標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Content and Consciousness Revisited; With Replies by Dani Carlos Mu?oz-Suárez,Felipe De Brigard Book 2015 Springer International Publishing [打印本頁] 作者: 手套 時間: 2025-3-21 16:23
書目名稱Content and Consciousness Revisited影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Content and Consciousness Revisited影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Content and Consciousness Revisited網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Content and Consciousness Revisited網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Content and Consciousness Revisited被引頻次
書目名稱Content and Consciousness Revisited被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Content and Consciousness Revisited年度引用
書目名稱Content and Consciousness Revisited年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Content and Consciousness Revisited讀者反饋
書目名稱Content and Consciousness Revisited讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 煩擾 時間: 2025-3-21 20:57
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17374-0Conscious-state anti-realism; Daniel Dennett; Dennett‘s Content and Consciousness; Dennett‘s dual-level作者: STALE 時間: 2025-3-22 02:50 作者: Slit-Lamp 時間: 2025-3-22 07:09 作者: sphincter 時間: 2025-3-22 10:17 作者: 冒號 時間: 2025-3-22 14:21 作者: 冒號 時間: 2025-3-22 20:40 作者: 厭煩 時間: 2025-3-22 21:29
Hebert Montegranario,Jairo Espinosa argues that in that book Dennett reported a scientifically significant discovery about what minds are. This initially seems implausible, because at first sight . presents as an exercise in pure philosophical analysis of everyday discourse about the mental, and that is a profoundly unlikely method f作者: 宏偉 時間: 2025-3-23 04:30
S. David Hudnall M.D., F.C.A.P.ver, as I argue in this paper, both sides of this debate agreed on a basic assumption: that the truth (or falsehood) of our ascription of propositional attitudes has direct ontological implications four our theories about their nature. In the current paper I argue that such an assumption is false, a作者: AVID 時間: 2025-3-23 07:21
S. David Hudnall M.D., F.C.A.P.s a relatively neglected aspect of this framework – the treatment of thinking and reasoning in Chap. VIII. Here Dennett distinguishes two senses of “thinking”, parallel to the senses of “awareness” distinguished earlier in the book. In one sense “thinking” refers to sub-personal information processi作者: 叢林 時間: 2025-3-23 10:48
Danielle E. Levac,Heidi Sveistrupis to presume from the outset that the target of interpretation is rational. This paper examines the history of rationality constraints on mental state ascription. I argue that the reasons that Dennett and his philosophical brethren present for positing rationality constraints are not convincing. If作者: 堅毅 時間: 2025-3-23 16:47 作者: 贊成你 時間: 2025-3-23 19:18
III.C. Pathology of Vitreomaculopathiese starts and dead ends, Dennett warns, especially when it comes to the areas of thinking and reasoning. Why is the distinction important? To what extent have cognitive scientists and philosophers honored this distinction? This paper will use the current debate over the extended mind hypothesis – rou作者: LAIR 時間: 2025-3-23 22:23
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1086-1 call the intelligent storage of information”. This statement amounts to a claim that learning functions as the criterion of intelligence, or, at least, the criterion for the intelligent storage of information. It is this connection between learning and intelligence that I defend in this essay. I be作者: Protein 時間: 2025-3-24 06:04
Janet L. Denlinger PhD,Endre A. Balazs MD an objection to Dennett’s intentional stance theory (i.e. the ‘If it isn’t true, why does it work?’ objection). Specifically, young children’s use of the intentional stance enables them to learn from and thereby to become more similar to the adults in their culture. As a result, they themselves bec作者: MAUVE 時間: 2025-3-24 09:02
Janet L. Denlinger PhD,Endre A. Balazs MDiousness realism so conceived may thus be opposed by a variety of anti-realisms, distinguished from each other by denying the first, the second, or both of the realist’s defining claims. I argue that Dennett’s view of consciousness is best read as an anti-realism that affirms the existence of consci作者: 斷言 時間: 2025-3-24 12:37 作者: 宿醉 時間: 2025-3-24 18:43 作者: JAUNT 時間: 2025-3-24 19:01
,What Was I Thinking? Dennett’s , and the Reality of Propositional Attitudes,nd that Dennett had hinted at its falsehood in the first part of .. In an exercise of “counterfactual exegesis”, I suggest that, had this point been acknowledged then, this longstanding debate – which still survives to this date – could have probably been avoided.作者: ethnology 時間: 2025-3-25 00:06 作者: 相一致 時間: 2025-3-25 05:28 作者: 供過于求 時間: 2025-3-25 10:27 作者: 使熄滅 時間: 2025-3-25 14:46 作者: 譏諷 時間: 2025-3-25 17:29
Janet L. Denlinger PhD,Endre A. Balazs MDth of the realist’s defining claims. I argue that Dennett’s view of consciousness is best read as an anti-realism that affirms the existence of consciousness while denying an important independence claim.作者: 積云 時間: 2025-3-25 22:06 作者: 呼吸 時間: 2025-3-26 01:09 作者: 暴發(fā)戶 時間: 2025-3-26 05:57 作者: Annotate 時間: 2025-3-26 12:05 作者: 多余 時間: 2025-3-26 15:37 作者: Ambiguous 時間: 2025-3-26 16:53
Hebert Montegranario,Jairo Espinosaosopher (qua philosopher) can aspire: unification of empirical findings. The chapter then argues that because . does not try to integrate its unifying suggestions with any considerations from physics, it fails to offer a satisfying metaphysical account of the mental, even though most philosophical r作者: arthrodesis 時間: 2025-3-27 00:48 作者: cajole 時間: 2025-3-27 04:41 作者: tackle 時間: 2025-3-27 06:12 作者: immunity 時間: 2025-3-27 11:46
Janet L. Denlinger PhD,Endre A. Balazs MDt to the mill for a . realist interpretation of the reference of intentional terms, insofar the causal interaction between intentional interpretations of behavior and cognitive development provides an anchor that links intentional terms to functional and/or neural processes. Importantly, causal (as 作者: 吊胃口 時間: 2025-3-27 14:42
1573-4536 philosophy, the personal/sub-personal level distinction, intelligence, learning, intentionality, rationality, propositional attitudes, among other issues of scientific and philosophical interest. Each chapter 978-3-319-36727-9978-3-319-17374-0Series ISSN 1573-4536 Series E-ISSN 2468-399X 作者: 粗語 時間: 2025-3-27 20:21 作者: 裝勇敢地做 時間: 2025-3-28 00:37 作者: 額外的事 時間: 2025-3-28 04:03 作者: 星星 時間: 2025-3-28 07:46 作者: 情節(jié)劇 時間: 2025-3-28 14:27 作者: 沒血色 時間: 2025-3-28 17:37
,A Most Rare Achievement: Dennett’s Scientific Discovery in ,, argues that in that book Dennett reported a scientifically significant discovery about what minds are. This initially seems implausible, because at first sight . presents as an exercise in pure philosophical analysis of everyday discourse about the mental, and that is a profoundly unlikely method f作者: grandiose 時間: 2025-3-28 21:16
,What Was I Thinking? Dennett’s , and the Reality of Propositional Attitudes,ver, as I argue in this paper, both sides of this debate agreed on a basic assumption: that the truth (or falsehood) of our ascription of propositional attitudes has direct ontological implications four our theories about their nature. In the current paper I argue that such an assumption is false, a作者: JAUNT 時間: 2025-3-29 02:40 作者: 身心疲憊 時間: 2025-3-29 03:25 作者: 憂傷 時間: 2025-3-29 09:37
,Dennett’s Personal/Subpersonal Distinction in the Light of Cognitive Neuropsychiatry,ier and a later one. My aim is to clarify both versions of the distinction and examine them in the light of a particular enterprise, namely cognitive neuropsychiatry. In particular, the two versions of the distinction cast delusional subjects in very different lights. According to the later distinct作者: 陰謀小團體 時間: 2025-3-29 12:31
I Am Large, I Contain Multitudes: The Personal, the Sub-personal, and the Extended,e starts and dead ends, Dennett warns, especially when it comes to the areas of thinking and reasoning. Why is the distinction important? To what extent have cognitive scientists and philosophers honored this distinction? This paper will use the current debate over the extended mind hypothesis – rou作者: 令人悲傷 時間: 2025-3-29 15:49
Learning Our Way to Intelligence: Reflections on Dennett and Appropriateness, call the intelligent storage of information”. This statement amounts to a claim that learning functions as the criterion of intelligence, or, at least, the criterion for the intelligent storage of information. It is this connection between learning and intelligence that I defend in this essay. I be作者: panorama 時間: 2025-3-29 22:40
The Intentional Stance and Cultural Learning: A Developmental Feedback Loop, an objection to Dennett’s intentional stance theory (i.e. the ‘If it isn’t true, why does it work?’ objection). Specifically, young children’s use of the intentional stance enables them to learn from and thereby to become more similar to the adults in their culture. As a result, they themselves bec
