標題: Titlebook: Dao Companion to Chinese Philosophy of Logic; Yiu-ming Fung Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Buddhist Yin-ming.Chinese Logic. [打印本頁] 作者: 是英寸 時間: 2025-3-21 16:42
書目名稱Dao Companion to Chinese Philosophy of Logic影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Dao Companion to Chinese Philosophy of Logic影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Dao Companion to Chinese Philosophy of Logic網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Dao Companion to Chinese Philosophy of Logic網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Dao Companion to Chinese Philosophy of Logic被引頻次
書目名稱Dao Companion to Chinese Philosophy of Logic被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Dao Companion to Chinese Philosophy of Logic年度引用
書目名稱Dao Companion to Chinese Philosophy of Logic年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Dao Companion to Chinese Philosophy of Logic讀者反饋
書目名稱Dao Companion to Chinese Philosophy of Logic讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: sigmoid-colon 時間: 2025-3-21 23:24
Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophyhttp://image.papertrans.cn/d/image/260425.jpg作者: Hemiparesis 時間: 2025-3-22 03:31 作者: 畏縮 時間: 2025-3-22 06:03
Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020作者: Ganglion-Cyst 時間: 2025-3-22 09:11 作者: 微生物 時間: 2025-3-22 15:55 作者: 微生物 時間: 2025-3-22 20:52 作者: Deduct 時間: 2025-3-22 22:07 作者: octogenarian 時間: 2025-3-23 03:30 作者: deviate 時間: 2025-3-23 07:55
Aerosol radiative forcing and climateanguage does not have linguistic markers or other devices to express counterfactuals. He also maintains that, if sometimes argumentation needs counterfactuals, Chinese speakers are incapable to make such kind of argumentation. In this chapter, I will argue that Bloom’s view is not right. As demonstr作者: 蠟燭 時間: 2025-3-23 13:40 作者: depreciate 時間: 2025-3-23 17:10 作者: CHART 時間: 2025-3-23 20:54 作者: BLUSH 時間: 2025-3-24 01:03 作者: CHAR 時間: 2025-3-24 04:54 作者: angiography 時間: 2025-3-24 09:56 作者: Chemotherapy 時間: 2025-3-24 13:15
Nucleation in the Mediterranean Atmospherecation of Name” in the .. It also discusses the relevant studies by sinologists and shows that ancient Chinese thinkers already had a very clear and deep understanding about classes, which played an important role in the early texts and later development of ancient Chinese logic. We will also point 作者: GORGE 時間: 2025-3-24 15:15 作者: 印第安人 時間: 2025-3-24 19:31 作者: 錢財 時間: 2025-3-25 00:41 作者: 小隔間 時間: 2025-3-25 07:05
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13574-3roup of Warring States thinkers who shared an interest in language, logic, and metaphysics. Their investigations led some of these thinkers to propound various puzzling, paradoxical statements that seem intended to highlight fundamental features of reality or subtleties in semantic relations between作者: Phonophobia 時間: 2025-3-25 07:42 作者: accomplishment 時間: 2025-3-25 12:47
Introduction: Chinese Philosophy of Logic, of analytic philosophy have been interested in using logical and other analytical methods to deal with philosophical problems or issues, on the one hand, and in explaining logical concepts to disclose their philosophical implication or significance, on the other. The most salient example of the for作者: Confidential 時間: 2025-3-25 18:36 作者: MUTED 時間: 2025-3-25 22:30 作者: Generosity 時間: 2025-3-26 01:07 作者: 額外的事 時間: 2025-3-26 08:00
Counterfactual Conditionalsanguage does not have linguistic markers or other devices to express counterfactuals. He also maintains that, if sometimes argumentation needs counterfactuals, Chinese speakers are incapable to make such kind of argumentation. In this chapter, I will argue that Bloom’s view is not right. As demonstr作者: IVORY 時間: 2025-3-26 10:36 作者: 薄膜 時間: 2025-3-26 13:04
Contradictional principle of Aristotelian logic. According to this law, an object can’t possess opposite properties at the same time and in the same respect, i.e., “S is both P and not-P at the same time and in the same aspect” (the conjunction of “S is P” and “S is not P”) can’t be true, if P and not-P are cont作者: 文字 時間: 2025-3-26 17:08
Analogyer contains an analysis of interpretations of an excerpt from the . 孟子offered by several authors including Zhu Xi, James Legge, D. C. Lau, J.-P. Reding, Chad Hansen, Liu Yameng, and Chris Fraser. The author claims that the first-order predicate logic cannot be used for study of this and other cases 作者: 言外之意 時間: 2025-3-26 23:59 作者: syring 時間: 2025-3-27 04:19
Argumentation (, 辯)al literature, with focus on “Masters texts” (. 子書). It aims at providing a basic though accurate introduction into one of the most relevant argumentative strategies employed by early Chinese persuaders in the late pre-imperial and early imperial period. It contextualizes the use of argumentation, p作者: 先行 時間: 2025-3-27 06:14 作者: flex336 時間: 2025-3-27 12:22
Classes (, 類) and Individualscation of Name” in the .. It also discusses the relevant studies by sinologists and shows that ancient Chinese thinkers already had a very clear and deep understanding about classes, which played an important role in the early texts and later development of ancient Chinese logic. We will also point 作者: 激勵 時間: 2025-3-27 17:28
Sameness (, 同) and Difference (, 異)rns in ancient Chinese philosophy of language and logic. Among the different uses and senses of these two notions, one of them used in a logical context plays an important role in argumentation. That is related to the sameness and difference of . 類 (class or kind). In this chapter, I will argue that作者: gustation 時間: 2025-3-27 21:42
Definitions in Pre-Qin Textsrmal definitions in pre-Qin texts, but there is a clear intention to define notions and classical texts often present them in a form which obeys many of the criteria of a good definition. Such attempts at defining notions are present in the ., . and even Confucius’ .. They appear in a very elaborate作者: finite 時間: 2025-3-28 01:08
Logical Thought in Mohism and Later Mohismdy uses a lot of explicit arguments and implicit logical reasonings. Later Mohism, on the other hand, is mostly devoted to a conscious discussion of genuine logical notions. The present chapter analyzes in modern terms the Mohist notions of “names,” “standards,” “criteria” and gives some interpretat作者: 男生如果明白 時間: 2025-3-28 02:32
Paradoxes in the School of Namesroup of Warring States thinkers who shared an interest in language, logic, and metaphysics. Their investigations led some of these thinkers to propound various puzzling, paradoxical statements that seem intended to highlight fundamental features of reality or subtleties in semantic relations between作者: Cupidity 時間: 2025-3-28 08:02 作者: bibliophile 時間: 2025-3-28 11:21 作者: flex336 時間: 2025-3-28 14:46
Neutral Chemistry in the Earth’s Atmospheregagement and the ultimate concern and between the “speakable” and the “unspeakable”. Fifth, I briefly examine a relatively recent debate on the relation of the structure of Chinese nouns to Chinese thought from the referential point of view: I focus on how the mass-noun-semantics part of Hansen’s ma作者: 冷漠 時間: 2025-3-28 21:52 作者: 贊成你 時間: 2025-3-29 02:54 作者: Folklore 時間: 2025-3-29 06:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-68638-2real, and things always exist as the unity of opposites. Although “S cannot be P and not-P” is logically consistent, it is an abstraction that does not take the context of the utterance and multi-dimension of things into consideration. On the contrary, a proposition like “S is P and not-P,” though p作者: Ceramic 時間: 2025-3-29 08:49 作者: 官僚統(tǒng)治 時間: 2025-3-29 14:03
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13574-3rent, compresent features of things as separate entities, as if we were to treat the hardness and whiteness of a white stone as two distinct objects. Several paradoxes seem to follow from properties of the “dimensionless,” a pre-Han term referring to a geometric point.作者: Alpha-Cells 時間: 2025-3-29 15:41
Book 2020sophy of language, Chinese philology, and history of ideas to deal with the basic ideas and majorproblems in logical thought and logical thinking in China. In doing so, it advances the understanding of the lost tradition in Chinese philosophical studies.?.作者: 谷物 時間: 2025-3-29 20:44
What Is , 名? “Name” Not “Word”more like a word than a name. It is anachronistic, however, to think that early Chinese texts used the term “.” to mean what is later meant by .. Thus, I argue, a more promising starting point for understanding uses of . in early Chinese texts is the idea of a name.作者: 獎牌 時間: 2025-3-30 02:59 作者: fetter 時間: 2025-3-30 07:17
Sentences (, 辭, , 句) and Propositional Attitudeshat that-construction of Modem English evolved from Middle English via a process of grammaticalization (i.e., from demonstrative as referring term to complementizer as functional word). Before grammaticalization, to express propositional attitudes, like those expressed by that-sentences in Modem Eng作者: Exonerate 時間: 2025-3-30 10:38
Truth in Pre-Han Thought and informatively frame inquiry into the topic of truth in Chinese philosophy. It then offers concise interpretations of several concepts in pre-Han texts with conceptual roles overlapping that of truth.作者: Flavouring 時間: 2025-3-30 14:18
Contradictionreal, and things always exist as the unity of opposites. Although “S cannot be P and not-P” is logically consistent, it is an abstraction that does not take the context of the utterance and multi-dimension of things into consideration. On the contrary, a proposition like “S is P and not-P,” though p作者: 并排上下 時間: 2025-3-30 17:54 作者: Wernickes-area 時間: 2025-3-30 21:19 作者: 易彎曲 時間: 2025-3-31 01:25 作者: Lucubrate 時間: 2025-3-31 07:03 作者: 黑豹 時間: 2025-3-31 09:48
Counterfactual Conditionalsated by many Chinese and Western sinologists or linguists, we can find different kinds of counterfactual markers and other linguistic devices in modern and classical Chinese. Based on textual evidence in Classical Chinese, I will demonstrate that counterfactual expressions and reasonings are often used by ancient Chinese thinkers.作者: 粘 時間: 2025-3-31 13:40
Reasoning (, 譬, , 侔, , 援, , 推)ion, i.e., asserting the falsity of a proposition. In addition, I will point out that the last reasoning pattern includes two kinds of “stopping” (. 止), that is, inductive and deductive “stopping” inferences.