標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Chaucer in Early English Dictionaries; The Old-Word Traditi Johan Kerling Book 1979 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1979 Chaucer. [打印本頁] 作者: ODE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 19:59
書目名稱Chaucer in Early English Dictionaries影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Chaucer in Early English Dictionaries影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Chaucer in Early English Dictionaries網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Chaucer in Early English Dictionaries網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Chaucer in Early English Dictionaries被引頻次
書目名稱Chaucer in Early English Dictionaries被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Chaucer in Early English Dictionaries年度引用
書目名稱Chaucer in Early English Dictionaries年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Chaucer in Early English Dictionaries讀者反饋
書目名稱Chaucer in Early English Dictionaries讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: Ceremony 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 22:01
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0182-3he publication of all English dictionaries, and they had a considerable influence on them. This influence is evident from the large number of Speghtian old words included in English dictionaries down to 1721. These old words and their source have hitherto received hardly any attention.作者: 山羊 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 04:20 作者: glisten 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 08:17
Pro Ajax and the .NET 2.0 Platform difficult to read: apart from explicit statements to that effect, there is also the indirect evidence for this in the appearance of marginal and interlinear glosses in Chaucerian MSS., and most convincingly in the publication of an edition of Chaucer with an extensive glossary.作者: excursion 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 10:48 作者: 毛細(xì)血管 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:58
Pro Ajax and the .NET 2.0 Platforme importance of Cockeram chiefly lies in his continuation of the Speght tradition, and in his transmission of a corpus of Speghtian words to later compilers, even though his own selection among these words is not of great interest and does not seem to have been a careful one.作者: 毛細(xì)血管 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 17:03 作者: Obvious 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 23:23 作者: 付出 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 01:24 作者: flavonoids 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 09:30 作者: 豐富 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 10:54
Pro Ajax and the .NET 2.0 PlatformThe first English dictionary of any kind to indicate that particular words are old and should not be used is a sixteenth century rhyming dictionary. Levins’ dictionary may have provided Spenser with some words for use in the ..作者: Banister 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 16:20
Pro Ajax and the .NET 2.0 PlatformColes’ selection of old words was largely determined by his use of Skinner, a hitherto undetected source for his dictionary. Coles is thus the first of the second generation of lexicographers who were indebted to Speght, but who drew on him only indirectly through Skinner.作者: Classify 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 21:53 作者: 密切關(guān)系 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:32 作者: 初次登臺(tái) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 05:04 作者: 重力 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:29
Elisha Coles: , (1676)Coles’ selection of old words was largely determined by his use of Skinner, a hitherto undetected source for his dictionary. Coles is thus the first of the second generation of lexicographers who were indebted to Speght, but who drew on him only indirectly through Skinner.作者: 大量 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 11:49 作者: 寬宏大量 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 16:36 作者: pineal-gland 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 22:09
Introductionhe publication of all English dictionaries, and they had a considerable influence on them. This influence is evident from the large number of Speghtian old words included in English dictionaries down to 1721. These old words and their source have hitherto received hardly any attention.作者: gustation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:02 作者: incredulity 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 07:10
Thomas Speght and His Glossaries to Chaucer’s Works (1598, 1602) difficult to read: apart from explicit statements to that effect, there is also the indirect evidence for this in the appearance of marginal and interlinear glosses in Chaucerian MSS., and most convincingly in the publication of an edition of Chaucer with an extensive glossary.作者: 審問,審訊 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 08:18
John Bullokar:, (1616)Speght’s glossary of 1602. Bullokar added a small number of words that he had probably encountered in his own reading. His selection of old words is a haphazard one, but it influenced later English lexicographers, especially Cockeram.作者: Yag-Capsulotomy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 14:11 作者: Focus-Words 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 16:18
John Kersey: , (1708)debted to Coles’ . and therefore in a great many instances ultimately to Speght. The immediate effect of the expansion was that the alphabetical distribution of old words in this dictionary became more even than in the dictionary of which it was an abridgement.作者: WAX 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:24
Nathan Bailey: , (1721)emented these with material from other lexicographical sources. In spite of the large variety of lexicographical material available to him, 50% of the old words in Bailey’s dictionary still derive ultimately from Speght. Thus Speght’s glossaries continued to dominate the selection of old words for well over a century of English lexicography.作者: Dysarthria 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:36
Conclusions both considerable and long-lasting. The first inclusion of a glossary in an edition of Chaucer shows that by 1598 Chaucer’s words were becoming hard to understand, and there are indications that this difficulty in understanding Chaucer’s poetry contributed to a decline in his popularity until he was ‘rescued’ by Dryden.作者: sultry 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 05:07 作者: Receive 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:29 作者: 羽毛長(zhǎng)成 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:01
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0182-3he publication of all English dictionaries, and they had a considerable influence on them. This influence is evident from the large number of Speghtian old words included in English dictionaries down to 1721. These old words and their source have hitherto received hardly any attention.作者: 吹氣 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 20:32
Pro Ajax and the .NET 2.0 Platformnth-century English lexicographers promoted the idea that ‘Chaucer’ means ‘old’ and ‘old’ means ‘Chaucer’. It will therefore be useful to look at Chaucer’s reputation and to consider in general the comprehensibility of Middle English in the period we are concerned with.作者: 傻瓜 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:40
Pro Ajax and the .NET 2.0 Platform difficult to read: apart from explicit statements to that effect, there is also the indirect evidence for this in the appearance of marginal and interlinear glosses in Chaucerian MSS., and most convincingly in the publication of an edition of Chaucer with an extensive glossary.作者: jeopardize 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:09 作者: CORE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 09:16
Pro Ajax and the .NET 2.0 Platforme importance of Cockeram chiefly lies in his continuation of the Speght tradition, and in his transmission of a corpus of Speghtian words to later compilers, even though his own selection among these words is not of great interest and does not seem to have been a careful one.作者: arsenal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 12:38 作者: 松軟 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 14:05
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0183-0 seventeenth century. Over 50% of the items in his long appendix of old words are based, directly and indirectly, on Speght’s glossaries. This appendix may be looked upon as the first Middle English dictionary, meant for the educated reader and the scholar, rather than for the general public. The im作者: 過份 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 18:51
Pro Ajax and the .NET 2.0 Platformdebted to Coles’ . and therefore in a great many instances ultimately to Speght. The immediate effect of the expansion was that the alphabetical distribution of old words in this dictionary became more even than in the dictionary of which it was an abridgement.作者: GRAVE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:51 作者: 癡呆 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:51 作者: 忍受 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 07:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0183-0ed as ‘Chaucerian’ (while many of his ‘old’ words were also from Chaucer) and by the fact that in later editions of his dictionary published during his lifetime (1662, 1671 and 1678) there is some inconsistency in the marking of old words.作者: 終止 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 13:37
Edward Phillips:, (1658)ed as ‘Chaucerian’ (while many of his ‘old’ words were also from Chaucer) and by the fact that in later editions of his dictionary published during his lifetime (1662, 1671 and 1678) there is some inconsistency in the marking of old words.作者: Lineage 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 17:27
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0183-0portance of Skinner to the present study lies in the fact that his selection influenced later English lexicographical works, and in that later English lexicographers turned to Skinner, rather than to Speght. Yet through Skinner they kept making use of Speght.作者: Acetaldehyde 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 19:33 作者: 慌張 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 00:20
Introductionhe publication of all English dictionaries, and they had a considerable influence on them. This influence is evident from the large number of Speghtian old words included in English dictionaries down to 1721. These old words and their source have hitherto received hardly any attention.作者: Asperity 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 03:52 作者: Dissonance 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 09:00
Thomas Speght and His Glossaries to Chaucer’s Works (1598, 1602) difficult to read: apart from explicit statements to that effect, there is also the indirect evidence for this in the appearance of marginal and interlinear glosses in Chaucerian MSS., and most convincingly in the publication of an edition of Chaucer with an extensive glossary.作者: 偏狂癥 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 15:18 作者: nerve-sparing 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 16:11 作者: 容易懂得 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 21:12
Edward Phillips:, (1658)and Cockeram’s. The principles behind his selection are difficult to detect; this is illustrated by the fact that he also included words which he marked as ‘Chaucerian’ (while many of his ‘old’ words were also from Chaucer) and by the fact that in later editions of his dictionary published during hi作者: 不如樂死去 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 03:46
Stephen Skinner: , (1671) seventeenth century. Over 50% of the items in his long appendix of old words are based, directly and indirectly, on Speght’s glossaries. This appendix may be looked upon as the first Middle English dictionary, meant for the educated reader and the scholar, rather than for the general public. The im作者: STELL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 05:42 作者: LITHE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 08:47
Nathan Bailey: , (1721)emented these with material from other lexicographical sources. In spite of the large variety of lexicographical material available to him, 50% of the old words in Bailey’s dictionary still derive ultimately from Speght. Thus Speght’s glossaries continued to dominate the selection of old words for w作者: 不要嚴(yán)酷 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 13:30 作者: 蹣跚 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 19:35
10樓作者: forestry 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 00:43
10樓作者: Intrepid 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 01:38
10樓作者: 賭博 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 05:44
10樓
