標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism; The Exegete as Theol N. Scott Amos Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 Cam [打印本頁] 作者: implicate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 19:28
書目名稱Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism被引頻次
書目名稱Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism年度引用
書目名稱Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism讀者反饋
書目名稱Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: Fortuitous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 23:44 作者: Keratin 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:17 作者: 熱情的我 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 08:32
1572-5596 show the extent to which he was a theologian of the biblical humanist school, influenced by the method Erasmus set forth in the .Ratio Verae Theologiae.in which true theology begins, ends, and is best “done” as an exercise in the exegesis of the Word of God..978-3-319-36244-1978-3-319-10238-2Series ISSN 1572-5596 作者: Inflamed 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 11:12
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403973641y Tremellius after Bucer’s death (Bucer died before completing them) and published in 1562; additional, more limited evidence is found in the . and notes taken by a Trinity Student, John Banck, but as a representation of the whole of Bucer’s lectures, Tremellius’s edition is the fullest we have.作者: 等級(jí)的上升 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 14:32
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403973641f a Rhenish “school” of exegesis and theology which shaped the theological curriculum in the .. Hence, what we find in the prefatory lectures in Cambridge was in keeping with his earlier career. One might characterize his statement as a “.”.作者: 注射器 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:52
Conclusion: Masks and Uncertainty,ded theological formulation), he added a separate discussion that builds further on his exegesis. Yet his practice is consistent with his prefatory lecture, and is an example of biblical humanist method in theology and exegesis.作者: Deadpan 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 23:09 作者: 取之不竭 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 05:02 作者: 他一致 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 07:43
Das Idol Maske eines Verbrechens,e (the principal focus in this study) and in his prior career. It becomes clear that Bucer was a theologian in the model of biblical humanism: exegesis as the true theology, the exegete as the true theologian.作者: 聲明 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 11:23
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403973641it. Efforts towards reform of the theological curriculum in Cambridge took a dramatic turn with the introduction of the Cambridge Injunctions. Nevertheless, the Injunctions appear to have had little substantial impact on the teaching of theology prior to the reign of Edward VI.作者: ureter 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 16:58 作者: reptile 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 20:31 作者: 盡責(zé) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 23:47
Introduction,e (the principal focus in this study) and in his prior career. It becomes clear that Bucer was a theologian in the model of biblical humanism: exegesis as the true theology, the exegete as the true theologian.作者: 粘連 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 03:39
The Old Theology and the New Learning at Cambridge to 1549it. Efforts towards reform of the theological curriculum in Cambridge took a dramatic turn with the introduction of the Cambridge Injunctions. Nevertheless, the Injunctions appear to have had little substantial impact on the teaching of theology prior to the reign of Edward VI.作者: BROOK 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:01 作者: 平庸的人或物 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:38
Theology in an Exegetical Context: Bucer on Ephesians 1:3–6 and the Doctrine of Electionlvin (and other Protestant or evangelical exegetes). Yet in his attention to Paul’s letter as a theological compendium, and in his effort to pattern his own lectures as the same, Bucer’s treatment does have a distinctive character, and the method and purpose of his theology is distinctively that of biblical humanism.作者: Palpate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 15:37 作者: 連系 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 19:41 作者: 墊子 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:06
1572-5596 cholasticism.Is the first extended study devoted exclusively.This book describes Martin Bucer (1491-1551) as a teacher of theology, focusing on his time as Regius Professor of Divinity at the University of Cambridge between 1549 and 1551. The book is centered on his 1550 Cambridge lectures on Ephesi作者: 作繭自縛 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 04:17
Introduction,e made a Doctor of Theology. The difference between Bucer’s career as an exegete and a theologian and the traditional expectations of individuals to be made a Doctor of Theology point towards the existence of two patterns or approaches to the practice and teaching of theology: the approach of schola作者: concubine 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 09:50 作者: ALTER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:24
“Remember the Readings and Preachings of God’s Prophet and True Preacher, Martin Bucer”: Bucer’s Sojthe end of the year was installed as Regius Professor of Divinity. His lectures on Ephesians were given in the midst of the turmoil of Reformation in mid-Tudor Cambridge, an atmosphere that was already charged prior to Bucer’s arrival. It is apparent that Bucer sought to conform his lectures to the 作者: osteopath 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 17:03
“,”: Bucer’s Prefatory Lectures on Ephesians and His Use of Biblical Humanist Theological Methodnsciously display his effort to meet the requirements of the Cambridge Injunctions and at the same time testify to his continued commitment to the program of biblical humanism. It is necessary to read Bucer’s methodological statement in 1550 within the context of his earlier career, including a brie作者: synovitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 23:15 作者: 不幸的人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:00 作者: nautical 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:53
Theology in an Exegetical Context: Bucer on Ephesians 1:13–18 and the Doctrine of Faithe verses Bucer identified a second . in Paul’s “treatise”, the doctrine of faith. Again, Bucer employed the biblical humanist exegetical method that was his usual practice. While in general his pattern of treatment is like that of the exegetical tradition, he is distinctive in finding these verses t作者: Bouquet 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 10:39
Conclusionridge Injunctions of 1535, but they also show him to be a teacher of theology in the style and method of biblical humanism. The theology he taught and practiced was intensely exegetical in its method, and its purpose was explicitly practical and in no way speculative. Indeed, not only was biblical h作者: DEMUR 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:08 作者: investigate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 18:21 作者: 犬儒主義者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:38
Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism978-3-319-10238-2Series ISSN 1572-5596 作者: Debrief 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 01:39
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10238-2Cambridge Injunctions; Christian ethics; Christian life; Ephesians; Martin Bucer; Rhenish “school” of exe作者: olfction 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 07:47 作者: NICHE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 12:23 作者: 新奇 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:05
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403973641es in 1550–1551. Although the Cambridge Injunctions of 1535 took a highly critical stance towards toward traditional patterns of the teaching of theology, they did fairly identify the constituent elements of the scholastic theological curriculum: an initial focus on the Bible; the crucial role of Pe作者: Hirsutism 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 20:00 作者: 競(jìng)選運(yùn)動(dòng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:33
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403973641nsciously display his effort to meet the requirements of the Cambridge Injunctions and at the same time testify to his continued commitment to the program of biblical humanism. It is necessary to read Bucer’s methodological statement in 1550 within the context of his earlier career, including a brie作者: ingestion 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 04:35
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403973641the biblical humanist program. This is clear in Bucer’s attention to text-critical matters; philological issues; matters of grammar and rhetoric; attention to the author in context; his use of Scripture to interpret Scripture; and the manner in which he used non-Scriptural authorities. In looking at作者: 獸皮 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 07:09 作者: 阻擋 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 10:42 作者: objection 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 15:39
