標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review; Comparative Perspect Guobin Zhu Conference proceedings 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: invoke 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:06
書(shū)目名稱Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review影響因子(影響力)
書(shū)目名稱Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度
書(shū)目名稱Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review被引頻次
書(shū)目名稱Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review年度引用
書(shū)目名稱Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review年度引用學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review讀者反饋
書(shū)目名稱Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 懲罰 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:09 作者: 不如屎殼郎 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:18
as Psychological Fiction (1959), The analysis of the national reports reveals why, how and when the courts defer to administrative actions..In each constitutional system, deference is employed differently as the positioning of the judiciary within the separation of powers, the role of the courts as a mechanism of checks and balanc作者: Coronary 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:45 作者: DEFER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 09:50 作者: insomnia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 14:48 作者: insomnia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:39
‘Cartloads of Books’: some Sources for te even more gaps which have to be filled by the courts. In the Czech Republic relative ease of judicial review by the courts of first instance and the wide open access to the Supreme Administrative Court mean that many administrative cases are resolved in four instances—two instances of administrat作者: Picks-Disease 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:35
The Idea of Childhood: A GenealogyEuropean Union (EU) administration. The analysis shows that the review of the European courts on the discretionary choices of the EU administration revolves around the concept of ‘manifest error’. This term has acquired a different meaning throughout time, evolving from a very light review towards a作者: 背信 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 04:13 作者: mendacity 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 05:52
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-35086-8is, I present an overview of reliance on deference “stricto sensu” in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court when deciding on challenges to administrative action. Using textual analysis, it is shown that very few decisions consider the doctrine as such as the basis of the rejection of an application作者: dowagers-hump 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:10
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-35086-8ght according to which the existence of administrative courts is a deviation from constitutional principles. It argues, first, that such courts were set up simply because existing judges did not ensure an adequate judicial protection against the State and, second, that the Constitution does not simp作者: 只有 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 14:49
Macmillan Studies in Victorian Literaturetions were traditionally understood to be completely out of judicial reach and thus deemed exceptions to the fundamental principle of administration based on law. Even so, how to comprehend administrative discretion and manage to legally check its leeway has been explored in some depth. The concepti作者: 廢除 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:27
: ‘The Cold Hard Armour of Pride’trine, which is also referred to as the limited judicial review of administrative actions, is the subject of dynamic developments. The exact role that the court should play in the review of administrative actions remains a contentious issue. The focus of this contribution is the relationship between作者: inspiration 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:24 作者: 無(wú)王時(shí)期, 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 05:42 作者: 吞沒(méi) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 10:02
Dickens, , and the Paris Boulevardsy engage with the issue of deference—until about a decade ago. While there is yet to be a general doctrine of deference in Singapore, the contours of the courts’ broad approach to deference can be discerned, which tends towards erring on the side of prudence and caution in the fair and just protecti作者: Picks-Disease 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 14:34 作者: NOVA 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 16:09 作者: 有法律效應(yīng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 20:33 作者: boisterous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:10
Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Lawhttp://image.papertrans.cn/d/image/264773.jpg作者: perpetual 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 05:38
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23545-2“Deference” is not a term which is found in the legal vocabulary of Argentinean law. However, the judicial review of administrative actions have had different stages. From denying control to having a judicial control with all the guarantees of defense in court. At present, the main issue of discussion is about determining the scope of the review.作者: 要塞 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 09:09
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230377998The article deals with the development of judicial review in Denmark focusing on the level of deference to the administration. It presents the general understanding of the concept of free discretion in Danish law and the scope of the investigation that a Danish court is expected to conduct during judicial review.作者: Manifest 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 15:33
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-35086-8This chapter outlines the approach to deference that Hong Kong courts adopt, evaluates whether such approach is justified, and proposes an approach that should be adopted in light of Hong Kong’s unique constitutional and institutional landscape.作者: 包租車(chē)船 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 18:04 作者: PRO 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:49 作者: Radiculopathy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:10
A Principled Approach to Judicial Deference for Hong Kong,This chapter outlines the approach to deference that Hong Kong courts adopt, evaluates whether such approach is justified, and proposes an approach that should be adopted in light of Hong Kong’s unique constitutional and institutional landscape.作者: 音的強(qiáng)弱 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 05:48 作者: 佛刊 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 10:47 作者: 抱狗不敢前 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:36
Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in Australia, of Comparative Law in Fukuoka, Japan..Judicial deference is a topic that has its origins in North American jurisprudence. In Australia, Gageler J has identified alternative meanings for the concept: respectful regard for the judgment or opinion of another; and respectful acknowledgement of the auth作者: vitreous-humor 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 18:39
,Comparer la déférence judiciaire : regards canadiens vers l’extérieur,ve law in Canada is the law of judicial deference. However, in order to properly understand judicial deference?in Canada, it is necessary to step back and place it in context. The first point is that “deference” has always played a role in administrative law in one way or another. However, what make作者: amenity 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 21:13
Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in China,trative organs rather than show their respects in a self-restraint way. One of the core issues in China’s judicial reforms that have been pushed forward in recent years is how to rationally arrange various governmental powers, to coordinate the relationships among the legislature, the administration作者: DALLY 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 01:26 作者: 寬度 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 06:05
Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review: The European Union,European Union (EU) administration. The analysis shows that the review of the European courts on the discretionary choices of the EU administration revolves around the concept of ‘manifest error’. This term has acquired a different meaning throughout time, evolving from a very light review towards a作者: Substance-Abuse 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 11:12
Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in Finland,dicial protection and other related factors, such as adequate access to a court, guarantees of procedural fairness, the sufficiently broad scope of judicial review, effective remedies and a relatively active role for the administrative courts. In Finland, as in several other continental European jur作者: 者變 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 14:49
Judicial Deference to the Administration in Israel,is, I present an overview of reliance on deference “stricto sensu” in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court when deciding on challenges to administrative action. Using textual analysis, it is shown that very few decisions consider the doctrine as such as the basis of the rejection of an application作者: 新奇 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:06
Judicial Review of Administrative Action in Italy: Beyond Deference?,ght according to which the existence of administrative courts is a deviation from constitutional principles. It argues, first, that such courts were set up simply because existing judges did not ensure an adequate judicial protection against the State and, second, that the Constitution does not simp作者: COMMA 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 22:08 作者: 防御 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 04:49
Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review: The Case of the Netherlands,trine, which is also referred to as the limited judicial review of administrative actions, is the subject of dynamic developments. The exact role that the court should play in the review of administrative actions remains a contentious issue. The focus of this contribution is the relationship between作者: 簡(jiǎn)潔 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 10:08
,The “Dreadful Truth” and Transparent Fictions: Deference in New Zealand Administrative Law,n the “transparent fiction” of . which remains the justification for judicial review. The continued reliance upon the notion of the courts as the determinator of the law leaves little space for the recognition of areas in which the executive has such authority. However, the absence of deference as a作者: 拖網(wǎng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 13:14 作者: Merited 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 17:40 作者: 防御 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 21:07
Full Judicial Review or Administrative Discretion? A Swedish Perspective on Deference to the Adminiined by the historically founded competence of administrative courts conducting a full review under the so-called administrative-judicial form of appeal. Here, the administrative court has the same decision-making competence as the deciding administrative authority, and thus may alter the decision i作者: Iatrogenic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 23:41 作者: dysphagia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 04:32 作者: 窒息 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 08:53
as Psychological Fiction (1959),sial nature, that wide portions of the society oppose, are perceived as political and therefore the courts are keener to grant deference. But the degree of deference depends on the characteristics of the dispute, the gravity of the issue, the level of technicality and whether the dispute is human ri作者: Abnormal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 13:11
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596320iew in Australia. Judicial review is concerned with the legality not the merits of decisions under review. A court will intervene if it perceives there has been an error of law, but not otherwise..The comprehensive statutory system of merits review undertaken by tribunals at both Commonwealth and St作者: Immobilize 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 16:01 作者: 憎惡 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 21:59 作者: 小臼 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 00:44 作者: Hiatal-Hernia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 04:33 作者: pancreas 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 09:59
Macmillan Studies in Victorian Literature. The degree of intensity tends to depend on the nature of the action and the judiciary’s confidence in making its own judgment through the judicial process. Modes of judicial review may vary from lenient through intermediate to strict scrutiny. Recent developments have brought the frequent use of p作者: boisterous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 14:22
Anny Sadrin (Professor of English)ademics to develop models to provide structure to this “variable intensity” approach, the opposition of the Supreme Court means that the application of deference remains open to the discretion of individual judges. Nevertheless, evidence already exists of a degree of structure being applied around v作者: 羽毛長(zhǎng)成 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 17:39
Dickens, , and the Paris Boulevards judicial review together with the current tension between the constitutional powers. The article exposes a point of view according to which the deference concept is not (yet) adequate to the Polish law and political system. The authors came to the conclusion that the usage of the deference doctrine作者: fertilizer 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 21:50 作者: persistence 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 04:11
Dickens, Europe and the New Worldstrative discretion or deference to the administration. The conclusion drawn here is that legal research in this field is needed to establish principles that are more general. In contrast, the two other main forms of judicial review—municipal appeal and legal review of governmental decisions—provide 作者: 賭博 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 08:25
The Nature of Dickens’s Realism most celebrated of which is Chevron deference, are part of the American system of rather broad diffusion of powers of governance, a pattern that includes but is not limited to the American versions of separation of powers and federalism. Substantial judicial deference to administrative agencies is 作者: disparage 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 10:06 作者: 消散 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 17:10
Conference proceedings 2019nstituting the outcome of the 20th General Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law, held in Fukuoka, Japan in July 2018, it offers a valuable and unique resource for the study of comparative administrative law..作者: 殺人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 20:34 作者: Excitotoxin 時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 00:07
Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in Australia,iew in Australia. Judicial review is concerned with the legality not the merits of decisions under review. A court will intervene if it perceives there has been an error of law, but not otherwise..The comprehensive statutory system of merits review undertaken by tribunals at both Commonwealth and St作者: auxiliary 時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 05:21
,Comparer la déférence judiciaire : regards canadiens vers l’extérieur, doctrine de la déférence judiciaire envers l’administration bénéficie d’un statut central en droit administratif canadien. On pourrait presque dire que le droit administratif canadien est le droit de la déférence judiciaire. Or, pour bien comprendre le développement de cette doctrine, il faut la pl作者: Urgency 時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 09:44
