標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Cross-Border Mergers; EU Perspectives and Thomas Papadopoulos Book 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 European Company Law.Harmoniza [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: HIV763 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 19:37
書目名稱Cross-Border Mergers影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Cross-Border Mergers影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Cross-Border Mergers網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Cross-Border Mergers網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Cross-Border Mergers被引頻次
書目名稱Cross-Border Mergers被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Cross-Border Mergers年度引用
書目名稱Cross-Border Mergers年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Cross-Border Mergers讀者反饋
書目名稱Cross-Border Mergers讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 光亮 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:54
An Empirical Research on Cross-Border Mergers at EU Levelrnal market and businesses in Europe and in order to draw substantive conclusions as to drivers and obstacles in respect to the Directive or ways how to improve the current legal framework on cross-border mergers, it is important to have a clear picture about the empirical nature of cross-border mer作者: 舞蹈編排 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:17
Cross-Border Mergers and Reincorporations in the EU: An Essay on the Uncertain Features of Companiesoughout the EU. Hence, companies can, at least in theory, re-incorporate from a member state to another. Despite this recent case law, however, only some member states allow cross-border re-incorporations by way of relocation of registered office, while many other either do not regulate this transac作者: 枯燥 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 08:21 作者: ACME 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 11:03
Shareholders’ Derivative Suits Against Corporate Directors, Following Cross-Border Mergers: A Functitime. However, as this paper shows, the effect of this form of corporate transformation on shareholder litigation remains a grey area..Despite the fact that the—now codified—3rd Company Law Directive demands that Member States provide for remedy of shareholders’ loss, in a national context, EU law, 作者: 殘廢的火焰 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 14:30 作者: 殘廢的火焰 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 17:49
Cross-Border Mergers and Cross-Border Takeovers Compared7/1132). These rules are not alone in pursuing this aim, as the takeover bid directive (Directive 2004/25/EC) also contributes to fostering cross-border combinations of European firms. While grounded on comparable regulatory aims, the two set of rules display remarkable differences. These are only i作者: RUPT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:29
The Relationship Between Article 4(1)(b) of the Cross-Border Merger Directive and the European Mergends may once more become more frequent. The lack of a common policy at the EU level leaves each Member State free to set its own framework to oppose mergers based on the public interest. However, such frameworks need to comply with Article 4(1)(b) of the Cross-Border Merger Directive (CBMD) which ex作者: Exonerate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 04:10
Unions’ Freedom to Establish and Provide Serviceseviewed the proportionality of collective action by trade unions on the assumption that strikes infringed business rights to establish and provide services. But the Court of Justice never had submissions on the rights of trade unions to establish and provide services to their members. A plain readin作者: AUGUR 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 07:54 作者: 占卜者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:38 作者: mortuary 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:10
Experiences from the Implementation of the Cross-Border Mergers Directive in Austriaan rules for cross-border mergers are to a wide extent similar to the rules applicable to domestic mergers. From a practical perspective, the requirements of the EU Cross-Border Mergers Directive have been well integrated into the Austrian legal system. Special characteristics of the Austrian cross-作者: Cholesterol 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 21:41 作者: 使出神 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:40
Cross-Border Mergers: The Danish Experiencee prior to the development at EU level initiated by the CJEU (C-411/03) and the adoption in 2004 of the 10th Company Law Directive on Cross-border Mergers (2005/56/EC). The Danish implementation of the Directive includes Danish public limited companies (A/S) as well as private limited companies (ApS作者: 公社 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 06:04 作者: Manifest 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 06:48
The Implementation of the Cross-Border Mergers Directive (2005/56/EC) in Germany: A Story of Insuffins of Companies (Umwandlungsgesetz [UmwG]) in 2007 provided for the first time a legal framework for cross-border mergers of corporations in Germany. However, these provisions are hardly used in practice and are generally considered as a failure. After analyzing the reasons for this limited use of c作者: patella 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 10:49
Cross-Border Mergers in Franceciency. We will analyze key areas where France has domestic provisions implementing the Directive which may diverge from those of the other EU Member States: the scope, the stakeholder protection and the procedure.作者: 畏縮 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:40 作者: Extort 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 20:01
2214-2037 Directive in the light of European and national company lawThis edited volume focuses on specific, crucially important structural measures that foster corporate change, namely cross-border mergers. Such cross-border transactions play a key role in business reality, economic theory and corporate, fi作者: 不適 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 03:06 作者: 配偶 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 05:23
Christina Hoferdt,Hans Sünderhau how shareholders, and in particular hedge funds, exploit the appraisal remedy in order to reap profits and assess the dangers posed by this practice. Finally, the chapter will seek to decipher the factors that have led to the growing use of the appraisal remedy in the US and its underutilization in EU.作者: PAEAN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 09:37 作者: Confidential 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 12:35 作者: 蕨類 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 18:41 作者: municipality 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 22:08 作者: Hectic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:28
Disclosure of Inside Information in Cross-Border Mergersome evident in the contradictory judgements delivered by national courts. Reading into these judgements, this article analyses the notion of inside information and delineates the disclosure obligations in mergers in European capital market law. The cross-border parameter adds a certain degree of complexity to the matter.作者: BRAVE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 08:13
Cross-Border Mergers and Cross-Border Takeovers Comparedhe case with cross-border takeovers. This chapter offers a comparative analysis of some of these differences and explores their rationale and their consequences on investor protection. The analysis includes the board’s role, shareholder information and collective decision-making, as well as shareholder exit?rights.作者: persistence 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 12:11
The Implementation of the Cross-Border Mergers Directive (2005/56/EC) in Germany: A Story of Insuffirules on the protection of minority shareholders and the rules on creditor protection. Afterwards the paper shows alternatives to cross-border mergers reflecting especially the discussion in Germany on the impact of the Sevic-, Cartesio and VALE-cases of the ECJ.作者: Cognizance 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:08
Experiences from the Implementation of the Cross-Border Mergers Directive in Austriaborder mergers regime concern the cross-border merger proceedings before the Austrian courts as well as the safeguards for the protection of (minority) shareholders and creditors of the merging corporations.作者: 痛苦一生 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 18:55 作者: 無(wú)意 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 21:35 作者: 束以馬具 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 02:45
Book 2019 angles of the Cross-border Mergers Directive in the light of European and national company law, thebook is divided into three sections: the first section focuses on EU and comparative aspects of the Cross-border Mergers Directive, while the second examines the interaction of the directive with othe作者: 受傷 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 07:29 作者: stress-test 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 12:15 作者: 或者發(fā)神韻 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 17:23
Christina Hoferdt,Hans Sünderhautarget state. On the other hand, this proceeding could be burdensome and time-consuming, as no ‘fast-track procedure’ is available when a cross-border merger only aims at relocating the company’s registered office. Eventually, several hidden obstacles might emerge, due to the different regulatory fr作者: helper-T-cells 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:14 作者: 微粒 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 00:49
,Den Frauen gefallen – Optik und Auftreten,of the EUMR in the protection of mergers against public interest opposition is limited. This limitation stems from the threshold for establishing a Union dimension within the meaning for that Regulation. This Chapter suggests that, while the scope of the CBMD covers more mergers, the real playing fi作者: OPINE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:50 作者: aerial 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 10:05
Wolfgang Grundmann,Klaus SchüttelModel-DTA—the latter combined with the Parent-Subsidiary Directive. For example, clever use of the rules of art. 13 of Model-DTA can be used for tax planning purposes, in order to achieve effective relocation of the taxing jurisdiction of capital gains..EU member States had been, thus, for a long ti作者: 正面 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 12:17
Wolfgang Grundmann,Klaus Schüttelrules incorporated in the Directive would be of utmost practical benefit, without necessarily disturbing national legal orders and practices or touching upon fundamental procedural differences that apply in different EU member states. Lastly, we argue that capitalising on the overall positive experi作者: SKIFF 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:09 作者: SCORE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 21:28
F?lle zum Ausbildungs- und ArbeitsvertragDanish rules that provide protection for creditors and minority shareholders in the non-surviving limited company. The Danish provisions on cross-border mergers make up the basis for the Danish provision on transfer of the seat, and consequently the chapter closes with a short presentation of the Da作者: Isolate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 23:19 作者: CRUDE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 05:07 作者: nugatory 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 09:07
Cross-Border Mergers and Reincorporations in the EU: An Essay on the Uncertain Features of Companiestarget state. On the other hand, this proceeding could be burdensome and time-consuming, as no ‘fast-track procedure’ is available when a cross-border merger only aims at relocating the company’s registered office. Eventually, several hidden obstacles might emerge, due to the different regulatory fr作者: 顯而易見 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 11:44
Shareholders’ Derivative Suits Against Corporate Directors, Following Cross-Border Mergers: A Functiate interests may face several obstacles following (cross-border) mergers within the EU, depending on whether the suit is temporally prior to the merger or vice versa. The fact that, post-merger, the merged company ceases to exist (and is succeeded by another entity, in another jurisdiction), gives 作者: Albinism 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 19:33
The Relationship Between Article 4(1)(b) of the Cross-Border Merger Directive and the European Mergeof the EUMR in the protection of mergers against public interest opposition is limited. This limitation stems from the threshold for establishing a Union dimension within the meaning for that Regulation. This Chapter suggests that, while the scope of the CBMD covers more mergers, the real playing fi作者: 四牛在彎曲 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 22:29 作者: 反話 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 01:48 作者: 合適 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 05:07 作者: fiscal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 11:26 作者: 是限制 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 14:27
Cross-Border Mergers: The Danish ExperienceDanish rules that provide protection for creditors and minority shareholders in the non-surviving limited company. The Danish provisions on cross-border mergers make up the basis for the Danish provision on transfer of the seat, and consequently the chapter closes with a short presentation of the Da作者: 強(qiáng)制性 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 16:43 作者: insurrection 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 21:06 作者: 不確定 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 03:57
Christina Hoferdt,Hans Sünderhauoughout the EU. Hence, companies can, at least in theory, re-incorporate from a member state to another. Despite this recent case law, however, only some member states allow cross-border re-incorporations by way of relocation of registered office, while many other either do not regulate this transac作者: 使絕緣 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 05:42
Christina Hoferdt,Hans Sünderhaunew breed of hedge funds which specialize in so-called appraisal arbitrage has resulted in a spectacular increase in appraisal petitions in connection with M&A transactions in the US and has led to calls for a tighter regulation of the appraisal remedy. Despite the growing popularity of appraisal ri作者: vascular 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 13:13
time. However, as this paper shows, the effect of this form of corporate transformation on shareholder litigation remains a grey area..Despite the fact that the—now codified—3rd Company Law Directive demands that Member States provide for remedy of shareholders’ loss, in a national context, EU law, 作者: frivolous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 17:00
ropean legislature decided to resolve it by simply incorporating into MAR the ECJ case law on the notion of inside information. At first glance, the new legal framework appears to provide legal certainty in European capital market law. However, the notion of inside information and the disclosure obl作者: Cloudburst 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 20:53
7/1132). These rules are not alone in pursuing this aim, as the takeover bid directive (Directive 2004/25/EC) also contributes to fostering cross-border combinations of European firms. While grounded on comparable regulatory aims, the two set of rules display remarkable differences. These are only i
