標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Computers and Cognition: Why Minds are not Machines; James H. Fetzer Book 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001 Prolog.artif [打印本頁] 作者: Deleterious 時間: 2025-3-21 20:05
書目名稱Computers and Cognition: Why Minds are not Machines影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Computers and Cognition: Why Minds are not Machines影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Computers and Cognition: Why Minds are not Machines網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Computers and Cognition: Why Minds are not Machines網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Computers and Cognition: Why Minds are not Machines被引頻次
書目名稱Computers and Cognition: Why Minds are not Machines被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Computers and Cognition: Why Minds are not Machines年度引用
書目名稱Computers and Cognition: Why Minds are not Machines年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Computers and Cognition: Why Minds are not Machines讀者反饋
書目名稱Computers and Cognition: Why Minds are not Machines讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 捏造 時間: 2025-3-21 23:36 作者: 思考才皺眉 時間: 2025-3-22 03:04 作者: Communicate 時間: 2025-3-22 04:36 作者: 報復(fù) 時間: 2025-3-22 09:00 作者: Autobiography 時間: 2025-3-22 14:14 作者: Autobiography 時間: 2025-3-22 19:28 作者: Entrancing 時間: 2025-3-22 23:30
Philosophical Aspects of Program Verificationof the discipline. There are those, such as C. A. R. Hoare and Edsgar Dijkstra, who maintain that, in order to attain the standing of a science rather than of a craft, computer science should model itself after mathematics. Others, including Richard DeMillo, Richard Lipton, and Alan Perlis, however,作者: 放大 時間: 2025-3-23 05:25
Philosophy and Computer Scienceisal of the scope and limits of formal methods to guarantee the reliability of computer system performance. Although intended as a philosophical critique, the response thereby generated was not altogether “philosophical”. The debate has now moved beyond . to ., and other journals and books and shows作者: AVOW 時間: 2025-3-23 08:43 作者: GUMP 時間: 2025-3-23 12:46
Computers and Cognition: Why Minds are not Machines978-94-010-0973-7Series ISSN 0924-0780 作者: Indent 時間: 2025-3-23 17:07
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2223-5radition associated especially with the name of René Descartes and the . tradition associated with B.F. Skinner. Dualism is strongly anti-reductionistic, insofar as mentality is taken be different than and not reducible to behavior. Behaviorism, by contrast, is strongly reductionistic, taking mental作者: 重疊 時間: 2025-3-23 22:02 作者: ARK 時間: 2025-3-24 00:24 作者: 羽飾 時間: 2025-3-24 02:40 作者: 雄偉 時間: 2025-3-24 10:07
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-34287-0izes in the “Series Foreword” as “brain-style computation”. In the Preface, the three editors (including Rumelhart) contrast connectionism with Newell and Simon’s conception of “physical symbol systems”. This conception finds its philosophical counterpart in the theories of Chomsky (regarding syntax作者: Diverticulitis 時間: 2025-3-24 12:49
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48661-5s a human being, of course, I have also had to personally cope with experiences in life that have involved formal systems and syntax processing. Sometimes our professional activities become detached from our life experiences to a degree that might astonish empirical scientists. Our enthusiasm for a 作者: 驚呼 時間: 2025-3-24 16:51
Lecture Notes in Computer Scienceton and Perlis [.], contend this suggestion is mistaken because it rests upon a misconception. Their position emphasizes the crucial role of social processes in coming to accept the validity of a proof or the truth of a theorem, no matter whether within purely mathematical contexts or without: “We b作者: faddish 時間: 2025-3-24 21:32
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48661-5of the discipline. There are those, such as C. A. R. Hoare and Edsgar Dijkstra, who maintain that, in order to attain the standing of a science rather than of a craft, computer science should model itself after mathematics. Others, including Richard DeMillo, Richard Lipton, and Alan Perlis, however,作者: Synovial-Fluid 時間: 2025-3-25 02:16 作者: 我吃花盤旋 時間: 2025-3-25 04:53
Heuristics for Large Geometric Problems, is quite difficult if not impossible to imagine how contemporary affairs—in business and science, communications and transportation, governmental and military activities, for example—could be conducted without the use of computing machines, whose principal contribution has been to relieve us of the作者: epicondylitis 時間: 2025-3-25 10:23 作者: 用樹皮 時間: 2025-3-25 14:52
Studies in Cognitive Systemshttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/234629.jpg作者: 表示向前 時間: 2025-3-25 16:50
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0973-7Prolog; artificial intelligence; behavior; cognition; consciousness; epistemology; evolution; philosophy; sc作者: 不要不誠實 時間: 2025-3-25 20:08
978-1-4020-0243-4Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001作者: 發(fā)誓放棄 時間: 2025-3-26 00:08 作者: 夾死提手勢 時間: 2025-3-26 06:55
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2223-5ic, insofar as mentality is taken be different than and not reducible to behavior. Behaviorism, by contrast, is strongly reductionistic, taking mentalistic language to be at best no more than an abbreviated mode for the description of behavior and at worst just scientifically insignificant gibberish.作者: Motilin 時間: 2025-3-26 12:13 作者: AGOG 時間: 2025-3-26 16:01 作者: BULLY 時間: 2025-3-26 18:09 作者: 腐爛 時間: 2025-3-26 21:00 作者: 繞著哥哥問 時間: 2025-3-27 04:32
Philosophical Aspects of Program Verification than of a craft, computer science should model itself after mathematics. Others, including Richard DeMillo, Richard Lipton, and Alan Perlis, however, deny that the goals of the discipline can be gained by means of purely formal methods.作者: 灌輸 時間: 2025-3-27 08:05
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40268-0hich can account for them as predictable manifestations of a more adquate conception. Thinking does not ordinarily require the execution of mental algorithms, which appears to be at best no more than one rather special kind of thinking.作者: 摸索 時間: 2025-3-27 12:11 作者: 迅速成長 時間: 2025-3-27 17:36
Heuristics for Large Geometric Problems, no signs of abating. The APA Committee on Philosophy and Computers has asked me to discuss my experiences relating philosophy and computer science. I suggest that philosophical distinctions not only make a difference to understanding this domain but that their theoretical adequacy is also thereby tested.作者: 改變立場 時間: 2025-3-27 18:50 作者: 冥界三河 時間: 2025-3-27 23:22
Mental Algorithmshich can account for them as predictable manifestations of a more adquate conception. Thinking does not ordinarily require the execution of mental algorithms, which appears to be at best no more than one rather special kind of thinking.作者: 千篇一律 時間: 2025-3-28 04:06 作者: Commodious 時間: 2025-3-28 09:25
Philosophy and Computer Science no signs of abating. The APA Committee on Philosophy and Computers has asked me to discuss my experiences relating philosophy and computer science. I suggest that philosophical distinctions not only make a difference to understanding this domain but that their theoretical adequacy is also thereby tested.作者: geriatrician 時間: 2025-3-28 12:48
Computer Reliability and Public Policy: Limits of Knowledge of Computer-Based Systems necessity for certain kinds of mental exertion. The computer revolution has reduced our mental labors by means of these machines, just as the Industrial Revolution reduced our physical labor by means of other machines.作者: Bouquet 時間: 2025-3-28 17:16
Book 2001plain why the prevailing paradigm -the computational conception of language and mentality - can nolonger be sustained. An alternative approach is advanced, inspired bythe work of Charles S. Peirce, according to which minds are sign-using(or `semiotic‘) systems, which in turn generates distinctions b作者: 異常 時間: 2025-3-28 22:33 作者: Iniquitous 時間: 2025-3-28 23:55 作者: 傻 時間: 2025-3-29 05:40
Book 2001d limits of computer and AIsystems can be more adequately appraised and alternative accounts ofconsciousness and cognition can be more thoroughly criticised. ..Readership:. Intermediate and advanced students of computerscience, AI, cognitive science, and all students of the philosophy ofthe mind.作者: entrance 時間: 2025-3-29 10:47 作者: Eviction 時間: 2025-3-29 15:22
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48661-5ndermine what we take as our best theories. The computational conception that dominates what is known as “cognitive science” provides a remarkable illustration of this point. Even if some of our thought processes are computational, most of them are not, which makes . either trivial or false. We need something better.作者: 籠子 時間: 2025-3-29 16:31
Signs and Minds and .). Indeed, this perspective has been said to be “the heart of research in artificial intelligence” (., p. 3), a view that appears to be representative of its standing within the community at large.作者: 楓樹 時間: 2025-3-29 20:23 作者: 執(zhí)拗 時間: 2025-3-30 03:36
0924-0780 s and cognition can be more thoroughly criticised. ..Readership:. Intermediate and advanced students of computerscience, AI, cognitive science, and all students of the philosophy ofthe mind.978-1-4020-0243-4978-94-010-0973-7Series ISSN 0924-0780
