派博傳思國際中心

標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Chinese Maritime Cases; Selection for Year o Martin Davies,Jiang Lin Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu [打印本頁]

作者: 抵押證書    時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 16:18
書目名稱Chinese Maritime Cases影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Chinese Maritime Cases影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Chinese Maritime Cases網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Chinese Maritime Cases網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Chinese Maritime Cases被引頻次




書目名稱Chinese Maritime Cases被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Chinese Maritime Cases年度引用




書目名稱Chinese Maritime Cases年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Chinese Maritime Cases讀者反饋




書目名稱Chinese Maritime Cases讀者反饋學(xué)科排名





作者: Lament    時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:10

作者: Carcinogenesis    時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 02:54

作者: 溫和女孩    時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 04:51

作者: 怎樣才咆哮    時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 10:17

作者: Lamina    時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 14:24
Chongqing Transportation Equipment Finance Leasing Co., Ltd. v. Chongqing Kunyuan Shipping Co., Ltdond Defendant, as a public institution performing administrative functions was not legally permitted to engage in business activities such as providing a guarantee, it was nevertheless ordered to pay half of the outstanding amount if the First Defendant did not do so.
作者: Lamina    時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 20:19

作者: Aura231    時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 21:22

作者: OPINE    時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 04:49
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22359-4d M.V. “Hua Dian 8”. The Court held that Offshore Oil failed to prove that “Hua Dian 8” bore any liability towards the collision with MS “Conti Esperance” and that the Defendant owed the Plaintiff RMB461,785.99, which included certain deductions for unreasonable repairs that did not stem from the ac
作者: 無能的人    時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 06:46

作者: Banister    時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 11:31

作者: 內(nèi)疚    時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 16:33

作者: TEN    時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 18:59

作者: Hiatus    時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:43

作者: 植物茂盛    時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 05:37
Bo Fu Company (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd. v. Top Logic International Limited,endant initially paid 180,000 USD to the Plaintiff, and disputed its liability to pay the remaining 896,078.75 USD, arguing that the cost was excessive. The court rejected the Defendant’s evidence that the cost of repairs was excessive and found for the Plaintiff.
作者: 違抗    時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:44

作者: 玩忽職守    時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:15

作者: conscience    時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 18:39

作者: lymphoma    時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 22:56
China Pacific Insurance Co., Ltd. Shipping Insurance Operation Center v. Teh May Maritime Corporateo the Defendant carrier’s ship in Brazil was alleged to be lacking in weight upon delivery in Shanghai. The Defendant argued that the difference in weight, as measured in wet metric tons, was due to the quality of the iron ore, which naturally drained off water weight during the voyage to Shanghai.
作者: spinal-stenosis    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:06

作者: Fermentation    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 06:45

作者: CONE    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:05

作者: Dna262    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 12:59

作者: 肉體    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 18:15

作者: 致命    時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:57

作者: 歡騰    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 03:12

作者: Heart-Rate    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 05:34
Alexandros Papangelis,Yannis Stylianountiff was instructed to operate the boat without any formal training. The Plaintiff bumped her chin and suffered injuries, which resulted in three lost teeth, cuts to her chin and missed work for 30?days.
作者: Endemic    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 12:21

作者: 考博    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 13:47

作者: 鑒賞家    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 20:46
Dual Methods for General Optimal Controlom a shortage of cargo presumed to occur during the transportation under a contract for carriage of goods by sea. The Plaintiff issued an open policy of carriage of goods to its insured regarding copper and copper products at the actual sale value on the invoice of such goods.
作者: 小溪    時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:06
Stochastic Policy Iteration Methods two others, Zhejiang Jiaolong Group Co., Ltd. and Chenye Shipbuilding Co., Ltd., for breach of contract. Plaintiff entered into two Floating Capital Loan Contracts with CEIEC Ningbo for RMB 77 million and RMB 40 million plus interest, respectively.
作者: 飲料    時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 02:26
Denis Belomestny,John Schoenmakersendant initially paid 180,000 USD to the Plaintiff, and disputed its liability to pay the remaining 896,078.75 USD, arguing that the cost was excessive. The court rejected the Defendant’s evidence that the cost of repairs was excessive and found for the Plaintiff.
作者: 多樣    時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:59

作者: 失眠癥    時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 11:33
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13093-1intiff filed suit for the realization (foreclosure) of the ship’s mortgage, and asked the court to compel auction or sale of the vessel in order to repay the Defendant’s outstanding debts, and to give the Plaintiff priority over other claims in repayment from the proceeds of sale.
作者: 用不完    時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 14:54

作者: forecast    時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:20
Sukhpreet Kaur,Yogesh Kumar,Sushil Kumaro the Defendant carrier’s ship in Brazil was alleged to be lacking in weight upon delivery in Shanghai. The Defendant argued that the difference in weight, as measured in wet metric tons, was due to the quality of the iron ore, which naturally drained off water weight during the voyage to Shanghai.
作者: 寬容    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:54
Problems in Bending of Bars and Plates,the Defendant’s ship after it had been struck while at anchor by another ship. The Plaintiff sought to recover 5% of the cargo losses from the Defendant, on the basis that this was the Defendant’s share of responsibility for the sinking. The Plaintiff argued that the Defendant had overloaded the shi
作者: 天氣    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:19

作者: 思想流動(dòng)    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 09:08
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22359-4 repair costs and lost wages, from a collision that occurred on May 18, 2010 against the Defendant, Offshore Oil Engineering Co., Ltd. In response, Offshore Oil argued that some of the repairs made by the Plaintiff in South Africa were unreasonable, and could have been done for a much lower rate in
作者: Libido    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 14:19

作者: 折磨    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 18:20
Advanced Social Interaction with AgentsThis is the judgment of first instance, and the judgment of second instance and judgment of retrial are on page 134 and page 155 respectively.
作者: 恭維    時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 18:47
C,D: Chat-Oriented Dialog SystemsThis is the judgment of first instance and the judgment of second instance is on page 199.
作者: attenuate    時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 00:08

作者: tic-douloureux    時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 05:02
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13093-1The outsider, Qingdao Yi Jia Economic & Trade Industry Import & Export Co., Ltd., signed a . with the Defendant, Vopak Bohai Petrochemicals (Tianjin) Terminal Co Ltd. They agreed that the Defendant would provide Yi Jia Company with the service of discharging and storing BTX aromatics.
作者: 襲擊    時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 07:18

作者: 我邪惡    時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 14:23

作者: negligence    時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 15:37
Jan M. Ko?cielny,Micha? Syfert,Anna Sztyber(2012) Yong Hai Fa Zhou Shang Chu Zi No. 714
作者: Cacophonous    時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 20:16

作者: 使人煩燥    時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 02:29
CAI Bingchang v. FENG Zhifu,The Plaintiff as the Defendant’s employee claimed that the Defendant should pay him maintenance and cure for the injuries he suffered while working on the Defendant’s ship. The Defendant argued that he should not be liable because the injuries were caused by the Plaintiff’s own gross negligence.
作者: 成份    時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 05:31

作者: 發(fā)炎    時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 11:24
,Chaozhou Asia–Pacific Energy Co., Ltd. v. Hua Yang International Marine Transportation Co., Ltd. etThis is the judgment of first instance and the judgment of second instance is on page 199.
作者: 夾克怕包裹    時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 15:50
CHEN Linglong et al. v. Ping An Property & Casualty Insurance Company of China Ltd. Tianjin Branch The Plaintiff shipowner contracted to acquire vessel insurance from two Defendant insurers. When Plaintiff’s vessel, M/V “Jin Ye 88” encountered a storm that occasioned total loss of the ship, the Plaintiffs filed an insurance claim to recover the value for which they had contracted.
作者: 放逐某人    時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 20:24

作者: 抵制    時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 22:55

作者: BRINK    時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 02:22
Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering Co., Ltd. v. Alpha Elephant Inc. et al.,(2014) Xia Hai Fa Ren Zi No. 14
作者: Barrister    時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 05:17

作者: 得體    時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 12:39
Foshan Feitu Import and Export Co., Ltd. v. DHL Global Forwarding (China) Co., Ltd. Foshan Branch e(2013) Guang Hai Fa Chu Zi No. 492
作者: 佛刊    時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 15:48
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63239-0Chinese maritime case; Chinese maritime judgment; Chinese case; Chinese judgment; Maritime case; Maritime
作者: 難解    時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 19:47

作者: 粗魯性質(zhì)    時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 23:40
Martin Davies,Jiang LinOffers selected Chinese maritime judgments.Provides insights of how Chinese maritime courts apply Chinese maritime law in practice.Assists foreign parties to make wise decision on how to manage their
作者: CRUMB    時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 02:53

作者: FACT    時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 09:47
AIU Property & Casualty Insurance Co., Ltd. Guangzhou Branch v. American President Lines Ltd.,om a shortage of cargo presumed to occur during the transportation under a contract for carriage of goods by sea. The Plaintiff issued an open policy of carriage of goods to its insured regarding copper and copper products at the actual sale value on the invoice of such goods.
作者: Gene408    時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 13:21

作者: gene-therapy    時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 16:39

作者: indemnify    時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 21:53

作者: 偽證    時(shí)間: 2025-4-2 00:13

作者: antiquated    時(shí)間: 2025-4-2 06:22

作者: depreciate    時(shí)間: 2025-4-2 10:44





歡迎光臨 派博傳思國際中心 (http://www.pjsxioz.cn/) Powered by Discuz! X3.5
铅山县| 宜昌市| 旌德县| 麻江县| 涟源市| 土默特右旗| 额尔古纳市| 冷水江市| 棋牌| 汉沽区| 怀柔区| 监利县| 平和县| 韩城市| 新平| 故城县| 南宫市| 渝中区| 漳浦县| 邢台市| 祁门县| 樟树市| 扶风县| 额济纳旗| 桃源县| 高清| 八宿县| 理塘县| 淅川县| 龙海市| 望江县| 隆尧县| 小金县| 黄骅市| 建阳市| 慈溪市| 江达县| 彰武县| 崇礼县| 兰西县| 夏津县|