標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Corporate Capitalism‘s Use of Openness; Profit for Free? Arwid Lund,Mariano Zukerfeld Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho [打印本頁] 作者: SORB 時間: 2025-3-21 19:34
書目名稱Corporate Capitalism‘s Use of Openness影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Corporate Capitalism‘s Use of Openness影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Corporate Capitalism‘s Use of Openness網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Corporate Capitalism‘s Use of Openness網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Corporate Capitalism‘s Use of Openness被引頻次
書目名稱Corporate Capitalism‘s Use of Openness被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Corporate Capitalism‘s Use of Openness年度引用
書目名稱Corporate Capitalism‘s Use of Openness年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Corporate Capitalism‘s Use of Openness讀者反饋
書目名稱Corporate Capitalism‘s Use of Openness讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 按等級 時間: 2025-3-21 22:07
2947-9290 g commons and collaborative production, new business models .“Matching the rigour of the analysis with an extraordinary pedagogical capacity, the authors unveil all the arcana of the ‘openness’ capitalism model and digital labour. Essential for scholars and students across the social and economic sc作者: 畸形 時間: 2025-3-22 04:20 作者: flavonoids 時間: 2025-3-22 08:34
Profiting from Openness: A Critique of a New Business Model,talism or informational capitalism. Some instead speak of a movement within capitalism from Fordism to post-Fordism that has changed capital’s regime of accumulation and the regulation of the capitalist system, transforming its reproduction. The profit from openness model, introduced in Chap. 1, eme作者: 口味 時間: 2025-3-22 10:48 作者: aesthetic 時間: 2025-3-22 15:00
Profiting from Open Access Publishing,mic publishers’ exploitation. On top of that, Elsevier and other commercial academic publishers are prospering from research that is paid for by someone else, and that someone else (often the public) is in most cases paying the companies to publish the research. This is profit for free at its prime.作者: aesthetic 時間: 2025-3-22 21:02 作者: Ingenuity 時間: 2025-3-23 00:26 作者: Mhc-Molecule 時間: 2025-3-23 02:25
Conclusions and Policies, strands of policy suggestions that challenge the for-profit perspective that has been criticized throughout this book.?In so doing we are challenging liberal ideology from the point of view of socialism’s understanding of freedom as an effective power to act, an ideological position that logically 作者: thyroid-hormone 時間: 2025-3-23 08:35
Arwid Lund,Mariano ZukerfeldAddresses issues of governance and citizenship, politics and policy outcomes.Sits at the intersection of three fields of knowledge concerning commons and collaborative production, new business models 作者: flutter 時間: 2025-3-23 10:50 作者: 大約冬季 時間: 2025-3-23 17:35
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28219-6collaborative prosumer; peer producer; wikinomics; unpaid labour; commercial crowdsourcing; open access作者: 現(xiàn)暈光 時間: 2025-3-23 21:39
978-3-030-28221-9The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl作者: 尖牙 時間: 2025-3-23 22:26 作者: Hectic 時間: 2025-3-24 02:45 作者: obnoxious 時間: 2025-3-24 09:33
Robust UAV Communications with Jammingtalism or informational capitalism. Some instead speak of a movement within capitalism from Fordism to post-Fordism that has changed capital’s regime of accumulation and the regulation of the capitalist system, transforming its reproduction. The profit from openness model, introduced in Chap. 1, eme作者: 等級的上升 時間: 2025-3-24 12:33 作者: Expand 時間: 2025-3-24 18:12
Yun Zhang,Xin Qi,Lupeng Guo,Nan Qiaomic publishers’ exploitation. On top of that, Elsevier and other commercial academic publishers are prospering from research that is paid for by someone else, and that someone else (often the public) is in most cases paying the companies to publish the research. This is profit for free at its prime.作者: 一個攪動不安 時間: 2025-3-24 22:22
Guiting Li,Xuan Zhang,Junyu Guo,Qi Yangt from openness business model. YouTube, our case study, leads this segment by any measure, but is also the second largest Internet site by traffic. As of January 2019, YouTube had 1.9 billion monthly active users worldwide, watching some 5 billion videos each day. The videos are uploaded by around 作者: Initial 時間: 2025-3-25 00:31
Guiting Li,Xuan Zhang,Junyu Guo,Qi Yang the 11,400 courses offered by these platforms. While there are several not-for-profit MOOCs, many of them are aimed at making money, and Coursera, our case study, is the leader of the pack. The company currently has some 37 million learners and made roughly USD 140 million in revenues in 2018. Reve作者: 宇宙你 時間: 2025-3-25 06:41
Tong Xue,Wei Wu,Qie Wang,Xuanli Wu strands of policy suggestions that challenge the for-profit perspective that has been criticized throughout this book.?In so doing we are challenging liberal ideology from the point of view of socialism’s understanding of freedom as an effective power to act, an ideological position that logically 作者: 無意 時間: 2025-3-25 07:31
Robust UAV Communications with Jamming its infrastructure. The earlier dichotomy between senders and receivers, between producers and consumers was loosened up and the categories started to merge with each other, giving rise to new possibilities according to intellectuals of the time. In this introduction we present this shift as a shif作者: 核心 時間: 2025-3-25 13:16 作者: 屈尊 時間: 2025-3-25 16:48 作者: Accessible 時間: 2025-3-25 23:12 作者: 觀察 時間: 2025-3-26 02:44
Guiting Li,Xuan Zhang,Junyu Guo,Qi Yangploitation of the data and attention of users. YouTube offers a “partner” program that allegedly shares income with so-called producers of videos. However, we show that the requisites for qualifying as a “partner” are not so easy to fulfill and, moreover, that 96.5% of “creators” do not make enough 作者: PUT 時間: 2025-3-26 06:49 作者: senile-dementia 時間: 2025-3-26 10:21 作者: 平常 時間: 2025-3-26 14:26 作者: intoxicate 時間: 2025-3-26 16:59 作者: Certainty 時間: 2025-3-26 23:49
Profiting from Openness: A Critique of a New Business Model,e else’s freedom to act. The kind of openness that fosters commoning and the building of robust commons is one thing, and the openness that supports interoperability in a capitalist world is another thing. This difference is connected to classical ideologies. The study’s ideology analysis is elabora作者: BRACE 時間: 2025-3-27 04:45
Profiting from Free and Open Source Software,ose its products. Finally, a potentially open and horizontal community, the Fedora project, which could have distributed the freedoms to act in effective and thereby democratic forms, coordinated by a non-profit foundation, is legally and organizationally subsumed under a hierarchical business struc作者: investigate 時間: 2025-3-27 06:17
Profiting from Open Access Publishing,ournals, together with the engagement of company representatives, naturalizes the existence of high APCs. Finally, the analysis shows that Elsevier profits indirectly and ideologically from openness by open-washing enclosed and toll-accessed subscription articles in hybrid journals with its OA-publi作者: 不透氣 時間: 2025-3-27 10:46 作者: 清楚 時間: 2025-3-27 14:40
Profiting from Massive Open Online Courses,universities partner with Coursera and are positioned as middlemen: they lawfully provide the courses developed by their teachers, contribute with some kind of “trademark” and deliver recognition (the certification, degree, etc.) to the learners in exchange for some of Coursera’s revenues. This is o作者: crescendo 時間: 2025-3-27 19:15
Conclusions and Policies,ed sectors of cognitive capitalism in order to operationalize and structure this shift of perspective. The policies relate to economy, technical infrastructure, legal regulation (where we introduce the .) and alternative digital platforms.
