標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Coleridge’s Sublime Later Prose and Recent Theory; Kristeva, Adorno, Ra Murray J. Evans Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Aut [打印本頁] 作者: 尖酸好 時間: 2025-3-21 19:37
書目名稱Coleridge’s Sublime Later Prose and Recent Theory影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Coleridge’s Sublime Later Prose and Recent Theory影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Coleridge’s Sublime Later Prose and Recent Theory網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Coleridge’s Sublime Later Prose and Recent Theory網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Coleridge’s Sublime Later Prose and Recent Theory被引頻次
書目名稱Coleridge’s Sublime Later Prose and Recent Theory被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Coleridge’s Sublime Later Prose and Recent Theory年度引用
書目名稱Coleridge’s Sublime Later Prose and Recent Theory年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Coleridge’s Sublime Later Prose and Recent Theory讀者反饋
書目名稱Coleridge’s Sublime Later Prose and Recent Theory讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: observatory 時間: 2025-3-22 00:00
,Touchstones for Sublimity: Coleridge’s , (1816–17) and the 1818 Lectures on Literature,w can he commend his elusive Ideas to readers if he cannot establish them empirically? Amid socioeconomic turmoil after the Napoleonic wars, the first of his two lay sermons, ., offers his famous definitions of symbol (“the translucence of the Eternal through and in the Temporal”), expressed in symb作者: Ablation 時間: 2025-3-22 00:47 作者: 現(xiàn)任者 時間: 2025-3-22 08:16
,Sublime Disintegration: Coleridge’s , (1825) and Theodor Adorno’s , (1970),oblems, Coleridge’s departure from his earlier view of the symbol in . prevents his imitating the intuitive, “silvery-grey” tone of Leighton’s writing. Instead, his sublime rhetoric in . aims at presenting his Ideas. It relies on two rhetorical figures: negative definition that defines articles of b作者: 憲法沒有 時間: 2025-3-22 11:45 作者: 對待 時間: 2025-3-22 15:33 作者: 對待 時間: 2025-3-22 17:12 作者: 抱怨 時間: 2025-3-22 22:14
ith sublime theory and discourse of the last fifty years.Sit.This book explores the sublime in Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s later major prose in relation to more recent theories of the sublime. Building on the author’s previous monograph?.Sublime Coleridge: The Opus Maximum., this study focuses on subl作者: 青石板 時間: 2025-3-23 04:25
Book 2023hor’s previous monograph?.Sublime Coleridge: The Opus Maximum., this study focuses on sublime theory and discourse in Coleridge’s other major prose texts of the 1820s:?.Confessions of an Inquiring Spirit.?(wr. 1824),?.Aids to Reflection.?(1825), and?.On the Constitution of the Church and State.?(182作者: 激勵 時間: 2025-3-23 06:16
Introduction,idge, Julia Kristeva, Theodor Adorno, and Jacques Rancière. Introduction of rhetorical concepts of positive proof (for system-building) and negative proof (arguing by negation) follows. The chapter closes with abstracts of the remaining chapters in the book.作者: commensurate 時間: 2025-3-23 12:29 作者: MOCK 時間: 2025-3-23 14:09
,Touchstones for Sublimity: Coleridge’s , (1816–17) and the 1818 Lectures on Literature,and weak politics to define the distance his later prose must go for the reform he desires. In two lectures on the Middle Ages (1818), including his oft-quoted scene in a Gothic cathedral, Coleridge’s invocation of the sublime signals a more heterogeneous symbolism that cracks the mould of symbol?as作者: gorgeous 時間: 2025-3-23 21:31
,Sublime Boundaries of Belief and Unbelief: Coleridge’s , (wr. 1824) and Julia Kristeva’s , (2006),ination of psychoanalysis, Christianity, and agnosticism. Otherwise her sense of the “semiotic” informs a sublime discourse neither symbolic nor sublime in Coleridge’s senses, yet reminiscent of Coleridge’s transition in his lectures away from symbolism and towards a more expansive sublime. Thus Kri作者: 量被毀壞 時間: 2025-3-23 22:51 作者: Pert敏捷 時間: 2025-3-24 03:44
,Sublime Politics: Coleridge’s , (1829) and Jacques Rancière’s , (2011),croppers in the American 1930s. In spite of Rancière’s expressed aversion to the sublime, his discourse is sublime in effect. Contrasts with Coleridge’s metaphysical care with symbol and Idea highlight the relative conceptual looseness of Rancière’s “symbol,” “spiritual,” and “material” and his trea作者: Intact 時間: 2025-3-24 09:08
,Conclusion: The Sublime in Coleridge, Kristeva, Adorno, and Rancière,the problem of yoking abstract reasoning or conceptualizing with a sublime aesthetic that challenges and exceeds articulation. This section focuses on what Rancière calls his “intellectual anarchy”: his rejection of received views and the conceptual dispersion in his scenes. The chapter concludes on作者: Jingoism 時間: 2025-3-24 13:02
itics in the sublime theory and practice of this central Romantic author and three of his important successors: Julia Kristeva, Theodor Adorno, and Jacques Rancière...978-3-031-25529-8978-3-031-25527-4作者: 榮幸 時間: 2025-3-24 18:14 作者: investigate 時間: 2025-3-24 21:00 作者: 休息 時間: 2025-3-24 23:25
Werner Bergmann,Marianna Grüters modern art. Adorno’s thoroughgoing rejection of symbolism, “the unity of the universal and the particular,” retrospectively clarifies Coleridge’s more gradual departure from the symbolism of .. Reading Coleridge’s depiction of the sublime Gothic cathedral in his 1818 lectures, moreover, illuminates作者: Enzyme 時間: 2025-3-25 03:45 作者: 小淡水魚 時間: 2025-3-25 08:43 作者: 遭遇 時間: 2025-3-25 12:54
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25527-4Julia Kristeva; Theodor Adorno; Jacques Ranciere; Visionary experience; Immanuel Kant; British religious 作者: AGONY 時間: 2025-3-25 17:37 作者: prick-test 時間: 2025-3-25 20:20 作者: Cervical-Spine 時間: 2025-3-26 00:33
Konzept der Service-Externalisierung,w can he commend his elusive Ideas to readers if he cannot establish them empirically? Amid socioeconomic turmoil after the Napoleonic wars, the first of his two lay sermons, ., offers his famous definitions of symbol (“the translucence of the Eternal through and in the Temporal”), expressed in symb作者: 女上癮 時間: 2025-3-26 04:28 作者: spondylosis 時間: 2025-3-26 09:49 作者: 裝飾 時間: 2025-3-26 15:55
?DISG“: Mit dem Kunden auf ?Du“ und ?Du“e expediency of the state. The clerisy provides a strong remedy for British socioeconomic ills, where the . did not. To render ideas less obscure in his sublime discourse, Coleridge uses illustrations of Ideas working in events that most substantially manifest them. Coleridge’s long illustration of 作者: Interregnum 時間: 2025-3-26 20:52 作者: Obstacle 時間: 2025-3-27 00:55
Murray J. EvansAdvances scholarship on Coleridge’s later major prose, which has received little critical attention.Places Coleridge’s sublime in dialogue with sublime theory and discourse of the last fifty years.Sit作者: FEAS 時間: 2025-3-27 04:43 作者: 共棲 時間: 2025-3-27 07:11
9樓作者: SYN 時間: 2025-3-27 11:43
10樓作者: Synapse 時間: 2025-3-27 15:55
10樓作者: 組成 時間: 2025-3-27 19:32
10樓作者: cluster 時間: 2025-3-27 22:43
10樓
