025-3-30 19:48 作者: 運動吧 時間: 2025-3-30 23:05 作者: Fissure 時間: 2025-3-31 01:36
s not say much more, and little has been said about it by commentators. How to make sense of the essential general validity by which Wittgenstein characterizes logic? This chapter aims to clarify this crucial concept.
