標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Compositionality, Context and Semantic Values; Essays in Honour of Robert J. Stainton,Christopher Viger Book 2009 Springer Science+Busines [打印本頁] 作者: Buren 時間: 2025-3-21 17:42
書目名稱Compositionality, Context and Semantic Values影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Compositionality, Context and Semantic Values影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Compositionality, Context and Semantic Values網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Compositionality, Context and Semantic Values網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Compositionality, Context and Semantic Values被引頻次
書目名稱Compositionality, Context and Semantic Values被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Compositionality, Context and Semantic Values年度引用
書目名稱Compositionality, Context and Semantic Values年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Compositionality, Context and Semantic Values讀者反饋
書目名稱Compositionality, Context and Semantic Values讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: DALLY 時間: 2025-3-21 21:44 作者: 陪審團每個人 時間: 2025-3-22 03:51
Outlines of external development,icational antecedents. This paper modifies some aspects of Davidson’s view in such a way as to permit such phenomena to occur while preserving the underlying idea of ‘parataxis.’ I focus on the case of binding. I sketch some extensions of the proposed modification and discuss some of the more far reaching consequences of modified theory.作者: 躺下殘殺 時間: 2025-3-22 06:34 作者: CAMP 時間: 2025-3-22 11:36 作者: OCTO 時間: 2025-3-22 14:55
Bridging the Paratactic Gapicational antecedents. This paper modifies some aspects of Davidson’s view in such a way as to permit such phenomena to occur while preserving the underlying idea of ‘parataxis.’ I focus on the case of binding. I sketch some extensions of the proposed modification and discuss some of the more far reaching consequences of modified theory.作者: OCTO 時間: 2025-3-22 17:02
Descriptions, Negation, and Focusr, these factors can generate an illusion of scope. In particular, focus can generate illusions of scope, which may lead us to think sentences display scope ambiguities they do not. These conclusions offer limited support to non-quantificational treatments of definite descriptions.作者: Prophylaxis 時間: 2025-3-22 22:42 作者: 熱心 時間: 2025-3-23 01:36
Outlines of external development,onial communication of knowledge. To capture such a dimension, we ought to replace the notion of ., with that of .. I argue that there are epistemic intuitions, pertaining to speakers’ epistemic responsibilities in producing testimony, that can be used to constrain what counts as the ‘strictly said’ content.作者: insert 時間: 2025-3-23 05:37
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57468-9 overt phenomena under study. But this claim, I contend, is false. In actual practice, scientific models will often never capture all of the behavior of the relevant phenomenon, and this feature does not undermine them as such. I maintain that semantic theorizing is just an instance of this more general aspect of scientific methodology.作者: 充滿人 時間: 2025-3-23 11:00
Steel Design for Engineers and Architectsthe roles of pointwise and setwise truth properties in modal logic. I argue that thinking of supertruth and determinate truth as setwise truth properties allows an understanding of supervaluationist approaches to vagueness which escapes both Williamson’s objections to and a needless metalinguistic orientation of traditional supervaluationism.作者: Abduct 時間: 2025-3-23 16:15 作者: 敏捷 時間: 2025-3-23 20:26
Outlines of external development,pels Cappelen and Lepore to endorse their positive view is CSAs, the very arguments they claim to be unsound. Thus there is a considerable amount of tension in their views. My goal here is to resolve this tension by defending CSAs from Cappelen and Lepore‘s criticism, and to illustrate why one should endorse these arguments.作者: 嚴(yán)重傷害 時間: 2025-3-24 00:21
“If”, “Unless”, and Quantificationtements to restrict the quantifiers in whose scope they occur, while also contributing a covert modal element to the semantics. In providing this account, I also offer a semantics for unquantified statements containing ‘unless‘.作者: 愛社交 時間: 2025-3-24 05:27
In Defense of Context Shifting Argumentspels Cappelen and Lepore to endorse their positive view is CSAs, the very arguments they claim to be unsound. Thus there is a considerable amount of tension in their views. My goal here is to resolve this tension by defending CSAs from Cappelen and Lepore‘s criticism, and to illustrate why one should endorse these arguments.作者: 怪物 時間: 2025-3-24 09:21 作者: circuit 時間: 2025-3-24 12:12
On Failing to Capture some (or even all) of what is Communicated overt phenomena under study. But this claim, I contend, is false. In actual practice, scientific models will often never capture all of the behavior of the relevant phenomenon, and this feature does not undermine them as such. I maintain that semantic theorizing is just an instance of this more general aspect of scientific methodology.作者: Goblet-Cells 時間: 2025-3-24 15:04 作者: 險代理人 時間: 2025-3-24 21:22 作者: monologue 時間: 2025-3-25 02:26
Outlines of external development, is little reason to believe that our words have such context-invariant meanings, and I suggest that the pragmatic picture of assertion can secure a rich enough conception of objectivity to address the skeptic.作者: 激勵 時間: 2025-3-25 05:43
Preliminary Considerations of Design,on-literally. In this paper, I do two things. ., I argue that certain arguments that Cappelen and Lepore would likely raise against a direct expression view of metaphor won‘t work. ., appealing to considerations used in support of my first point, I argue that one of Cappelen and Lepore‘s central arg作者: 多山 時間: 2025-3-25 10:57
Preliminary Considerations of Design,a. These include the phenomena of single-object advantage, detecting patterns by selecting relevant parts (and executing “visual routines”), and keeping track of individual objects that move among identical distractors (in Multiple Object Tracking experiments). I also discuss the need for a mechanis作者: 懸掛 時間: 2025-3-25 12:57
Contextualism, Skepticism and Objectivity is little reason to believe that our words have such context-invariant meanings, and I suggest that the pragmatic picture of assertion can secure a rich enough conception of objectivity to address the skeptic.作者: 泥瓦匠 時間: 2025-3-25 16:33
The Direct Expression of Metaphorical Contenton-literally. In this paper, I do two things. ., I argue that certain arguments that Cappelen and Lepore would likely raise against a direct expression view of metaphor won‘t work. ., appealing to considerations used in support of my first point, I argue that one of Cappelen and Lepore‘s central arg作者: narcissism 時間: 2025-3-25 20:38 作者: 最高峰 時間: 2025-3-26 00:18
“If”, “Unless”, and Quantification to the thesis that natural language is semantically compositional. More recently, Higginbotham (2003) and von Fintel and Iatridou (2002) have suggested that compositionality can be upheld, but only if we assume the validity of the principle of Conditional Excluded Middle. I argue that these authors作者: 沖擊力 時間: 2025-3-26 04:31 作者: Spinous-Process 時間: 2025-3-26 08:46
On the Epistemic Utility of ,hat .’) depends on the context of the report. Insofar as the notion of . captures the content dimension of such reports, the result is that this notion is of little use to epistemology, and in particular cannot be used to capture the content dimension of those speech acts that are apt for the testim作者: 織布機 時間: 2025-3-26 16:00 作者: 擔(dān)心 時間: 2025-3-26 19:14 作者: Cleave 時間: 2025-3-27 00:52
On Failing to Capture some (or even all) of what is Communicated and by implication a great many other ones – cannot be correct, because they fail to capture some of the “intuitive truth conditions” of the relevant sentences. In response, I argue that this charge rests on the claim that an acceptable scientific theory must (at least sometimes) capture all of the作者: cipher 時間: 2025-3-27 03:54
The Disunity of Truth picture which escapes Frege’s criticisms by positing a thin notion of semantic content which then interacts with a multiplicity of kinds of truth to account for phenomena such as modality. After exploring several ways in which we can understand the existence of multiple truth properties, I discuss 作者: 心胸狹窄 時間: 2025-3-27 05:18
Descriptions, Negation, and Focusntion to the role of focus, and a number of related semantic and pragmatic factors, shows that the cases give no evidence of scope interaction. However, these factors can generate an illusion of scope. In particular, focus can generate illusions of scope, which may lead us to think sentences display作者: 螢火蟲 時間: 2025-3-27 12:44
Evidentials: Some Preliminary Distinctionsuished from main Verbs, and thus amenable to abstract study, even through languages that do not support evidential morphology. These questions point to distinctions that are often not made, and sometimes not even considered, in the important and growing literature on the topic. A major question is: 作者: 包庇 時間: 2025-3-27 16:57 作者: 牛馬之尿 時間: 2025-3-27 19:28 作者: 障礙物 時間: 2025-3-27 22:56
Compositionality, Context and Semantic Values978-1-4020-8310-5Series ISSN 0924-4662 Series E-ISSN 2215-034X 作者: obsession 時間: 2025-3-28 04:52
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8310-5Formal semantics; Pragmatics; communication; language; philosophy of language; semantic作者: 強制性 時間: 2025-3-28 08:34 作者: Gum-Disease 時間: 2025-3-28 12:21 作者: 允許 時間: 2025-3-28 14:47 作者: initiate 時間: 2025-3-28 20:39
Outlines of external development,hat .’) depends on the context of the report. Insofar as the notion of . captures the content dimension of such reports, the result is that this notion is of little use to epistemology, and in particular cannot be used to capture the content dimension of those speech acts that are apt for the testim作者: 帶傷害 時間: 2025-3-29 02:02 作者: 巫婆 時間: 2025-3-29 06:31 作者: progestogen 時間: 2025-3-29 08:20
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57468-9 and by implication a great many other ones – cannot be correct, because they fail to capture some of the “intuitive truth conditions” of the relevant sentences. In response, I argue that this charge rests on the claim that an acceptable scientific theory must (at least sometimes) capture all of the作者: 極微小 時間: 2025-3-29 11:26 作者: Painstaking 時間: 2025-3-29 18:45 作者: anaphylaxis 時間: 2025-3-29 22:33
