標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Donald Davidson on Action, Mind and Value; Syraya Chin-Mu Yang,Robert H. Myers Book 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021 Donald Da [打印本頁] 作者: Neogamist 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 17:49
書目名稱Donald Davidson on Action, Mind and Value影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Donald Davidson on Action, Mind and Value影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Donald Davidson on Action, Mind and Value網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Donald Davidson on Action, Mind and Value網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Donald Davidson on Action, Mind and Value被引頻次
書目名稱Donald Davidson on Action, Mind and Value被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Donald Davidson on Action, Mind and Value年度引用
書目名稱Donald Davidson on Action, Mind and Value年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Donald Davidson on Action, Mind and Value讀者反饋
書目名稱Donald Davidson on Action, Mind and Value讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: DEAF 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:05
,Davidson’s Meta-normative Naturalism and the Rationality Requirement, constructivism (or perhaps constitutivism) instead. Normative realists have countered by insisting that they can establish (1) that rationality typically requires people to act on their normative judgments and (2) that people typically are rational. I acknowledge that normative realists can establi作者: 使閉塞 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 04:11
Acting Against Your Better Judgement,stead of treating one’s better judgement as a conditional judgement about what is desirable to do given available reasons, it is proposed to treat it as an unconditional judgement about what is desirable to do from a rational perspective that one takes to be the right perspective to have. This makes作者: 束縛 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:30
A Davidsonian Theory of Evaluative Judgment,ing evaluative judgment. As the Humean theory of motivation is the dominant view, most philosophers endorse the idea that desire is necessary for motivation. It follows that the internalist usually appeals to non-cognitivism to argue for internalism, because if evaluative judgments express/are desir作者: 禮節(jié) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 10:27
Davidson on Emotions and Values,sal version of the cognitive theory of emotions which he associates to an objective conception of values. I confront his account of the correctness of emotions with the fitting attitude view of the relation of emotions and value. They can be reconciled if the correctness of an emotion is construed a作者: 拍下盜公款 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:10
Pleasure Makes Pro-attitudes,ns of a certain kind and believing that their action is of that kind. If acting for a reason must be caused by pro-attitudes, then the right account of pro-attitudes will help us correctly identify cases of action for reason. In this paper, we examine what it takes for a mental state to be a pro-att作者: 拍下盜公款 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:25
On the Distinctive Value of Knowledge,.” Recently, the distinctive value thesis has been forcefully challenged by three arguments, which I call “the swamping argument,” “the generalized swamping argument,” and “the ad hoc argument,” respectively. These three arguments rely on what I will call “epistemic veritism,” the view that the dist作者: 聯(lián)想記憶 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 23:09 作者: liaison 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 05:17
Methodological Considerations in the Triangulation Argument,. This is later known as the triangulation argument. However, this argument is very controversial and not many philosophers accept it. One of the reasons is that there is no consensus on how exactly the argument goes. In this chapter, I try to reformulate this argument, and special attention is paid作者: 錯(cuò) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 09:16 作者: cloture 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:41
,Davidson’s Triangulation Argument in the Logic of Actions,odelling of the argument in the framework of an epistemic logic of actions. I focus on two aspects. Firstly, to guarantee that the propositional content of what the speaker says in the ongoing communication is justified true beliefs, I suggest that the speaker’s utterances must be assertions governe作者: 憤怒事實(shí) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:30
Report on the User’s Conceptual Models when one’s actual rational perspective is not the one that one takes to be the one to have—i.e. when one’s judgement of the apparent good does not coincide with one’s judgement of the actual good. One makes two judgements—one from an adopted perspective that one judges to be the one to have and one from one’s actual perspective.作者: 羊欄 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 18:08
User Interface Management Systemse this issue by reconstructing a Davidsonian theory of evaluative judgment. I will argue that, following Davidson, by taking evaluative attitudes as conative propositional attitudes, we will be able to see how evaluative judgments can be both necessarily motivating and truth-apt.作者: commensurate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 01:08 作者: lethargy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 04:16
Acting Against Your Better Judgement,s when one’s actual rational perspective is not the one that one takes to be the one to have—i.e. when one’s judgement of the apparent good does not coincide with one’s judgement of the actual good. One makes two judgements—one from an adopted perspective that one judges to be the one to have and one from one’s actual perspective.作者: Formidable 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 06:58 作者: 評(píng)論性 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 10:49
Meaning, Evidence, and Objectivity, Verheggen’s interpretation of it, helps answer the initial question. It ends with a brief discussion of the question whether the conception has the resources to account for the objectivity of meaning.作者: Soliloquy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 14:51 作者: Valves 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 22:20 作者: 門閂 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 02:17 作者: Laconic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 05:48 作者: declamation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 11:29
Objects and Events in Davidson, I suggest that when Davidson turned to epistemological questions, he relinquished the ontology that guided his early work on action and came to take a much more relaxed view of “what there is”. I touch on the implications of this for Davidson’s physicalism, which he used his thesis of the Nomological Character of Causality to establish.作者: AER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 12:43
,Davidson’s Meta-normative Naturalism and the Rationality Requirement,sh (1) but argue that (2) poses problems both for non-naturalists and for reductive naturalists. I close by suggesting that Davidson’s non-reductive (or “anomalous”) form of naturalism may give normative realists a better chance of success.作者: 躺下殘殺 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 18:09 作者: Palpate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 23:15
The Cardiotoxicity of Drugs and Poisonse distinctive value thesis, the former in effect implies the latter. My argument depends on the idea that justification enough for knowledge does not contain or presuppose certain falsehoods in a way that mere justification does.作者: gimmick 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 00:40 作者: 搖曳的微光 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:35
Book 2021nd its impact on his epistemology, his philosophy of language and mind, and his philosophy of values.? The authors critically assess central elements of Davidson’s program and offer reappraisals of his seminal contributions to, and his continuing influence on, the development of contemporary philoso作者: Guileless 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 08:35 作者: 丑惡 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:36 作者: intoxicate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:14
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69731-9usality always to consist in the relation . obtaining between a pair of events. I argue that Davidson’s conception of events as individual entities stood in the way of according objects a role in the causal world, and that it cannot allow for the understanding of general statements about events. But作者: flaunt 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:17 作者: synovial-joint 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 01:44 作者: abject 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 07:35
User Interface Management Systemsing evaluative judgment. As the Humean theory of motivation is the dominant view, most philosophers endorse the idea that desire is necessary for motivation. It follows that the internalist usually appeals to non-cognitivism to argue for internalism, because if evaluative judgments express/are desir作者: 沙草紙 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 09:35
User Interface Management Systemssal version of the cognitive theory of emotions which he associates to an objective conception of values. I confront his account of the correctness of emotions with the fitting attitude view of the relation of emotions and value. They can be reconciled if the correctness of an emotion is construed a作者: 偽造 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:50 作者: MOAT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 18:11 作者: 繞著哥哥問 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:27 作者: 懸崖 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:34
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70309-6. This is later known as the triangulation argument. However, this argument is very controversial and not many philosophers accept it. One of the reasons is that there is no consensus on how exactly the argument goes. In this chapter, I try to reformulate this argument, and special attention is paid作者: 吞吞吐吐 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 07:06 作者: 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 11:26 作者: Bernstein-test 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:47 作者: 宮殿般 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 20:50
Logic in Asia: Studia Logica Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/282586.jpg作者: aesthetician 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 00:16 作者: 輕信 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 04:51
978-981-15-7232-6Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021作者: 好忠告人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 07:48
Davidson on Emotions and Values,sal version of the cognitive theory of emotions which he associates to an objective conception of values. I confront his account of the correctness of emotions with the fitting attitude view of the relation of emotions and value. They can be reconciled if the correctness of an emotion is construed as a form of idealization.作者: 幻想 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 14:32
2364-4613 the philosophy of mind and language, epistemology, moral philosophy, and the philosophy of values. It is also of interest toresearchers in adjoining disciplines, such as cognitive science, linguistics, and psychology.?.978-981-15-7232-6978-981-15-7230-2Series ISSN 2364-4613 Series E-ISSN 2364-4621 作者: HUSH 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 18:47 作者: faultfinder 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 21:01 作者: Bravado 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 00:10
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70309-6his writings on triangulation, which also demonstrate that radical interpretation is but an instance of triangulation, since they make clear that successful radical interpretation in effect requires triangulation.作者: Immunization 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 07:44
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70313-3on. A semantics appropriate for the logic of common knowledge will be given. I further propose that the transition from the speaker’s initial assertion to common knowledge can be illuminated by virtue of individual agents’ learning and the group learning, resulting from what the hearer learns from t作者: syncope 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 10:31
Pleasure Makes Pro-attitudes, as perceptions of value is overly restrictive. Such views fail to account for akrasia or attribute unprecedented functional properties to perceptual states. Finally, we propose an account of pro-attitudes that avoids these pitfalls: In addition to causing behavior, pro-attitudes cause more pleasure作者: wall-stress 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 16:06
,The Continuity of Davidson’s Thought: Non-reductionism Without Quietism,his writings on triangulation, which also demonstrate that radical interpretation is but an instance of triangulation, since they make clear that successful radical interpretation in effect requires triangulation.
