派博傳思國際中心

標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Doing the Best We Can; An Essay in Informal Fred Feldman Book 1986 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1986 Immanuel Kant.Indi [打印本頁]

作者: Reticent    時間: 2025-3-21 18:25
書目名稱Doing the Best We Can影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Doing the Best We Can影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Doing the Best We Can網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Doing the Best We Can網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Doing the Best We Can被引頻次




書目名稱Doing the Best We Can被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Doing the Best We Can年度引用




書目名稱Doing the Best We Can年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Doing the Best We Can讀者反饋




書目名稱Doing the Best We Can讀者反饋學(xué)科排名





作者: 珠寶    時間: 2025-3-21 23:21

作者: 緯度    時間: 2025-3-22 03:14
Utilitarian FoundationsRoughly, the idea is that something is obligatory if and only if it is the best of the possibilities. This idea appears in very simple guise in the popular maxim that “you ought to do the best you can”. Classic act utilitarianism is perhaps the most famous theoretical development of the idea. On tha
作者: Myocarditis    時間: 2025-3-22 08:35
A Theory of Moral Obligationaditional formulations are unacceptable. In order to formulate this insight adequately, we must have a suitable concept of possibility to account for the meaning of ‘can’ and a suitable concept of value to account for the meaning of ‘best’. In Section 1 of this chapter, I explain my concept of possi
作者: 宿醉    時間: 2025-3-22 12:07

作者: MULTI    時間: 2025-3-22 16:45

作者: MULTI    時間: 2025-3-22 18:12
Defeasible Commitment and Prima Facie Obligationeveral different sorts of proposition. As I see it, this fact is responsible for one of the most serious defects in the literature concerning iffy oughts. We frequently find cases in which one writer, focussing on one sort of iffy ought, proposes an analysis. He claims to have given an account of “c
作者: Generator    時間: 2025-3-22 21:19

作者: 過于光澤    時間: 2025-3-23 02:53

作者: 攀登    時間: 2025-3-23 08:04

作者: employor    時間: 2025-3-23 11:30

作者: Forehead-Lift    時間: 2025-3-23 15:19

作者: Bereavement    時間: 2025-3-23 19:38

作者: 東西    時間: 2025-3-23 23:54
Biases Introduced by the Algorithm Itselfo some concepts of obligation that have not been discussed here. Among these are various society- and code-relative forms of obligation, such as legal obligation and etiquettical obligation. Such concepts as these are not doing-the-best-we-can concepts of obligation. They would require a rather different sort of analysis.
作者: EXULT    時間: 2025-3-24 03:45

作者: prostatitis    時間: 2025-3-24 08:18
A Theory of Moral Obligationch is the concept of value that is used in the formulation of the theory of moral obligation proposed here. Finally, in Section 3, I state the theory itself, and point out a few of its most fundamental logical features.
作者: FAR    時間: 2025-3-24 14:44
Conflicts of Obligationo some concepts of obligation that have not been discussed here. Among these are various society- and code-relative forms of obligation, such as legal obligation and etiquettical obligation. Such concepts as these are not doing-the-best-we-can concepts of obligation. They would require a rather different sort of analysis.
作者: aggressor    時間: 2025-3-24 18:37
0921-8599 sm are formally incoherent. I was intrigued by his argument. It had long seemed to me that I had a firm grasp on act utilitarianism. Indeed, it had often seemed to me that it was the clearest and most attractive of normative theories. Yet here was a simple and relatively uncontrover- sial argument t
作者: 繼承人    時間: 2025-3-24 20:05
Stability, Reliability, and Securityhese objections, I hope to show that my approach is rationally defensible. The second reason for considering the objections seems to me to be more important. It is this: the presentation of the objections and replies will enable the reader to gain a deeper understanding of the nature and purpose of the theory.
作者: 無所不知    時間: 2025-3-25 01:41

作者: 全部    時間: 2025-3-25 06:30

作者: Accord    時間: 2025-3-25 09:40

作者: infringe    時間: 2025-3-25 13:34
What Ought to be is getting corrupt might say that there should be more honesty in government. Someone who feels that the present distribution of wealth is unjust might say that there ought to be a more equal distribution of wealth in the world. Each of these could very well be a statement of the ought-to-be.
作者: cogitate    時間: 2025-3-25 17:49
Conclusionsified”, I mean to draw attention to the fact that, insofar as possible, I have analyzed these normative notions by appeal to closely related components of a single, relatively simple metaphysical and axiological system.
作者: 禁令    時間: 2025-3-25 23:18

作者: 做方舟    時間: 2025-3-26 03:14

作者: ethnology    時間: 2025-3-26 08:20
Book 1986mally incoherent. I was intrigued by his argument. It had long seemed to me that I had a firm grasp on act utilitarianism. Indeed, it had often seemed to me that it was the clearest and most attractive of normative theories. Yet here was a simple and relatively uncontrover- sial argument that showed
作者: parsimony    時間: 2025-3-26 09:29
Hypothetical Imperativesysis. Some of these reasons will emerge shortly. In this chapter, I try to identify the sort of statement Kant may have had in mind; I note a variety of puzzling features of these things; I explain why some proposed accounts seem to me to be inadequate; I give my own account of them; and I try to explain why they have the puzzling features noted.
作者: 鞭打    時間: 2025-3-26 15:08

作者: 小隔間    時間: 2025-3-26 19:34

作者: 整頓    時間: 2025-3-27 00:45

作者: Antarctic    時間: 2025-3-27 02:32
The Stability Bias of Algorithms have thought that the welfare of a social group would more-or-less automatically be maximized if all the members of that group were to do their moral obligations.. We can say that any doctrine to this effect is a version of the “principle of moral harmony” (PMH).
作者: terazosin    時間: 2025-3-27 06:07
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-3811-0Roughly, the idea is that something is obligatory if and only if it is the best of the possibilities. This idea appears in very simple guise in the popular maxim that “you ought to do the best you can”. Classic act utilitarianism is perhaps the most famous theoretical development of the idea. On tha
作者: 致詞    時間: 2025-3-27 12:40

作者: Condense    時間: 2025-3-27 14:36

作者: Vaginismus    時間: 2025-3-27 21:06
The Lives in Front of Interfaceseratives”. While some philosophers. have apparently used the term ‘hypothetical imperative’ as little more than a stylistic variant for ‘statement of conditional obligation’, I think there is good reason to distinguish hypothetical imperatives from other iffy oughts, and to give them a separate anal
作者: Microgram    時間: 2025-3-28 00:38
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-3811-0everal different sorts of proposition. As I see it, this fact is responsible for one of the most serious defects in the literature concerning iffy oughts. We frequently find cases in which one writer, focussing on one sort of iffy ought, proposes an analysis. He claims to have given an account of “c
作者: 故意    時間: 2025-3-28 04:29
The Stability Bias of Algorithms have thought that the welfare of a social group would more-or-less automatically be maximized if all the members of that group were to do their moral obligations.. We can say that any doctrine to this effect is a version of the “principle of moral harmony” (PMH).
作者: 營養(yǎng)    時間: 2025-3-28 06:54

作者: creatine-kinase    時間: 2025-3-28 10:42
Biases Introduced by the Algorithm Itselfral obligation, individual prudential obligation, social obligation, and civic obligation. I have also introduced and discussed some forms of “collective” obligation — group moral and prudential obligation, for example. There is also the concept of the ought-to-be. Each of these is a “doing-the-best
作者: Ptosis    時間: 2025-3-28 18:19

作者: 大喘氣    時間: 2025-3-28 21:57
Individual Obligation and Group Welfare have thought that the welfare of a social group would more-or-less automatically be maximized if all the members of that group were to do their moral obligations.. We can say that any doctrine to this effect is a version of the “principle of moral harmony” (PMH).
作者: Ibd810    時間: 2025-3-29 02:13
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4570-8Immanuel Kant; Indian; Utilitarianism; access; accessibility; concept; deontic logic; individual; morality; p




歡迎光臨 派博傳思國際中心 (http://www.pjsxioz.cn/) Powered by Discuz! X3.5
仙游县| 松原市| 洛扎县| 宜兰县| 司法| 乌兰浩特市| 衡水市| 高密市| 偏关县| 平阴县| 通江县| 鹤庆县| 西昌市| 汶川县| 托里县| 裕民县| 社旗县| 廉江市| 平顶山市| 略阳县| 加查县| 黎川县| 长葛市| 兴业县| 江阴市| 江源县| 邵东县| 项城市| 蒲江县| 长葛市| 开远市| 防城港市| 彝良县| 乌兰浩特市| 商洛市| 三门县| 潞城市| 潞西市| 麟游县| 闽清县| 安徽省|