作者: Irritate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:39
Whitehead and Deleuze: Thinking the Event,he ways in which things manifest themselves to consciousness, so there are also these ‘exceptional events’ we sometimes experience, like falling in love, or even like the Holocaust (which for Lyotard is a kind of archetype of an event). Such events indeed are extraordinary — they take us by surprise作者: 是貪求 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:31
The Emergence of a Speculative Empiricism: Whitehead Reading Bergson,a perpetual growth, a creation pursued without end’.. Certainly, the terms differ: where Bergson refers to duration, vital force and the event, Whitehead, in . ., prefers to speak of becoming, creativity and actual entities. But a common trajectory seems to extend beyond the divergent vocabulary.作者: sulcus 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 08:23
A Whiteheadian Chaosmos?,meaning and order’; rather, ‘patterns of meaning and order emerge gradually, fitfully, and unevenly from [a] churning multiplicity of value centers’ (Sherburne, 1986, pp. 83, 92). Thus — or so it would seem — the term ‘chaosmology’ is simply a fancy neologism for speculative naturalism, for a cosmol作者: 瑪瑙 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:06 作者: 北京人起源 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:31 作者: 北京人起源 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 20:37 作者: gene-therapy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 23:57 作者: MOCK 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 02:01
n between their concepts, methods and modes of philosophy. Themes are examined in the context of the contrasts, differences and conjunctions - the rhizomatic connections - between their shared concepts.978-0-230-28073-1作者: osteoclasts 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 06:17 作者: 愛(ài)國(guó)者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 10:59 作者: Angioplasty 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 15:56
Heterogenesis and the Problems of Metaphysics,experience; and events defied the strict modal distinction between possible, impossible and necessary. That the link between empiricism and metaphysics was exemplified for Adorno in the concept of . might also have met with Deleuze’s approval, for openness, according to Adorno, is philosophy thinking beyond itself.作者: IRATE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 18:54
Deleuze, Whitehead and the Reversal of Platonism, the professional divide, informing the questions of language, temporality and other topics. It has also been suggested that the claim regarding the ‘end of metaphysics’ is modern philosophy’s ‘supreme fiction’, the strategy that constitutes its relation to prior traditions, enabling it to constantly renew itself.作者: Ingest 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:38
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91577-2round in the problems to be outlined below, this chapter asks whether a parallel idea of determination can be found in Whitehead’s work.. It will be shown that such parallels exist through many of Whitehead’s books and essays, but that there are significant and productive differences between the two positions.作者: 露天歷史劇 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 03:41 作者: 開(kāi)始從未 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 08:35 作者: AORTA 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 12:05 作者: Coronary 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:31
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-03126-6stops emphasizing that public, consensual matters of fact, precisely because we are able to characterize them in a consensual way, are shaped by language, and as such are the worst starting point for philosophy. For Whitehead, philosophy demands experimentation with language, knowing that any ready-made use of words means failure.作者: 導(dǎo)師 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 22:34
Zur Soziologie des Hofmeisterstandespear that I am eliding or confusing the distinction between subjectivity and individuality here. However, one of the arguments I wish to set out in this chapter is that the validity and complexity of such a distinction can be helpfully rethought through a sustained engagement with the work of Whitehead and Deleuze.作者: 吸氣 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:22 作者: Arctic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 06:30 作者: 奴才 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 07:56
,Introduction: Deleuze, Whitehead, Bergson — Rhizomatic Connections,both ends of the twentieth century. At the start of the century Bergson’s thought was hailed as ‘the beginning of a new era’ and yet, under the weight of criticisms which labelled his thought ‘intuitionist’ or ‘irrationalist’, he virtually disappeared for most of the middle decades of the twentieth 作者: humectant 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 11:43
Thinking with Deleuze and Whitehead: a Double Test,rison. Comparison always entails the risk of reducing philosophical thoughts to a matter of opinions to be compared from an outside, apparently neutral, standpoint, that is by an unmoved reader, and this risk becomes lethal when, as is the case with both Whitehead and Deleuze, the philosophers expli作者: ACRID 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 18:29
Language, Subjectivity and Individuality,tivity that is not limited to the ‘human’. Both writers provide compelling reasons as to why and how contemporary analyses should avoid positing the human person as either an object or a subject. Rather, ‘human’ individuality is to be envisaged as an aspect within the wider, processual effectivity w作者: Biguanides 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 23:48
Whitehead and Deleuze: Thinking the Event,the ‘event’. It is a concept we are all familiar with in a sense, even in philosophy, since it is so central to much of contemporary thought. It plays, for instance, a central role in Whitehead’s process philosophy, but it is also a key concept for postmodern philosophers like Jacques Derrida and Je作者: 合群 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 03:22
The Emergence of a Speculative Empiricism: Whitehead Reading Bergson, William James, and John Dewey.’. There are many readers, particularly in France, who have seen this as attesting to a continuity between the two philosophers.. This impression seems all the more justified given the similar homage Whitehead had earlier paid Bergson in .: ‘I believe that in this doct作者: FLOUR 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:41 作者: abolish 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:49 作者: 神圣在玷污 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 13:06
Deleuze, Whitehead and the Reversal of Platonism, has been at least one of the primary questions of ‘modern’ philosophy and arguably . question of philosophy in the twentieth century on both sides of the professional divide, informing the questions of language, temporality and other topics. It has also been suggested that the claim regarding the ‘作者: defray 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:31
A Whiteheadian Chaosmos?,nction between a cosmology and a chaosmology. At its most simplistic, the difference in play is that between a cosmos in which order is imposed on a primordial chaos ‘from outside’, or transcendently (as when Form is imposed on matter by the Platonic demiurge, or harmony established . by the Leibniz作者: 小平面 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 21:04
,‘O bitches of impossibility!’ Programmatic Dysfunction in the Chaosmos of Deleuze and Whitehead,in sense they are, in that ‘functioning’ seems to be a very dubious thing; in the sense that the way we organize our thought is politically revealing (AO XIII); in the sense that to subject ourselves to any system in order to gain security or control is a way of suppressing life (N 143).. In this se作者: ALIAS 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 03:49 作者: PLUMP 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 08:35
Die Hochspannungs-Gleichstrommaschineboth ends of the twentieth century. At the start of the century Bergson’s thought was hailed as ‘the beginning of a new era’ and yet, under the weight of criticisms which labelled his thought ‘intuitionist’ or ‘irrationalist’, he virtually disappeared for most of the middle decades of the twentieth 作者: 新陳代謝 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 11:21 作者: macabre 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:34
Zur Soziologie des Hofmeisterstandestivity that is not limited to the ‘human’. Both writers provide compelling reasons as to why and how contemporary analyses should avoid positing the human person as either an object or a subject. Rather, ‘human’ individuality is to be envisaged as an aspect within the wider, processual effectivity w作者: 向宇宙 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:03
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91577-2the ‘event’. It is a concept we are all familiar with in a sense, even in philosophy, since it is so central to much of contemporary thought. It plays, for instance, a central role in Whitehead’s process philosophy, but it is also a key concept for postmodern philosophers like Jacques Derrida and Je作者: 上釉彩 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:29
Die Holl?ndische Landwirtschaft William James, and John Dewey.’. There are many readers, particularly in France, who have seen this as attesting to a continuity between the two philosophers.. This impression seems all the more justified given the similar homage Whitehead had earlier paid Bergson in .: ‘I believe that in this doct作者: nuclear-tests 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 04:37
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91577-2e problems and the power of the concept in resolving them explain its pivotal role in Deleuze’s work. Indeed, it is questionable whether Deleuze’s metaphysics can stand without reciprocal determination. Given the strong connection between Deleuze’s and Whitehead’s philosophies and their common backg作者: 不可救藥 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 08:43
Die Holl?ndische Landwirtschaft for Deleuze, was the sole form of necessity; the empiricist search for the conditions of the new involved a counter-effectuation of the accidents of experience; and events defied the strict modal distinction between possible, impossible and necessary. That the link between empiricism and metaphysic作者: 形狀 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 14:12
Die Holl?ndische Landwirtschaft has been at least one of the primary questions of ‘modern’ philosophy and arguably . question of philosophy in the twentieth century on both sides of the professional divide, informing the questions of language, temporality and other topics. It has also been suggested that the claim regarding the ‘作者: 背信 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 15:53
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91885-8nction between a cosmology and a chaosmology. At its most simplistic, the difference in play is that between a cosmos in which order is imposed on a primordial chaos ‘from outside’, or transcendently (as when Form is imposed on matter by the Platonic demiurge, or harmony established . by the Leibniz作者: 植物學(xué) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 19:21 作者: ELUC 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 00:30
n between their concepts, methods and modes of philosophy. Themes are examined in the context of the contrasts, differences and conjunctions - the rhizomatic connections - between their shared concepts.978-0-230-28073-1作者: 托人看管 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 06:37 作者: 把手 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 07:19 作者: formula 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 12:32
Whitehead and Deleuze on Creation and Calculus,In . (hereafterP&R). we find:作者: 拍翅 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 16:57 作者: 遷移 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 21:46 作者: 藐視 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 01:18
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230280731concept; conjunctions; event; Gilles Deleuze; Henri Bergson; individual; knowledge; metaphysics; philosophy; 作者: 造反,叛亂 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 04:28
Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2009作者: Vital-Signs 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 10:55
2625-3577 chert werden kann, m?glichst ohne die Natur für kommendeGenerationen dauerhaft durch schlechte Landwirtschaftspraktiken zusch?digen. Dafür werden die derzeitigen Vorgehensweisen, Chancen sowieRisiken und Problematiken der drei scheinbar gegens?tzlichenLandwirtschaftsformen (konventionell, ?kologisch
