作者: 有角 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:55 作者: palette 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 02:52 作者: COW 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:03
Compositional Semantics With Lexicalized Tree-Adjoining Grammar (LTAG): How Much Underspecificationree for . at the VP node of the tree α.. The derivation tree in Figure 1. shows this derivation. If both substitution and adjoining are described as . of one tree to another tree, then the entire derivation consists of a set of attachments.作者: Expressly 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 10:19 作者: diathermy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:42 作者: diathermy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 20:21 作者: AIL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 22:49
https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0023017sition, and much of the paper discusses this application. Incidentally, the reader can experiment with this implementation over the internet: most of what is discussed below is available as part of Johan Bos’s DORIS system (Discourse Oriented Representation and Inference System.).作者: 橢圓 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 01:27
https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-150-4 will be developed, and we believe that these ideas will be easier to grasp if we concentrate on one word, which will be used in most of our examples. We have selected the french word ., but the phenomena under discussion would have been as well described on other usual nouns.作者: Inordinate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 05:37
Random Closed Sets and Capacity Functionals,ts descendants (.; .), or by simple structure sharing (.; .; .); or whether some more indirect construction process is involved (.; .). In nearly every case, however, the goal of the process is a formal paraphrase that ‘means the same as the original’.作者: 閑蕩 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:23
Inference and Computational Semantics,sition, and much of the paper discusses this application. Incidentally, the reader can experiment with this implementation over the internet: most of what is discussed below is available as part of Johan Bos’s DORIS system (Discourse Oriented Representation and Inference System.).作者: INCH 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:06 作者: 的闡明 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 18:20
Weak Lexical Semantics and Multiple Views,ts descendants (.; .), or by simple structure sharing (.; .; .); or whether some more indirect construction process is involved (.; .). In nearly every case, however, the goal of the process is a formal paraphrase that ‘means the same as the original’.作者: 委派 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 23:36 作者: 氣候 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 03:48
Introduction to classical mechanics,ree for . at the VP node of the tree α.. The derivation tree in Figure 1. shows this derivation. If both substitution and adjoining are described as . of one tree to another tree, then the entire derivation consists of a set of attachments.作者: Cacophonous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:09 作者: 蛤肉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:13 作者: 庇護(hù) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 15:39 作者: 前奏曲 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 22:51
In Search Of The Semantic Value(S) Of An Occurrence: An Example And A Framework,ir status and importance varies from theory to theory. This paper attempts to sketch a general framework; due to space limitation, only the main ideas will be developed, and we believe that these ideas will be easier to grasp if we concentrate on one word, which will be used in most of our examples.作者: integrated 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 02:36
Weak Lexical Semantics and Multiple Views,me debate as to whether this can be done strictly compositionally, e.g. by function application and composition, as proposed in Montague grammar and its descendants (.; .), or by simple structure sharing (.; .; .); or whether some more indirect construction process is involved (.; .). In nearly ever作者: 具體 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 07:14
Underspecified Lexical Conceptual Structures For Sense Variations, meaning remains generic or vague and may vary depending on other constituents in the sentence. Meaning specializations and variations introduced by arguments and modifiers are particularly complex and very frequent for predicative terms, especially for verbs (.; .; .). The meaning of a predicate in作者: 細(xì)菌等 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 09:23
The Availability of Partial Scopings in an Underspecified Semantic Representation, meaning. Given a sentence displaying quantifier scope ambiguity, such as ., part of the problem of representing the sentence’s meaning is to distinguish between the two possible meanings, (1a), where every man loves a (possibly) different woman, or (1b), where a single woman is loved by every man: 作者: 癡呆 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 11:39 作者: Fraudulent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 19:25 作者: 故意 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:48 作者: Asperity 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 00:18 作者: 競(jìng)選運(yùn)動(dòng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:08 作者: 等級(jí)的上升 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:55 作者: 格言 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 15:43
Building a Semantic Lexicon: Structuring and Generating Concepts,ntent of lexical items at various levels of representation. Actually, their design represents an important challenge for the computational linguistics community, both from the theoretical and the applicative point of view. The difficulty of this enterprise is given by the inherently multi-purpose an作者: 得意人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:05 作者: 摻和 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 20:59 作者: 光滑 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 01:09 作者: 繁殖 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 09:09
Harry Bunt,Reinhard Muskens,Elias ThijsseIncludes supplementary material: 作者: Orchiectomy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 10:37
Studies in Linguistics and Philosophyhttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/234733.jpg作者: Acumen 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 17:02
Computing Meaning978-94-010-0572-2Series ISSN 0924-4662 Series E-ISSN 2215-034X 作者: reserve 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 21:20 作者: 戲服 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 00:54 作者: 親愛(ài) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 02:13
Lecture Notes in Computer Sciencef the lexicon and on the formal representation of word meaning, and on the other hand the increasing need by natural language processing (NLP) systems of accessing large repositories of lexical knowledge. The latter, in fact, represents one of the most critical bottle-necks in the development of rob作者: 用肘 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 07:22
https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-150-4ir status and importance varies from theory to theory. This paper attempts to sketch a general framework; due to space limitation, only the main ideas will be developed, and we believe that these ideas will be easier to grasp if we concentrate on one word, which will be used in most of our examples.作者: 大洪水 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 11:11
Random Closed Sets and Capacity Functionals,me debate as to whether this can be done strictly compositionally, e.g. by function application and composition, as proposed in Montague grammar and its descendants (.; .), or by simple structure sharing (.; .; .); or whether some more indirect construction process is involved (.; .). In nearly ever作者: 譏諷 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:42
https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-150-4 meaning remains generic or vague and may vary depending on other constituents in the sentence. Meaning specializations and variations introduced by arguments and modifiers are particularly complex and very frequent for predicative terms, especially for verbs (.; .; .). The meaning of a predicate in作者: 清晰 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 21:14
https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-150-4 meaning. Given a sentence displaying quantifier scope ambiguity, such as ., part of the problem of representing the sentence’s meaning is to distinguish between the two possible meanings, (1a), where every man loves a (possibly) different woman, or (1b), where a single woman is loved by every man: 作者: abnegate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 02:40 作者: Externalize 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 03:28 作者: 母豬 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 07:43 作者: 有其法作用 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 15:20 作者: Gentry 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 18:50 作者: 新奇 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 22:50
https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-150-4A well-known problem in the semantic interpretation of natural language is presented by the use of referring expressions to not directly point at their intended referents, but at some associated object. Examples are:作者: SHOCK 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 00:51 作者: 名次后綴 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 06:36
Equations of motion for the earth,Lexicalized grammars. such as TAG (.; .) and CCG (.) have been very successful in showing how clauselevel syntax and semantics project from the lexicon. What drives the current enterprise is the hypothesis that the same can be shown true, at some level, for discourse syntax and semantics. Here we demonstrate our initial effort to作者: nutrition 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 09:11 作者: 悄悄移動(dòng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 15:00
From Lexical Item to Discourse Meaning: Computational and Representational Tools,Computing meanings is something that we do when we read, when we write, when we listen and when we speak, and to a certain extent also when we think and when we dream. We seem to do it virtually all the time, and yet it isn’t even entirely clear what we . by saying that we compute .; the very concept of meaning is not beyond discussion.作者: intolerance 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 19:50 作者: 按時(shí)間順序 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 22:03 作者: ingrate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 02:08
Multiple Discourse Connectives in a Lexicalized Grammar For Discourse,Lexicalized grammars. such as TAG (.; .) and CCG (.) have been very successful in showing how clauselevel syntax and semantics project from the lexicon. What drives the current enterprise is the hypothesis that the same can be shown true, at some level, for discourse syntax and semantics. Here we demonstrate our initial effort to作者: 笨拙處理 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 06:20
Event Coreference Between Two Sentences,Work on temporal relations between two eventualities .. and .. examines almost exclusively if one of the eventualities precedes, includes or overlaps the other one (.; .; .). All these temporal relations suppose that .. ≠ ... We will concentrate on cases where .. = .., i.e. on .作者: 躺下殘殺 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 10:30
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0572-2communication; grammar; natural language; semantic; semantics
