標題: Titlebook: Chinese Maritime Cases; Selection for Year o Martin Davies,Jiang Lin Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu [打印本頁] 作者: 傷害 時間: 2025-3-21 16:23
書目名稱Chinese Maritime Cases影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Chinese Maritime Cases影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Chinese Maritime Cases網(wǎng)絡公開度
書目名稱Chinese Maritime Cases網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名
書目名稱Chinese Maritime Cases被引頻次
書目名稱Chinese Maritime Cases被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Chinese Maritime Cases年度引用
書目名稱Chinese Maritime Cases年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Chinese Maritime Cases讀者反饋
書目名稱Chinese Maritime Cases讀者反饋學科排名
作者: GREEN 時間: 2025-3-21 23:04
China Transport Groupage International Limited (Shenzhen) v. Guangzhou Index Shipping Ltd.,dant claimed that the Plaintiff failed to prove that the goods were not accepted after their arrival at the discharging port. The Court found in favour of the Plaintiff, holding that the Defendant had the obligation to pay the fees. However, the Court also held the Plaintiff as ashipper should have 作者: 染色體 時間: 2025-3-22 03:08
,Chenzhou Shipping Group Co., Ltd. v. People’s Insurance Company of China Co., Ltd. Guangdong BranchInsurer denied coverage based on five grounds. The outstanding issues here were focused on: (1) whether the Plaintiff-Insured as a ship finance lessee had the right to sue; (2) whether there was an insured accident; (3) whether the insurance slip stipulated that “failure to pay the premium would lea作者: Ventilator 時間: 2025-3-22 06:19
China Pacific Property Insurance Co., Ltd. Shipping Insurance Operation Center v. NYK Bulk Carrier oduct. The soybeans were not initially affected by a collision affecting the carrying vessel, but the Defendant failed to take adequate treatment measures for the affected, but not ruined, soybean product. It failed to make the corresponding plan of losses with the Plaintiff and relative interested 作者: cancellous-bone 時間: 2025-3-22 11:54 作者: 啜泣 時間: 2025-3-22 16:13 作者: 啜泣 時間: 2025-3-22 20:08 作者: 真實的你 時間: 2025-3-22 23:03 作者: VEN 時間: 2025-3-23 05:11 作者: Aesthete 時間: 2025-3-23 08:32
2730-9851 , trade, insurance and financial fields. The book remedies to certain extent the situation that there is lack of authoritative sources available to foreign personnel to look into how Chinese justice system func978-3-662-63812-5978-3-662-63810-1Series ISSN 2730-9851 Series E-ISSN 2730-986X 作者: 有常識 時間: 2025-3-23 10:25 作者: 雄偉 時間: 2025-3-23 15:55
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63810-1Chinese maritime case; Chinese maritime judgment; Chinese maritime adjudication; Chinese maritime litig作者: 遺傳 時間: 2025-3-23 20:30 作者: 寄生蟲 時間: 2025-3-23 23:43 作者: Microgram 時間: 2025-3-24 04:45 作者: Libido 時間: 2025-3-24 09:20
Josef Kallrath,Thomas I. MaindlInsurer denied coverage based on five grounds. The outstanding issues here were focused on: (1) whether the Plaintiff-Insured as a ship finance lessee had the right to sue; (2) whether there was an insured accident; (3) whether the insurance slip stipulated that “failure to pay the premium would lea作者: emulsify 時間: 2025-3-24 13:48
Summary, Visions and Perspectiveoduct. The soybeans were not initially affected by a collision affecting the carrying vessel, but the Defendant failed to take adequate treatment measures for the affected, but not ruined, soybean product. It failed to make the corresponding plan of losses with the Plaintiff and relative interested 作者: Archipelago 時間: 2025-3-24 17:23 作者: 匍匐 時間: 2025-3-24 20:07 作者: 含水層 時間: 2025-3-25 02:56
Planning in Semiconductor Manufacturingthe owner and consignee of the goods stored at the Plaintiff’s port. Such fees were stipulated in the Plaintiff’s contract signed with the Defendant’s agent, Sinotrans Liuzhou Company, to whom the court did not apportion any liability. The court found the Defendant failed to remove 29,999.66 tons of作者: Maximize 時間: 2025-3-25 06:08 作者: creatine-kinase 時間: 2025-3-25 07:36 作者: 混合 時間: 2025-3-25 13:35 作者: 推遲 時間: 2025-3-25 16:33 作者: LOPE 時間: 2025-3-25 21:14 作者: Abbreviate 時間: 2025-3-26 01:23 作者: 尖牙 時間: 2025-3-26 05:32
Operative Planning in the Process IndustryRelated Case(s): none作者: 清楚說話 時間: 2025-3-26 10:23
Josef Kallrath,Thomas I. MaindlRelated Case(s): This is the judgment of first instance and the judgment of second instance is on page 333.作者: 干旱 時間: 2025-3-26 15:51 作者: Lamina 時間: 2025-3-26 17:15
Operative Planning in the Process IndustryRelated Case(s): This is the judgment of first instance and the judgment of second instance is on page 407.作者: 壕溝 時間: 2025-3-26 22:31
Planning in Semiconductor ManufacturingRelated Case(s): This is the judgment of first instance and the judgment of second instance is on page 435.作者: amenity 時間: 2025-3-27 01:55 作者: 嘴唇可修剪 時間: 2025-3-27 06:06
Toward a General Theory of Real Options,Related Case(s): This is the judgment of first instance, and the judgment of second instance and the judgment of retrial are on page 527 and page 540 respectively.作者: 不朽中國 時間: 2025-3-27 12:27
Anhui Changhui Transportation and Trade Company v. Maritime Safety Administration Xuwen,The Defendant Maritime Safety Administration Xuwen (M.S.A. Xuwen) issued an administrative penalty against the Plaintiff following an incident between the Plaintiff’s vessel “Changhui 88”, afishing vessel. M.V.“Changhui 88” crossed paths with the fishing vessel at sea.Although the vessels did not collide, the fishing vessel subsequently sank.作者: corn732 時間: 2025-3-27 16:33
Hangzhou Hangsi Garment In & Export Co., Ltd. v. Meiji (China) Transportation and Logistics Co., LtRelated Case(s): this is the judgment of first instance, the judgment of second instance is on page 267.作者: Enrage 時間: 2025-3-27 18:39 作者: Biomarker 時間: 2025-3-27 22:50 作者: Ergots 時間: 2025-3-28 06:00 作者: PURG 時間: 2025-3-28 08:35
Huarong Financial Leasing Company Limited v. China Construction Bank Zhoushan Dinghai Sub-branch,Related Case(s): This is the judgment of first instance and the judgment of second instance and the ruling of retrial are on page 375 and page 393 respectively.作者: cushion 時間: 2025-3-28 12:46 作者: 作繭自縛 時間: 2025-3-28 14:56 作者: savage 時間: 2025-3-28 21:12 作者: RADE 時間: 2025-3-29 02:44
Joho Trading Corporation v. New Unite (HK) Marine Shipping Co., Ltd.,Related Case(s): This is the judgment of first instance, and the judgment of second instance and the judgment of retrial are on page 527 and page 540 respectively.作者: 冷峻 時間: 2025-3-29 04:29
Chinese Maritime Cases978-3-662-63810-1Series ISSN 2730-9851 Series E-ISSN 2730-986X 作者: deficiency 時間: 2025-3-29 10:53
Summary, Visions and Perspectiveoduct. The soybeans were not initially affected by a collision affecting the carrying vessel, but the Defendant failed to take adequate treatment measures for the affected, but not ruined, soybean product. It failed to make the corresponding plan of losses with the Plaintiff and relative interested parties.作者: insincerity 時間: 2025-3-29 14:58 作者: tic-douloureux 時間: 2025-3-29 16:10 作者: Mechanics 時間: 2025-3-29 22:07 作者: Jubilation 時間: 2025-3-30 01:38 作者: uncertain 時間: 2025-3-30 07:03 作者: receptors 時間: 2025-3-30 11:31
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-34624-4not a true party to the contract. The Defendant asserted its own counterclaim, stating that it did not pay rent because it had spent RMB1.2 million in renovation of the vessel and asserted that it was owed compensation for the necessary renovations and compulsory renovations.作者: Palate 時間: 2025-3-30 13:31 作者: aggravate 時間: 2025-3-30 19:35 作者: 形容詞 時間: 2025-3-30 21:01
2730-9851 oreign parties to make wise decision on how to manage their This book selects leading, innovative and influential Chinese maritime judgments and presents full translation of them, with brief summary, to the readers so that they can have insights of how the Chinese maritime judges interpret, apply an作者: Benzodiazepines 時間: 2025-3-31 03:47 作者: 出來 時間: 2025-3-31 07:15
Real Optimization with SAP? APOr of the Plaintiff, holding that the Defendant had the obligation to pay the fees. However, the Court also held the Plaintiff as ashipper should have estimated the maximum container demurrage based on the value of a container when entering into the contract. Thus, the amount of fees was adjusted according to the market value of a container.作者: lymphedema 時間: 2025-3-31 11:45 作者: 懶惰民族 時間: 2025-3-31 16:25
Planning in Semiconductor Manufacturing agent, Sinotrans Liuzhou Company, to whom the court did not apportion any liability. The court found the Defendant failed to remove 29,999.66 tons of its iron ore from the Plaintiff’s port, and failed to pay the remaining fee balance owed.作者: Assault 時間: 2025-3-31 19:06 作者: Engulf 時間: 2025-4-1 00:27
China Transport Groupage International Limited (Shenzhen) v. Guangzhou Index Shipping Ltd.,r of the Plaintiff, holding that the Defendant had the obligation to pay the fees. However, the Court also held the Plaintiff as ashipper should have estimated the maximum container demurrage based on the value of a container when entering into the contract. Thus, the amount of fees was adjusted according to the market value of a container.作者: 遺棄 時間: 2025-4-1 02:06
,Chenzhou Shipping Group Co., Ltd. v. People’s Insurance Company of China Co., Ltd. Guangdong Branch had the right to sue; (2) whether there was an insured accident; (3) whether the insurance slip stipulated that “failure to pay the premium would lead to the automatic termination of the insurance contract”; (4) whether the insurance contract had been terminated. The court found for the Plaintiff-Insured.作者: Enteropathic 時間: 2025-4-1 09:32 作者: 障礙物 時間: 2025-4-1 11:25
Chongqing Wanzhou Yangjiang Shipping Co., Ltd. et al. v. Chongqing Sanyi Logistics Co., Ltd.,not a true party to the contract. The Defendant asserted its own counterclaim, stating that it did not pay rent because it had spent RMB1.2 million in renovation of the vessel and asserted that it was owed compensation for the necessary renovations and compulsory renovations.作者: Antimicrobial 時間: 2025-4-1 17:19
Fairwind International Shipping Co., Ltd. v. Vertex Shipping Co., Ltd.,tional orders. As a result, the Defendant filed an application for preservation of maritime claims. However, the Defendant could not obtain the Plaintiff’s correct business registration address because this information was not disclosed in the charter party.作者: Germinate 時間: 2025-4-1 20:12
Foreign Economic and Technical Cooperation Co., Ltd. of China Changjiang National Shipping Group et held that because the Defendant had actual knowledge that the Plaintiff’s name as stated in the guarantee contract was, despite the lack of conformity, referring to the same company as in the other documents, the Defendant was at fault in refusing to pay the Plaintiff and was liable for the amount claimed plus interest.作者: Isometric 時間: 2025-4-2 02:40
