標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Classical versus Neoclassical Monetary Theories; The Roots, Ruts, and Will E. Mason,William N. Butos Book 1996 Springer Science+Business Me [打印本頁] 作者: BOUT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 16:54
書目名稱Classical versus Neoclassical Monetary Theories影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Classical versus Neoclassical Monetary Theories影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Classical versus Neoclassical Monetary Theories網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Classical versus Neoclassical Monetary Theories網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Classical versus Neoclassical Monetary Theories被引頻次
書目名稱Classical versus Neoclassical Monetary Theories被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Classical versus Neoclassical Monetary Theories年度引用
書目名稱Classical versus Neoclassical Monetary Theories年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Classical versus Neoclassical Monetary Theories讀者反饋
書目名稱Classical versus Neoclassical Monetary Theories讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: constitute 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:39 作者: mechanism 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 02:08 作者: 退潮 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 08:09 作者: JUST 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 09:05 作者: Feigned 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 14:10
Book 1996netary theory in a larger historicalcontext, while examining the relevance of contemporary questions inmonetary policy. The first half of the volume analyzes the developmentof the methodological and conceptual foundations of monetary theory,up to and including contemporary mainstream views; the seco作者: Feigned 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:28 作者: 太空 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 23:14 作者: atopic-rhinitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 02:25 作者: fatuity 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 07:03 作者: 一小塊 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:38
The Dichotomy: A Methodological Interlude, conclusion, however, Patinkin’s terms underwent a rehardening in the later stages of his argument, where he found that the “implications” of the “invalid dichotomy” were “straightforward” (1965, p. 187).作者: FLEET 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 15:14 作者: legacy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:21
century monetary theory in a larger historicalcontext, while examining the relevance of contemporary questions inmonetary policy. The first half of the volume analyzes the developmentof the methodological and conceptual foundations of monetary theory,up to and including contemporary mainstream views作者: excrete 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:21 作者: 褻瀆 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 05:23
Gloria Streit Olness,Hanna K. Ulatowskaoeconomics, which, by contrast, must deal with the . that do not remain ., such isolation of variables and simplification of analysis is impossible, In the more realistic, complex, and less manageable world of macroeconomics, Gresham’s Law may prevail over Darwin’s. Bad monetary theories may drive out the good.作者: Aromatic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 06:42
David Pellow,Darya Filippova,Carl Kingsfordin the following propositions: (1) money is an exogenous constant of monetary policy rather than an endogenous variable of monetary theory, and (2) therefore, the central bank can, if it will, control the money supply by making a “monetary aggregate” the target of monetary policy.作者: calorie 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 14:01
Research in Computational Molecular Biologyify “money” while extending the concept to the “monetary aggregates” M2 and M3 implied that belief in expansion of government control of money persisted while the Fed’s legal limits on the money supply (in the form of its own minimum reserve requirements) were eliminated (without complaint from monetarists).作者: surmount 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 18:27
Cambridge Confirmation of the Neoclassical Inversion, value of money are, according to Marshall, the same laws on which the general theory of value is based. In other words, the value of money, like the value of all other commodities, depends on demand and supply. In his own words, ‘The value of each metal is determined by the relation in which the supply of it stands to the demand for it.’作者: reaching 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 20:51 作者: 大酒杯 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 02:24 作者: defuse 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 07:10
The Chicago Paradox,ify “money” while extending the concept to the “monetary aggregates” M2 and M3 implied that belief in expansion of government control of money persisted while the Fed’s legal limits on the money supply (in the form of its own minimum reserve requirements) were eliminated (without complaint from monetarists).作者: SCORE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:08 作者: Synchronism 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 14:30 作者: 六邊形 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 19:11 作者: 紅潤 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:12 作者: 故意 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:35 作者: Ointment 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 05:27
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47489-2sical in conception. Eprime Eshag’s review (1963, p. 1) of Cambridge monetary theory begins with the following statement:.The laws which determine the value of money are, according to Marshall, the same laws on which the general theory of value is based. In other words, the value of money, like the 作者: Valves 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 10:17
Francesca M. Bosco,Alberto Parola Patinkin persistently clung to this conclusion despite a softening of his terminology and modifications of his argument to meet the objections of his critics. The original characterization of the “inconsistency” as a substantive “contradiction” became successively an inconsistency, a possible incon作者: FECK 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:00 作者: nocturnal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:17
Constantinos Tsirogiannis,Brody Sandelbankers in playing a numbers game with “monetary aggregates.” Monetarists presume to stabilize the economy by fixing the growth rate of the money supply they refuse to identify. The contradiction may explain why the success of monetarism has been matched by the apparent inability of central banks co作者: Overdose 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 20:58
David Pellow,Darya Filippova,Carl Kingsfordssible as long as monetarists are unable to agree on what money is or how to count it. Nevertheless, the essential idea of monetarism may be captured in the following propositions: (1) money is an exogenous constant of monetary policy rather than an endogenous variable of monetary theory, and (2) th作者: Senescent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 03:58 作者: 叫喊 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:49 作者: 積習(xí)已深 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 11:38 作者: 鉗子 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:29 作者: 翻布尋找 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 20:11 作者: 蛤肉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 00:28
Research in Computational Molecular Biologysses “the breakdown of nominal income between real income and prices” (1971, p. 34). This helps to explain why his predictions of real versus price level effects of given monetary policies are little, if any, better than could be obtained by tossing a coin..作者: Infant 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:36 作者: 講個(gè)故事逗他 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 09:48
Special Qualifications and Equipment, of convertible paper money, i.e., bank-notes.” There had been no question about this in the classics. Classical writers invariably attached the qualifying word, “paper,” to media of exchange that did not qualify as a “material recompense or equivalent.” While classical money was a commodity, it was作者: 無可爭辯 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 13:37 作者: 加強(qiáng)防衛(wèi) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 15:39 作者: bonnet 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 22:14
Classical Monetary Theory,modities were similarly explained for the simple reason that, in classical analysis, money was a commodity, namely, specie, i.e., a particular fabrication of precious metal (Mason 1963, pp. 42–43, 55–56).. “The introduction of money,” observed John Stuart Mill (1871, p. 619 [italics mine]), “is a me作者: surrogate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 00:20
The Neoclassical Inversion of Classical Monetary Theory,assical analysis. The postclassical controversy between the commodity and the quantity schools of monetary theory originated as a contest between halftruths.. Each side, ignoring the classical distinction between the long-run and short-run values of money,. elaborated one aspect of classical monetar作者: anesthesia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 06:37
Cambridge Confirmation of the Neoclassical Inversion,sical in conception. Eprime Eshag’s review (1963, p. 1) of Cambridge monetary theory begins with the following statement:.The laws which determine the value of money are, according to Marshall, the same laws on which the general theory of value is based. In other words, the value of money, like the 作者: Ethics 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 07:36 作者: 讓步 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 13:59
,Economic Darwinism Versus Gresham’s Law in the “Development” of Monetary Theory,alue theory, where limitation of the variables by the . assumption reduces the relevant inferences to the inexorability of mathematical logic. In macroeconomics, which, by contrast, must deal with the . that do not remain ., such isolation of variables and simplification of analysis is impossible, I
