標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Debates in Macroeconomics from the Great Depression to the Long Recession; Cycles, Crises and P Arie Arnon Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if appl [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: hector 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 18:19
書目名稱Debates in Macroeconomics from the Great Depression to the Long Recession影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Debates in Macroeconomics from the Great Depression to the Long Recession影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Debates in Macroeconomics from the Great Depression to the Long Recession網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Debates in Macroeconomics from the Great Depression to the Long Recession網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Debates in Macroeconomics from the Great Depression to the Long Recession被引頻次
書目名稱Debates in Macroeconomics from the Great Depression to the Long Recession被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Debates in Macroeconomics from the Great Depression to the Long Recession年度引用
書目名稱Debates in Macroeconomics from the Great Depression to the Long Recession年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Debates in Macroeconomics from the Great Depression to the Long Recession讀者反饋
書目名稱Debates in Macroeconomics from the Great Depression to the Long Recession讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: Mettle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 23:26
The Early Keynes as a Marshallian: Before the Great Depressionnomic tradition. The Marshallian school, dominant at the turn of the twentieth century, shaped his early views on economics, including those on money and banking. The famous ., to which we will return in Chap. 5, was the last of the three famous books on the monetary economy written by Keynes. The f作者: 挖掘 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:29 作者: adipose-tissue 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:48
A Distraction: The Heated Hayek–Keynes Exchange About the ely, was impolite yet the overall relationship between these two protagonists was less appalling than the common description. What is clear in that exchange is that the two rivals knew, and in fact agreed, that they both had an unsatisfactory understanding of the concept of capital. Hayek claimed th作者: Anguish 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 11:09
Keynes’s ,: The Central Messageshe .—doubted the basic assumptions that most others continued to uphold. One of the crucial assumptions that they questioned was the tendency toward full employment in capitalism. The new, roughly formulated ideas were a fundamentally heretical thought: Even under competitive conditions, the market 作者: 辮子帶來幫助 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 14:58 作者: 辮子帶來幫助 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 20:04 作者: BYRE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 22:39 作者: Constant 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 01:49 作者: evanescent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:03
Opposing Keynesianism: Hayek’s 1970s Volte Face—From Opposing to Supporting “Free Banking” as he did prior to 1941. However, a sudden and somewhat surprising change in Hayek’s intellectual life came when he was awarded the Nobel Prize in economics in 1974. His main economic writings after the mid-1970s were dedicated to advancing a novel argument in favor of free banking. Hayek’s objecti作者: 十字架 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 10:47 作者: 紅潤(rùn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 14:51 作者: BULLY 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 21:42
On Some Dissenting Views: “Post-Keynesians” and Hyman Minskyriticisms from his supporters. That group of authors, mostly known as ‘post-Keynesian’ economists (although some were not identified as such), raised a wide range of ideas that were in line, in their opinion, with the principles Keynes promoted in the .. Naturally, these scholars’ writings were focu作者: Respond 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:23 作者: thyroid-hormone 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:55 作者: faucet 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 08:05
Eastern Europe: Progress and Problemshich was a definitive study of monetary theory which Keynes hoped would be his authoritative contribution to that discussion. However, as Keynes’s doubts about the validity of his 1930 theory grew in the face of the Great Depression this hope was shattered. This ultimately led to the 1936 revolutionary ..作者: Apogee 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 12:08 作者: 獨(dú)行者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:01 作者: Cocker 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 21:14 作者: BOOM 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:45
Book 2022f cycles, crises and macro-policy. It explores the road from the dominance of Keynesian ideas to those of New Classical Macroeconomics (NCM) toward the end of the millennium...The book covers the early influential work of Knut Wicksell; the economic debates of the 1930s, with core contributions from作者: CON 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 07:11 作者: Spirometry 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 07:47 作者: 難管 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 12:48
Socialism and International Languagetheory properly and he had not studied Wicksell before 1930. The differences between Keynes and Hayek on policy were explicit in their public positions, for example in a famous debate on the pages of the London Times.作者: allergy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 16:08 作者: finite 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 22:22 作者: 眼界 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 03:56 作者: 金哥占卜者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:19 作者: Interlocking 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:58
A Distraction: The Heated Hayek–Keynes Exchange About the theory properly and he had not studied Wicksell before 1930. The differences between Keynes and Hayek on policy were explicit in their public positions, for example in a famous debate on the pages of the London Times.作者: Rotator-Cuff 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:19
Keynes’s ,: The Central Messages unemployment and the level of production were determined by a market that had not even been conceived of as a well-specified theoretical construct before 1936—the aggregate market for goods and services. Keynes’s major challenge was to convince the community of economists of his novel proposition.作者: aptitude 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 18:43
Opposing Keynesianism: Friedman and the Rise of Monetarismyclical, short term changes. The Monetarist-Keynesian debate on the role of governments and the efficiency of macro policies, particularly monetary policy, heated up in the late 1960s with the stagflation that spread in many economies, revealing the uncommon pairing of unemployment and inflation, hence stagflation.作者: 情愛 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:48 作者: 憎惡 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 01:34 作者: insurrection 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:26
978-3-030-97705-4The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl作者: headway 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 09:48 作者: incubus 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 16:29
Springer Studies in the History of Economic Thoughthttp://image.papertrans.cn/d/image/264031.jpg作者: 雪崩 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:47 作者: peritonitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:48
Eastern Europe: Progress and Problems in later years. In his acclaimed treatise on monetary theory, . (1898), Wicksell reevaluated the debates among the Classicals, who did not provide satisfactory answers to the determination of the price level. Wicksell suggested an alternative innovative approach based on his “two rates” theory. Wic作者: 強(qiáng)所 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:57 作者: 藐視 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 06:30
Dangerous Language or Language of Hope?930s for his role in the debates on economic theory and policy. In ., written before the Great Depression, Hayek made the case that a theory, described by him as “a monetary explanation of the trade cycle,” was preferable to its alternatives, described as “real” explanations. Furthermore, he argued 作者: 杠桿支點(diǎn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 10:30 作者: 阻塞 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:13
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54917-4he .—doubted the basic assumptions that most others continued to uphold. One of the crucial assumptions that they questioned was the tendency toward full employment in capitalism. The new, roughly formulated ideas were a fundamentally heretical thought: Even under competitive conditions, the market 作者: 石墨 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 19:31
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9732-3cal approach. Hayek had always been deeply interested in the methodological and philosophical aspects of social thinking. This article, both in Hayek’s mind and as others read it, marked the start of a transformation in Hayek’s intellectual journey. He came to share the methodological skepticism so 作者: 可能性 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 00:37 作者: 后退 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 05:55 作者: Malaise 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 10:51
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283566es of government intervention—became world famous after the Second World War. Friedman strongly disagreed with the Keynesian claim that markets, left to themselves, might lead to suboptimal performance that could only be corrected via policy interventions. This fundamental dispute was the source for作者: Charlatan 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 15:15 作者: GEON 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 19:22 作者: 沐浴 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 20:48
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-8062-5antly, in macro policy making, before the end of the millennium. The views of the various tendencies within NCM regarding macro policy were diverse—particularly dissimilar were the New Keynesians—but they all shared a common theoretical conceptualization. A focal tenet was the method of New Classica作者: ACRID 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 03:50
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-8062-5riticisms from his supporters. That group of authors, mostly known as ‘post-Keynesian’ economists (although some were not identified as such), raised a wide range of ideas that were in line, in their opinion, with the principles Keynes promoted in the .. Naturally, these scholars’ writings were focu作者: motivate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 06:55 作者: 字謎游戲 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 11:18 作者: 刺耳的聲音 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 13:02 作者: 冥想后 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 18:56 作者: 小淡水魚 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 23:10 作者: 直覺好 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 02:07
Opposing Keynesianism: New Classical Macroeconomics from,, Through ,, to, and (the So Called) eynesian ideas. The label attached to this new tendency, New Keynesian macroeconomics (NK), was confusing to many. New Classical macroeconomists directed severe criticisms at Keynesian economics. One of the better-known disputes emerged in 1978, when Lucas and Sargent presented a renowned paper enti作者: voluble 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 06:10
How Did Micro Come to Reign over Macro Again? On Microeconomics, Macroeconomics and Microfoundationsencies were more radical in adopting a micro perspective in the analysis of the whole economy, some were less, particularly concerning macro policies. The birth of macroeconomics after the 1936 ., adopting a non-micro perspective for the analysis of whole economies in what was a clear break from wha
