標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment; Paula Satne,Krisanna M. Scheiter Book 2022 Springer Nature Sw [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: Flange 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 16:33
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment影響因子(影響力)
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment被引頻次
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment年度引用
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment年度引用學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment讀者反饋
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 有惡臭 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 21:25 作者: PARA 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:39 作者: 起皺紋 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:51
Spinoza on Hatred and Power and the Challenge of Reconciliation ‘internalization’. His account calls into question whether forgiveness is ever really justified, or whether it could ever possibly be virtuous. So we might well wonder why a discussion of Spinoza’s psychology of hatred belongs in a discussion about forgiveness, reconciliation, revenge, or ameliorat作者: PARA 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 11:55
Free Will Skepticism and Retributive Punishmentee Will Skepticism argument holds that we can no longer reasonably believe in the existence of free will or in the closely connected idea of moral responsibility. Without genuine free will, the power to control one’s own decisions, there can be (according to this argument) no basis for blame or prai作者: 松緊帶 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:10
Punishment, Revenge, and the Nature of Moral Philosophyare less successful than standardly assumed, I insist that there is a largely overlooked dimension along which the two phenomena are indeed quite different. This dimension relates to the role that narratives play in each: the avenger (unlike the punisher) must be committed to a certain narrative, to作者: 松緊帶 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:53 作者: Wallow 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 21:53 作者: 易彎曲 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 04:19
The Dark Side of Forgivenessis the “alteration thesis” of forgiveness, recently defended by David Owens and Chris Bennett. Bennett argues that forgiveness is a “normative power”: the forgiver undertakes an obligation no longer to treat the wrongdoer as standing under the obligations generated by the act of wrongdoing. This, I 作者: 誘騙 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 07:22
Why Aristotle’s Virtuous Agent Won’t Forgive: Aristotle on ,, ,, and ropriate excusing circumstances. Aristotle’s virtuous judge, however, does not forgive; the wrongdoer is excused from blame in the first place, rather than being forgiven precisely because she is blameworthy. Additionally, the judge does not fail to blame because she wishes to be merciful or from na作者: Engaged 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 11:28
Who Is Entitled to Forgive? A Study of ‘Third-Party’ and ‘Proxy’ Forgivenessdrawn between cases in which someone offers her own forgiveness to an offender for an injury inflicted on another person?(‘a(chǎn)utonomous third-party forgiveness’) and cases in which she forgives (or purports to forgive) on behalf of that victim (‘deputatory third-party forgiveness’). I argue that deput作者: Geyser 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:48 作者: Mercantile 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 20:09
An African Feminist Approach to Forgiveness: Pumla Gobodo-Madikizela Consideredorgiveness. In my attempt to sketch the contours of an African feminist approach to forgiveness, I engage mainly with her work on the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (henceforth TRC) of South Africa. In Section One of the chapter, I give an overview of what I consider the most important themes i作者: IOTA 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:44 作者: Organization 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 03:57 作者: 向下 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:09 作者: DENT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 11:12
Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment作者: nettle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:03
Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment978-3-030-77807-1作者: 郊外 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 22:39 作者: chlorosis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:25
Spinoza on Hatred and Power and the Challenge of Reconciliationunder the powers of a civil state. Spinoza’s view, however, appears to authorize a broad posture of forbearance towards all wrongdoers I will then explore what this broad forbearance involves, as an alternative response to wrongdoing to blame and forgiveness. It does not involve foregoing just punis作者: 微生物 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 05:39
Free Will Skepticism and Retributive Punishment the proximate control to govern one’s actions by moral reasons, and it provides a plausible basis on which to base the notion of legitimate retributive punishment, as well as general ideas about praise and blame. While Free Will Skepticism provides a useful caution against attributing ‘ultimate’ re作者: 寒冷 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 07:45 作者: MEEK 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 15:34 作者: Largess 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 17:32 作者: 容易做 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 23:07 作者: Evocative 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 00:12 作者: FAR 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 05:16
ment and revenge, the path to reconciliation, the morality of blame, and the?role of forgiveness in political conflict..Chapter 16 is available open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License via link.springer.com..978-3-030-77809-5978-3-030-77807-1作者: chronology 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 08:47
Transforming the Hong Kong Legal Machineon in the political sphere and the philosophical debates surrounding the nature and desirability of political forgiveness and its relation to the moral duty to remember after an atrocity, as well as the relationship between political reconciliation, apologies, and punishment. The volume offers cutti作者: Infusion 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 13:57
Lean Six Sigma: The Joint Commission,under the powers of a civil state. Spinoza’s view, however, appears to authorize a broad posture of forbearance towards all wrongdoers I will then explore what this broad forbearance involves, as an alternative response to wrongdoing to blame and forgiveness. It does not involve foregoing just punis作者: CRATE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 18:25 作者: EXULT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 00:23 作者: 不能根除 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 02:31 作者: PTCA635 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 07:44
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31462-9her descriptive approach; and (iii) what I believe she sees as the three main conditions of forgiveness, namely perpetrator remorse, victim witness and mutual empathy. In Section Two, I consider her as a proponent of an African feminist approach to political forgiveness. While I discern clear strand作者: 生來(lái) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 09:54 作者: 使聲音降低 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:51 作者: 虛情假意 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 17:51 作者: 痛打 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:08 作者: semiskilled 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:52 作者: Middle-Ear 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 08:36
The Power of Protective Coerciongrets or hesitation of any kind. Mobilizing Bernard Williams’s understanding of “simplemindedness”, I thus suggest that the avenger needs to be “simpleminded” in a way that the punisher need not be. And I suggest that this distinction between punisher and avenger contains important lessons for our understanding of moral philosophy in general.作者: 不可思議 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 10:32
Transforming the School-to-Prison Pipelinesing to blame for the wrong kind of reason is not necessarily a bad thing to do. No less than forgiving, it can be a valuable and important way of responding to the moral conflicts that shape our shared moral lives.作者: meritorious 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 18:36
Fast Fourier Transform Algorithms,giveness can sometimes be in order where a sympathetic third-party feels her own resentment for the harm visited by the offender on the victim. However, because sympathy with victimhood is not itself victimhood, autonomous third-party forgiveness can never substitute for or supplant the victim’s own forgiveness.作者: Host142 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 21:34 作者: Conduit 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 01:54 作者: 銼屑 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 06:21
Punishment, Revenge, and the Nature of Moral Philosophygrets or hesitation of any kind. Mobilizing Bernard Williams’s understanding of “simplemindedness”, I thus suggest that the avenger needs to be “simpleminded” in a way that the punisher need not be. And I suggest that this distinction between punisher and avenger contains important lessons for our understanding of moral philosophy in general.作者: appall 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 11:13
Forgiving and Ceasing to Blamesing to blame for the wrong kind of reason is not necessarily a bad thing to do. No less than forgiving, it can be a valuable and important way of responding to the moral conflicts that shape our shared moral lives.作者: MOAN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 14:57
Who Is Entitled to Forgive? A Study of ‘Third-Party’ and ‘Proxy’ Forgivenessgiveness can sometimes be in order where a sympathetic third-party feels her own resentment for the harm visited by the offender on the victim. However, because sympathy with victimhood is not itself victimhood, autonomous third-party forgiveness can never substitute for or supplant the victim’s own forgiveness.作者: V切開(kāi) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 17:50
Political Apologies, Punishment, and Reconciliation Without Forgivenessic apologies can be an important way of expressing what I have elsewhere called – following Darrel Moellendorf – political regret, and that their role in doing so need not depend on their having forgiveness as a constitutive goal.作者: 描繪 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 21:24
Does Forgiveness Require Forswearing Resentment?his paper, I articulate several ways of understanding the claim that forgiving requires one to forswear resentment. I then argue that just one of these versions of the claim is plausible, but only when it is so severely weakened that it is not an illuminating claim about the nature of forgiveness.作者: Halfhearted 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 00:50 作者: Gum-Disease 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 06:32 作者: abstemious 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 08:29 作者: triptans 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 13:30 作者: fetter 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 18:49 作者: beta-carotene 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 23:50
Kant on Punishment, Pardon, and Forgivenessderstood in terms of a maxim to protest a wrongdoing, and not simply in terms of feelings like resentment. Forgiveness should be understood as the maxim to cease moral punishment. Crucially, the reason for forgiveness, on the Kantian interpretation advanced here, is that we have a duty to be forgiving, akin to the duty of beneficence.作者: 表狀態(tài) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 03:15 作者: esoteric 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 05:05 作者: periodontitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 12:26
Transforming the Hong Kong Legal Machinee different chapters. The chapters examine the merits and pitfalls of common reactive attitudes to wrongdoing, such as anger, hatred, resentment, and forgiveness, taking into account both historical perspectives and contemporary debates. The introduction explains some of the philosophical debates ab作者: 與野獸博斗者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 15:37 作者: Canary 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 18:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16928-6derstand why the stoic sage will not be subject to anger, I present a worry for Seneca’s view: given that the sage cannot be harmed, what justifies the sage in punishing wrongdoers, or those who sought to cause her harm? I then explicate Seneca’s curative stance on punishment, which he analogizes to作者: 萬(wàn)神殿 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 23:04
Lean Six Sigma: The Joint Commission, ‘internalization’. His account calls into question whether forgiveness is ever really justified, or whether it could ever possibly be virtuous. So we might well wonder why a discussion of Spinoza’s psychology of hatred belongs in a discussion about forgiveness, reconciliation, revenge, or ameliorat作者: Seminar 時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 03:49 作者: 亞麻制品 時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 07:48
The Power of Protective Coercionare less successful than standardly assumed, I insist that there is a largely overlooked dimension along which the two phenomena are indeed quite different. This dimension relates to the role that narratives play in each: the avenger (unlike the punisher) must be committed to a certain narrative, to
