標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Creating Shared Value – Concepts, Experience, Criticism; Josef Wieland Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017 shared value.co [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: 忠誠(chéng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 16:47
書(shū)目名稱Creating Shared Value – Concepts, Experience, Criticism影響因子(影響力)
書(shū)目名稱Creating Shared Value – Concepts, Experience, Criticism影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Creating Shared Value – Concepts, Experience, Criticism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度
書(shū)目名稱Creating Shared Value – Concepts, Experience, Criticism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Creating Shared Value – Concepts, Experience, Criticism被引頻次
書(shū)目名稱Creating Shared Value – Concepts, Experience, Criticism被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Creating Shared Value – Concepts, Experience, Criticism年度引用
書(shū)目名稱Creating Shared Value – Concepts, Experience, Criticism年度引用學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Creating Shared Value – Concepts, Experience, Criticism讀者反饋
書(shū)目名稱Creating Shared Value – Concepts, Experience, Criticism讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: ineluctable 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 22:01 作者: aggravate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 03:56 作者: syring 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:31
Book 2017in the context of corporate social responsibility.?This book offers a contribution to the current academic discussions on the well-received article of Michael Porter and Marc Kramer in Harvard Business Review in 2011.?In the light of the increasing references to the shared value concept, it develops作者: CHARM 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 09:49 作者: 幼兒 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 16:36
Introduction,The present issue is based on contributions to the annual meeting of the German Philosophical Society’s Research Group on Economics and Ethics. The conference took place in May 2015 at the Leadership Excellence Institute Zeppelin | LEIZ at Zeppelin University Friedrichshafen and focused on the topic of “Creating Shared Value”.作者: 幼兒 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:34 作者: 翻動(dòng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 22:27
Ethical Economyhttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/239412.jpg作者: 周興旺 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 04:34 作者: 憤慨點(diǎn)吧 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 07:45
Ways Out of the Working Capital Traphe positive and negative criticism which CSV has received since 2011. They then show that CSV falls short of a modern understanding of corporate responsibility which is centred on more adequate ideas about the relationship between business and society. The article concludes with critical comments on作者: 誰(shuí)在削木頭 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:04 作者: 煩躁的女人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 16:08
Preference Representation Languagesstion whether business is creating value for the many or just for a few. At the same time there is an expectation that business contributes to solutions to huge challenges such as poverty or climate change. In such an environment, the concept of Shared Value is catching a lot of attention from acade作者: 不妥協(xié) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:34
Preferences in Database Queriescept of “Creating Shared Value” is plausible and productive. This paper examines the question as to whether Michael E. Porter’s and Marc R. Kramer’s . concept of “Creating Shared Value” is convincing or not, through the lens of a research program called “Business Metaphysics”, referring predominantl作者: Hangar 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 23:00 作者: 反復(fù)拉緊 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 04:47 作者: 陳列 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:16
Preference Representation Languagesk whose programmatic title points to the creation of shared value. However, their impact is due not to the scientific merit of their classic 2011 paper, which is indeed low, as many scholarly commentators have already pointed out. In my paper, I will explain the surprising discrepancy between impact作者: 一再困擾 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 14:13 作者: 怪物 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:38 作者: Hiatus 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 22:34 作者: 調(diào)情 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:03
Creating Shared Value – Concepts, Experience, Criticism作者: 令人不快 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 03:31
2211-2707 her, students and practitioners will be given a deeper insight on how to approach to the concept in a conceptional and philosophical way..978-3-319-84017-8978-3-319-48802-8Series ISSN 2211-2707 Series E-ISSN 2211-2723 作者: 領(lǐng)先 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 09:26
Ways Out of the Working Capital Trap it was sufficient to answer questions about corporate social responsibility with the terse statement “the business of business is business”. This debate is about social-theoretical and philosophical questions, but also about the long-standing discussion in economic theory about the nature of the fi作者: SIT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 15:24
Making Hidden Priorities Explicit owners/shareholders, managers and stakeholders may also alter the rent allocation of firms to the advantage of owners/shareholders via stakeholder preferences. Prudent forms of CSR, therefore, can enhance welfare.作者: archaeology 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 16:27
Preference Representation Languages turn claim that business has to maximize profits or respectively has to create value for the shareholders first and foremost. This situation analysis raises some important questions that this article tries to explore: How could it happen in the first place that business is under such scrutiny, give作者: GENUS 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:10
Preferences in Database Querieswitnessed for example: “Shareholder Value”, “Stakeholder Management”, “Corporate Social Responsibility”, “Sustainability”, and lately the spectre of “Creating Shared Value” (Porter/Kramer Harv Bus Rev 89:62–77, (2011); Porter Harv Bus Rev (.), Porter Creating shared value (Ideas for Change) (.); Por作者: 恃強(qiáng)凌弱 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:45
Preferences in Argumentation Theoryal responsibility, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2003) which became Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility (Harv Bus Rev 84(12):78–92, 2006) and gradually developed into the concept of Creating Shared Value (Harv Bus Rev 89(1):62–77, 2011). We see how Michael Porter integrates the crit作者: 魔鬼在游行 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 05:52 作者: Wernickes-area 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 08:37 作者: Jingoism 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 15:04
Book 2017thin the fields of Business Ethics, Theory of the Firm, Management and Philosophy, researcher, students and practitioners will be given a deeper insight on how to approach to the concept in a conceptional and philosophical way..作者: Essential 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:52
Shared Value – Theoretical Implications, Practical Challenges it was sufficient to answer questions about corporate social responsibility with the terse statement “the business of business is business”. This debate is about social-theoretical and philosophical questions, but also about the long-standing discussion in economic theory about the nature of the fi作者: 強(qiáng)制性 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 00:39 作者: Recessive 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 04:19 作者: CAND 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:19
How the (Business) World Really Works. Business Metaphysics & “Creating Shared Value”witnessed for example: “Shareholder Value”, “Stakeholder Management”, “Corporate Social Responsibility”, “Sustainability”, and lately the spectre of “Creating Shared Value” (Porter/Kramer Harv Bus Rev 89:62–77, (2011); Porter Harv Bus Rev (.), Porter Creating shared value (Ideas for Change) (.); Por作者: SPER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 10:20
Creating Shared Value as Institutionalization of Ethical Responsibilities of the Business Corporatioal responsibility, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2003) which became Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility (Harv Bus Rev 84(12):78–92, 2006) and gradually developed into the concept of Creating Shared Value (Harv Bus Rev 89(1):62–77, 2011). We see how Michael Porter integrates the crit作者: 舉止粗野的人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 16:58 作者: Blood-Clot 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 21:03
Between Enthusiasm and Overkill. Assessing Michael Porter’s Conceptual Management Frame of Creating earing is primarily practical..I explain the successful propagation of the CVS notion by reference to a number of factors: (1) a cultural dynamics of fame very similar to the contemporary pop star system, (2) a strategy of reducing complexity by deflecting attention from precursors, (3) entrepreneur作者: 凹槽 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:33
Shared Value – Theoretical Implications, Practical Challenges reflects a fundamental and significant debate in society about reconfiguring the relationship between business and society. (Porter and Kramer, Creating shared value. Harv Business Rev 89(1/2): 62–77, 2011) The demand made by the Secretary General of the UN to ask and answer, as part of this debate作者: 肉體 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 02:44
Creating Shared Value. A Fundamental Critiquehe positive and negative criticism which CSV has received since 2011. They then show that CSV falls short of a modern understanding of corporate responsibility which is centred on more adequate ideas about the relationship between business and society. The article concludes with critical comments on作者: 盤(pán)旋 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 06:29 作者: amplitude 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 11:18
Just When You Thought It Couldn’t Get Worse, You Hear: “The Business of Business Is Business”-Some Rstion whether business is creating value for the many or just for a few. At the same time there is an expectation that business contributes to solutions to huge challenges such as poverty or climate change. In such an environment, the concept of Shared Value is catching a lot of attention from acade作者: 暴行 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:08
How the (Business) World Really Works. Business Metaphysics & “Creating Shared Value”cept of “Creating Shared Value” is plausible and productive. This paper examines the question as to whether Michael E. Porter’s and Marc R. Kramer’s . concept of “Creating Shared Value” is convincing or not, through the lens of a research program called “Business Metaphysics”, referring predominantl作者: 角斗士 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 22:11
