標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?; Jack Li Book 20021st edition Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002 Epicurus.death.is [打印本頁] 作者: 風(fēng)俗習(xí)慣 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 17:00
書目名稱Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?被引頻次
書目名稱Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?年度引用
書目名稱Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?讀者反饋
書目名稱Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: DEFT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:43 作者: Expiration 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 02:56 作者: Indicative 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:25 作者: CIS 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 11:55
Conclusion, him I have shown, in Chapter One, that the Epicurean argument is defective. Hence, at this point, I can at least claim that it is possible that death . be a harm to the person who dies. However, to really secure this conclusion, it is necessary to give further justification.作者: 易達(dá)到 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 14:45
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-9777-8 him I have shown, in Chapter One, that the Epicurean argument is defective. Hence, at this point, I can at least claim that it is possible that death . be a harm to the person who dies. However, to really secure this conclusion, it is necessary to give further justification.作者: 易達(dá)到 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:35
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-9777-8 him I have shown, in Chapter One, that the Epicurean argument is defective. Hence, at this point, I can at least claim that it is possible that death . be a harm to the person who dies. However, to really secure this conclusion, it is necessary to give further justification.作者: Eructation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 23:10
Spontane intrazerebrale BlutungenThe Epicurean argument has provided the classical objection to the widely held view that death can be a harm to the person who dies. To attain the central aim of this book, first of all, I want to refute Epicurus in this chapter.作者: pessimism 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 02:34
Spontane intrazerebrale BlutungenThis chapter is concerned with the questions: Is the desire-thwarting theory acceptable? If not, why? Let me outline this theory first.作者: blister 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 05:55
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12382-5The deprivation theory is the most popular anti-Epicurean view.1 Silverstein calls this view the standard argument against the Epicurean view.2 In this chapter, I want to investigate whether or not this very popular anti-Epicurean view is satisfactory. To begin this task, let me first illustrate the deprivation theory.作者: Sinus-Node 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 10:38 作者: ELATE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 16:41
Diagnostiek van Neurologische AandoeningenIn this chapter, I will reject the Lucretian symmetry argument by criticising some proposals from recent philosophers. To achieve this, let me explicate the Lucretian symmetry argument first.作者: 違抗 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 21:20
The Epicurean Argument,The Epicurean argument has provided the classical objection to the widely held view that death can be a harm to the person who dies. To attain the central aim of this book, first of all, I want to refute Epicurus in this chapter.作者: 騷動(dòng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 01:20
The Desire-thwarting Theory,This chapter is concerned with the questions: Is the desire-thwarting theory acceptable? If not, why? Let me outline this theory first.作者: oxidize 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 04:37
The Deprivation Theory,The deprivation theory is the most popular anti-Epicurean view.1 Silverstein calls this view the standard argument against the Epicurean view.2 In this chapter, I want to investigate whether or not this very popular anti-Epicurean view is satisfactory. To begin this task, let me first illustrate the deprivation theory.作者: 形容詞 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:41 作者: Intersect 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 12:36
The Lucretian Symmetry Argument,In this chapter, I will reject the Lucretian symmetry argument by criticising some proposals from recent philosophers. To achieve this, let me explicate the Lucretian symmetry argument first.作者: Communal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:22 作者: Ledger 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 22:24 作者: 輕率看法 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:23
Conclusion, him I have shown, in Chapter One, that the Epicurean argument is defective. Hence, at this point, I can at least claim that it is possible that death . be a harm to the person who dies. However, to really secure this conclusion, it is necessary to give further justification.作者: modish 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 06:06
Book 20021st editionher death can be a harm to the person who dies. This problem is an ancient one which was raised long ago by the early Greek philosopher Epicurus, who notoriously argued that death is at no time a harm to its ‘victim‘ because before death there is no harrn and after death there is no victim. Epicurus作者: Arbitrary 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 11:09
xing issues surrounding the problem of whether death can be a harm to the person who dies. This problem is an ancient one which was raised long ago by the early Greek philosopher Epicurus, who notoriously argued that death is at no time a harm to its ‘victim‘ because before death there is no harrn a作者: Charitable 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:58
7樓作者: 輕快走過 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 15:51
7樓作者: LAVE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:32
7樓作者: frozen-shoulder 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 04:12
7樓作者: 發(fā)芽 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:16
8樓作者: 物種起源 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:38
8樓作者: patella 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:09
8樓作者: 盲信者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:21
9樓作者: ELUC 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 00:52
9樓作者: ESPY 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 03:01
9樓作者: 柔聲地說 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 08:50
9樓作者: 有角 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 12:17
10樓作者: neutralize 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 14:48
10樓作者: Glower 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 20:45
10樓作者: 謙虛的人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:11
10樓
