標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Chrysostomus Javelli; Pagan Philosophy and Tommaso De Robertis,Luca Burzelli Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), und [打印本頁] 作者: tricuspid-valve 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 17:22
書目名稱Chrysostomus Javelli影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Chrysostomus Javelli影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Chrysostomus Javelli網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Chrysostomus Javelli網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Chrysostomus Javelli被引頻次
書目名稱Chrysostomus Javelli被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Chrysostomus Javelli年度引用
書目名稱Chrysostomus Javelli年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Chrysostomus Javelli讀者反饋
書目名稱Chrysostomus Javelli讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 我沒有強(qiáng)迫 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 21:43 作者: IOTA 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 03:24 作者: effrontery 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:14
978-3-031-27675-0The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl作者: arbiter 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 10:28
Chrysostomus Javelli978-3-031-27673-6Series ISSN 0066-6610 Series E-ISSN 2215-0307 作者: penance 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 14:10
,Einführung in die digitale Regelung,ition, which are easily accessible in the often-reprinted, massive . editions of the late sixteenth century (Lyon 1568, Venice 1577, Lyon 1580). In this revised biographical account, Javelli’s literary output is seen in the context of his entire life and its key aspects as observant Dominican friar,作者: penance 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 20:44
Steuerbarkeit und Beobachtbarkeit,he key task of helping Pomponazzi with the publication of the ., which the Bolognese Inquisition had censured because it did not comply with the requirements of the papal bull . (1513). In 1519, Javelli therefore wrote an appendix of . to the . in which he resolved, in the light of the Christian fai作者: OTHER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 22:51 作者: Coronary 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 04:03
,Einführung in die digitale Regelung,that no certain solution could be found to this issue, thus resorting to Christian faith. The fifteenth-century Aristotelian school of Padua (Paul of Venice, Gaetano da Thiene, Agostino Nifo, Elijah del Medigo, Pietro Pomponazzi) provided a philosophical solution by observing that the action of God 作者: 得意牛 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:09
Reglerentwurf zur Polzuweisung,to him – as a faithful Thomist – characterises God’s creation of human souls as well as of the world as a whole. God’s act of creation is manifested in time, yet it does not require pre-existing matter, and hence we may attribute to God creation .. Javelli arrives at this formula dialectically, as h作者: 抵押貸款 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 10:14 作者: Fortuitous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 14:27
,Einführung in die digitale Regelung, Scotism: the influence of Scotist literature on distinctions as seen in some sixteenth-century Thomists. The chapter has a primary focus on Chrysostomus Javelli’s engagement in his discussion of divine attributes with the Scotist doctrine of distinctions, but also considers other Thomist sources. F作者: 連鎖,連串 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 18:26
,Einführung in die digitale Regelung,ental commentaries on the moral and political philosophy of Aristotle, Plato and the Scriptures, which have been almost entirely neglected by modern scholarship. The purpose of this chapter is to assess the importance of these works by focusing on Javelli’s epitomes of Plato’s ethics and political p作者: 導(dǎo)師 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:06 作者: Thymus 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 05:16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29562-1elli should be credited as one of the few Renaissance thinkers who attempted to build a systematic and consistent project of Christian philosophy, encompassing all three traditional branches of practical philosophy: ethics, economics and politics. He develops this conception in three interrelated tr作者: meretricious 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:58
Steuerbarkeit und Beobachtbarkeiton of virtue, subject of virtue, the role of prudence as a connection of virtues, etc., which corresponds to Aquinas’ treatise on virtues in the .), and (2) the particular virtues (parts of virtues, subordinated virtues, sins against particular virtues, etc., which corresponds to a significant part 作者: 感激小女 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 11:21
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32511-6st presents Javelli’s . from a historical standpoint. It traces its origins to the controversy arising from the publication of Luther’s edition of St Paul’s . (1534). The second part discusses Chaps. ., ., ., and . of Javelli’s ., where the author surveys and rejects the views on predestination held作者: OGLE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 18:02 作者: reptile 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 20:36
,Einführung in die digitale Regelung, of dedicatory letters, colophons and incidental autobiographical remarks, was almost entirely omitted by the editors of all the posthumous editions of his works and hitherto has been overlooked by scholars.作者: Parameter 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 03:03 作者: APO 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 03:29
Reglerentwurf zur Polzuweisung,nts: in fact, a concern for teaching underpins all his exegetical works. These features will emerge vividly in the second part of this chapter, where I will take a closer look at one of the ., which concerns the intromission and extramission of visual species.作者: 馬具 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:43 作者: 值得贊賞 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 12:06 作者: 的事物 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 17:53 作者: intertwine 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:19 作者: Hemiplegia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 01:21
Javelli on Predestinationhe creatures (.) rather than the Creator. He also develops a complex account of the different phases through which the process of predestination works. By doing this, Javelli’s theory stands out as an original attempt of simultaneously preserving God’s prescience, predestination and human free will.作者: Metastasis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:25
Book 2023explored influences. This book is a valuable tool for students and scholars of?early modern philosophy, classical tradition, and Christian theology, contributing to the understanding of a neglectedchapter of Western?intellectual history..作者: Derogate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:44 作者: Bother 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 13:10
Book 2023 in the?intellectual landscape of sixteenth-century Europe, Javelli (ca. 1470-1540) was?the author of insightful commentaries on both Plato and Aristotle as well as of?original works in which he laid the foundations of a new Christian philosophy. In?this volume, a group of leading scholars from arou作者: STENT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 17:16 作者: 品牌 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 21:33
Javelli, Pomponazzi and the Immortality of the Soul: From the , (1519) to the , (1536) the debate and produced an autonomous treatise, which he however entitled ., not .. This chapter reconstructs Javelli’s intellectual arc from the composition of his . (1519) up until the publication of his . (1536), shedding light on the reasons behind his unusual lexical choice in the title of the latter work.作者: Tincture 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 02:12 作者: 河流 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 06:46 作者: Self-Help-Group 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 10:39
Using Ficino: Chrysostomus Javelli on Love and pective. And in doing so, Javelli consistently relied on Ficino’s . on the .. Javelli, nonetheless, did not merely copy and paste material from Ficino’s text, but he re-elaborated it by making selections and by manipulating its?meaning, all aimed at proving that Plato’s philosophy was indeed a ‘docta religio’.作者: 的’ 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:06
Javelli’s , and the Dominican Exegesis of Aristotle’s , in the Renaissancerks of Dominicus of Flanders, Franciscus Thomae, and Girolamo Savonarola, before delving deeply into Javelli’s .. The chapter concludes with a comparison of this work to the commentary of Javelli’s confrère Francesco Silvestri, which offers an outstanding example of erudition and philological rigour作者: 沙漠 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 21:47 作者: overwrought 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:06
Chrysostomus Javelli’s Commentaries on Plato’s Moral Philosophytonic and mystical tradition revived in the previous century by Marsilio Ficino and develops one of the first interpretations of ‘Plato through Plato’, in a way that echoes sixteenth-century philological interpretations of ‘Aristotle through Aristotle’. Finally, the essay explores how Javelli’s Plat作者: Intend 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 04:22
Neither Plato Nor Aristotle: Javelli’s Project of Christian Philosophye main tenets of classical ethics, concluding that both Platonism and Aristotelianism are equally useless for the development of a genuinely Christian philosophy. In his philosophically grounded confutation of classical ethics, not only does Javelli echo arguments and motives already presented by Er作者: set598 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 09:28 作者: Indecisive 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 12:36
,Einstellregeln für PI-Mehrgr??enregler,rks of Dominicus of Flanders, Franciscus Thomae, and Girolamo Savonarola, before delving deeply into Javelli’s .. The chapter concludes with a comparison of this work to the commentary of Javelli’s confrère Francesco Silvestri, which offers an outstanding example of erudition and philological rigour作者: Engaged 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 17:57
,Einführung in die digitale Regelung,ls of distinctions in the Scotist school. Special attention is paid to étienne Brulefer, since his summary of Petrus Thomae’s model of seven distinctions was Javelli’s source for the Scotist doctrine. I then investigate how Javelli worked with Brulefer’s summary, and how he sought to integrate the S作者: 強(qiáng)壯 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 19:15 作者: Relinquish 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 01:39
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29562-1e main tenets of classical ethics, concluding that both Platonism and Aristotelianism are equally useless for the development of a genuinely Christian philosophy. In his philosophically grounded confutation of classical ethics, not only does Javelli echo arguments and motives already presented by Er作者: 犬儒主義者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 03:13 作者: 尾隨 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 10:08 作者: Connotation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 15:19
Chrysostomus Javelli OP (,. 1470–1540): A Biographical Introductionition, which are easily accessible in the often-reprinted, massive . editions of the late sixteenth century (Lyon 1568, Venice 1577, Lyon 1580). In this revised biographical account, Javelli’s literary output is seen in the context of his entire life and its key aspects as observant Dominican friar,作者: 憎惡 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 17:12
Javelli, Pomponazzi and the Immortality of the Soul: From the , (1519) to the , (1536)he key task of helping Pomponazzi with the publication of the ., which the Bolognese Inquisition had censured because it did not comply with the requirements of the papal bull . (1513). In 1519, Javelli therefore wrote an appendix of . to the . in which he resolved, in the light of the Christian fai作者: 出來 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 19:53 作者: 愛管閑事 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 23:55
Chrysostomus Javelli on Causal Efficiency and Eternal Movement: Physical Issuesthat no certain solution could be found to this issue, thus resorting to Christian faith. The fifteenth-century Aristotelian school of Padua (Paul of Venice, Gaetano da Thiene, Agostino Nifo, Elijah del Medigo, Pietro Pomponazzi) provided a philosophical solution by observing that the action of God 作者: nonchalance 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 07:53
Hervaeus Natalis and Chrysostomus Javelli on Averroes’ Account of Creation: A Thomist Controversy Coto him – as a faithful Thomist – characterises God’s creation of human souls as well as of the world as a whole. God’s act of creation is manifested in time, yet it does not require pre-existing matter, and hence we may attribute to God creation .. Javelli arrives at this formula dialectically, as h作者: 晚間 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 09:38
Reading Aristotle’s ,: Chrysostomus Javelli’s Discussion of Extramission and Intromission Theories ostotelian encyclopaedia. Javelli addressed Aristotle’s . two times: at first, in his epitome published in 1531 in Venice; then, in his set of twenty-one ., the . of which was published posthumously in 1577 in Venice. Although it is not possible to establish the date of composition of these works, in作者: 骨 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 15:32
Javelli and the Reception of the Scotist System of Distinctions in Renaissance Thomism Scotism: the influence of Scotist literature on distinctions as seen in some sixteenth-century Thomists. The chapter has a primary focus on Chrysostomus Javelli’s engagement in his discussion of divine attributes with the Scotist doctrine of distinctions, but also considers other Thomist sources. F
