標題: Titlebook: Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology; Karim Dharamsi,Giuseppina D‘Oro,Stephen Leach Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Au [打印本頁] 作者: FLUX 時間: 2025-3-21 17:09
書目名稱Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名
書目名稱Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology被引頻次
書目名稱Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology年度引用
書目名稱Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology讀者反饋
書目名稱Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology讀者反饋學科排名
作者: ORBIT 時間: 2025-3-21 23:25 作者: cleaver 時間: 2025-3-22 02:48 作者: Restenosis 時間: 2025-3-22 07:03 作者: 討厭 時間: 2025-3-22 10:27 作者: 切割 時間: 2025-3-22 13:16
Sich gesund fühlen im Jahre 2000away with, his earlier metaphilosophical reflections. The chapter provides a much-needed guide to understanding how Collingwood developed his mature metaphilosophical views concerning the nature of philosophy through his engagement with Oxford realism and logical positivism.作者: 切割 時間: 2025-3-22 20:47
,Die Privatheitsideologie und der K?rper,o Collingwood, is to ‘excavate’ different complexes of questions and answers until the absolute presuppositions which govern them are reached. It is this historical methodology that gives Collingwood’s metaphysics its distinctive character.作者: DIKE 時間: 2025-3-22 22:06
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80567-6lown deflationary strategy: rather than seeing philosophical problems as fake problems and advocating the end of philosophy, he sees the role of philosophical analysis to be that of making explicit the absolute presuppositions which inform different causal explanations in different contexts of inquiry.作者: 山崩 時間: 2025-3-23 01:36 作者: Graphite 時間: 2025-3-23 05:57
Erster Entwicklungszyklus (Papierversion)well’s diagnosis of the problem, but not with his proposed solution. For Collingwood, the solution lies not in liberalizing nature, but in rejecting a conception of metaphysics as a science of pure being and understanding it instead as a historical enquiry into the presuppositions of science, including natural science.作者: 破裂 時間: 2025-3-23 12:38
Presuppositions and the Logic of Question and Answer,o Collingwood, is to ‘excavate’ different complexes of questions and answers until the absolute presuppositions which govern them are reached. It is this historical methodology that gives Collingwood’s metaphysics its distinctive character.作者: 起來了 時間: 2025-3-23 17:32
Collingwood, Pragmatism, and Philosophy of Science,lown deflationary strategy: rather than seeing philosophical problems as fake problems and advocating the end of philosophy, he sees the role of philosophical analysis to be that of making explicit the absolute presuppositions which inform different causal explanations in different contexts of inquiry.作者: 心胸開闊 時間: 2025-3-23 18:31
,Why Epistemic Pluralism Does not Entail Relativism: Collingwood’s Hinge Epistemology,ailed by the absolute presuppositions constitutive of those forms of knowing. Since epistemic pluralism is not a form of epistemic relativism, it is not vulnerable to the stock objections raised against relativism.作者: cleaver 時間: 2025-3-24 00:37 作者: Oratory 時間: 2025-3-24 05:23
Sich gesund fühlen im Jahre 2000t metaphysics is not the study of pure being but of the presuppositions that govern knowledge of reality. They argue that a reassessment of his contribution to philosophical methodology is timely in the light of the recent revival of interest in second-order questions concerning the role and character of philosophical analysis.作者: foreign 時間: 2025-3-24 07:02 作者: Additive 時間: 2025-3-24 11:34
Dritter Entwicklungszyklus (iPad App) of Collingwood’s ideas about the historicity of human experience and understanding. In conclusion, Ahlskog argues that the metaphilosophical dimension of Collingwood’s philosophy of history is integrally connected with the concept of history as self-knowledge.作者: Explicate 時間: 2025-3-24 15:48 作者: Initiative 時間: 2025-3-24 22:48 作者: 陶瓷 時間: 2025-3-24 23:09
Collingwood on the Relationship Between Metaphysics and History,cian works essentially as a historian. While Van der Dussen claims that Collingwood’s central argument in . is that metaphysics is a historical science, the book’s philosophical position is captured in only the first four chapters. As such the book itself exemplifies what Collingwood advocated in his ., the rapprochement of philosophy and history.作者: Meander 時間: 2025-3-25 06:58
Collingwood and the Philosophy of History: The Metaphilosophical Dimension, of Collingwood’s ideas about the historicity of human experience and understanding. In conclusion, Ahlskog argues that the metaphilosophical dimension of Collingwood’s philosophy of history is integrally connected with the concept of history as self-knowledge.作者: indices 時間: 2025-3-25 10:48 作者: parallelism 時間: 2025-3-25 13:29 作者: 災禍 時間: 2025-3-25 16:50 作者: paroxysm 時間: 2025-3-25 20:37 作者: 澄清 時間: 2025-3-26 03:43
,The Development of Collingwood’s Metaphilosophical Views, philosophical analysis gradually gave rise to his mature metaphilosophical views. He shows that concerns with second-order questions concerning the nature of philosophy were present from the very beginning and that Collingwood’s later metaphilosophical view gradually evolve from, rather than break 作者: 符合規(guī)定 時間: 2025-3-26 06:10 作者: periodontitis 時間: 2025-3-26 12:18
Presuppositions and the Logic of Question and Answer,oes indeed bear similarities to Bacon’s and Kant’s use of questions, as Collingwood claims. She argues that Collingwood’s emphasis on questions is more similar to Kant’s concern with presuppositions that make knowledge possible than to Bacon’s interest in pursuing and questioning nature to divulge h作者: 繁榮地區(qū) 時間: 2025-3-26 12:45
Collingwood, Pragmatism, and Philosophy of Science,church and that while there are family resemblances between Collingwood and philosophers of a pragmatist orientation, there are also some important differences. Collingwood tends to have in common with all pragmatists a rejection of the correspondence theory of truth. But unlike classical pragmatist作者: addict 時間: 2025-3-26 18:34
,Why Epistemic Pluralism Does not Entail Relativism: Collingwood’s Hinge Epistemology,ained criticism in his . (2006). She argues that Collingwood’s metaphysics of absolute presuppositions aims to defend a form of epistemic pluralism which is not reducible to the kind of epistemic relativism Boghossian critiques. The decoupling of epistemic pluralism from epistemic relativism rests o作者: Granular 時間: 2025-3-26 23:39
Oscillation and Emancipation: Collingwood on History and Human Nature,ll. Both Collingwood and McDowell, Dharamsi argues, acknowledge the irreducibly normative (in Collingwood’s words: criteriological) nature of the study of mind and both reject the widespread naturalist assumption that philosophy is continuous with natural science. The liberal naturalist’s and Collin作者: 劇本 時間: 2025-3-27 04:49
Collingwood and the Philosophy of History: The Metaphilosophical Dimension,at Collingwood’s philosophy of history is simultaneously both a descriptive metaphysics of history and an elucidation of the relation between historical and philosophical thought. As a descriptive metaphysics, Ahlskog argues that Collingwood’s account has an irreducible and underexplored role for co作者: fluoroscopy 時間: 2025-3-27 06:11
The Later Collingwood on Method: Re-Enactment and Abduction,e Hempel-Dray debate about the status of covering laws in history. After all, this debate was not part of Collingwood’s context and, although one can pry from his writings a contribution to it, one may simply, by doing so, misunderstand what he was up to. In the second part, they present the Gabbay-作者: 大廳 時間: 2025-3-27 11:02
Collingwood and Archaeological Theory,s that Collingwood would have welcomed it for it has developed out of respect for the principle that in any investigation, in examining the evidence, one must always have some question in mind. Nonetheless, although Collingwood would have welcomed recent developments in archaeological theory, and wo作者: APEX 時間: 2025-3-27 17:39 作者: expdient 時間: 2025-3-27 18:00
Sich gesund fühlen im Jahre 2000cerning the nature of absolute presuppositions, and in what sense they can be said to be constitutive of the forms of inquiry which they make possible, is a central concern of this collection and is discussed by several contributors.作者: Perceive 時間: 2025-3-27 23:24
An Essay on Collingwood,cerning the nature of absolute presuppositions, and in what sense they can be said to be constitutive of the forms of inquiry which they make possible, is a central concern of this collection and is discussed by several contributors.作者: 貨物 時間: 2025-3-28 05:01
Karim Dharamsi,Giuseppina D‘Oro,Stephen LeachExplores an under-served area: investigates Collingwood‘s main treatises in specific relation to the field of philosophical methodology.Offers currency: shows the relationship between Collingwood and 作者: 變色龍 時間: 2025-3-28 09:08 作者: 有危險 時間: 2025-3-28 13:44
Sich gesund fühlen im Jahre 2000med that philosophy has a distinctive subject matter and a distinctive method. Its distinctive subject matter is what he called the “absolute presuppositions” that govern the special sciences and its method consists in making these presuppositions explicit by showing that they are entailed by the qu作者: EXALT 時間: 2025-3-28 17:26 作者: Awning 時間: 2025-3-28 20:49 作者: Pastry 時間: 2025-3-29 02:53
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73084-9 latter does not so much argue for as assume that metaphysics is a historical discipline. Sympathetic, Van der Dussen argues that the metaphysician uncovers presuppositions, but it is the task of the special sciences to change them. It is only in relation to other metaphysicians that the Collingwood作者: adroit 時間: 2025-3-29 06:22 作者: DEI 時間: 2025-3-29 08:17
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80567-6church and that while there are family resemblances between Collingwood and philosophers of a pragmatist orientation, there are also some important differences. Collingwood tends to have in common with all pragmatists a rejection of the correspondence theory of truth. But unlike classical pragmatist作者: OTTER 時間: 2025-3-29 14:14
Dritter Entwicklungszyklus (iPad App)ained criticism in his . (2006). She argues that Collingwood’s metaphysics of absolute presuppositions aims to defend a form of epistemic pluralism which is not reducible to the kind of epistemic relativism Boghossian critiques. The decoupling of epistemic pluralism from epistemic relativism rests o作者: 內(nèi)部 時間: 2025-3-29 18:55
Erster Entwicklungszyklus (Papierversion)ll. Both Collingwood and McDowell, Dharamsi argues, acknowledge the irreducibly normative (in Collingwood’s words: criteriological) nature of the study of mind and both reject the widespread naturalist assumption that philosophy is continuous with natural science. The liberal naturalist’s and Collin
