標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Claude Lefort; Thinker of the Polit Martín Plot (teaches) Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2013 Cla [打印本頁] 作者: 揭發(fā) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 17:57
書目名稱Claude Lefort影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Claude Lefort影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Claude Lefort網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Claude Lefort網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Claude Lefort被引頻次
書目名稱Claude Lefort被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Claude Lefort年度引用
書目名稱Claude Lefort年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Claude Lefort讀者反饋
書目名稱Claude Lefort讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: intellect 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 21:13 作者: 致詞 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 03:11
Lefort as Phenomenologist of the Politicalnciples” is to accept the given to the extent that it . given. I ask myself what is the phenomenon that Lefort spent his life describing and interpreting. I will claim that it was ., the process by which power comes to be disjoined from the person, the body, of the prince. There are three moments wi作者: GILD 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:26
Lefort and Machiavelli of work. Divided into six parts, it starts by proposing a theory of interpretation and a study of the history of the reception of the Florentine secretary at several moments of European history, and later deals with the analysis of the reference books on Machiavellian bibliography, which he qualifi作者: CUMB 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:32 作者: 占卜者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 14:15 作者: 占卜者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 20:44
Claude Lefort, the Practice and Thought of Disincorporationnd of the 1940s, the years 1950 and 1960 and the works such as his . (1972), . (1975), his essay on Solzhenitsyn’s ., or . (1978), his collection of writings on Merleau-Ponty, or, again, the texts composing . (1978), and then those which provided the material for other collections: . (1981), . (1986作者: 壁畫 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 23:06 作者: lacrimal-gland 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 04:08 作者: Carbon-Monoxide 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 05:34 作者: 廣大 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:26 作者: 運(yùn)動(dòng)性 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:07 作者: chapel 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 20:06 作者: 切割 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:07
Democracy beyond the Political: Reconsidering the Socialitical, he must, almost of necessity, speak of the social, though not unambiguously. The problem concerns the use of the term before and after the democratic revolution. He uses the term as though it were present in all “societies” (and the very use of “societies” suggests how difficult it is to avo作者: fixed-joint 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:34
Lefort and the Fate of Radical Democracycracy.” Beginning with .,. Lefort’s account of democracy was developed in subsequent work written both jointly and separately which elaborated the political logics of what Laclau and Mouffe were happy to affirm as “post-Marxism.” Laclau and Mouffe have not simply applied Lefort’s account of democrac作者: 圍巾 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:27 作者: OVERT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 12:42 作者: collateral 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 18:23
Mir S. Mulla,Giancarlo Majori,A. A. Arataleau-Ponty. Later in the chapter I will evoke the process by which a society attempts to reconnect power to a determinate element of the real; this, according to Lefort, is totalitarianism. I will end the paper with a few more personal reflections on Lefort.作者: 吞噬 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 21:04
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9413-6 of Strauss, I find that references to him appear with even greater frequency than I had remembered. And this leads me to venture into the possibility that, even when he is not mentioned, Strauss appears, time and again, in a silent dialogue, in the interstices of Lefort’s work.作者: 改進(jìn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 01:03 作者: 音的強(qiáng)弱 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 05:38 作者: intuition 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:43 作者: 繞著哥哥問 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 11:43
Francis A. Gunther,Jane Davies Gunthermmitments. As a broad illustration of this contention, this essay surveys Lefort’s relationship with his friend Pierre Clastres. But it also uses their relationship to address the relationship of the symbolic and the imaginary in his thought.作者: Legion 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 19:13
Francis A. Gunther,Jane Davies Gunther), and . (1992)? Where should one locate in this collection his last book, . (1999)? or, finally, the combined articles in his last collection, . (2007)? What thread ties these different moments in his oeuvre, how did he construe it, and how is one to read it today?作者: archaeology 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:30
Claude Lefort, Political Anthropology, and Symbolic Divisionmmitments. As a broad illustration of this contention, this essay surveys Lefort’s relationship with his friend Pierre Clastres. But it also uses their relationship to address the relationship of the symbolic and the imaginary in his thought.作者: 巧思 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 03:04
Claude Lefort, the Practice and Thought of Disincorporation), and . (1992)? Where should one locate in this collection his last book, . (1999)? or, finally, the combined articles in his last collection, . (2007)? What thread ties these different moments in his oeuvre, how did he construe it, and how is one to read it today?作者: 在前面 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:43 作者: 的染料 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 10:58 作者: 執(zhí) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:46 作者: 傷心 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 18:24
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7059-8n between his social, political, and cultural life. A student of Merleau-Ponty, Lefort remained a phenomenologist, whether he was writing on working-class politics, Soviet totalitarianism, or French or Renaissance history, and above all when he tried to understand the radical nature of democracy and of the democratic project.作者: 肌肉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 00:45 作者: nettle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:02
Claude Lefort: A Political Biographyn between his social, political, and cultural life. A student of Merleau-Ponty, Lefort remained a phenomenologist, whether he was writing on working-class politics, Soviet totalitarianism, or French or Renaissance history, and above all when he tried to understand the radical nature of democracy and of the democratic project.作者: 終點(diǎn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 08:09
Lefort and Machiavelliconcepts. Following the rationale he presented in the first part, Lefort deals with the text from a viewpoint that is rather distinct from those of the historians of ideas and even of the specialists who believe that they can find a solution for the enigmas that arise from the reading of the works of the Florentine author..作者: 繁重 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 12:04
Claude Lefort978-0-230-37558-1Series ISSN 2947-8383 Series E-ISSN 2947-8391 作者: 文藝 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 16:26
Regulation of pesticides in Finland,faces a closure that is also an opening. In his preface to Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s .,. Lefort argues that Merleau-Ponty perfectly understood all the ambiguity proper to the notion of institution, thus taking it.>Originally formulated by Merleau-Ponty–who himself had followed Husserl in his turn, sin作者: dapper 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:16 作者: 管理員 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:34 作者: 吹牛需要藝術(shù) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 04:47
A. L. Page,Ahmed A. Elseewi,I. R. Straughan of work. Divided into six parts, it starts by proposing a theory of interpretation and a study of the history of the reception of the Florentine secretary at several moments of European history, and later deals with the analysis of the reference books on Machiavellian bibliography, which he qualifi作者: 詼諧 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 08:55 作者: 協(xié)迫 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 14:16 作者: Explosive 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:12
Francis A. Gunther,Jane Davies Gunthernd of the 1940s, the years 1950 and 1960 and the works such as his . (1972), . (1975), his essay on Solzhenitsyn’s ., or . (1978), his collection of writings on Merleau-Ponty, or, again, the texts composing . (1978), and then those which provided the material for other collections: . (1981), . (1986作者: 背心 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 20:04 作者: 戰(zhàn)勝 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 23:46
Tara M. Smith,Glenn W. Stratton, and negotiated revolutions, terms all indicating distance from the revolutionary tradition they knew all too well. Even in South Africa in the 1990s, few spoke of revolution during what was indeed the radical transformation of the system of apartheid. The analysts, if they did not adopt the terms 作者: overshadow 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 04:26
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5606-9 day, liberals (political or economic) have advocated the rights of man, to protect the individual from arbitrary government. They frame human rights as universal moral principles that, together with general rule of law principles, constitutionalism, the separation of powers, and so on, secure indiv作者: 舔食 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 08:54
Michael R. Bleavins,Richard J. Aulerichdern form of despotism. Born in the antipaternalistic pursuit of freedom and equality, democratic society may end up giving itself up to a historically unprecedented type of paternalism — a sort of state maternalism. This is the “soft” and “mild” despotism Tocqueville struggles to envision as he loo作者: 小說 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 14:36
Residue Reviews/Rückstandsberichtet, had been adopted by the General Assembly the previous November without a vote, but 2008 was chosen in order to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the first International Conference on New or Restored Democracies held in Manila in June 1988. While general references to democracy have underpinned 作者: 肥料 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 19:27 作者: muffler 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 21:09 作者: defray 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 03:20
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5874-2cracy.” Beginning with .,. Lefort’s account of democracy was developed in subsequent work written both jointly and separately which elaborated the political logics of what Laclau and Mouffe were happy to affirm as “post-Marxism.” Laclau and Mouffe have not simply applied Lefort’s account of democrac作者: fulcrum 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 08:06 作者: 大方不好 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 11:42 作者: octogenarian 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 12:39 作者: 殖民地 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 16:43
Book 2013This is the first English language volume to offer such a wide-ranging scholarly and intellectual perspective on Claude Lefort. It constitutes the most comprehensive attempt to reconstruct Lefort‘s engagement with his theoretical interlocutors as well as his influence on today‘s democratic thought and contemporary continental political philosophy.作者: 使混合 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 00:33 作者: Cardioversion 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 04:29
978-1-349-35089-6Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2013作者: Solace 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 06:08
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4934-4sion? For, although in this early (1972) thesis the sentences do indeed tend to meander-ings and tucked-in afterthoughts (or what the French call “.”), both authors thereby remain faithful to their mental movements’ ranging through the depths of a meditation followed through to its reluctant release作者: libertine 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 13:16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5606-9sts, and opinions that steer the exercise of state power.. In other words, unlike the rights of man, democracy involves politics in the sense of aggregating an electoral majority out of the clash of particular interests, in the sense of policy making and in the sense of governing and using state pow作者: 割讓 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 15:43 作者: 辭職 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 17:35
Residue Reviews/Rückstandsberichtecal terms, democracy is now widely held as the only political regime with universal appeal, a point which is reaffirmed by the resolution itself when it states that “democracy is a universal value based on the freely expressed will of peoples to determine their own political, economic, social and cu作者: 下垂 時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 00:25
