標題: Titlebook: EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science; Vassilios Karakostas,Dennis Dieks Conference proceedings 2013 Spri [打印本頁] 作者: Flippant 時間: 2025-3-21 18:32
書目名稱EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science被引頻次
書目名稱EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science年度引用
書目名稱EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science讀者反饋
書目名稱EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 臭名昭著 時間: 2025-3-21 23:50 作者: Ophthalmoscope 時間: 2025-3-22 02:58
Intuitionistic Semantics for Fitch’s Paradox no threat to the antirealist. However, the semantics become intolerably inexpressive. On the other hand, if one interprets ?Kp as saying that Kp is untrue ., another way-out of the paradox presents itself. I sketch which one this is, and I describe the intuitionistic models, in which it can be appl作者: Mosaic 時間: 2025-3-22 05:27
Correlation and Truth in terms of probabilities. This paper discusses one particularly simple correlation measure which is highly significant for almost any such attempt within the philosophy of science or epistemology. In particular, it shows how this correlation measure is related to central attempts to capture essent作者: 不可救藥 時間: 2025-3-22 12:06 作者: Devastate 時間: 2025-3-22 13:09
How Organization Explainspulability criterion for constitutive relevance only captures the explanatory relevance of causal properties of parts and leaves the organization side of mechanistic explanation unaccounted for. We use the contrastive counterfactual theory of explanation and an account of the dimensions of organizat作者: Devastate 時間: 2025-3-22 20:20 作者: capsule 時間: 2025-3-22 23:20 作者: 鋼筆尖 時間: 2025-3-23 04:27 作者: 首創(chuàng)精神 時間: 2025-3-23 07:41 作者: 比喻好 時間: 2025-3-23 13:14
The Ultimate Argument Against Convergent Realism and Structural Realism: The Impasse Objectioneories. For instance, if X is a set of theoretical entities that remains stable even over some scientific revolutions, this may be taken as support for convergent scientific realism about entities. Likewise, if X is a similarly stable set of structures of theories, this may be taken as support for (作者: Breach 時間: 2025-3-23 17:22
Doing Away with the No Miracles Argumentists and anti-realists have tied the case for realism to the adequacy of this argument. I argue that it is mistake for realists to let the debate be framed in this way. Realists would be well advised to abandon the NMA altogether and pursue an alternative strategy, which I call the “l(fā)ocal strategy”.作者: Delectable 時間: 2025-3-23 20:46 作者: 天氣 時間: 2025-3-23 23:43 作者: abduction 時間: 2025-3-24 02:21
Against the Statistical Account of Special Science Lawsunt. According to this account, a typical special science law “asserts a certain precisely defined statistical relation among well-defined variables” Earman and Roberts (., 439–478, 1999) and this statistical relation does not require being hedged by ceteris paribus conditions. In this paper, we rai作者: Chauvinistic 時間: 2025-3-24 09:08 作者: 隼鷹 時間: 2025-3-24 12:25
The European Philosophy of Science Association Proceedingshttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/300474.jpg作者: Collision 時間: 2025-3-24 17:02
d transparency, as in evidence for scientific conclusions and especially for evidence-based policy, which is where the need for such a theory first became apparent to me. I then apply the Argument Theory to answer a question that is too seldom asked, and never properly answered, in evidence-based po作者: BAN 時間: 2025-3-24 19:18
Mitarbeitergespr?che in der Pflege are close to each other or approximately equal. Two objects are analogous to each other if they are partly identical. From this perspective, it is useful to distinguish similarity models and analogy models as sources of learning about real targets. Similarity models include idealized models and the作者: 泥瓦匠 時間: 2025-3-25 02:57
Mitbestimmung in der Unternehmung no threat to the antirealist. However, the semantics become intolerably inexpressive. On the other hand, if one interprets ?Kp as saying that Kp is untrue ., another way-out of the paradox presents itself. I sketch which one this is, and I describe the intuitionistic models, in which it can be appl作者: Mingle 時間: 2025-3-25 06:08
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-42506-0 in terms of probabilities. This paper discusses one particularly simple correlation measure which is highly significant for almost any such attempt within the philosophy of science or epistemology. In particular, it shows how this correlation measure is related to central attempts to capture essent作者: Pamphlet 時間: 2025-3-25 08:23 作者: emulsify 時間: 2025-3-25 12:19 作者: 流利圓滑 時間: 2025-3-25 16:24
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55492-6relations, in terms of means of mutual manipulability (MM). Interpreted metaphysically, MM implies that inter-level relations are symmetrical. But in that case MM violates one of the main desiderata of scientific explanation, namely explanatory asymmetry. Parts of Craver’s writings suggest a metaphy作者: LAITY 時間: 2025-3-25 22:22 作者: tenosynovitis 時間: 2025-3-26 01:45
Simula SpringerBriefs on Computingarget physical systems. By thinking along this line I use the example of the vibrating string model to identify the two kinds of idealizations that have been discerned by most philosophers to be pervasive in scientific modeling, which I label isolation and stabilization, and argue that they are the 作者: 材料等 時間: 2025-3-26 06:01 作者: SUGAR 時間: 2025-3-26 09:46
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47638-0eories. For instance, if X is a set of theoretical entities that remains stable even over some scientific revolutions, this may be taken as support for convergent scientific realism about entities. Likewise, if X is a similarly stable set of structures of theories, this may be taken as support for (作者: 殺蟲劑 時間: 2025-3-26 15:42 作者: discord 時間: 2025-3-26 16:57
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77348-9ponents deemed very probably true. Articulating such a criterion has proved difficult, however. Long-term retention across theory-change provides a poor basis at best (judging by examples like the ether of light); the same can be said about such features as empirical success and current freedom from作者: 蹣跚 時間: 2025-3-26 21:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3295-5atural kinds and should therefore be eliminated from the vocabulary of scientific psychology. In this paper I examine the perhaps most well known case of scientific eliminativism, Edouard Machery’s concept eliminativism. I argue that the split-lump-eliminate scheme of conceptual change underlying Ma作者: implore 時間: 2025-3-27 01:15
unt. According to this account, a typical special science law “asserts a certain precisely defined statistical relation among well-defined variables” Earman and Roberts (., 439–478, 1999) and this statistical relation does not require being hedged by ceteris paribus conditions. In this paper, we rai作者: Benzodiazepines 時間: 2025-3-27 08:34 作者: motor-unit 時間: 2025-3-27 11:21
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01306-0Constitutive mechanistic explanations; Correlation and truth; Deflationism on Scientific Representatio作者: phytochemicals 時間: 2025-3-27 16:02
978-3-319-34703-5Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013作者: Lacunar-Stroke 時間: 2025-3-27 18:46
Doing Away with the No Miracles Argumentists and anti-realists have tied the case for realism to the adequacy of this argument. I argue that it is mistake for realists to let the debate be framed in this way. Realists would be well advised to abandon the NMA altogether and pursue an alternative strategy, which I call the “l(fā)ocal strategy”.作者: 溫室 時間: 2025-3-27 22:42 作者: glisten 時間: 2025-3-28 02:10
EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science作者: Ovulation 時間: 2025-3-28 08:21
EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science978-3-319-01306-0作者: 綠州 時間: 2025-3-28 12:59
Mechanistic Explanation: Asymmetry Lostsical interpretation of MM, and Craver explicitly commits to constitutive relationships being symmetrical. Other parts of Craver’s writings suggest an epistemological reading. If interpreted in this way, however, namely as a means for individuating mechanisms, MM is arguably redundant.作者: Rotator-Cuff 時間: 2025-3-28 17:18
Idealization in Physics Modelingresult of the same kind of thought process. Furthermore, I argue that isolation and stabilization do not exhaust the idealizations that we encounter in scientific modeling. What we need in order to make sense of much of the modern modeling practices, such as quantum mechanical modeling, is the idea of idealization as decomposition.作者: Afflict 時間: 2025-3-28 19:45
Against the Statistical Account of Special Science LawsEarman and Roberts (., 439–478, 1999) and this statistical relation does not require being hedged by ceteris paribus conditions. In this paper, we raise two objections against the attempt to cash out the content of special science generalizations in statistical terms.作者: botany 時間: 2025-3-29 01:57 作者: 跑過 時間: 2025-3-29 04:12
Simula SpringerBriefs on Computingresult of the same kind of thought process. Furthermore, I argue that isolation and stabilization do not exhaust the idealizations that we encounter in scientific modeling. What we need in order to make sense of much of the modern modeling practices, such as quantum mechanical modeling, is the idea of idealization as decomposition.作者: 混亂生活 時間: 2025-3-29 10:11
Conference proceedings 2013emes. The first section of this volume begins with the formal philosophy of science, moves on to idealization, representation and explanation and then finishes with realism, anti-realism and special science laws. The second section covers the philosophy of the physical sciences, looking at quantum m作者: 按時間順序 時間: 2025-3-29 12:07
makes positive RCT results evidence for policy predictions? The answer it turns out is quite a lot: information is required both about the causal role of the policy in the local circumstances and the helping factors required for it to work there.作者: 大看臺 時間: 2025-3-29 18:10
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-42506-0tion and scientific reasoning necessitates answering the question of how correlation and truth are related. This paper proposes an answer to this question and outlines its consequences for epistemology and the philosophy of science.作者: 大溝 時間: 2025-3-29 23:22 作者: Nibble 時間: 2025-3-30 00:48
the mistaken view that models are just like other symbols, such as the linguistic ones, and that defationism is the right answer to the constitutional question of scientific representation. The paper briefly considers in passing some broader questions in connection with the criticism of deflationism.作者: 終止 時間: 2025-3-30 04:45
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47638-0remely successful though ontologically significantly false theory. In this case, the inference from the stability of X to the probable reality of X would become invalid. The paper closes with a discussion of several counter-objections to the impasse objection.作者: 沙文主義 時間: 2025-3-30 09:16 作者: 停止償付 時間: 2025-3-30 13:51 作者: Yourself 時間: 2025-3-30 18:28
Correlation and Truthtion and scientific reasoning necessitates answering the question of how correlation and truth are related. This paper proposes an answer to this question and outlines its consequences for epistemology and the philosophy of science.
