標題: Titlebook: Doing Worlds with Words; Formal Semantics wit Jaroslav Peregrin Book 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1995 Denotation.formal [打印本頁] 作者: 精明 時間: 2025-3-21 17:06
書目名稱Doing Worlds with Words影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Doing Worlds with Words影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Doing Worlds with Words網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Doing Worlds with Words網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Doing Worlds with Words被引頻次
書目名稱Doing Worlds with Words被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Doing Worlds with Words年度引用
書目名稱Doing Worlds with Words年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Doing Worlds with Words讀者反饋
書目名稱Doing Worlds with Words讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: Acquired 時間: 2025-3-21 21:51 作者: Ibd810 時間: 2025-3-22 04:18 作者: Virtues 時間: 2025-3-22 04:54
Limits and Continuous Functionsgic and semantics as explicating, some ultimate “form of the world”. Let us now investigate the general picture of the relationship between language and the world, between words and things, to which holding this position leads us.作者: dowagers-hump 時間: 2025-3-22 11:30
Book 1995possibilities and limitations of elucidatingthe nature of meaning by means of formal logic, model theory andmodel-theoretical semantics. The main thrust of the book is to showthat it is misguided to understand model theory metaphysically and soto try to base formal semantics on something like formal作者: 不能和解 時間: 2025-3-22 16:06
Axiomatic Systems,atement . from statements ..,...,.. to say that the statement ...., ., or, regimented into symbolic notation, (.. ∧ ... ∧ ..)→., is necessarily true. Thus the valid inference (16) can be expressed as the necessarily true statement (17); similarly, the validity of (18) is tantamount to the necessary truth of (19)..作者: 不能和解 時間: 2025-3-22 19:26 作者: 歌曲 時間: 2025-3-22 22:27 作者: vibrant 時間: 2025-3-23 03:25 作者: jumble 時間: 2025-3-23 07:29 作者: 招人嫉妒 時間: 2025-3-23 11:40
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2698-5quivocal than christening (e.g. by some obscure stepwise processes taking place during the forgotten prehistory of mankind) — but in principale in the same manner. As Tichy (1992) puts it, language is a code and a theory of language thus has to consist in cracking the code.作者: calorie 時間: 2025-3-23 15:23 作者: accessory 時間: 2025-3-23 21:46 作者: Lumbar-Spine 時間: 2025-3-24 01:40 作者: 思想 時間: 2025-3-24 04:04
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2698-5nt distinction is thus absolutely crucial. It is the existence of this distinction that makes logic meaningful; and it is this distinction that makes it possible to make sense of the concept of meaning.作者: Mettle 時間: 2025-3-24 07:00
Necessity,nt distinction is thus absolutely crucial. It is the existence of this distinction that makes logic meaningful; and it is this distinction that makes it possible to make sense of the concept of meaning.作者: 放大 時間: 2025-3-24 13:18 作者: SOBER 時間: 2025-3-24 18:42 作者: scotoma 時間: 2025-3-24 23:01
Quantification,le of recursive constraints reducing satisfaction of such statements to satisfaction of their substatements. The idea flowing from this is to handle quantificational statements analogously; to find analogous recursive constraints for quantificational statements. Attempting this, though, we immediate作者: GRACE 時間: 2025-3-24 23:19
Truth,of capturing truth .? After all, necessary truth seems to be a subspecies, a special case of truth — is not every account for necessary truth thus a special case of a general theory, which would yield truth . as another special case?作者: 蛙鳴聲 時間: 2025-3-25 05:25 作者: REIGN 時間: 2025-3-25 10:10 作者: curriculum 時間: 2025-3-25 13:40
Criterial Reconstruction,eference and meaning can be grasped as tools for such a reconstruction. In Chapter 2, moreover, we indicated that grammar can be approached analogously as a criterial reconstruction of “well-formedness”.. Now it is time to say more about the very concept of criterial reconstruction.作者: ALOFT 時間: 2025-3-25 16:58 作者: 怪物 時間: 2025-3-25 22:07
Language and the World,e something that gets explicated precisely in course of such reconstruction. Moreover, in the previous chapter we considered the Wittgensteinian and Quinean challenge to the very concept of necessary truth; and we concluded that it is not legitimate to see necessary truth as reflecting, and hence lo作者: ineffectual 時間: 2025-3-26 02:36 作者: 靦腆 時間: 2025-3-26 07:11
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1801-0The words and expressions we employ to make ourselves understood by other people have meaning; and it is their meaning that capacitates their serving as tools of communication. But what is meaning?作者: Occipital-Lobe 時間: 2025-3-26 08:50 作者: MULTI 時間: 2025-3-26 16:20 作者: Grasping 時間: 2025-3-26 19:11
Roots of Logical Schematization,To answer the question . is anything but simple; and it is surprising how few of those who write on logic try to give an explicit and precise answer to it..作者: SPURN 時間: 2025-3-27 00:38 作者: 帶傷害 時間: 2025-3-27 03:55 作者: Accommodation 時間: 2025-3-27 08:24 作者: Mingle 時間: 2025-3-27 11:11 作者: Conquest 時間: 2025-3-27 15:30 作者: Offstage 時間: 2025-3-27 21:35 作者: 吝嗇性 時間: 2025-3-28 01:45 作者: UNT 時間: 2025-3-28 05:28
Undergraduate Texts in Mathematicsof capturing truth .? After all, necessary truth seems to be a subspecies, a special case of truth — is not every account for necessary truth thus a special case of a general theory, which would yield truth . as another special case?作者: Conspiracy 時間: 2025-3-28 09:23
Undergraduate Texts in Mathematicsds a framework of individuals and properties, which enables us to accommodate the pre-theoretical concepts of reference and existence. The existence of the individuals and properties was not the result of a metaphysical deliberation, but resulted from our way of reconstruction of the inferential str作者: 清楚 時間: 2025-3-28 10:31 作者: Camouflage 時間: 2025-3-28 15:15 作者: 休閑 時間: 2025-3-28 21:18
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2698-5erstood as a matter of the same pursuit — necessary truths amount to rules governing our usage of language (they can be seen as articulating instances of consequence and hence limitations to assertibility), and as expressions acquire meaning just via being manipulated according to these rules, it is作者: 先鋒派 時間: 2025-3-28 23:57
Limits and Continuous Functionse something that gets explicated precisely in course of such reconstruction. Moreover, in the previous chapter we considered the Wittgensteinian and Quinean challenge to the very concept of necessary truth; and we concluded that it is not legitimate to see necessary truth as reflecting, and hence lo作者: inquisitive 時間: 2025-3-29 03:04 作者: FACT 時間: 2025-3-29 08:55
978-90-481-4618-5Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1995作者: 顯微鏡 時間: 2025-3-29 13:51
Truth,of capturing truth .? After all, necessary truth seems to be a subspecies, a special case of truth — is not every account for necessary truth thus a special case of a general theory, which would yield truth . as another special case?作者: 表主動 時間: 2025-3-29 16:18 作者: asthma 時間: 2025-3-29 21:27 作者: 抗生素 時間: 2025-3-30 02:05
