標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice; The Theory and Appli T. Price Caldwell,Oliver Cresswell,Robert J. Stain Book 2018 Springer Inte [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: 果園 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 18:40
書目名稱Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice被引頻次
書目名稱Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice年度引用
書目名稱Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice讀者反饋
書目名稱Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 無(wú)表情 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 21:47
Molecular Sememics: Toward A Model of an Ordinary Language shows how in ordinary language it is this brief moment of choice, this “molecule”, that is in fact the sememe, the fundamental unit of meaning. This molecule is created in momentary discourse, existing before conventionalization ‘fixes’ its terms, and failing to notice this gives the false impressi作者: notification 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 02:47
Whorf, Orwell, and Mentalese (The Molecular Sememe: Some Implications for Semantics)‘mentalese’, a purely formal manipulation of logical concepts that then correlate to words. Contrary to the linguistic relativist hypothesis, all languages are fundamentally equal in this, and though the words may differ the thinking is the same. Here though, Caldwell proposes a different view, draw作者: 包租車船 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:03
The Coerciveness of Discourse around discourse, he distinguishes between two kinds: discourse in the . sense?– a set of semantic relationships that become conventionalised through continuous use in the same way; and discourse in the . sense?– a particular act of speech, writing, or conversation that takes place ‘within’ a disco作者: 有說服力 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 09:16
Molecular Sememics (Unfinished Book Manuscript)and he begins by presenting his motivation for the theory. It has the potential for explaining many facts about language, which, when taken together, are difficult to explain consistently within the current orthodoxies of linguistic study. Caldwell stresses that such an explanation can be found by f作者: 無(wú)能力之人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 16:42 作者: 無(wú)能力之人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:00
The Rhetoric of Plain Fact: Stevens’ “No Possum, No Sop, No Taters”lly on the ontological connections between language and perception unearthed in the poetry of Wallace Stevens. By implicitly utilizing his theory of Molecular Sememics, Caldwell aims to show that Stevens’ concern with poems that truly capture the phenomenology of experience offers a perfect example 作者: debris 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 23:52
American Shoot-Out: Hemingway vs. Richard Forde used as an aid for literary criticism. In commenting on the two authors’ styles, Caldwell notes that while Hemingway attempts to reify his words since he knows they will be distrusted as mere symbols, and Ford distrusts the words and categories he’s inherited as an author, both take up what Caldwe作者: Osteoarthritis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 04:34
What I Have Learned About English from Being in Japan (Or: Why Can’t Japanese Students of English Maakers of English provided supporting evidence for his theory of Molecular Sememics. Beginning with a discussion of the misuse of the determiners “a” and “the” by Japanese speakers of English, Caldwell finds that instead of systematic or syntactic rules being violated, it is a misunderstanding of the作者: judicial 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 06:08
Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice978-3-319-75441-3Series ISSN 0924-4662 Series E-ISSN 2215-034X 作者: Flounder 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 09:53
T. Price Caldwell,Oliver Cresswell,Robert J. StainPresents an extremely original approach to linguistic meaning and thought-provoking perspectives on language.Directly applies this highly original approach to works in literature and to pedagogy.Is wr作者: 得意牛 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:54
Studies in Linguistics and Philosophyhttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/280968.jpg作者: GILD 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:50
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75441-3Structuralism in linguistics; Semiotics; Linguistics and literature; Wallace Stevens; Linguistic pragmat作者: 動(dòng)作謎 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 23:25
978-3-030-09231-3Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018作者: cognizant 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:36
Biochemische Individualit?t und Gichtroach to linguistics to shed light on both its failings and its insights. According to Caldwell its key failure to provide a semantically consistent analysis of the system of ordinary language was due to the scope of this analysis. The principle of the differential of meaning could not provide the a作者: 得意牛 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 08:47
Physiologie der Appetitregulation, shows how in ordinary language it is this brief moment of choice, this “molecule”, that is in fact the sememe, the fundamental unit of meaning. This molecule is created in momentary discourse, existing before conventionalization ‘fixes’ its terms, and failing to notice this gives the false impressi作者: 大洪水 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 12:37
Immunbiologie des Kindesalters,‘mentalese’, a purely formal manipulation of logical concepts that then correlate to words. Contrary to the linguistic relativist hypothesis, all languages are fundamentally equal in this, and though the words may differ the thinking is the same. Here though, Caldwell proposes a different view, draw作者: 知道 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 16:44
Hans Josef Karl,Hans J?rg Bauer around discourse, he distinguishes between two kinds: discourse in the . sense?– a set of semantic relationships that become conventionalised through continuous use in the same way; and discourse in the . sense?– a particular act of speech, writing, or conversation that takes place ‘within’ a disco作者: fertilizer 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 21:26
R. Thurau,W. Courtin,F. Eckardtand he begins by presenting his motivation for the theory. It has the potential for explaining many facts about language, which, when taken together, are difficult to explain consistently within the current orthodoxies of linguistic study. Caldwell stresses that such an explanation can be found by f作者: 絆住 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:11 作者: maculated 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 04:28
Stoffwechsel, Ern?hrung · Verdauunglly on the ontological connections between language and perception unearthed in the poetry of Wallace Stevens. By implicitly utilizing his theory of Molecular Sememics, Caldwell aims to show that Stevens’ concern with poems that truly capture the phenomenology of experience offers a perfect example 作者: Longitude 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 11:07 作者: Entreaty 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 14:20 作者: oncologist 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 17:20
Biochemische Individualit?t und Gichtin a word comes to have meaning in contrast to its immediate “others”; and as such, Caldwell’s own theory of Molecular Sememics is perhaps best understood as something of a moderate or micro-structuralism.作者: 單調(diào)女 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:59 作者: GAVEL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 03:42 作者: 膠狀 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 04:19
The Coerciveness of Discourseture of discourse provide a discipline to it that differs from the syntax of standard theory, and highlight how the meaning of our words comes not from the terms themselves, but from the discourse within which they are situated.作者: Optometrist 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:47
0924-4662 iginal approach to works in literature and to pedagogy.Is wr.This volume presents eight papers and a draft monograph by T. Price Caldwell on topics in linguistics, semiotics and philosophy of language...From the beginning of his professional career onwards, Caldwell wrote short fiction and poetry, a作者: Hypopnea 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:00 作者: MURKY 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 17:10 作者: Delude 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 22:11
Molecular Sememics: Toward A Model of an Ordinary Languageon that it is the words we use to name a molecule that are the bearers of meaning. Situating himself against this orthodox understanding of linguistic meaning, Caldwell firmly sets the premise of Molecular Sememics to be that meaning originates in an individual utterance, and is then conventionalized through continued use in that same manner.作者: cartilage 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 04:01 作者: 上下連貫 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 08:45
Physiologie der Appetitregulation,on that it is the words we use to name a molecule that are the bearers of meaning. Situating himself against this orthodox understanding of linguistic meaning, Caldwell firmly sets the premise of Molecular Sememics to be that meaning originates in an individual utterance, and is then conventionalized through continued use in that same manner.作者: 加花粗鄙人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 09:29 作者: 打火石 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:31
Whorf, Orwell, and Mentalese (The Molecular Sememe: Some Implications for Semantics)rent discourses, and sometimes have no name at all. Thus, on Caldwell’s view it is not just different languages and cultures that may be incommensurate?– even different discourses in the same language may be so with one another. Molecular Sememics therefore stands in opposition to both standard theo作者: Liability 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:26
Molecular Sememics (Unfinished Book Manuscript)t standard theory) to be a result of mistaking the formal model of language that arose out of this program for an explanation of language itself..Following from this in section three, Caldwell endeavours to begin where Saussure finished. Approaching language from a non-formalist perspective he seeks作者: glisten 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 22:58
The Molecular Sememe: A Model for Literary Interpretationonclusion to an unhappy extreme, often losing the author’s message in the process. Recognizing that language is not a single system or structure, but rather a set of conventionalized micro-structures, Molecular Sememics offers a view of language that allows for the creativity witnessed not just in p作者: 雪上輕舟飛過 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:34
American Shoot-Out: Hemingway vs. Richard Ford is said. For the latter, all molecules have every item exhaustively listed, and so there is nothing for the reader to learn beyond what is given. Operating subtly in this chapter, Caldwell’s theory of Molecular Sememics sheds light on authorial intention, as well as the effects of that intention, c作者: 縱欲 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 07:22 作者: Confidential 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 14:20
0924-4662 iction and pedagogy..The monograph – which Caldwell was left unfinished due to illness – aims to present as a single intellectual package the theory and the applications...978-3-030-09231-3978-3-319-75441-3Series ISSN 0924-4662 Series E-ISSN 2215-034X 作者: 蚊子 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 14:52
Immunbiologie des Kindesalters,rent discourses, and sometimes have no name at all. Thus, on Caldwell’s view it is not just different languages and cultures that may be incommensurate?– even different discourses in the same language may be so with one another. Molecular Sememics therefore stands in opposition to both standard theo作者: Melanoma 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 20:44
R. Thurau,W. Courtin,F. Eckardtt standard theory) to be a result of mistaking the formal model of language that arose out of this program for an explanation of language itself..Following from this in section three, Caldwell endeavours to begin where Saussure finished. Approaching language from a non-formalist perspective he seeks作者: ALLEY 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 00:01
