標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Crowding Out Fiscal Stimulus; Testing the Effectiv John J. Heim Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 statistical [打印本頁] 作者: DEIFY 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 18:11
書目名稱Crowding Out Fiscal Stimulus影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Crowding Out Fiscal Stimulus影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Crowding Out Fiscal Stimulus網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Crowding Out Fiscal Stimulus網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Crowding Out Fiscal Stimulus被引頻次
書目名稱Crowding Out Fiscal Stimulus被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Crowding Out Fiscal Stimulus年度引用
書目名稱Crowding Out Fiscal Stimulus年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Crowding Out Fiscal Stimulus讀者反饋
書目名稱Crowding Out Fiscal Stimulus讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 完成才能戰(zhàn)勝 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 22:48 作者: 歡呼 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 03:45
Test Results: Consumer Spending and Borrowing Models (One-Variable Deficit),consumption as well as a stimulus effect. The models included 21 OLS and 26 2SLS models, and 48 tests of the robustness of those results by testing to see if results could be replicated in three different, but overlapping time periods. Results overwhelmingly indicated crowd out adversely affected co作者: 哄騙 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 06:54
Test Results: Investment Spending and Borrowing Models (One-Variable Deficit),consumption as well as a stimulus effect. The models included 21 OLS and 26 2SLS models, and 48 tests of the robustness of those results by testing to see if results could be replicated in three different but overlapping time periods. Results overwhelmingly indicated crowd out adversely affected con作者: insomnia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 11:38
Test Results: Consumer Spending and Borrowing Models (Two-Variable Deficit),ion as well as a stimulus effect. The models included six consumer spending and 11 consumer borrowing; five were OLS, 12 were 2SLS. Results overwhelmingly indicated crowd out adversely affected consumption spending. The two separate variable (Revenue, Spending) definition of the deficit was used, so作者: Postulate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:11 作者: Postulate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 20:32
Effects of Stimulus Programs on GDP, Net of Crowd Out Effects,mulus programs are enacted, from $0.47–$0.89 per dollar of tax cut-induced deficit, to between $0.35–$0.57 per dollar of spending increase-induced deficit. The effect of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Obama stimulus program) is calculated. It was estimated to have negatively aff作者: 陪審團(tuán)每個(gè)人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 22:05 作者: coalition 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 02:32
Alternatives to Financing Stimulus Programs with Domestic Borrowing,nd that changing the M1 money supply alleviated crowd out. The chapter offers the hypothesis (untested) it may be because the Federal Reserve’s principal method of increasing the M1 money supply mechanically funnels the money principally to investors selling securities so as to be able to buy other 作者: addict 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 06:31
Do Crowd Out Effects Differ in Recession and Non-recession Periods?,-recession periods. The 13 tests conducted in this chapter indicate they are not despite the decline in private borrowing in recessions, which theoretically should allow additional government borrowing without reducing what is available to meet now—lower private borrowing needs. But empirically, the作者: Hemoptysis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 11:51
Does the Gale and Orszag Hypothesis Explain Tax and Spending Effects Better in Recessions Than Non-more true in recessions than non-recession periods. Eight models were tested. The hypothesis that some forms of stimulus might be more effective than others in recessions compared to non-recession periods was not found to be supported by the data. No type of stimulus was found effective in either ty作者: 半圓鑿 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:48
Summary of Findings and Conclusions,ffects of deficit-financed government stimulus programs more than fully offset the stimulus effects of these deficits. Both stimulus and crowd out effects were separately measured in the econometric tests..Results also indicated that the type of tax cut or spending program did not matter, and that t作者: Contracture 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 18:22 作者: Aids209 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 23:29 作者: 招致 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 04:27
Developmental Morphographemics IIIt notes that the models tested were all standard Keynesian models, so as to ensure that evidence that stimulus programs worked had a fair chance to present itself. Discusses how various econometric problems like stationarity, endogeneity, multicollinearity and heteroskedasticity were handled. Discu作者: Hdl348 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 10:19 作者: ALLEY 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 14:13
Virginia A. Mann,Raymond R. Baliseconsumption as well as a stimulus effect. The models included 21 OLS and 26 2SLS models, and 48 tests of the robustness of those results by testing to see if results could be replicated in three different but overlapping time periods. Results overwhelmingly indicated crowd out adversely affected con作者: 抵消 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 15:37 作者: Salivary-Gland 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 22:02 作者: Instrumental 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 01:47
Philip A. Luelsdorff,Sergej V. Chesnokovmulus programs are enacted, from $0.47–$0.89 per dollar of tax cut-induced deficit, to between $0.35–$0.57 per dollar of spending increase-induced deficit. The effect of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Obama stimulus program) is calculated. It was estimated to have negatively aff作者: EXTOL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 04:11
Alberto E. Pati?o Douce,T. C. McCarthys in available savings, and finds they are the same. Both predict lower GDP and standards of living than would otherwise occur. Also, eight tests are made to determine if stimulus programs have net positive psychological effects on the population, inducing additional spending and its stimulus effect作者: Nmda-Receptor 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 11:00
Developmental Morphographemics IInd that changing the M1 money supply alleviated crowd out. The chapter offers the hypothesis (untested) it may be because the Federal Reserve’s principal method of increasing the M1 money supply mechanically funnels the money principally to investors selling securities so as to be able to buy other 作者: 謊言 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 14:07
J. Huw Davies,Friedhelm von Blanckenburg-recession periods. The 13 tests conducted in this chapter indicate they are not despite the decline in private borrowing in recessions, which theoretically should allow additional government borrowing without reducing what is available to meet now—lower private borrowing needs. But empirically, the作者: 東西 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 19:27 作者: arbiter 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 23:35
Alberto E. Pati?o Douce,T. C. McCarthyffects of deficit-financed government stimulus programs more than fully offset the stimulus effects of these deficits. Both stimulus and crowd out effects were separately measured in the econometric tests..Results also indicated that the type of tax cut or spending program did not matter, and that t作者: Eructation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 00:21
Philip A. Luelsdorff,Sergej V. Chesnokovnt as well as a stimulus effect. The models included 16 OLS and 9 2SLS models. Results overwhelmingly indicated crowd out adversely affected investment spending. The two separate variables (Revenue, Spending) definition of the deficit was used, with coefficients calculated for each, to see if the two types had different effects.作者: Ascribe 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:01
Women and the Russian Revolutionmore true in recessions than non-recession periods. Eight models were tested. The hypothesis that some forms of stimulus might be more effective than others in recessions compared to non-recession periods was not found to be supported by the data. No type of stimulus was found effective in either type of period.作者: 愛好 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:26 作者: 針葉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:38 作者: 無彈性 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:04 作者: preeclampsia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 21:19
http://image.papertrans.cn/d/image/240455.jpg作者: Foolproof 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 02:27 作者: 持續(xù) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 09:18
978-3-319-83410-8The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017作者: 愛得痛了 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 12:46
Philip A. Luelsdorff,Sergej V. ChesnokovResults of tests using the one- and two-variable definitions of the government deficit are found consistent. Both indicate negative net effects of stimulus programs, with the two-variable tests indicating larger negative results.作者: 詞匯表 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 16:46 作者: deceive 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 20:43 作者: Axillary 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:48
A Note on the Disposable Income Variable Used in Consumption Models,This chapter is technical in nature. It notes after-tax income is an important determinant of consumption and examines two different ways of calculating it.作者: 放大 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:17 作者: 琺瑯 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 09:55 作者: 忍受 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 11:18 作者: 館長 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 14:49 作者: Synapse 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 21:18 作者: 散開 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 22:59 作者: 本能 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 04:53 作者: PTCA635 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 10:57
C. Max Finlayson,Isabell von Oertzennd to be wrong, but statistically significant. A second model simply adds crowd out variable (the government deficit) to the Keynesian model and shows that this slight modification permits signs in theory that match those obtained empirically.作者: Frequency-Range 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 15:03 作者: 木訥 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 17:46 作者: 命令變成大炮 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 21:55
Virginia A. Mann,Raymond R. Balise see if results could be replicated in three different but overlapping time periods. Results overwhelmingly indicated crowd out adversely affected consumption spending. The single variable (Revenue Spending) definition of the deficit was used.作者: watertight, 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 00:07 作者: Fallibility 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 05:42
Developmental Morphographemics IIpal method of increasing the M1 money supply mechanically funnels the money principally to investors selling securities so as to be able to buy other securities (which generally does not affect the GDP), not to the general population, who would be more likely to use it to buy real goods and services, stimulating the GDP.作者: Fulsome 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 11:51 作者: INTER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 15:29
