標題: Titlebook: Compromise, Peace and Public Justification; Political Morality B Fabian Wendt Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 201 [打印本頁] 作者: Asphyxia 時間: 2025-3-21 18:44
書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification網(wǎng)絡公開度
書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名
書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification被引頻次
書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification年度引用
書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification讀者反饋
書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification讀者反饋學科排名
作者: 幸福愉悅感 時間: 2025-3-22 00:18
Two Levels of Moral Evaluationossibility of making moral compromises for moral reasons. On the first level, one evaluates what the best arrangement would be. On the second level, one evaluates what the best arrangement would be under circumstances of disagreement about what the best arrangement would be. In a moral compromise, o作者: Cumulus 時間: 2025-3-22 01:53
Consentine consent is. Whether consent is genuine, he argues, does neither depend on whether one faces offers or threats, nor does it depend on whether these offers or threats are coercive or exploitative. Instead, it depends, first, on whether one has the cognitive and emotional capacity to give voluntary作者: 系列 時間: 2025-3-22 06:23 作者: 我還要背著他 時間: 2025-3-22 12:29
The Value of Peacet people most of the time. He also debates John Gray’s value pluralist argument for giving peace pride of place. He argues that value pluralism cannot show that peace has a special place among all values. What is special about peace is that it is in the interest of almost everyone.作者: 善變 時間: 2025-3-22 16:28 作者: 善變 時間: 2025-3-22 17:33 作者: 外向者 時間: 2025-3-23 01:03
Public Justification: The Basic Idealization of public justification has to deal with (at least) the following four issues: What is to be publicly justifiable? Who is the relevant constituency of public justification? How far should members of the constituency be idealized? Do justifying reasons have to be public reasons?作者: Medicaid 時間: 2025-3-23 04:09
Rawls, Stability and Public Justificationhese answers can show that we should conceive public justification as a strictly necessary requirement for the moral justification of constitutional essentials (or laws more generally). But he also argues that one Rawlsian answer successfully shows that public justification should at least be concei作者: 新鮮 時間: 2025-3-23 09:17
Respect and Public Justificationt the requirement of respect for persons is not sufficient to ground a strict principle of public justification, but that it indeed is a source of the value of public justification. Public justification has constitutive moral value because it constitutes an expression of respect for persons.作者: JOT 時間: 2025-3-23 09:52
Community and Public Justificationof that claim and argues that a ‘community of mutual moral accountability’ is indeed constituted by publicly justifiable moral rules. For that reason, public justification has constitutive value. Against Gerald Gaus, he argues that this rationale for public justification cannot show that public just作者: 溫和女人 時間: 2025-3-23 16:55 作者: 保守黨 時間: 2025-3-23 21:41
Fabian WendtOffers a unique perspective on the nature of compromise, peace and public justification.Documents a systematic theory applicable to politicians and philosophers.Provides a clear, rigorous and well-doc作者: jabber 時間: 2025-3-23 22:52 作者: Obligatory 時間: 2025-3-24 06:01 作者: eardrum 時間: 2025-3-24 07:32 作者: calumniate 時間: 2025-3-24 13:53 作者: JOT 時間: 2025-3-24 18:22
Peace and Non-interferenceaffairs of freely associated groups. Wendt argues that this is not the conception of peace we should adopt if we want a conception of peace that is feasible without moral consensus, something that allows us to live together in the face of moral disagreement.作者: 磨碎 時間: 2025-3-24 20:21 作者: Obedient 時間: 2025-3-25 03:10 作者: ATRIA 時間: 2025-3-25 04:46 作者: 摸索 時間: 2025-3-25 11:21
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28877-2morality; justice; politics; values; community作者: craving 時間: 2025-3-25 15:18 作者: 物種起源 時間: 2025-3-25 19:16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9458-5In this chapter, Wendt introduces the topic of the book, provides chapter overviews, discusses whether his project is an exercise in ‘realism’ and ‘non-ideal theory,’ and explains why he conceives public justification as distinct from justice.作者: 戰(zhàn)役 時間: 2025-3-25 23:20
R. Hilton Biggs,Margaret E. B. JoynerIn this chapter, Wendt distinguishes several types of compromises: principled and pragmatic compromises, rational compromises, fair compromises, and, finally, rotten compromises.作者: preservative 時間: 2025-3-26 03:06 作者: Radiculopathy 時間: 2025-3-26 06:54
Introduction,In this chapter, Wendt introduces the topic of the book, provides chapter overviews, discusses whether his project is an exercise in ‘realism’ and ‘non-ideal theory,’ and explains why he conceives public justification as distinct from justice.作者: BIBLE 時間: 2025-3-26 10:22
Types of CompromisesIn this chapter, Wendt distinguishes several types of compromises: principled and pragmatic compromises, rational compromises, fair compromises, and, finally, rotten compromises.作者: Feedback 時間: 2025-3-26 13:42
The Deontic Morality of CompromisingWendt makes some explorations in what he calls the deontic morality of compromising. He proposes and partly defends some principles regarding people’s moral duties in the process before a compromise is made, and some principles regarding people’s moral obligations after a compromise was made.作者: TRUST 時間: 2025-3-26 16:47 作者: aerobic 時間: 2025-3-26 23:37 作者: MURKY 時間: 2025-3-27 04:56
The Immunotracing of Keratinocyte Subsetshe discusses the idea of a ‘just peace,’ he rejects the claim that peace is a mere precondition for justice and not a value of its own, and he rejects the idea that realizing justice is necessary for achieving sufficiently stable peace.作者: Interdict 時間: 2025-3-27 05:35
The Fibrous Proteins of the Epidermisaffairs of freely associated groups. Wendt argues that this is not the conception of peace we should adopt if we want a conception of peace that is feasible without moral consensus, something that allows us to live together in the face of moral disagreement.作者: POINT 時間: 2025-3-27 12:04
Ghost in the Shell 2: Innocence (2004),lization of public justification has to deal with (at least) the following four issues: What is to be publicly justifiable? Who is the relevant constituency of public justification? How far should members of the constituency be idealized? Do justifying reasons have to be public reasons?作者: watertight, 時間: 2025-3-27 16:32
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437907t the requirement of respect for persons is not sufficient to ground a strict principle of public justification, but that it indeed is a source of the value of public justification. Public justification has constitutive moral value because it constitutes an expression of respect for persons.作者: 支形吊燈 時間: 2025-3-27 19:06 作者: 破布 時間: 2025-3-28 01:39
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78884-0t distinguishes two accounts of agreement or consent, he distinguishes moral and non-moral compromises, and he spells out what compromises need not be: compromises need not be agreed to for reasons of self-interest, they do not have to mirror the distribution of power, no process of bargaining need 作者: opinionated 時間: 2025-3-28 03:53
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78884-0ossibility of making moral compromises for moral reasons. On the first level, one evaluates what the best arrangement would be. On the second level, one evaluates what the best arrangement would be under circumstances of disagreement about what the best arrangement would be. In a moral compromise, o作者: NUDGE 時間: 2025-3-28 07:55 作者: PATRI 時間: 2025-3-28 11:52
I. R. Scott,C. R. Harding,J. G. Barrettd on modus vivendi arrangements. Modus vivendi arrangements, in turn, are understood as the institutional instruments to realize peace. They are accepted as a second-best, but they need not be based on a compromise. In order to count as a modus vivendi, they have to satisfy certain minimal moral cri作者: Infelicity 時間: 2025-3-28 15:47 作者: 偽造者 時間: 2025-3-28 22:31
The Immunotracing of Keratinocyte Subsetshe discusses the idea of a ‘just peace,’ he rejects the claim that peace is a mere precondition for justice and not a value of its own, and he rejects the idea that realizing justice is necessary for achieving sufficiently stable peace.作者: Popcorn 時間: 2025-3-29 01:59
The Fibrous Proteins of the Epidermisaffairs of freely associated groups. Wendt argues that this is not the conception of peace we should adopt if we want a conception of peace that is feasible without moral consensus, something that allows us to live together in the face of moral disagreement.作者: 險代理人 時間: 2025-3-29 05:51 作者: Dislocation 時間: 2025-3-29 10:07
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437907hese answers can show that we should conceive public justification as a strictly necessary requirement for the moral justification of constitutional essentials (or laws more generally). But he also argues that one Rawlsian answer successfully shows that public justification should at least be concei作者: ovation 時間: 2025-3-29 12:23
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437907t the requirement of respect for persons is not sufficient to ground a strict principle of public justification, but that it indeed is a source of the value of public justification. Public justification has constitutive moral value because it constitutes an expression of respect for persons.作者: initiate 時間: 2025-3-29 18:14 作者: 退潮 時間: 2025-3-29 22:31
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437907 moral evaluation. They thus provide moral reasons to make compromises. He also discusses what kind of moral reasons these are, he says a few words on other second-level values, and he discusses one of Simon May’s arguments against principled reasons to compromise in politics.作者: encomiast 時間: 2025-3-30 00:16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78884-0 consent, and, second, on whether the other party to the compromise violated basic moral rights in order to get one’s consent, or threatened to violate basic moral rights. When consent is not genuine, there is no genuine compromise as well.作者: 允許 時間: 2025-3-30 04:37 作者: Cardiac-Output 時間: 2025-3-30 12:00 作者: DAFT 時間: 2025-3-30 12:52
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78884-0: compromises need not be agreed to for reasons of self-interest, they do not have to mirror the distribution of power, no process of bargaining need precede a compromise, and the parties need not have a cooperative mindset.作者: 虛假 時間: 2025-3-30 20:09 作者: Blood-Clot 時間: 2025-3-31 00:32 作者: 倫理學 時間: 2025-3-31 02:54
