標題: Titlebook: Direct Protection of Innovation; William Kingston Book 1987 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1987 contract.law.patent.patent law [打印本頁] 作者: OAK 時間: 2025-3-21 19:28
書目名稱Direct Protection of Innovation影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Direct Protection of Innovation影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Direct Protection of Innovation網(wǎng)絡公開度
書目名稱Direct Protection of Innovation網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名
書目名稱Direct Protection of Innovation被引頻次
書目名稱Direct Protection of Innovation被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Direct Protection of Innovation年度引用
書目名稱Direct Protection of Innovation年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Direct Protection of Innovation讀者反饋
書目名稱Direct Protection of Innovation讀者反饋學科排名
作者: 心胸狹窄 時間: 2025-3-21 23:41
The Unexploited Potential of Patentsciated with arbitrary use of power in this way, and to be contrasted with a Franchise. The difference between the two was that a Franchise conferred rights (which could be sole rights, as in the case of a monopoly) and these carried corresponding duties, but no similar duties were imposed on the holder of a Monopoly.作者: Antigen 時間: 2025-3-22 04:29 作者: 溫和女孩 時間: 2025-3-22 05:29
Chapter XIIIoint it out. Their work in response to this Brief, endorsed by their reputations as experts on Patents, guarantees at least one thing: It is highly unlikely that the proposals have any serious drawback that is not touched upon somewhere in the previous “critical” chapters.作者: CLAP 時間: 2025-3-22 09:11
Caitlyn Hauff,Christy Greenleaf. (that is as an abstraction, apart from a concrete embodiment). The only way of achieving protection of a concept or technical teaching in the Kronz system, would be through separately protecting every possible individual embodiment of it.作者: Emg827 時間: 2025-3-22 13:12 作者: Emg827 時間: 2025-3-22 18:13
Kronz’s “Innovation Patent”. (that is as an abstraction, apart from a concrete embodiment). The only way of achieving protection of a concept or technical teaching in the Kronz system, would be through separately protecting every possible individual embodiment of it.作者: synovium 時間: 2025-3-23 00:18
On the Design of a System to Improve the Production of Innovationse value of a successful outcome. Some if not all of these attributes of a research project are quite uncertain .; in general, the information available to interested private parties is far superior to that available to public authorities. In this situation the advantages of decentralization afforded by a perfect patent system seem unusually clear.作者: TEN 時間: 2025-3-23 04:58 作者: 安撫 時間: 2025-3-23 07:26
Sportswomen’s Apparel in the United Statesciated with arbitrary use of power in this way, and to be contrasted with a Franchise. The difference between the two was that a Franchise conferred rights (which could be sole rights, as in the case of a monopoly) and these carried corresponding duties, but no similar duties were imposed on the holder of a Monopoly.作者: 手工藝品 時間: 2025-3-23 10:18
Energy Marketplace Transactionse optimal set of rewards in this case, but it does seem to be an effective one. There are various other ways of rewarding new and important ideas, but I am going to here confine myself to the discussion of possible innovations in the patent system.作者: angiography 時間: 2025-3-23 14:53 作者: STRIA 時間: 2025-3-23 20:31
http://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/280626.jpg作者: brother 時間: 2025-3-23 22:35 作者: 表示問 時間: 2025-3-24 03:13
Sebastian Schwab,Daniel MemmertThe proposals outlined in the two previous chapters were developed completely independently of each other. One proposal comes from a legal and Patent Attorney background; the other from business and economics. The extent of their agreement is consequently quite remarkable, including, as it does:作者: Exhilarate 時間: 2025-3-24 07:45 作者: 阻撓 時間: 2025-3-24 10:44
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6570-2The position of a practising Patent Attorney with experience of protecting innovation on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean constitutes a favoured observation post for appreciating the practical efficiency of the various patent systems.作者: 正面 時間: 2025-3-24 16:27 作者: 內(nèi)向者 時間: 2025-3-24 19:41 作者: 陳列 時間: 2025-3-25 02:20 作者: 或者發(fā)神韻 時間: 2025-3-25 07:23 作者: 同謀 時間: 2025-3-25 10:38 作者: BYRE 時間: 2025-3-25 12:34
Response in Defence of the Innovation Patent ConceptFor ease of understanding, I propose to respond to the comments of the various contributors in the order in which these appear above.作者: 披肩 時間: 2025-3-25 16:45
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1265-1contract; law; patent; patent law作者: harpsichord 時間: 2025-3-25 23:36 作者: Respond 時間: 2025-3-26 01:42
Sportswomen’s Apparel in the United Statesor her) sole control of some valuable resource, any sovereign could ensure that a favourite could prosper. In medieval times, monopoly came to be associated with arbitrary use of power in this way, and to be contrasted with a Franchise. The difference between the two was that a Franchise conferred r作者: collagen 時間: 2025-3-26 04:39
Caitlyn Hauff,Christy Greenleaff “innovation property” which is quite different from the intellectual property of which the classical Patent system is one type. In that system, protection of an embodiment of a concept or technical teaching, can be no more than part of, or an aspect of, whatever protection applies to the concept o作者: Rotator-Cuff 時間: 2025-3-26 08:34 作者: Influx 時間: 2025-3-26 16:10
Energy Marketplace Transactionssystem for new ideas is highly desirable. We certainly do not have a surplus of such new ideas. It is by no means certain that the patent system is the optimal set of rewards in this case, but it does seem to be an effective one. There are various other ways of rewarding new and important ideas, but作者: nugatory 時間: 2025-3-26 18:53 作者: GLUT 時間: 2025-3-26 22:27
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22652-7iscoveries which could not be otherwise obtained by private transactions. Thus a private incentive is created which encourages firms and individuals to devote resources to inventive endeavors. In organizing their efforts they have an incentive to obtain and apply information regarding the nature and作者: BACLE 時間: 2025-3-27 01:18 作者: 忘川河 時間: 2025-3-27 07:08 作者: refraction 時間: 2025-3-27 12:38
Kronz’s “Innovation Patent”f “innovation property” which is quite different from the intellectual property of which the classical Patent system is one type. In that system, protection of an embodiment of a concept or technical teaching, can be no more than part of, or an aspect of, whatever protection applies to the concept o作者: Confirm 時間: 2025-3-27 15:36 作者: inflate 時間: 2025-3-27 20:04
Intellectual Propertysystem for new ideas is highly desirable. We certainly do not have a surplus of such new ideas. It is by no means certain that the patent system is the optimal set of rewards in this case, but it does seem to be an effective one. There are various other ways of rewarding new and important ideas, but作者: Indict 時間: 2025-3-28 00:32
Chapter IX to me to be both original and of great importance. During recent decades, economists have debated extensively the value of the existing Patent System and many contributions to this debate have voiced criticisms of smaller and larger importance. Some have even advocated abolishing the system altoget作者: nephritis 時間: 2025-3-28 03:52
On the Design of a System to Improve the Production of Innovationsiscoveries which could not be otherwise obtained by private transactions. Thus a private incentive is created which encourages firms and individuals to devote resources to inventive endeavors. In organizing their efforts they have an incentive to obtain and apply information regarding the nature and作者: 翅膀拍動 時間: 2025-3-28 07:19 作者: carotid-bruit 時間: 2025-3-28 14:25
Innovation Protection Viewed from an Information Perspectiverous posturing, is a quaint sideshow accompanying the major drama of innovation; it can be tolerated as amateur theatricals provided by patent lawyers and bureaucrats, but their vulgar entertainment must not be allowed to interrupt the professional subtlety and artistry of the main performance. Kron作者: 虛情假意 時間: 2025-3-28 16:05
Chapter IXe field could write: “It is almost impossible to conceive of any existing social institution so faulty in so many ways. It survives only because there seems to be nothing better”.(1) The alternatives put forward by various authors have been extensively discussed in the literature, where they were fo作者: 時代 時間: 2025-3-28 22:17
A Possible Future: Deregulationrous posturing, is a quaint sideshow accompanying the major drama of innovation; it can be tolerated as amateur theatricals provided by patent lawyers and bureaucrats, but their vulgar entertainment must not be allowed to interrupt the professional subtlety and artistry of the main performance. Kron作者: AMOR 時間: 2025-3-29 01:22 作者: 有危險 時間: 2025-3-29 04:59 作者: dagger 時間: 2025-3-29 11:10 作者: 徹底檢查 時間: 2025-3-29 11:55
10樓作者: Foregery 時間: 2025-3-29 18:55
10樓作者: Oafishness 時間: 2025-3-29 23:38
10樓作者: 使更活躍 時間: 2025-3-30 00:39
10樓
