標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Directions in Relevant Logic; Jean Norman,Richard Sylvan Book 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989 15th century.Enzo Paci.Gottfried Wilhel [打印本頁] 作者: controllers 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 19:50
書目名稱Directions in Relevant Logic影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Directions in Relevant Logic影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Directions in Relevant Logic網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Directions in Relevant Logic網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Directions in Relevant Logic被引頻次
書目名稱Directions in Relevant Logic被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Directions in Relevant Logic年度引用
書目名稱Directions in Relevant Logic年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Directions in Relevant Logic讀者反饋
書目名稱Directions in Relevant Logic讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: ENNUI 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:14
What is Relevant Implication?, the other two semantical. On the strength of these analyses I defend a concept of relevant implication which is intuitionistic rather than classical (as in the work of Anderson, Belnap, Meyer, Dunn and others).作者: homeostasis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 04:10
Book 1989to promulgate. In March 1981 we received most of the typescript of IN MEMORIAM: ALAN ROSS ANDERSON Proceedings of the International Conference of Relevant Logic from the original editors, Kenneth W. Collier, Ann Gasper and Robert G. Wolf of Southern Illinois University. 1 They had, most unfortunatel作者: Melanocytes 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 04:44 作者: Bombast 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:26 作者: 使高興 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 14:24
Bewohner ermutigen, aktivieren, organisieren any calculus you can think of. Since we know from Urquhart 82 that the principal relevance logics are one and all undecidable, we cannot hope to settle the . decision problem for second degree formulas. This is what makes the result reported here for a special kind of second degree formula have some interest.作者: 使高興 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:44
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-95094-9f propositional relevance logic were complete in the sense that their theorems were just those formulas true in all models whose components o, R and * conformed to the second-order conditions expressed by the axioms of the system.作者: upstart 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:46
Introduction: Routes in Relevant Logicthe other Way — in short it is a time so far like other periods of major logical revolution that some of the noisiest anti-authorities insist upon it being received, for good or evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only.作者: PACT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 05:22
Deducibility, Entailment and Analytic Containmentin sense of “containment”.. Another is Parry’s system, AI, of “analytic implication” which began with a more restricted sense of containment but has usually been presented as a theory of deducibility (cf. Parry 33 and 72).作者: indignant 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 09:27 作者: 五行打油詩 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:16 作者: Admire 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 15:21
, or easy to promulgate. In March 1981 we received most of the typescript of IN MEMORIAM: ALAN ROSS ANDERSON Proceedings of the International Conference of Relevant Logic from the original editors, Kenneth W. Collier, Ann Gasper and Robert G. Wolf of Southern Illinois University. 1 They had, most un作者: Noisome 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 20:49
, — Optionen und Handlungsans?tzetical reasoning (HR) (Rescher 64), only introducing the concept itself in section 4. The earlier motivational parts of this paper draw heavily on Belnap 79, which, however, ended in different conclusions, as we make clear at the end of section 3. Section 3 also indicates why we consider that relevance logic itself does not solve the problem.作者: PANEL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 23:15 作者: contradict 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 05:16
The Classical Logic of Relevant Logiciansms conjoined and talk of inference forms (P ∴ Q). I use ‘formally correct’ because a relevant logician does not accept an argument as meeting the formal conditions for deductive adequacy simply if a classical sentential analysis of it produces a classically valid form. (In the remainder of this essa作者: LEVER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:19 作者: Obstreperous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 12:37 作者: FLUSH 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 15:01 作者: biosphere 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 20:26
Analytic Implication; Its History, Justification and Varietiess作者: 發(fā)電機(jī) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:21
Friederike Ohnemus,Martina Mundingert logical innovation, it is an age of conformity, oppressed by restrictive practices under the dominant logical paradigm; it is a season of brilliant shafts of light, it is a season of classical darkness; it is a spring of hope, it is a winter of despair; we have everything before us, we have nothin作者: 易達(dá)到 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 03:57 作者: syncope 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:26 作者: Cardioversion 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 14:17 作者: 嚴(yán)峻考驗(yàn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 17:05 作者: goodwill 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:10
?ffentlicher Raum und Urbanit?ty everything, and that a false proposition implies everything, on the ground that A false or B true does not establish the existence of any “real connection” between A and B; this real connection they suppose to be an essential part of the idea of implication. I believe that E rests on a confusion b作者: 形上升才刺激 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:02 作者: 反復(fù)無常 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:00 作者: 下級(jí) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 10:01
Bewohner ermutigen, aktivieren, organisierenm below is chiefly supplied in §19 and §24.3 (all references via the “section squiggle” are to ENT). There we showed how to decide provability for . (no nesting of arrows). From above, the context is provided by Meyer 79b, who shows by a surprisingly simple argument that the decision question for . 作者: Goblet-Cells 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:59 作者: Obsessed 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 18:49 作者: 歪曲道理 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:24 作者: HUMID 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 04:43 作者: acrophobia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 07:47 作者: antenna 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 10:44 作者: 尊嚴(yán) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 16:26
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-87170-1may derive a sentence which obviously has nothing to do with the premises we begin with. He objected first to Addition: from p to infer Apq. The logicians usually object to the rules for C: from Np to infer Cpq and from q to infer Cpq. They come together in the classic case.: from p and Np to infer q.作者: 小平面 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 18:54
?ffentlicher Raum und Urbanit?ty everything, and that a false proposition implies everything, on the ground that A false or B true does not establish the existence of any “real connection” between A and B; this real connection they suppose to be an essential part of the idea of implication. I believe that E rests on a confusion between two distinct notions of real connection.作者: 神秘 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 22:53
Partnerschaftliche Stadtteilentwicklungs, of course, that R. has no finite characteristic matrix; and Pahi has suggested in 72 ways of extending this latter result to a wide class of subsystems of R.. In fact, however, modifications of the method of (Ulrich 71) permit complete extension.作者: Hay-Fever 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:13
Reason and Argumenthttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/280690.jpg作者: 多骨 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 07:06 作者: ELUDE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 10:36 作者: reflection 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 17:35
The Classical Logic of Relevant Logiciansed that they were (in my 74). I want to argue for this suggestion after discussing some terminology. By ‘relevant logician’ I mean a logician who accepts a natural language argument A being formally correct on a classical sentential analysis if and only if a classical sentential analysis of A produc作者: –scent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 21:57 作者: 積習(xí)難改 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 02:07
Conjunctive Containmentr beliefs, hypotheses, etc. We provide a prospective application for this concept by consideration of an amendment to Rescher’s 1964 theory of hypothetical reasoning (HR) (Rescher 64), only introducing the concept itself in section 4. The earlier motivational parts of this paper draw heavily on Beln作者: terazosin 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 06:31 作者: 燕麥 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 11:09
What is Relevant Implication? Ackermann’s early papers). In the present paper I propose to investigate this concept through three closely connected analyses, one proof-theoretical, the other two semantical. On the strength of these analyses I defend a concept of relevant implication which is intuitionistic rather than classical作者: 全神貫注于 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 11:26 作者: Indurate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 17:57
Which Entailments Entail which Entailments?m below is chiefly supplied in §19 and §24.3 (all references via the “section squiggle” are to ENT). There we showed how to decide provability for . (no nesting of arrows). From above, the context is provided by Meyer 79b, who shows by a surprisingly simple argument that the decision question for . 作者: LARK 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 22:46
Incompleteness for Quantified Relevance Logicsics were a privileged point o, an ‘a(chǎn)ccessibility’ relation R and a special operator * for evaluating negation. Under the truth- conditions of the semantics, each formula A(P.,…,P.) could be seen as expressing a first order condition A.(p.,…,p., o, R,*) on sets p.,…,p. and o, R, *, while each formula作者: 保留 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 03:31 作者: Receive 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 05:01
https://doi.org/10.1007/b104647e fragmented and do not necessarily add to a coherent whole. In contrast, the argument made is that visualizing NOS in terms of images can help bring some coherence to how NOS is conceptualized and enacted in science education. Various visual accounts including the . and the . are used to illustrate作者: neuron 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 10:36 作者: athlete’s-foot 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 12:55
,Bisher ungekl?rte Krankheiten, unterstützen werden /Service94/. Da diese mobilen Systeme Dienstleistungen erbringen, ordnet man sie unter dem Begriff ?Serviceroboter“ ein /Service94/. Den weitaus gr??ten Anteil der Serviceroboter bilden hierbei die bodengestützten ?Serviceroboterfahrzeuge“ (SRF) /Wüst92/.
