標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Critical Theory and the Thought of Andrew Feenberg; Darrell P. Arnold,Andreas Michel Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho [打印本頁] 作者: hydroxyapatite 時間: 2025-3-21 16:59
書目名稱Critical Theory and the Thought of Andrew Feenberg影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Critical Theory and the Thought of Andrew Feenberg影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Critical Theory and the Thought of Andrew Feenberg網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Critical Theory and the Thought of Andrew Feenberg網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Critical Theory and the Thought of Andrew Feenberg被引頻次
書目名稱Critical Theory and the Thought of Andrew Feenberg被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Critical Theory and the Thought of Andrew Feenberg年度引用
書目名稱Critical Theory and the Thought of Andrew Feenberg年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Critical Theory and the Thought of Andrew Feenberg讀者反饋
書目名稱Critical Theory and the Thought of Andrew Feenberg讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: ATOPY 時間: 2025-3-21 22:52 作者: 助記 時間: 2025-3-22 04:08
Investmentsparen in der Bundesrepubliksections include (1) democracy, (2) environmentalism, and (3) the Internet. Part Two is entitled New World for Old. Its subsections include technoscience and transhumanism. Part Three is entitled Lukácsian Marxism. Its subsections are (1) Reification, (2) Instrumentalizaiton Theory, and (3) On Nature.作者: 陶器 時間: 2025-3-22 08:05
Statistik für den Wertpapierbesitzerother contemporary intellectual work? How are we to evaluate the work of the Frankfurt School today? The interview provides Feenberg with the possibility to offer direct and clear answers to these and other questions of the continued relevance of critical theory.作者: 有其法作用 時間: 2025-3-22 12:32
Replies to Critics: Epistemology, Ontology, Methodologysections include (1) democracy, (2) environmentalism, and (3) the Internet. Part Two is entitled New World for Old. Its subsections include technoscience and transhumanism. Part Three is entitled Lukácsian Marxism. Its subsections are (1) Reification, (2) Instrumentalizaiton Theory, and (3) On Nature.作者: Neuropeptides 時間: 2025-3-22 15:47
Appendix: Interview with Bruna Della Torre de Carvalho Lima and Eduardo Altheman Camargo Santosother contemporary intellectual work? How are we to evaluate the work of the Frankfurt School today? The interview provides Feenberg with the possibility to offer direct and clear answers to these and other questions of the continued relevance of critical theory.作者: Neuropeptides 時間: 2025-3-22 21:02 作者: 粗糙濫制 時間: 2025-3-22 21:14 作者: 不公開 時間: 2025-3-23 04:07
Statistik für den Wertpapierbesitzer by engaging his key works of the 1990s that spell out his general theoretical and political perspectives, and that illustrate his theory with examples of democratizing and reconstructing technologies, focusing in particular on . and ..作者: 出處 時間: 2025-3-23 07:48 作者: curriculum 時間: 2025-3-23 13:35 作者: B-cell 時間: 2025-3-23 17:14
What is the “Philosophy of Praxis”? is “.” reified, and that therefore dereifying practices have no relevance in the natural realm. I argue that focusing on material practice overcomes the nature/history dualism, and that dereification has a role to play throughout the single material world that we inhabit.作者: Debark 時間: 2025-3-23 21:02
Feenberg, Rationality and Isolationbest ad hoc and at worst seems to cede science to positivism. I argue, however, that Feenberg’s account of rationality can easily be given an alternative, more ontological, grounding. Some implications of this alternative account are then drawn out, especially in relation to Feenberg’s theory of technology.作者: 敵意 時間: 2025-3-24 00:53
Andrew Feenberg, Critical Theory, and the Critique of Technology by engaging his key works of the 1990s that spell out his general theoretical and political perspectives, and that illustrate his theory with examples of democratizing and reconstructing technologies, focusing in particular on . and ..作者: 值得尊敬 時間: 2025-3-24 02:34 作者: 斜 時間: 2025-3-24 10:20
eenberg has begun to make good on what is often characterized as “the broken promise of critical theory” to address issues of technology, but also the continued importance of critical theory more generally, and of Feenberg’s contributions to understanding this tradition..978-3-319-86278-1978-3-319-57897-2作者: 喪失 時間: 2025-3-24 14:14
horizon foreclosed. The critical theory of technology moves in between aggregation and foreclosure. With its roots in a politically active Marxian dialectic, class struggle regains its ability to redirect technological change, foreclosed in critical theory from Dean and Fuchs.作者: EXUDE 時間: 2025-3-24 17:44
technical devices and production with Marcuse’s call for an “aesthetic .” leads Feenberg to articulate a new form of rationality. This new form of rationality includes a reformation of technical design that reflects life-affirming aesthetic and political values and possibilities.作者: Abrade 時間: 2025-3-24 23:01 作者: Creatinine-Test 時間: 2025-3-25 00:47
The Question Concerning a Vital Technology: Heideggerian Influences on the Philosophy of Andrew Feentechnical devices and production with Marcuse’s call for an “aesthetic .” leads Feenberg to articulate a new form of rationality. This new form of rationality includes a reformation of technical design that reflects life-affirming aesthetic and political values and possibilities.作者: Popcorn 時間: 2025-3-25 04:47 作者: cleaver 時間: 2025-3-25 08:28
Philosophy of Praxis or Philosophical Anthropology? Andrew Feenberg and Axel Honneth on Lukács’s The after a period of partial eclipse, the relevant discussion seems to have acquired new impetus due to the theoretical interventions of Andrew Feenberg and Axel Honneth. This chapter examines their respective efforts to update the Lukácsian concept and seeks to determine which one could be considered作者: EXALT 時間: 2025-3-25 12:10
Gegenst?ndlichkeit—From Marx to Lukács and Back Againlosophy cannot be understood without reflecting on the historically rich network between phenomenology, Neo-Kantianism, and social theory. Moreover, in contradistinction to many contemporary critical theorists, Feenberg, following Lukács, is not hostile to epistemological and ontological questions i作者: 舊石器時代 時間: 2025-3-25 16:50
Feenberg, Rationality and Isolationge. Why or how the social practices involved appear this way is explained in terms of their apparent rationality. While Feenberg does more than most critical theorists to elaborate the conception of rationality involved, the account he gives, in terms of particular resemblances to science, seems at 作者: allergy 時間: 2025-3-25 23:13
Transforming Dystopia with Democracy: The Technical Code and the Critical Theory of Technologyamifications of that process should be understood. It focuses on Andrew Feenberg’s idea of a technical code, which is a key concept in his thesis that technology design and use are always political. The idea of the technical code explains how nontechnical meanings and values get inscribed in technol作者: Essential 時間: 2025-3-26 03:56
Andrew Feenberg’s Ecological Modernismf Robyn Eckersley and John Dryzek, who, also both inspired by Frankfurt School Critical Theory, develop a critical political ecology. In this chapter, I outline Feenberg’s position and suggest that his views would be complimented and productively expanded by integrating insights, among others, from 作者: violate 時間: 2025-3-26 06:47 作者: 培養(yǎng) 時間: 2025-3-26 11:15 作者: upstart 時間: 2025-3-26 13:25
Future Questions: Democracy and the New Converging TechnologiesThis is so because Heidegger conceives of the .-. (as event of Being or .) affecting all aspects of society, rather than ., as the real-life interests of capitalism (calculation, profitability). And it is for this reason that Heidegger cannot distinguish between beneficial and negative effects of te作者: BRACE 時間: 2025-3-26 18:45 作者: optional 時間: 2025-3-26 22:35
Andrew Feenberg, Critical Theory, and the Critique of Technologyasing importance of technology in all facets of our lives and that develops a critical theory that articulates how technologies can serve as instruments or domination or emancipation and democratization. In this study, I shall interrogate Feenberg’s work in developing a critical theory of technology作者: mechanical 時間: 2025-3-27 01:53
Replies to Critics: Epistemology, Ontology, Methodologyspect to epistemology, ontology, and methodology. The chapter is divided into three main parts. Part One is devoted to questions of democracy. Its subsections include (1) democracy, (2) environmentalism, and (3) the Internet. Part Two is entitled New World for Old. Its subsections include technoscie作者: adumbrate 時間: 2025-3-27 08:57
Appendix: Interview with Bruna Della Torre de Carvalho Lima and Eduardo Altheman Camargo Santoselationship between theory and practice today? Is there any longer a place for Orthodox Marxism? What is the relationship between critical theory and other contemporary intellectual work? How are we to evaluate the work of the Frankfurt School today? The interview provides Feenberg with the possibil作者: immunity 時間: 2025-3-27 10:28 作者: Pepsin 時間: 2025-3-27 14:34 作者: gruelling 時間: 2025-3-27 19:09
Andrew Feenberg’s Ecological Modernismte and regional and transnational governmental bodies as well as work in transnational civil society, also even aimed at business, that create the cultural conditions for positive government and responsible individual decision making.作者: narcotic 時間: 2025-3-27 22:30 作者: Commentary 時間: 2025-3-28 02:47 作者: opportune 時間: 2025-3-28 10:15
nal Marxist discourses tend to reduce . to an “economic” theory and Feenberg seems to follow this tradition, that is, he seems to dismiss the critique of political economy as the primary horizon for a critical theory of society. However, as I will demonstrate, Marx’s project cannot be reduced to a l作者: Nonporous 時間: 2025-3-28 13:57 作者: 極微小 時間: 2025-3-28 16:39
te and regional and transnational governmental bodies as well as work in transnational civil society, also even aimed at business, that create the cultural conditions for positive government and responsible individual decision making.作者: GRE 時間: 2025-3-28 19:01 作者: coddle 時間: 2025-3-29 00:54
Statistik für den Wertpapierbesitzerritical Theory in general and the philosophy of technology in particular are reviewed so as to shift the discussion to a postmodern fold. As will be seen, the classical immanent critiques of technoscience have to be modulated for the Digital Age, given the different material conditions of the time a作者: AGATE 時間: 2025-3-29 06:29 作者: Neutropenia 時間: 2025-3-29 08:09 作者: 憤慨一下 時間: 2025-3-29 12:38 作者: 極力證明 時間: 2025-3-29 19:13 作者: 清澈 時間: 2025-3-29 22:07 作者: 叫喊 時間: 2025-3-30 01:48
978-3-319-86278-1The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017
