標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Dialogical Rhetoric; An Essay on Truth an Wouter H. Slob Book 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002 Argument.dialectic.dialog [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: Blandishment 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 16:54
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Dialogical Rhetoric影響因子(影響力)
作者: 剛開(kāi)始 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 21:55 作者: Pelvic-Floor 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 04:18
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0476-3Argument; dialectic; dialogue; logic; postmodernism; rhetoric作者: 拋物線 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:40 作者: 改良 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 10:23 作者: 緩解 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:11
Steven Burgess,Casey Rentmeesterthey had something to say about the concept of truth, said surprisingly little: they were far more interested in truths than in “truth”’ (Pitcher, 1964, 1). Pitcher suggests that the interest in theories of truth was triggered by the ‘a(chǎn)pparently outrageous things which the Absolute Idealists of the 作者: 緩解 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:26
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9442-8s yielding incompatible conclusions cannot be permitted. We have seen that pre-modern philosophy had no need to defend its (mono-)logic, but as soon as the modernist ’turn to the subject’ had its logical counterpart in the syntactical approach of Frege a problem emerged. Modern formal logic allowed 作者: 圍裙 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:00
Frank C. Richardson,Robert C. Bishopion is what accounts for such normative distinctions. As all of these distinctions are debatable (at least from a human perspective), we can see them as outcomes of discussions. We might therefore generalize the problem as a matter of evaluating arguments and concentrate on the distinction between g作者: FLING 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 04:02 作者: enlist 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 07:52
Patrick Londen,Philip Walsh,Jeff Yoshiminormativity differs from a dialectical approach, as well as from a mono-logical one. The latter holds that there is only one logic that controls the correctness of inferences. I argued that mono-logic requires a strong understanding of truth, and I hope to have explained sufficiently that we should 作者: Insensate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:03
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18944-1Allegedly, we live in a postmodern world. We see weird buildings being erected, television is omnipresent, virtual money determines our wealth and Big Brother is watching terrorists and everybody else. The phenomena of postmodernism are clear enough, but understanding the concept of postmodernism is something else.作者: 騎師 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 15:28
Introduction,Allegedly, we live in a postmodern world. We see weird buildings being erected, television is omnipresent, virtual money determines our wealth and Big Brother is watching terrorists and everybody else. The phenomena of postmodernism are clear enough, but understanding the concept of postmodernism is something else.作者: 細(xì)絲 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 20:55 作者: gregarious 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 01:29 作者: geometrician 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 04:37 作者: alliance 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:56
Truth; What is the Problem?,consists in thinking that one theory can satisfy different projects of truth without properly distinguishing them. As anyone dealing with the issue can confirm, it is difficult to get a grip on the problem of truth.作者: 退潮 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:55
Holistic Incommensurability,ready, there are important differences between non- and post-foundational holism. These differences can be described in terms of ‘scale’. Non-foundationalism applies a ‘large’ holism: it postulates a (cultural) background that is shared by a certain group of people that allows them to appeal to some作者: Substance-Abuse 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 18:06
1566-7650 the problem of incommensurability, can be seen in a different light. As a result, truth reappears again. Surviving the postmodern criticisms, it is a matter of978-1-4020-0909-9978-94-010-0476-3Series ISSN 1566-7650 Series E-ISSN 2215-1907 作者: Optic-Disk 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 22:15 作者: 懶洋洋 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:52 作者: Inscrutable 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 04:55
Frank C. Richardson,Robert C. Bishopnot. Much like St. Augustin’s understanding of evil as ., a bad argument had the status of ... Consequently, no separate study of fallacious argumentation was necessary. Fallacies were simply considered the complement of valid inference, and deserved no special treatment of their own.作者: violate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:24
Patrick Londen,Philip Walsh,Jeff Yoshimie one conventionally to be in force. Yet, they argue, the choice cannot be a matter of mere will: it must be a rational one. Whereas mono-logic normativity depends upon truth, we have seen that dialectical rationality depends upon rationality.作者: Lignans 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 12:44 作者: 沖擊力 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 17:46 作者: 遺產(chǎn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:07
Conclusion,e one conventionally to be in force. Yet, they argue, the choice cannot be a matter of mere will: it must be a rational one. Whereas mono-logic normativity depends upon truth, we have seen that dialectical rationality depends upon rationality.作者: 永久 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:23 作者: syring 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:33 作者: 厚臉皮 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:51
From Dialogue to Rhetoric,. The very fact that there are alternatives fundamentally changes the logical space in which normative issues are to be settled. Truth no longer speaks for itself, but has become dependent upon the logical system that is operative.作者: 條街道往前推 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 15:04 作者: 庇護(hù) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 17:56 作者: Transfusion 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:31
From Dialogue to Rhetoric,s yielding incompatible conclusions cannot be permitted. We have seen that pre-modern philosophy had no need to defend its (mono-)logic, but as soon as the modernist ’turn to the subject’ had its logical counterpart in the syntactical approach of Frege a problem emerged. Modern formal logic allowed 作者: TRAWL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 03:02
What is Wrong with Fallacies?,ion is what accounts for such normative distinctions. As all of these distinctions are debatable (at least from a human perspective), we can see them as outcomes of discussions. We might therefore generalize the problem as a matter of evaluating arguments and concentrate on the distinction between g作者: NIL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 07:44 作者: Foment 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 09:36
Conclusion,normativity differs from a dialectical approach, as well as from a mono-logical one. The latter holds that there is only one logic that controls the correctness of inferences. I argued that mono-logic requires a strong understanding of truth, and I hope to have explained sufficiently that we should 作者: 英寸 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:10
arily fitting their true preferences) on the entire community. Another explanation may lie in Wagner principle about the natural tendency of public bureaucracy to expansion. The European rules as well as the Italian policies, in the application of the fiscal compact, should more clearly and firmly d作者: 憤慨點(diǎn)吧 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 17:45
Hari Pranav Arun Kumar,J. S. Gokul,K. N. Sudhakartries like USA, Germany, UK, the Republic of Korea, Italy, Spain, France, the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine, and for the world. The presented information?is?useful to regulate the quarantine activities and to predict the medical and economic consequences of different/future pandemics.?.978-981-33-6418-9978-981-33-6416-5作者: gene-therapy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 00:24 作者: Permanent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:40
Barbara Perry,Ryan Scrivensof an HMM-based recognition system to handle multiple fonts, different handwriting styles, and their variations. Most current HMM approaches are HTK-based systems which are maximum likelihood (ML) trained and which try to adapt their models to different writing styles using writer adaptive training,作者: ASSAY 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 09:28
