標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Debating Europe in National Parliaments; Public Justification Frank Wendler Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: CRUST 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 16:42
書目名稱Debating Europe in National Parliaments影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Debating Europe in National Parliaments影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Debating Europe in National Parliaments網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度
書目名稱Debating Europe in National Parliaments網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Debating Europe in National Parliaments被引頻次
書目名稱Debating Europe in National Parliaments被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Debating Europe in National Parliaments年度引用
書目名稱Debating Europe in National Parliaments年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Debating Europe in National Parliaments讀者反饋
書目名稱Debating Europe in National Parliaments讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: Amorous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 21:50 作者: Ostrich 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 02:40 作者: 教育學(xué) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:16 作者: 和平 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 08:47
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09534-7he argumentative framing of justifications for Europe, and the patterns of polarization between political parties in the plenary debates of four EU Member State parliaments. The analysis of this topic requires a theoretical framework that links discursive, actor-related, and institutional elements i作者: 奇怪 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 16:13 作者: 奇怪 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 17:33 作者: eustachian-tube 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:37 作者: Maximize 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:29 作者: PAD416 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 06:41 作者: 最高峰 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:54
Die Umschichtung im polyphonen Denken,iscursive justification of decisions, institutions, and policies of the EU on the one hand, and the emergence of party political polarization through emerging differences in the use of argumentative frames and political positions, on the other. From this point of departure, the main puzzle of this b作者: abreast 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 14:11
Debating Europe in National Parliaments978-1-137-51727-2Series ISSN 2662-5873 Series E-ISSN 2662-5881 作者: 野蠻 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:06 作者: dictator 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:23
Data and Method,es for the empirical analysis (Sect. 3.1), the method of data collection through the computer-based text coding of evaluative claims (Sect. 3.2), and the methods applied for subsequent quantitative (Sect. 3.3) and qualitative content analyses (Sect. 3.4).作者: amorphous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 03:12
2662-5873 public debate about the EU. Responding to claims about a politicization of European governance, the author investigates the link between two dimensions of debate – the discursive justification and party political contestation of decision-making in the EU. Embedded in a comparison between the legisl作者: Jogging 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:10 作者: 大量 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 11:46 作者: 卡死偷電 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 18:53
The Discursive Justification of European Integration,s and arguments about Europe, or do we observe similar patterns of justification for European integration across countries? Are various aspects of European integration framed in very different or similar ways in debate, and what role does the reference to norms and interests play in a comparison of constitutional and policy-specific topics?作者: 按等級(jí) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 22:02 作者: NAV 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 02:27 作者: 昏睡中 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 05:01
Introduction,ve brought European issues into the spotlight of public debate (cp. Cramme and Hobolt 2015; Risse 2014). From a political science perspective, studying the public debate about the EU in parliaments is attractive for several reasons. The stances of political actors and parties can be studied firsthan作者: 使無(wú)效 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:01
Theoretical Framework,chapter is to show how the model can be adapted to the analysis of public debate on issues of European integration in national parliaments and to present the resulting hypotheses that will guide the empirical analysis.作者: 勤勞 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:33
Formats of Parliamentary Debate About the European Union,cted as case studies (to be presented in the next chapter). Its aim is to show that considerable differences can be observed particularly between the relatively closed, top-down communication in the French National Assembly, and the more open, relatively balanced, and polarized exchange between parl作者: 幻想 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 19:07
The Polarization of Parliamentary Parties,an be gained from a differentiation of the three distinct normative frames based on identity, political values, and legitimacy. Second, this chapter traces these links between justification and polarization in a comparative analysis of the five thematic case studies within each of these four levels 作者: 男學(xué)院 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 22:07 作者: Morbid 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 03:26
Conclusion,tive to expect a variety of very diverse arguments, debates, and degrees of contention in the public debate on European governance. Against this background, the main argument of the book is to show how evaluative statements about European integration can be systematically linked to observable patter作者: archenemy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:47
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09534-7ve brought European issues into the spotlight of public debate (cp. Cramme and Hobolt 2015; Risse 2014). From a political science perspective, studying the public debate about the EU in parliaments is attractive for several reasons. The stances of political actors and parties can be studied firsthan作者: Blood-Clot 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 08:27
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09534-7chapter is to show how the model can be adapted to the analysis of public debate on issues of European integration in national parliaments and to present the resulting hypotheses that will guide the empirical analysis.作者: Silent-Ischemia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 15:56 作者: Oscillate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 20:52 作者: 編輯才信任 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 00:51 作者: 壓倒性勝利 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 01:35 作者: preservative 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:50 作者: bibliophile 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 11:37 作者: 補(bǔ)充 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 14:40 作者: 合群 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 20:41
Formats of Parliamentary Debate About the European Union,mblée Nationale, the German Bundestag, the British House of Commons, and the Austrian Nationalrat. This selection of cases includes a considerable degree of variation in the institutional and party political context of parliamentary interactions, resulting in different styles of debate. The task of 作者: 注意力集中 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:58 作者: Tinea-Capitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:26
The Polarization of Parliamentary Parties,cision-making through public claims-making on the one hand, and the polarization between parliamentary parties through expressed differences in their positions toward issues of European integration, on the other. Building on the findings of the previous chapter, this part of our analysis aims at the作者: Interim 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 07:43 作者: 難取悅 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 11:51 作者: 障礙物 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 14:34
Panagiotis Papadimitriou,Vassilis Tsaoussidis Welt konstruiert werden k?nnen - zeitliche Prozesse wie z. B. Arbeitsabl?ufe und menschliche Handlungen, aber auch r?umlich gedachte Entit?ten wie Maschinen, Akteure, Welten oder Objekte. Die Grenzen zwischen natürlicher, technischer und symbolischer Welt werden neu gezogen - ein Umstand, der die t作者: 下垂 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 22:38
anize and host the International Peptide Symposium in Japan. The First International Peptide Symposium (IPS’97) was held on November 30–December 5, 1997, in Kyoto, and was co sponsored by four Peptide Societies. The attendance at this Symposium was 550 participants, including representatives from 32 different978-94-017-4106-4978-0-306-46864-3作者: 殺子女者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 02:11 作者: BILE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 03:38 作者: 蛤肉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 08:13
Planung und Betrieb von Smart Grids weiteren Vorschlag glaubt W. MATHESIUS eine bessere Form des Zulegierens (3) durch Reduktion des Titans durch die Eisenschmelze selbst aus einer Schlacke mit 30 % Kalk und 70 % Titans?ure zu erreichen.
