標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity; In the Aftermath of M. V. Dougherty Book 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018 [打印本頁] 作者: 突然 時間: 2025-3-21 18:20
書目名稱Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity被引頻次
書目名稱Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity年度引用
書目名稱Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity讀者反饋
書目名稱Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 膽汁 時間: 2025-3-21 20:21 作者: 清洗 時間: 2025-3-22 03:01 作者: freight 時間: 2025-3-22 05:37 作者: 千篇一律 時間: 2025-3-22 12:14
Run Yu Chen,Jin Yi Guo,Xiao Long Dengorrect the scholarly record when publications themselves are deficient. Intent may be an important element to be considered by institutions that have the role of investigating and punishing wrongdoers for scientific misconduct, but intent should be considered immaterial by members of the research co作者: Prophylaxis 時間: 2025-3-22 16:23
Yi Liu,Yefeng Ma,Qing Deng,Yi Liu,Hui Zhangthe original source material misappropriated in the act of plagiarism, and (3) are easily accessible to the scholarly community without registration barriers or paywalls. This analysis yields a twofold conclusion: first, relatively little uniformity exists among publishers in philosophy for respondi作者: Prophylaxis 時間: 2025-3-22 19:22
Yi Ou,Lei Chen,Jianliang Xu,Theo H?rderistleblowers in recent times have been described as post-publication vigilantes for their efforts in securing corrections of the scholarly record, so the professional dangers of academic whistleblowing should not be understated.作者: extinguish 時間: 2025-3-22 21:24
A Faceted Crawler for the Twitter Servicen that it hosts in one system but will leave other electronic versions unchanged (“The Platform Problem”). Quite frequently the original uncorrected versions of articles are uploaded on secondary websites outside the control of a publisher. These copies are more accessible to researchers than the co作者: aesthetic 時間: 2025-3-23 02:06 作者: RENIN 時間: 2025-3-23 08:24 作者: 痛得哭了 時間: 2025-3-23 13:33
Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research IntegrityIn the Aftermath of 作者: 亞當(dāng)心理陰影 時間: 2025-3-23 16:21
Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity978-3-319-99435-2Series ISSN 2212-9529 Series E-ISSN 2212-9537 作者: Germinate 時間: 2025-3-23 20:57 作者: Exclude 時間: 2025-3-24 01:04
Research Ethics Forumhttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/238750.jpg作者: Nonporous 時間: 2025-3-24 05:40
Chong Feng,Chun Liao,Zhirun Liu,Heyan Huangs the integrity of the scholarly record, corrupts the surrounding academic enterprise, and creates inefficiencies across all levels of knowledge production. The correction of the scholarly record for plagiarism is not a task for editors and publishers alone; each member of the research community has作者: Vasoconstrictor 時間: 2025-3-24 09:25 作者: Freeze 時間: 2025-3-24 13:42
Run Yu Chen,Jin Yi Guo,Xiao Long Denggrity, I propose that academic plagiarism has been committed when there is: (1) a non-trivial appropriation of words, images, or formulas, (2) with inadequate credit, (3) that generates an appearance of original authorship, (4) in a discrete item belonging to the scholarly record. This approach is s作者: Mercantile 時間: 2025-3-24 15:23 作者: 跟隨 時間: 2025-3-24 21:44 作者: Harass 時間: 2025-3-24 23:45
Yi Liu,Yefeng Ma,Qing Deng,Yi Liu,Hui Zhangbook chapters for one author of record. As the publications divide into those in philosophy and those in health communication, a comparison is possible between the manner in which different disciplines respond to evidence of suspected plagiarism. Using news reports as well as publicly issued stateme作者: 改良 時間: 2025-3-25 06:15
Jiaqi Liu,Zhidong Cao,Daniel Zengal publishing circumstances, which include allegations of self-plagiarism, places in high relief the requirements of genuine authorship, the complexity of some self-plagiarism claims, and the challenges of requesting corrections of the scholarly record. Differing standards of evidence are often prop作者: ANTE 時間: 2025-3-25 08:17 作者: hereditary 時間: 2025-3-25 15:19 作者: ODIUM 時間: 2025-3-25 19:31
Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018作者: 組裝 時間: 2025-3-25 20:46 作者: 無價值 時間: 2025-3-26 00:32 作者: Aspirin 時間: 2025-3-26 07:31
Yi Liu,Yefeng Ma,Qing Deng,Yi Liu,Hui Zhanged retractions, errata, and corrigenda that have been issued in these cases. Attention is given to the variety of text manipulations present in the articles and book chapters that have been subject to corrections by editors and publishers.作者: Tidious 時間: 2025-3-26 09:26
Jiaqi Liu,Zhidong Cao,Daniel Zengbenefits to the larger research community. Researchers, editors, and publishers sometimes conflate standards from legal, moral, and scientific domains, and a lack of clarity about the applicable standard can significantly delay a proper correction of the scholarly record.作者: Parley 時間: 2025-3-26 16:31
Introduction,s of the expression ‘correcting the scholarly record,’ discusses the integrity of authorship, outlines the purpose of academic publishing, and distinguishes post-publication from pre-publication responses to plagiarism.作者: 平躺 時間: 2025-3-26 17:42 作者: etiquette 時間: 2025-3-26 23:37 作者: 極肥胖 時間: 2025-3-27 04:31
2212-9529 e indispensable roles for rectifying the harms of academic pThis volume is the first book-length study on post-publication responses to academic plagiarism in humanities disciplines. It demonstrates that the correction of the scholarly literature for plagiarism is not a task for editors and publishe作者: 咯咯笑 時間: 2025-3-27 09:15 作者: 可憎 時間: 2025-3-27 12:53 作者: 解決 時間: 2025-3-27 14:02
Introduction,s the integrity of the scholarly record, corrupts the surrounding academic enterprise, and creates inefficiencies across all levels of knowledge production. The correction of the scholarly record for plagiarism is not a task for editors and publishers alone; each member of the research community has作者: 妨礙議事 時間: 2025-3-27 21:15 作者: Hangar 時間: 2025-3-28 00:43
What Is Academic Plagiarism?,grity, I propose that academic plagiarism has been committed when there is: (1) a non-trivial appropriation of words, images, or formulas, (2) with inadequate credit, (3) that generates an appearance of original authorship, (4) in a discrete item belonging to the scholarly record. This approach is s作者: 懸崖 時間: 2025-3-28 04:52
A Test Case for Published Corrections: The Discipline of Philosophy, them are many. Some of the most respected publishing houses in philosophy have recently faced the issue of having published plagiarized material. The chapter uses a specific context of serial plagiarism involving 43 articles and book chapters by one author of record as a test case. The various resp作者: 遍及 時間: 2025-3-28 08:26
Academic Whistleblowing,uals who disclose evidence of suspected plagiarism are often subject to considerable backlash. To be sure, the evidence they provide, even when impeccable, can create a significant workload of verification for editors and publishers, as well as for research integrity officers at the institutional ho作者: 內(nèi)行 時間: 2025-3-28 13:15
Publishing Corrections of the Scholarly Record: Some Test Cases,book chapters for one author of record. As the publications divide into those in philosophy and those in health communication, a comparison is possible between the manner in which different disciplines respond to evidence of suspected plagiarism. Using news reports as well as publicly issued stateme作者: ordain 時間: 2025-3-28 16:23
Contested Authorship, Self-Plagiarism, and the Scholarly Record,al publishing circumstances, which include allegations of self-plagiarism, places in high relief the requirements of genuine authorship, the complexity of some self-plagiarism claims, and the challenges of requesting corrections of the scholarly record. Differing standards of evidence are often prop作者: 頭腦冷靜 時間: 2025-3-28 19:28 作者: 蟄伏 時間: 2025-3-29 00:10
