標題: Titlebook: Carnap‘s Ideal of Explication and Naturalism; Pierre Wagner Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2012 [打印本頁] 作者: FETID 時間: 2025-3-21 18:05
書目名稱Carnap‘s Ideal of Explication and Naturalism影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Carnap‘s Ideal of Explication and Naturalism影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Carnap‘s Ideal of Explication and Naturalism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Carnap‘s Ideal of Explication and Naturalism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Carnap‘s Ideal of Explication and Naturalism被引頻次
書目名稱Carnap‘s Ideal of Explication and Naturalism被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Carnap‘s Ideal of Explication and Naturalism年度引用
書目名稱Carnap‘s Ideal of Explication and Naturalism年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Carnap‘s Ideal of Explication and Naturalism讀者反饋
書目名稱Carnap‘s Ideal of Explication and Naturalism讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 不可侵犯 時間: 2025-3-22 00:15
Wittgenstein, Carnap, and Turing: Contrasting Notions of Analysised to view these particular foundational debates as the primary arena for the articulation of his philosophy.. Instead, he broadened his conception of explication to account for the distinction between analytic and synthetic truth in all areas of science (Carus 2007a).作者: 全面 時間: 2025-3-22 00:56
Carnap’s , : Between Enlightenment and Romanticism7a). Carus proposes to conceive of Carnap as the founding father of a new philosophy of enlightenment based on his notion of explication and characterized by an irreducible plurality of conceptualizations, each of which may flourish in its own right.作者: 斗志 時間: 2025-3-22 06:34
Natural Languages, Formal Languages, and Explicationefore long. This first step was then followed by a second one, taken in all likelihood in October 1932, when he adopted the ., an idea which he later explained in more detail. In . (1934), this principle is stated in the often quoted following terms: ‘.. Everyone is at liberty to build up his own lo作者: exhibit 時間: 2025-3-22 08:50
Rational Reconstruction, Explication, and the Rejection of Metaphysicsenterprise of conceptual clarification is to take place. The choice of such a language now defines the standards of logical correctness governing theoretical questions, and so it cannot be dictated by these standards in turn. In the terminology of ‘Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology’ (1950a/1956a),作者: Hallmark 時間: 2025-3-22 15:48 作者: Hallmark 時間: 2025-3-22 18:48
G. Ananthakrishna,Hema Ramachandran work in terms of explication (explication of analyticity, of belief sentences, of empirical meaning, etc.) and in the preface he wrote for the second edition of the . in 1961, he even reinterpreted his earlier work on the rational reconstruction of concepts in terms of explication (Carnap 1928a/196作者: 抒情短詩 時間: 2025-3-22 23:41
Veronica Davalos,Manel Estellered to view these particular foundational debates as the primary arena for the articulation of his philosophy.. Instead, he broadened his conception of explication to account for the distinction between analytic and synthetic truth in all areas of science (Carus 2007a).作者: 失眠癥 時間: 2025-3-23 01:35
A. Bihain,V. Hien Nguyen,J.-J. Strodiot7a). Carus proposes to conceive of Carnap as the founding father of a new philosophy of enlightenment based on his notion of explication and characterized by an irreducible plurality of conceptualizations, each of which may flourish in its own right.作者: 挑剔為人 時間: 2025-3-23 07:20
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29537-0efore long. This first step was then followed by a second one, taken in all likelihood in October 1932, when he adopted the ., an idea which he later explained in more detail. In . (1934), this principle is stated in the often quoted following terms: ‘.. Everyone is at liberty to build up his own lo作者: 啤酒 時間: 2025-3-23 10:02 作者: 合群 時間: 2025-3-23 16:01 作者: 形容詞詞尾 時間: 2025-3-23 21:59
History of Analytic Philosophyhttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/222145.jpg作者: 天空 時間: 2025-3-23 23:31
Carnap’s Conception of Philosophy believe that he tried to help to establish philosophy as an exact science. However in a later interview Carnap explained how this idea rested on a simple misunderstanding. When asked about the term ‘scientific philosophy’ he replied:作者: ANNUL 時間: 2025-3-24 04:17
The Bipartite Conception of Metatheory and the Dialectical Conception of Explicationl and empirical inquiries. Here my aim is, first, to present it; second, to compare this conception of metatheory with the dialectical conception of explication that André Carus, following Howard Stein, attributes to the later Carnap; and, third, to explore some of the issues that both conceptions face.作者: CLEAR 時間: 2025-3-24 06:41
2634-5994 ting it in its historical context, discussing specific cases of explications, and enriching the on-going debate on conceptual engineering and naturalism in analytic philosophy.978-1-349-32846-8978-0-230-37974-9Series ISSN 2634-5994 Series E-ISSN 2634-6001 作者: Gossamer 時間: 2025-3-24 12:40 作者: 話 時間: 2025-3-24 16:10
Density waves in granular flow, being continued with some serious attention paid to the work of founders such as Gottlob Frege, Bertrand Russell, and Ludwig Wittgenstein. History of philosophy of science has become an explicit part of the philosophical agenda in the past quarter century or so. These areas of research importantly 作者: FIS 時間: 2025-3-24 22:11 作者: 發(fā)電機 時間: 2025-3-25 00:50
Veronica Davalos,Manel Estellernalysis of computability for the foundations of mathematics and physics, artificial intelligence, and the very architecture of science were to be developed and widely appreciated only after Carnap’s death. Perhaps more significant, once Carnap had developed the position articulated in . his principl作者: Mortal 時間: 2025-3-25 03:49 作者: 控制 時間: 2025-3-25 09:18
A. Bihain,V. Hien Nguyen,J.-J. Strodiots considered a dogmatic doctrine of the past. In the last twenty years or so, a growing number of scholars have been engaged in the task of undermining this picture. The more one engages with Carnap’s real thought, these scholars contend, the more one finds open-mindedness, tolerance, and pragmatism作者: Camouflage 時間: 2025-3-25 13:53
Piotr Masiakowski,Eric M. Shooter believe that he tried to help to establish philosophy as an exact science. However in a later interview Carnap explained how this idea rested on a simple misunderstanding. When asked about the term ‘scientific philosophy’ he replied:作者: dry-eye 時間: 2025-3-25 18:16 作者: 委屈 時間: 2025-3-25 23:19
Lois Winsky,David M. Jacobowitzl and empirical inquiries. Here my aim is, first, to present it; second, to compare this conception of metatheory with the dialectical conception of explication that André Carus, following Howard Stein, attributes to the later Carnap; and, third, to explore some of the issues that both conceptions f作者: 背叛者 時間: 2025-3-26 01:25
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4312-8Indeed, it was perhaps the difficulty in nailing down just this notion that first led to the conception of explication. Thus it may be seen as a paradigm case. However, Carnap’s work on the problem of the nature of logical truth is of course also of systematic and theoretical importance, as it provi作者: 香料 時間: 2025-3-26 08:15
Muhammed Mesud Hürkul,Ugur Sekerguished Carnap scholars, his work in semantics still does not seem to be understood well and Carnap continues to be, just as in the good old days, misunderstood, caricatured, accused of sins he did not commit. One good example is a thesis defended not so very long ago by the champion of the ‘model t作者: 剝皮 時間: 2025-3-26 10:22
Samantha Neakrase,Michelle Nalabandianr as the popular conception of logical positivism is based on anything at all, it is largely the perspective of 1931 that is at issue. This perspective is not, however, Carnap’s mature view. This paper attempts to illuminate Carnap’s later and more mature view by focusing on the character of his imp作者: Urologist 時間: 2025-3-26 14:49 作者: 上漲 時間: 2025-3-26 18:20
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29537-0ly emphasizes, in particular, a crucial transition in Carnap’s development from a concern with rational reconstruction in his earlier work to the practice of explication in his later. Both enterprises involve a replacement of the characteristically vague and intuitive concepts used in ordinary life 作者: Corral 時間: 2025-3-26 22:43 作者: 陶瓷 時間: 2025-3-27 01:31 作者: Tempor 時間: 2025-3-27 05:27
Book 2012The book consists of a series of chapters on Carnap‘s ideal of explication as an alternative to the naturalistic conceptions of science, setting it in its historical context, discussing specific cases of explications, and enriching the on-going debate on conceptual engineering and naturalism in analytic philosophy.作者: CHIDE 時間: 2025-3-27 10:07
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230379749Age of Enlightenment; bibliography; concept; construction; critique; dialectic; enlightenment; Ludwig Wittg作者: 白楊 時間: 2025-3-27 14:35
978-1-349-32846-8Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2012作者: MAL 時間: 2025-3-27 20:23
Carnap‘s Ideal of Explication and Naturalism978-0-230-37974-9Series ISSN 2634-5994 Series E-ISSN 2634-6001 作者: ineffectual 時間: 2025-3-27 22:12 作者: Jocose 時間: 2025-3-28 05:59
Lois Winsky,David M. Jacobowitzl and empirical inquiries. Here my aim is, first, to present it; second, to compare this conception of metatheory with the dialectical conception of explication that André Carus, following Howard Stein, attributes to the later Carnap; and, third, to explore some of the issues that both conceptions face.作者: 松軟 時間: 2025-3-28 08:22 作者: 使困惑 時間: 2025-3-28 11:01 作者: 冰河期 時間: 2025-3-28 17:24
Carnap, Pseudo-Problems, and Ontological Questionsare treated as theoretical questions and not as questions of pragmatic decision. The same already holds for the question of whether there exists an external world (independently of the subject of knowledge) or not. This position is very similar to that of Heidegger. The reason for this similarity is作者: plasma-cells 時間: 2025-3-28 20:18
Wittgenstein, Carnap, and Turing: Contrasting Notions of Analysisnalysis of computability for the foundations of mathematics and physics, artificial intelligence, and the very architecture of science were to be developed and widely appreciated only after Carnap’s death. Perhaps more significant, once Carnap had developed the position articulated in . his principl作者: CUB 時間: 2025-3-29 02:56
Rudolf Carnap and the Legacy of Aufkl?rungsomething of the original Enlightenment spirit, thought the novelist Robert Musil; they provide examples of a spiritual daring that has otherwise fallen by the wayside. ‘We others’, Musil regretted, ‘have let our courage drop since the time of the Enlightenment. Some small bungle was enough to get u作者: 會議 時間: 2025-3-29 03:57
Carnap’s , : Between Enlightenment and Romanticisms considered a dogmatic doctrine of the past. In the last twenty years or so, a growing number of scholars have been engaged in the task of undermining this picture. The more one engages with Carnap’s real thought, these scholars contend, the more one finds open-mindedness, tolerance, and pragmatism作者: Archipelago 時間: 2025-3-29 07:23 作者: 隱士 時間: 2025-3-29 13:33
Carnapian Explication: A Case Study and Critique., of the view that his first major work, . (1928), represents a crude form of positivism or the culmination of classical empiricisms. Careful historical studies of the . have, instead, brought to light its neo-Kantian and Husserlian roots, thus leading to a much subtler, more complicated story abou作者: Coronary 時間: 2025-3-29 19:32 作者: Evacuate 時間: 2025-3-29 22:30
Explicating ‘Analytic’Indeed, it was perhaps the difficulty in nailing down just this notion that first led to the conception of explication. Thus it may be seen as a paradigm case. However, Carnap’s work on the problem of the nature of logical truth is of course also of systematic and theoretical importance, as it provi作者: Exposition 時間: 2025-3-30 02:16
Carnap and the Semantical Explication of Analyticityguished Carnap scholars, his work in semantics still does not seem to be understood well and Carnap continues to be, just as in the good old days, misunderstood, caricatured, accused of sins he did not commit. One good example is a thesis defended not so very long ago by the champion of the ‘model t作者: vitreous-humor 時間: 2025-3-30 07:57 作者: 對待 時間: 2025-3-30 09:37
Natural Languages, Formal Languages, and Explicationse have been carefully distinguished by Steve Awodey and André Carus, who have also fully articulated the historical and philosophical context in which they occurred.1 The first step was taken in January 1931 during a sleepless night when ‘the whole theory of language structure and its possible appl
