標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Causation and Laws of Nature; Howard Sankey Book 1999 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1999 knowledge.metaphysics.realism [打印本頁] 作者: 漠不關(guān)心 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 19:41
書目名稱Causation and Laws of Nature影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Causation and Laws of Nature影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Causation and Laws of Nature網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Causation and Laws of Nature網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Causation and Laws of Nature被引頻次
書目名稱Causation and Laws of Nature被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Causation and Laws of Nature年度引用
書目名稱Causation and Laws of Nature年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Causation and Laws of Nature讀者反饋
書目名稱Causation and Laws of Nature讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 沒有貧窮 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 22:35
Causal Powers and Laws of Natureis a secularised version of the divine command theories of the Seventeenth and early Eighteenth Centuries. The metaphysical position which continues to inform this view is mechanism. According to mechanism, the world consists fundamentally of passive objects, having, in themselves, only the primary 作者: IST 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 02:01 作者: Congestion 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 06:18 作者: Orgasm 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 10:36
Nomic Necessity and Natural States: Comment on the Leckey—Bigelow Theory of Laws in this world. This view that the laws may have been otherwise is known as the . In recent years, however, the domination of this popular doctrine has been challenged by a new analysis of lawhood that denies the contingency thesis. This new analysis, known as Essentialism, rebuts the claim that the作者: Oratory 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:07
Laws of Nature as Relations Between Quantities? the latter. The gas laws, some of the other laws of thermodynamics, Ohms law, perhaps some dynamical and electrodynamic principles, all appear to state relations between quantities.1 For example, pressure, volume and temperature are quantities, and the gas laws describe relations between values ass作者: Oratory 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 20:28 作者: 反話 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 01:17 作者: Invertebrate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:07 作者: Proclaim 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:21 作者: Irksome 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 10:59
Comment on Smartunified structure but instead is merely . there were the scientific entities (electrons, protons and so on) which, if they had existed, would have articulated that structure. This stand, of course, poses a problem for his own frequently expressed view that laws of nature are nothing more ontological作者: aggravate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 15:05 作者: 咆哮 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 20:53
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08817-2very fundamental way the appropriateness of applying the notion of a law to nature, since only intelligent beings are in a position to obey, or not to obey, laws.1 In this paper I rise to the challenge embodied in Boyle’s remark, and attempt to make sense of laws as they are employed in physics.作者: 取回 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:39
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08826-4iculated that structure. This stand, of course, poses a problem for his own frequently expressed view that laws of nature are nothing more ontologically than cosmic regularities or, as he himself puts it, cosmic coincidences.作者: gorgeous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 05:20
Making Sense of Laws of Physicsvery fundamental way the appropriateness of applying the notion of a law to nature, since only intelligent beings are in a position to obey, or not to obey, laws.1 In this paper I rise to the challenge embodied in Boyle’s remark, and attempt to make sense of laws as they are employed in physics.作者: lymphedema 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:41 作者: 違反 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 14:06 作者: 尾隨 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:36
Nomic Necessity and Natural States: Comment on the Leckey—Bigelow Theory of Laws laws of nature are contingent. According to the essentialist doctrine, laws are . in that they are grounded in, and thus dependent on the essential natures of the fundamental natural kinds of objects and processes that occur in the world.作者: CHYME 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 20:58 作者: 扔掉掐死你 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:26 作者: ensemble 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 05:40
Organisation r?umlichen Wissensknowledge, an electro-fink capable of wreaking its effects instantaneously — which may seem to leave a ray of hope for the friend of the simple conditional analysis. Lewis’s adaptations use no such tricks, and he makes it clear that hopes of saving the simple conditional analysis by claiming foul play with time are illusory.作者: prosthesis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:09
Empirische Forschung zur Transparenz,I have chosen to leave it as it was, and try to explain my position more adequately and clearly in this reply. I think I have learnt quite a lot from this exchange, and I wish to thank John Bigelow for helping me to improve my understanding of the issues.作者: 執(zhí) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:55
Bigelow’s Worries About Scientific EssentialismI have chosen to leave it as it was, and try to explain my position more adequately and clearly in this reply. I think I have learnt quite a lot from this exchange, and I wish to thank John Bigelow for helping me to improve my understanding of the issues.作者: 取之不竭 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 19:11 作者: Free-Radical 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 23:57 作者: 龍蝦 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 00:55 作者: 祖先 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 08:13 作者: 領(lǐng)袖氣質(zhì) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:32
Real Law in Charles Peirce’s “Pragmaticism” s view is far from the antirealism which strikes many philosophers of science as an unsatisfying feature of pragmatism. Rather, it presents an original and challenging philosophical approach to scientific law, an approach which falls in the tradition of scholastic realism, as exemplified most notab作者: COWER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:30
Laws and Cosmologyin their lines of sight. I am not concerned in this paper to delimit fact from fiction in scientific discourse. The settlement of borderline disputes can wait for another occasion. My main argument for scientific realism is the cosmic coincidence argument. Would it not be a cosmic coincidence if the作者: COUCH 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:06 作者: 精密 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 22:14 作者: ECG769 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 01:18
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08817-2 them conformable to laws that it has no knowledge or apprehension of” (Boyle, [1686] 1979, pp. 181–2). With these words Robert Boyle questioned in a very fundamental way the appropriateness of applying the notion of a law to nature, since only intelligent beings are in a position to obey, or not to作者: 帶傷害 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 06:17 作者: MIRTH 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 12:38 作者: Genteel 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 14:53 作者: 扔掉掐死你 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 18:18
Organisation der geteilten Nutzung in this world. This view that the laws may have been otherwise is known as the . In recent years, however, the domination of this popular doctrine has been challenged by a new analysis of lawhood that denies the contingency thesis. This new analysis, known as Essentialism, rebuts the claim that the作者: Feigned 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:32
Innovation, Organisation und Konzern, the latter. The gas laws, some of the other laws of thermodynamics, Ohms law, perhaps some dynamical and electrodynamic principles, all appear to state relations between quantities.1 For example, pressure, volume and temperature are quantities, and the gas laws describe relations between values ass作者: 捏造 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:10 作者: 音的強(qiáng)弱 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 06:52 作者: catagen 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 12:18
Organisation r?umlichen Wissensartin has succeeded in refuting the ‘simple conditional analysis’ of dispositions. I agree. It is noteworthy how Lewis’s exposition of Martin’s case makes a small but significant improvement on the original. For Martin’ s counterexamples all involve some trickery with time — a divine agent with fore作者: 蒸發(fā) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 14:48 作者: Flawless 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 21:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08826-4unified structure but instead is merely . there were the scientific entities (electrons, protons and so on) which, if they had existed, would have articulated that structure. This stand, of course, poses a problem for his own frequently expressed view that laws of nature are nothing more ontological作者: FEMUR 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 02:35
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08818-9This comment is based first upon a letter that I sent to Brian Ellis about his paper, and second upon the quite elaborate reply that he returned to me. The reply, for which I thank him, gave me a much better grip on his position and so assisted me in the present enterprise.作者: 紋章 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 04:21 作者: DEAWL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 11:09 作者: 凌辱 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 12:52
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08822-6If a proposition is entailed by a set of laws of nature, does that make it a law? Call this the . There are two intuitively appealing ways of thinking about laws which produce sharply conflicting answers to this question.作者: 閹割 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 18:04
Comment on EllisThis comment is based first upon a letter that I sent to Brian Ellis about his paper, and second upon the quite elaborate reply that he returned to me. The reply, for which I thank him, gave me a much better grip on his position and so assisted me in the present enterprise.作者: Sigmoidoscopy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 22:03
Response to David ArmstrongThis reply is based on my letter to David Armstrong, which was in response to his earlier criticisms of my paper on Causal Powers and Laws of Nature. I have amended my reply to take account of the objections made in the revised version of his response. I am grateful for the opportunity he has given me to clarify my position.作者: 拉開這車床 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 01:01
Scientific EllisianismEllis defends a theory which is of great interest and importance: scientific essentialism. Science seeks the essential properties of things in the world, and the necessary truths which follow from them, argues Ellis. The core doctrine of the Ellis theory, I take to be this:作者: CIS 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 04:22 作者: GET 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 10:30
Studies in History and Philosophy of Sciencehttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/222637.jpg作者: venous-leak 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 13:17
The Naturalness Theory of Lawsents are true, but at the same time I believe that it is not logically necessary that the apple would fall. I believe that there is in nature a kind of necessity weaker than logical necessity: natural necessity.作者: precede 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 18:12
Laws of Nature as Relations Between Quantities? the latter. The gas laws, some of the other laws of thermodynamics, Ohms law, perhaps some dynamical and electrodynamic principles, all appear to state relations between quantities.1 For example, pressure, volume and temperature are quantities, and the gas laws describe relations between values assigned as measures of these.作者: 橫截,橫斷 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 23:24 作者: COLON 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 04:25
